Events Center (Binghamton) · at Binghamton · Conference game
Closing line
UNH -2.5✓ BING covered by 4.5
Closing total141.5Under by 13.5
| This season | BING | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-18 | Record | 3-23 |
| 11-13 | ATS | 11-15 |
| 12-12 | O/U | 15-11 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: UNH 73–72 BING · ✗ UNH (51%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | 36 | 27 | 63 |
| BING | 26 | 39 | 65 |
1st half: UNH 36, BING 26 (UNH by 10). The model had UNH by 0.4 and a total of 67.8 (actual 62).
Team stats
| UNH | BING | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-62 34% | Field goals | 26-49 53% |
| 12-36 33% | 3-pointers | 5-14 36% |
| 7-13 54% | Free throws | 8-11 73% |
| 36 14 off | Rebounds | 33 4 off |
| 12 | Assists | 13 |
| 6 | Steals | 3 |
| 1 | Blocks | 4 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 11 | Fouls | 14 |
| 20 | Points in paint | 40 |
| 2 | Fast-break points | 7 |
Players
| UNH | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Bike G | 31 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 3-11 | 3-10 |
| Belal El Shakery F | 29 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 3-11 | 0-1 |
| John Squire F | 29 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Davide Poser F | 28 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 8-14 | 8-14 |
| KiJan Robinson G | 26 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jack Graham G | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-5 |
| Comeh Emuobor F | 16 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-0 |
| R.J. Kennedy G | 16 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Jon O'Neill F | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Dylan Saunders, Myles Blackley, Giannos Xanthopoulos, Antoni Siewruk, Nick Sanford
| BING | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wes Peterson Jr. G | 40 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-2 |
| Jeremiah Quigley G | 40 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 7-12 | 0-0 |
| Jackson Benigni G | 38 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-3 |
| Stephan Snagg F | 36 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Zyier Beverly F | 33 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 6-11 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jake Blackburn G | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4-9 | 3-8 |
Did not play: Jayden Kelsey, Ryan Richardson, Sayerr Senghore, Nevin Ibroci, Jayden Lemond, Evan Ashe, Demetrius Lilley, Bryson Wilson
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUNH -1.5
1 → UNH
CloseUNH -2.5
1 pt toward UNH
Total
Open140.5
▲ 1
Close141.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
UNH -155 · BING +130
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UNH -1.5 · closed UNH -2.5 · moved 1 toward UNHmodel UNH -0.5
model UNH -0.5
Opened 140.5 · closed 141.5 · moved 1 upmodel 145
model 145
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UNH -2.5 | UNH -0.4 | BING +2.1 | W BING covered |
| Total | 141.5 | 144.9 | Over 3.4 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | UNH 72.7 · BING 72.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNH -0.4 | UNH -10.0 |
| 1H total | 67.8 | 62 |
| 1H projected score | UNH 34.1 · BING 33.7 | UNH 36 · BING 26 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
UNH 6–5 BINGUNH leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · UNH 3-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2025-26 | BING 82 @ UNH 88 | UNH -9.5 | BING W |
| Feb 20, 2024-25 | UNH 60 @ BING 79 | BING -8.5 | BING W |
| Jan 11, 2024-25 | BING 72 @ UNH 79 | UNH +6.5 | UNH W |
| Mar 9, 2023-24 | BING 64 @ UNH 77 | UNH -5.5 | UNH W |
| Mar 2, 2023-24 | UNH 74 @ BING 87 | BING -3.5 | BING W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
New Hampshire
24 games played
Straight up
6-18
25% wins
Against the spread
11-13
46% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-12
50% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 38-88 | +29.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 75-86 | +15.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 44-61 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 105 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-98 | +29.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 47-59 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 68-72 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 68-69 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-82 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 59-58 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 79-93 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 55-86 | +31.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-80 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 76-80 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 74-75 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 65-48 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-82 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-72 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 66-61 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 84-92 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 57-80 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 63-85 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 56-78 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 58-61 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CLEM
L 38-88
−20.5
9
@
HARV
L 75-86
+4.5
15
@
GMU
L 44-61
+7.5
18
@
PROV
L 66-98
−2.5
26
vs
BRWN
L 47-59
−6.5
30
@
FAIR
L 68-72
+5.5
3
@
DART
L 68-69
+7.5
6
vs
BU
W 88-82
+11.5
17
vs
STO
W 59-58
−2.5
21
@
SLU
L 79-93
+20.5
30
@
NEB
L 55-86
