Carver Arena · at Bradley · Conference game
Closing line
BRAD -3.5✓ BRAD covered by 5.5
Closing total157.5Over by 7.5
| This season | BRAD | |
|---|---|---|
| 20-10 | Record | 18-11 |
| 14-16 | ATS | 11-18 |
| 16-14 | O/U | 15-14 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: MUR 80–82 BRAD · ✓ BRAD (57%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUR | 35 | 43 | 78 |
| BRAD | 36 | 51 | 87 |
1st half: MUR 35, BRAD 36 (BRAD by 1). The model had BRAD by 1.1 and a total of 75.8 (actual 71).
Team stats
| MUR | BRAD | |
|---|---|---|
| 24-59 41% | Field goals | 28-52 54% |
| 11-26 42% | 3-pointers | 5-15 33% |
| 19-26 73% | Free throws | 26-36 72% |
| 31 12 off | Rebounds | 37 10 off |
| 15 | Assists | 18 |
| 5 | Steals | 6 |
| 2 | Blocks | 7 |
| 7 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 25 | Fouls | 20 |
| 24 | Points in paint | 34 |
| 17 | Fast-break points | 16 |
Players
| MUR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roman Domon G | 37 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 4-8 | 1-2 |
| Fredrick King C | 32 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 6-10 | 2-2 |
| KJ Tenner G | 30 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 3-11 | 2-5 |
| JJ Traynor F | 23 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-2 |
| Javon Jackson G | 23 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Mathis Courbon G | 20 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| Mason Miller F | 17 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Brayden Shorter G | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-6 |
| Dylan Anderson F | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Layne Taylor, Tristian Ford, Lachlan Crate, Dillon Butler, Brock Vice, Ben Shtolzberg
| BRAD | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Huibregtse G | 32 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 6-9 | 2-5 |
| AJ Smith F | 29 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 4-4 | 2-2 |
| Jaquan Johnson G | 28 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 5-12 | 0-2 |
| Ahmet Jonovic C | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| Corey Thomas F | 22 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Timoty van der Knaap G | 22 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Montana Wheeler G | 19 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-1 |
| Dietrich Richardson G | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-2 |
| Kai Yu C | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
Did not play: Gus Rugaard, Matthew Zobrist, Jackson Seastrunk, Handy Toussaint III, Gustavo Guimares, Demarion Burch
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenBRAD -3.5
no move
CloseBRAD -3.5
No change since the open
Total
Open159.5
▼ 2
Close157.5
Down 2 since the open
Moneyline
MUR +154 · BRAD -185
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened BRAD -3.5 · unchangedmodel BRAD -2
model BRAD -2
Opened 159.5 · closed 157.5 · moved 2 downmodel 162
model 162
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | BRAD -3.5 | BRAD -2.1 | MUR +1.4 | L BRAD covered |
| Total | 157.5 | 162.1 | Over 4.6 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | MUR 80 · BRAD 82.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BRAD -1.1 | BRAD -1.0 |
| 1H total | 75.8 | 71 |
| 1H projected score | MUR 37.3 · BRAD 38.4 | MUR 35 · BRAD 36 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
MUR 3–5 BRADBRAD leads · 8 games since 2021-22 · MUR 5-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2025-26 | BRAD 66 @ MUR 86 | MUR -5.5 | MUR W |
| Mar 7, 2024-25 | MUR 62 vs BRAD 70 | BRAD -4.5 | BRAD W |
| Feb 22, 2024-25 | MUR 83 @ BRAD 85 | BRAD -6.5 | MUR W |
| Jan 18, 2024-25 | BRAD 74 @ MUR 61 | MUR -1.5 | BRAD W |
| Jan 24, 2023-24 | MUR 63 @ BRAD 71 | BRAD -8.5 | MUR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Murray St
30 games played
Straight up
20-10
67% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +4.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-77 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 108-60 | -38.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 91-102 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 99-79 | -14.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 89-68 | -13.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 87-90 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 60-73 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 96-95 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 84-52 | -16.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 81-68 | -16.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 115-100 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 168.5 | O 215 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 81-72 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 85-79 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 84-81 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 81-77 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 86-66 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-69 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-79 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 85-81 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 90-101 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-81 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 65-70 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 86-103 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 81-74 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 6 | @ | W 91-81 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 60-89 | -4.5 | L −33.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 74-72 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 70-87 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 61-78 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 88-75 | -15.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
OMA
W 85-77
+2.5
7
vs
MVSU
W 108-60
+9.5
11
@
SMU
L 91-102
−0.5
15
vs
NICH
W 99-79
+5.5
18
vs
LR
W 89-68
+7.5
23
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
−9.5
24
vs
MCN
L 60-73
−10.5
25
vs
GW
W 96-95
+8.5
2
vs
MORE
W 84-52
+15.5
6
vs
BELL
W 81-68
−3.5
13
vs
AKR
W 115-100
+19.5
18
vs
DRKE
W 81-72
+1.5
21
@
VAL
W 85-79
+0.5
29
vs
SIU
W 84-81
−3.5
1
@
UIC
W 81-77
−1.5
4
vs
BRAD
W 86-66
+14.5
7
@
EVAN
W 79-69
+1.5
10
vs
VAL
W 92-79
+0.5
17
vs
INST
W 85-81
−7.5
21
@
DRKE
L 90-101
−15.5
24
@
UNI
L 76-81
−6.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-70
−8.5
31
@
BEL
L 86-103
−13.5
3
vs
UIC
W 81-74
+0.5
6
@
SIU
W 91-81
+8.5
9
vs
