Credit Union 1 Arena · at UIC · Conference game
Closing line
UIC -1.5✓ UIC covered by 5.5
Closing total141.5Over by 37.5
| This season | UIC | |
|---|---|---|
| 18-10 | Record | 14-13 |
| 11-17 | ATS | 15-12 |
| 14-14 | O/U | 12-15 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: BRAD 72–74 UIC · ✓ UIC (59%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | OT | 2OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRAD | 28 | 44 | 7 | 7 | 86 |
| UIC | 39 | 33 | 7 | 14 | 93 |
1st half: BRAD 28, UIC 39 (UIC by 11). The model had UIC by 1.4 and a total of 68.3 (actual 67).
Team stats
| BRAD | UIC | |
|---|---|---|
| 29-70 41% | Field goals | 30-58 52% |
| 12-33 36% | 3-pointers | 11-23 48% |
| 16-24 67% | Free throws | 22-32 69% |
| 40 15 off | Rebounds | 38 7 off |
| 19 | Assists | 19 |
| 8 | Steals | 9 |
| 4 | Blocks | 5 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 25 | Fouls | 21 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 36 |
| 3 | Fast-break points | 15 |
Players
| BRAD | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AJ Smith F | 44 | 17 | 10 | 4 | 7-11 | 3-7 |
| Jaquan Johnson G | 42 | 25 | 3 | 3 | 6-16 | 3-7 |
| Ahmet Jonovic C | 38 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Alex Huibregtse G | 32 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 4-10 |
| Timoty van der Knaap G | 31 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Corey Thomas F | 25 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3-4 | 0-1 |
| Demarion Burch G | 18 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1-8 | 1-3 |
| Montana Wheeler G | 16 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-3 |
| Kai Yu C | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Gustavo Guimares, Handy Toussaint III, Jackson Seastrunk, Matthew Zobrist, Dietrich Richardson, Gus Rugaard
| UIC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mekhi Lowery G | 41 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
| Andy Johnson G | 40 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 7-11 | 5-8 |
| Elijah Crawford G | 37 | 19 | 2 | 8 | 7-14 | 3-6 |
| Abdul Momoh F | 33 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| Rashund Washington Jr. G | 14 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Sam Silverstein G | 35 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Ahmad Henderson II G | 21 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| Jayce Nathaniel F | 19 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Josiah Hammons G | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Ante Beljan F | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Tai Walters-Whitaker, AJ Morgan, Chris Walker, Nano Barrantes, Carlos Harris III
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUIC -2.5
1 → BRAD
CloseUIC -1.5
1 pt toward BRAD
Total
Open142.5
▼ 1
Close141.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
BRAD +110 · UIC -130
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UIC -2.5 · closed UIC -1.5 · moved 1 toward BRADmodel UIC -2.5
model UIC -2.5
Opened 142.5 · closed 141.5 · moved 1 downmodel 146
model 146
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UIC -1.5 | UIC -2.6 | UIC +1.1 | W UIC covered |
| Total | 141.5 | 145.9 | Over 4.4 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | BRAD 71.6 · UIC 74.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UIC -1.4 | UIC -11.0 |
| 1H total | 68.3 | 67 |
| 1H projected score | BRAD 33.4 · UIC 34.9 | BRAD 28 · UIC 39 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
BRAD 6–2 UICBRAD leads · 8 games since 2021-22 · UIC has won the last 2 meetings · BRAD 3-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2025-26 | UIC 85 @ BRAD 70 | BRAD -7.5 | UIC W |
| Jan 29, 2024-25 | UIC 93 @ BRAD 70 | BRAD -8.5 | UIC W |
| Jan 11, 2024-25 | BRAD 61 @ UIC 60 | UIC +3.5 | UIC W |
| Mar 8, 2023-24 | UIC 47 vs BRAD 74 | BRAD -12.5 | BRAD W |
| Feb 14, 2023-24 | UIC 73 @ BRAD 85 | BRAD -14.5 | UIC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bradley
28 games played
Straight up
18-10
64% wins
Against the spread
11-17
39% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg +3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 63-69 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 85-54 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 67-78 | -15.5 | L −26.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 64-75 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 87-77 | -21.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 88-64 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 77-87 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-64 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 64-60 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-55 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 108-99 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 207 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 73-69 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 76-68 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 78-88 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-86 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 93-66 | -6.5 | W +20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 94-90 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-88 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 75-68 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 70-85 | -7.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-73 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-65 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 49-61 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 95-84 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 70-60 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 72-79 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-60 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−4.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
+21.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
−26.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−1.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
−11.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+14.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
−11.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
+14.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−1.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
