No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
35–33
✓ COFC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
34–34
✗ URI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
34–34
✓ UNH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
30–36
✓ UMBC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
34–33
✗ BCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.0
Projected
29–33
✗ UALB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
34–37
✗ FAU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.3
Projected
40–37
✗ WIN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.1
Projected
35–38
✗ RAD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
38–31
✗ UNCA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
39–32
✓ HPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.4
Projected
32–33
✓ CCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.9
Projected
30–32
✗ WAG lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
31–35
✓ STO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
30–37
✓ LIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
33–35
✓ LEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
32–37
✓ UVM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
34–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
32–36
✓ TOW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
31–38
✓ UNCW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
32–35
✓ MONM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.2
Projected
36–42
✓ W&M won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
35–37
✗ UTC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
31–35
✓ JAX won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.7
Projected
41–37
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.2
Projected
30–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
37–36
✗ LIB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
31–33
✗ LT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
31–35
✓ MTSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
34–36
✓ WKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
32–36
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
38–36
✗ DEN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
38–32
✓ SDST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
31–41
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
31–38
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–37
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
32–37
✓ SOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.1
Projected
27–35
✓ SIUE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
36–37
✓ SEMO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
32–36
✗ LIN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
33–34
✗ LR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
34–35
✗ MEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
32–38
✓ UCSB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
36–37
✓ STMN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
36–34
✓ HAW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
32–34
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
36–39
✓ MONT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
31–37
✓ IDHO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
38–38
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
30–35
✓ UTM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
33–34
✓ UTU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
36–40
✓ SHSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.4
Projected
37–39
✗ PV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
37–39
✓ CP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
36–35
✓ UCI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
30–39
✓ UCSD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.2
Projected
30–33
✓ CBU won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 18-10 · #117 10-16 · #159 |
— | — | COFC -2.2 | — | 67.1 | — | 60% COFC | › | |
| Half final | 15-12 · #105 13-13 · #142 |
— | — | URI -0.2 | — | 68.0 | — | 51% URI | › | |
| Half final | 6-18 · #286 3-23 · #272 |
— | — | UNH -0.4 | — | 67.8 | — | 52% UNH | › | |
| Half final | 6-19 · #290 16-8 · #264 |
— | — | UMBC -5.7 | — | 65.9 | — | 73% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 14-13 · #202 10-15 · #338 |
— | — | BCU -0.3 | — | 67.0 | — | 51% BCU | › | |
| Half final | 6-21 · #323 7-18 · #301 |
— | — | UALB -3.4 | — | 62.0 | — | 64% UALB | › | |
| Half final | 14-12 · #111 13-13 · #109 |
— | — | FAU -3.5 | — | 71.0 | — | 65% FAU | › | |
| Half final | 17-9 · #205 10-16 · #326 |
— | — | WIN -3.5 | — | 77.3 | — | 65% WIN | › | |
| Half final | 9-17 · #325 12-14 · #246 |
— | — | RAD -3.5 | — | 73.1 | — | 65% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #271 1-25 · #348 |
— | — | UNCA -6.8 | — | 68.7 | — | 77% UNCA | › | |
| Half final | 23-4 · #90 11-15 · #183 |