UNI
L 60-89
−33.5
12
@
INST
W 74-72
−1.5
15
vs
BEL
L 70-87
−15.5
18
@
ILST
L 61-78
−14.5
21
vs
EVAN
W 88-75
−2.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
OMA
W 85-77
+8.5
7
vs
MVSU
W 108-60
+8.5
11
@
SMU
L 91-102
+28.5
15
vs
NICH
W 99-79
+20.5
18
vs
LR
W 89-68
+3.5
23
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
+15.5
24
vs
MCN
L 60-73
−25.5
25
vs
GW
W 96-95
+23.5
2
vs
MORE
W 84-52
−22.5
6
vs
BELL
W 81-68
−8.5
13
vs
AKR
W 115-100
+46.5
18
vs
DRKE
W 81-72
−3.5
21
@
VAL
W 85-79
+8.5
29
vs
SIU
W 84-81
−0.5
1
@
UIC
W 81-77
−1.5
4
vs
BRAD
W 86-66
−10.5
7
@
EVAN
W 79-69
−5.5
10
vs
VAL
W 92-79
+18.5
17
vs
INST
W 85-81
−1.5
21
@
DRKE
L 90-101
+34.5
24
@
UNI
L 76-81
+11.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-70
−24.5
31
@
BEL
L 86-103
+25.5
3
vs
UIC
W 81-74
−2.5
6
@
SIU
W 91-81
+14.5
9
vs
UNI
L 60-89
+3.5
12
@
INST
W 74-72
−17.5
15
vs
BEL
L 70-87
−9.5
18
@
ILST
L 61-78
−19.5
21
vs
EVAN
W 88-75
+9.5
over 16under 14avg +4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bradley
29 games played
Straight up
18-11
62% wins
Against the spread
11-18
38% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +4.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 63-69 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 85-54 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 67-78 | -15.5 | L −26.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 64-75 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 87-77 | -21.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 88-64 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 77-87 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-64 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 64-60 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-55 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 108-99 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 207 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 73-69 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 76-68 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 78-88 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-86 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 93-66 | -6.5 | W +20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 94-90 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-88 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 75-68 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 70-85 | -7.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-73 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-65 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 49-61 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 95-84 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 70-60 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 72-79 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-60 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 86-93 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−4.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
+21.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
−26.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−1.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
−11.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+14.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
−11.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
+14.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−1.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
+10.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+3.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−2.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−3.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
−6.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−14.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+20.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+1.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
−3.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
−20.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−1.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
−22.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+11.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−0.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−8.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+12.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
+12.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
−9.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
+10.5
24
@
UIC
L 86-93
−5.5
covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−7.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
−8.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
+0.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−7.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
+14.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+10.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
+18.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
−6.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−24.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
−7.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+56.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−10.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−0.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
+12.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−10.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+14.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+12.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
+41.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
+2.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−12.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
+10.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+9.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−7.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−24.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+26.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
−16.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
+8.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
−11.5
24
@
UIC
L 86-93
+37.5
over 15under 14avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Murray St
20-10 overall · 12-7 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Evansville88–75
- L@ Illinois St61–78
- Lvs Belmont70–87
- W@ Indiana St74–72
- Lvs Northern Iowa60–89
A week or more of rest.
Bradley
18-11 overall · 12-7 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UIC86–93
- Wvs Illinois St74–60
- L@ Valparaiso72–79
- W@ S Illinois70–60
- Wvs Belmont95–84
5 days since their last game.