No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
30–35
✗ NHVN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
38–34
✓ M-OH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
37–32
✓ GW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
36–33
✓ WASH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
39–29
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
35–37
✓ UVA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
31–36
✓ TTU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
38–35
✗ SLU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
34–34
✓ OKST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
33–37
✓ IU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
35–36
✗ GTWN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
32–38
✗ BGSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
31–39
✓ TOL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
35–33
✓ MASS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
34–40
✗ KENT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
34–42
✓ AKR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
29–36
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
35–38
✓ MRSH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
38–33
✓ UK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
33–33
✓ CCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
32–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
33–35
✓ UIC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
28–41
✓ MICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
35–39
✓ ARST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.2
Projected
41–35
✗ ARIZ lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
39–31
✓ ISU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
36–33
✓ TENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
32–36
✗ CSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
34–37
✓ TCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
33–37
✓ BOIS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
38–36
✓ MIA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
35–30
✓ SJSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
40–37
✗ AUB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.0
Projected
36–42
✗ BYU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
34–38
✓ UCLA won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 4-22 · #88 10-15 · #355 |
— | — | NHVN -4.7 | — | 65.4 | — | 69% NHVN | › | |
| Half final | 24-0 · #125 9-18 · #188 |
— | — | M-OH -4.2 | — | 72.3 | — | 68% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 14-12 · #101 7-19 · #124 |
— | — | GW -4.3 | — | 68.7 | — | 68% GW | › | |
| Half final | 13-14 · #56 11-16 · #62 |
— | — | WASH -3.8 | — | 69.0 | — | 66% WASH | › | |
| Half final | 25-2 · #3 12-15 · #71 |
— | — | DUKE -9.9 | — | 67.0 | — | 86% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 19-8 · #48 24-3 · #20 |
— | — | UVA -1.8 | — | 71.9 | — | 58% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 15-12 · #30 20-7 · #12 |
— | — | TTU -4.9 | — | 66.6 | — | 70% TTU | › | |
| Half final | 24-2 · #69 18-9 · #91 |
— | — | SLU -2.5 | — | 72.7 | — | 61% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 16-11 · #47 16-11 · #45 |
— | — | OKST -0.4 | — | 68.2 | — | 52% OKST | › | |
| Half final | 11-16 · #59 17-10 · #38 |
— | — | IU -4.2 | — | 69.9 | — | 68% IU | › | |
| Half final | 9-18 · #42 13-14 · #64 |
— | — | GTWN -1.1 | — | 71.0 | — | 55% GTWN | › | |
| Half final | 8-17 · #187 13-12 · #200 |
— | — | BGSU -6.0 | — | 70.0 | — | 74% BGSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-17 · #334 12-13 · #157 |
— | — | TOL -7.8 | — | 70.6 | — | 80% TOL | › | |
| Half final | 14-13 · #209 6-19 · #181 |
— | — | MASS -2.7 | — | 68.1 | — | 62% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 7-18 · #270 18-7 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -5.6 | — | 73.8 | — | 73% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 14-11 · #237 20-5 · #118 |
— | — | AKR -8.3 | — | 76.1 | — | 82% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 10-19 · #221 16-11 · #147 |
— | — | TROY -7.0 | — | 64.3 | — | 78% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 9-19 · #234 17-11 · #231 |
— | — | MRSH -3.0 | — | 73.6 | — | 63% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 17-10 · #19 12-15 · #79 |
— | — | UK -4.8 | — | 71.1 | — | 70% UK | › | |
| Half final | 16-12 · #283 8-19 · #208 |
— | — | CCU -0.1 | — | 66.2 | — | 51% CCU | › | |
| Half final | 5-21 · #304 14-12 · #350 |
— | — | MORE -4.0 | — | 67.3 | — | 67% MORE | › | |
| Half final | 18-10 · #167 14-13 · #110 |
— | — | UIC -1.4 | — | 68.3 | — | 56% UIC | › | |
| Half final | 13-14 · #70 25-2 · #8 |
— | — | MICH -12.8 | — | 69.1 | — | 92% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 13-14 · #224 16-11 · #171 |
— | — | ARST -4.6 | — | 74.2 | — | 69% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 25-2 · #5 13-13 · #29 |
— | — | ARIZ -6.2 | — | 75.2 | — | 75% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 23-4 · #13 10-17 · #73 |
— | — | ISU -8.4 | — | 70.1 | — | 82% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 20-7 · #7 18-9 · #54 |
— | — | TENN -3.0 | — | 68.6 | — | 63% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 11-15 · #174 16-10 · #87 |
— | — | CSU -4.3 | — | 67.4 | — | 68% CSU | › | |
| Half final | 14-13 · #60 17-10 · #40 |
— | — | TCU -3.1 | — | 71.1 | — | 63% TCU | › | |
| Half final | 14-12 · #122 15-10 · #86 |
— | — | BOIS -4.1 | — | 70.0 | — | 67% BOIS | › | |
| Half final | 21-6 · #25 14-13 · #81 |
— | — | MIA -1.7 | — | 74.1 | — | 57% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 6-20 · #143 3-24 · #220 |
— | — | SJSU -4.5 | — | 65.3 | — | 69% SJSU | › | |
| Half final | 15-12 · #21 13-14 · #31 |
— | — | AUB -3.0 | — | 76.3 | — | 63% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 19-7 · #39 20-7 · #24 |
— | — | BYU -6.8 | — | 78.0 | — | 77% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 20-6 · #82 18-9 · #96 |
— | — | UNM -0.3 | — | 70.3 | — | 51% UNM | › | |
| Half final | 17-9 · #36 18-9 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -3.8 | — | 72.4 | — | 66% UCLA | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record