— | — | HPU -6.8 | — | 70.5 | — | 77% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 12-15 · #331 14-11 · #337 |
— | — | CCSU -1.0 | — | 64.4 | — | 55% CCSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-16 · #355 8-16 · #354 |
— | — | WAG -1.1 | — | 61.9 | — | 55% WAG | › | |
| Half final | 5-22 · #88 8-19 · #349 |
— | — | STO -3.2 | — | 65.8 | — | 64% STO | › | |
| Half final | 6-22 · #362 19-10 · #324 |
— | — | LIU -6.8 | — | 67.3 | — | 77% LIU | › | |
| Half final | 8-18 · #356 13-15 · #332 |
— | — | LEM -2.4 | — | 67.5 | — | 60% LEM | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #307 16-11 · #186 |
— | — | UVM -4.9 | — | 69.6 | — | 70% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 11-15 · #243 14-14 · #262 |
— | — | CAM -0.1 | — | 67.1 | — | 51% CAM | › | |
| Half final | 12-14 · #232 12-14 · #165 |
— | — | TOW -3.4 | — | 68.2 | — | 64% TOW | › | |
| Half final | 9-15 · #275 22-4 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -6.7 | — | 68.4 | — | 77% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 15-11 · #191 13-14 · #155 |
— | — | MONM -2.5 | — | 66.5 | — | 61% MONM | › | |
| Half final | 6-20 · #229 14-11 · #217 |
— | — | W&M -6.1 | — | 77.2 | — | 75% W&M | › | |
| Half final | 10-17 · #284 9-17 · #227 |
— | — | UTC -2.4 | — | 72.4 | — | 60% UTC | › | |
| Half final | 8-19 · #303 8-19 · #223 |
— | — | JAX -4.1 | — | 65.9 | — | 67% JAX | › | |
| Half final | 12-15 · #266 4-23 · #333 |
— | — | FGCU -3.7 | — | 77.7 | — | 65% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 9-17 · #206 10-14 · #198 |
— | — | JXST -4.0 | — | 63.2 | — | 67% JXST | › | |
| Half final | 20-4 · #160 13-11 · #148 |
— | — | LIB -0.5 | — | 73.0 | — | 52% LIB | › | |
| Half final | 10-14 · #250 12-12 · #244 |
— | — | LT -1.7 | — | 63.3 | — | 57% LT | › | |
| Half final | 7-17 · #190 10-14 · #154 |
— | — | MTSU -4.3 | — | 65.9 | — | 68% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-13 · #133 14-11 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -1.9 | — | 70.5 | — | 58% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 22-5 · #10 22-5 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -3.9 | — | 68.0 | — | 66% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 12-15 · #263 4-22 · #305 |
— | — | DEN -1.9 | — | 73.4 | — | 58% DEN | › | |
| Half final | 10-16 · #201 1-24 · #335 |
— | — | SDST -6.1 | — | 69.6 | — | 75% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 3-23 · #320 14-13 · #184 |
— | — | SAM -9.5 | — | 71.7 | — | 85% SAM | › | |
| Half final | 10-14 · #185 17-7 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -6.7 | — | 69.0 | — | 77% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 7-19 · #360 8-16 · #322 |
— | — | TXSO -4.0 | — | 70.5 | — | 67% TXSO | › | |
| Half final | 9-15 · #327 10-14 · #309 |
— | — | SOU -5.0 | — | 69.6 | — | 71% SOU | › | |
| Half final | 2-24 · #365 14-12 · #256 |
— | — | SIUE -7.9 | — | 62.1 | — | 80% SIUE | › | |
| Half final | 16-9 · #245 15-11 · #306 |
— | — | SEMO -1.5 | — | 72.8 | — | 56% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 8-18 · #361 13-13 · #258 |
— | — | LIN -4.1 | — | 67.4 | — | 67% LIN | › | |
| Half final | 15-12 · #350 9-18 · #222 |
— | — | LR -0.8 | — | 67.3 | — | 53% LR | › | |
| Half final | 17-10 · #77 12-15 · #76 |
— | — | MEM -0.6 | — | 69.3 | — | 53% MEM | › | |
| Half final | 7-20 · #281 15-11 · #134 |
— | — | UCSB -5.5 | — | 69.6 | — | 73% UCSB | › | |
| Half final | 20-6 · #213 18-8 · #212 |
— | — | STMN -1.3 | — | 72.8 | — | 56% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 17-7 · #140 15-11 · #182 |
— | — | HAW -1.7 | — | 69.3 | — | 57% HAW | › | |
| Half final | 15-8 · #274 12-13 · #162 |
— | — | MTST -1.1 | — | 65.9 | — | 55% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 6-18 · #196 11-13 · #273 |
— | — | MONT -3.6 | — | 74.8 | — | 65% MONT | › | |
| Half final | 7-18 · #321 12-13 · #247 |
— | — | IDHO -5.5 | — | 67.4 | — | 72% IDHO | › | |
| Half final | 15-10 · #219 10-17 · #254 |
— | — | EWU -0.2 | — | 75.5 | — | 51% EWU | › | |
| Half final | 10-16 · #282 17-9 · #341 |
— | — | UTM -4.7 | — | 64.6 | — | 69% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 10-14 · #253 14-12 · #268 |
— | — | UTU -1.4 | — | 66.6 | — | 56% UTU | › | |
| Half final | 10-14 · #178 16-8 · #189 |
— | — | SHSU -3.2 | — | 76.0 | — | 64% SHSU | › | |
| Half final | 9-18 · #280 7-17 · #343 |
— | — | PV -2.1 | — | 76.4 | — | 59% PV | › | |
| Half final | 6-20 · #297 10-16 · #164 |
— | — | CP -2.5 | — | 76.1 | — | 61% CP | › | |
| Half final | 16-10 · #149 16-10 · #194 |
— | — | UCI -0.6 | — | 71.3 | — | 53% UCI | › | |
| Half final | 6-20 · #329 17-9 · #123 |
— | — | UCSD -9.3 | — | 69.1 | — | 84% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 13-12 · #257 19-8 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -3.2 | — | 63.2 | — | 64% CBU | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record