+10.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+3.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−2.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−3.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
−6.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−14.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+20.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+1.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
−3.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
−20.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−1.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
−22.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+11.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−0.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−8.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+12.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
+12.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
−9.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
+10.5
covered 11didn’t cover 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−7.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
−8.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
+0.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−7.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
+14.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+10.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
+18.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
−6.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−24.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
−7.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+56.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−10.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−0.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
+12.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−10.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+14.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+12.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
+41.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
+2.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−12.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
+10.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+9.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−7.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−24.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+26.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
−16.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
+8.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
−11.5
over 14under 14avg +3 ptslonger = bigger margin
UIC
27 games played
Straight up
14-13
52% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg +4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-15
44% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 91-71 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 73-76 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 67-63 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 80-90 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 84-73 | -11.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 74-88 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 62-63 | -16.5 | L −17.5 | 163.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 66-80 | +12.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 84-87 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 54-60 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 76-88 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 77-81 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 59-66 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 70-57 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 63-59 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 69-61 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 128.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-67 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 76-49 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-70 | +7.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 76-74 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 68-66 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 74-81 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 6 | vs | L 62-68 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 80-70 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-56 | +1.5 | W +28.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 84-46 | -8.5 | W +29.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 67-71 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
DETM
W 91-71
+10.5
7
@
ORST
L 73-76
+3.5
15
@
CHST
W 67-63
−5.5
20
vs
HPU
L 80-90
+0.5
22
vs
USI
W 84-73
−0.5
26
@
RMU
L 74-88
−15.5
3
vs
UAPB
L 62-63
−17.5
7
@
YALE
L 66-80
−1.5
13
@
BEL
L 84-87
+9.5
17
vs
UNI
L 54-60
−0.5
21
@
CLT
L 76-88
−10.5
1
vs
MUR
L 77-81
+1.5
4
@
VAL
L 59-66
−4.5
7
vs
SIU
W 70-57
+14.5
10
@
ILST
W 63-59
+14.5
13
@
UNI
W 69-61
+14.5
17
vs
DRKE
W 74-67
+1.5
20
vs
EVAN
W 76-49
+18.5
24
@
BRAD
W 85-70
+22.5
27
vs
INST
W 76-74
−3.5
31
@
SIU
W 68-66
+5.5
3
@
MUR
L 74-81
−0.5
6
vs
BEL
L 62-68
−4.5
12
@
DRKE
W 80-70
+8.5
15
vs
ILST
W 83-56
+28.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-46
+29.5
21
vs
VAL
L 67-71
−11.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg +4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
DETM
W 91-71
+19.5
7
@
ORST
L 73-76
+2.5
15
@
CHST
W 67-63
−26.5
20
vs
HPU
L 80-90
+11.5
22
vs
USI
W 84-73
+3.5
26
@
RMU
L 74-88
+10.5
3
vs
UAPB
L 62-63
−38.5
7
@
YALE
L 66-80
−2.5
13
@
BEL
L 84-87
+16.5
17
vs
UNI
L 54-60
−19.5
21
@
CLT
L 76-88
+26.5
1
vs
MUR
L 77-81
−1.5
4
@
VAL
L 59-66
−19.5
7
vs
SIU
W 70-57
−19.5
10
@
ILST
W 63-59
−19.5
13
@
UNI
W 69-61
+1.5
17
vs
DRKE
W 74-67
+1.5
20
vs
EVAN
W 76-49
−14.5
24
@
BRAD
W 85-70
+10.5
27
vs
INST
W 76-74
+2.5
31
@
SIU
W 68-66
−8.5
3
@
MUR
L 74-81
−2.5
6
vs
BEL
L 62-68
−21.5
12
@
DRKE
W 80-70
+3.5
15
vs
ILST
W 83-56
−1.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-46
−10.5
21
vs
VAL
L 67-71
−0.5
over 12under 15avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Bradley
18-10 overall · 12-6 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Illinois St74–60
- L@ Valparaiso72–79
- W@ S Illinois70–60
- Wvs Belmont95–84
- L@ Northern Iowa49–61
3 days since their last game.
UIC
14-13 overall · 11-7 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Valparaiso67–71
- W@ Evansville84–46
- Wvs Illinois St83–56
- W@ Drake80–70
- Lvs Belmont62–68
3 days since their last game.