+0.5
3
vs
UVM
L 61-80
−11.5
8
@
NJIT
L 76-80
−6.5
10
@
UMBC
L 74-75
+5.5
19
@
ME
W 65-48
+18.5
22
vs
BING
W 88-82
−3.5
24
vs
UALB
W 80-72
+5.5
29
vs
UML
W 66-61
+1.5
31
@
BRY
L 84-92
−6.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-80
−13.5
12
vs
NJIT
L 70-76
−8.5
14
vs
UMBC
L 63-85
−19.5
19
@
UML
L 56-78
−18.5
21
vs
ME
L 58-61
−6.5
covered 11didn’t cover 13avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CLEM
L 38-88
−20.5
9
@
HARV
L 75-86
+13.5
15
@
GMU
L 44-61
−39.5
18
@
PROV
L 66-98
+2.5
26
vs
BRWN
L 47-59
−30.5
30
@
FAIR
L 68-72
−7.5
3
@
DART
L 68-69
−10.5
6
vs
BU
W 88-82
+35.5
17
vs
STO
W 59-58
−21.5
21
@
SLU
L 79-93
+14.5
30
@
NEB
L 55-86
−5.5
3
vs
UVM
L 61-80
+1.5
8
@
NJIT
L 76-80
+18.5
10
@
UMBC
L 74-75
+5.5
19
@
ME
W 65-48
−16.5
22
vs
BING
W 88-82
+34.5
24
vs
UALB
W 80-72
+14.5
29
vs
UML
W 66-61
−19.5
31
@
BRY
L 84-92
+44.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-80
−1.5
12
vs
NJIT
L 70-76
+0.5
14
vs
UMBC
L 63-85
+1.5
19
@
UML
L 56-78
−17.5
21
vs
ME
L 58-61
−16.5
over 12under 12avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Binghamton
26 games played
Straight up
3-23
12% wins
Against the spread
11-15
42% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-11
58% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 47-85 | +21.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 59-67 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 70-83 | +27.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 82-90 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 52-63 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 66-75 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 80-71 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 63-78 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 67-84 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 63-103 | +24.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 61-82 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-95 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 59-60 | +20.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 53-69 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 60-78 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 82-88 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 63-79 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 63-60 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 62-79 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 64-73 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 65-73 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 74-77 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 79-67 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 134.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 79-92 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−16.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−10.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+14.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+7.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−16.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
−6.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+12.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−12.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
−9.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
−15.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
−13.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+2.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−11.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
+19.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
+1.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−7.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−13.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+3.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
−10.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
+5.5
5
@
UMBC
L 62-79
−5.5
7
@
NJIT
L 64-73
−0.5
12
vs
UVM
L 65-73
+3.5
14
vs
UALB
L 74-77
+1.5
19
@
BRY
W 79-67
+16.5
21
@
UML
L 79-92
−3.5
covered 11didn’t cover 15avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−21.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+11.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+24.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−10.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
+11.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+11.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−3.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
+17.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
+31.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
+10.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+39.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−2.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
−21.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
−5.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−16.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−2.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+34.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
+17.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
−7.5
5
@
UMBC
L 62-79
+2.5
7
@
NJIT
L 64-73
−3.5
12
vs
UVM
L 65-73
+1.5
14
vs
UALB
L 74-77
+14.5
19
@
BRY
W 79-67
+11.5
21
@
UML
L 79-92
+24.5
over 15under 11avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
New Hampshire
6-18 overall · 4-9 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Maine58–61
- L@ UMass Lowell56–78
- Lvs UMBC63–85
- Lvs NJIT70–76
- L@ Vermont57–80
5 days since their last game.
Binghamton
3-23 overall · 2-12 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UMass Lowell79–92
- W@ Bryant79–67
- Lvs UAlbany74–77
- Lvs Vermont65–73
- L@ NJIT64–73
5 days since their last game.