Events Center (Binghamton) · at Binghamton · Conference game
Closing line
UVM -11.5✓ BING covered by 3.5
Closing total136.5Over by 1.5
| This season | BING | |
|---|---|---|
| 13-10 | Record | 2-20 |
| 11-12 | ATS | 8-14 |
| 14-9 | O/U | 11-11 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: UVM 77–66 BING · ✓ UVM (82%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UVM | 35 | 38 | 73 |
| BING | 32 | 33 | 65 |
1st half: UVM 35, BING 32 (UVM by 3). The model had UVM by 6.4 and a total of 66.9 (actual 67).
Team stats
| UVM | BING | |
|---|---|---|
| 29-53 55% | Field goals | 24-52 46% |
| 3-20 15% | 3-pointers | 7-15 47% |
| 12-18 67% | Free throws | 10-16 63% |
| 33 7 off | Rebounds | 25 5 off |
| 10 | Assists | 10 |
| 6 | Steals | 4 |
| 1 | Blocks | 0 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 19 | Fouls | 18 |
| 38 | Points in paint | 34 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 9 |
Players
| UVM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJ Hurley G | 34 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 5-9 | 1-4 |
| Sean Blake G | 32 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-2 |
| Gus Yalden F | 30 | 18 | 9 | 5 | 8-13 | 0-3 |
| Noah Barnett F | 21 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| Ben Johnson G | 19 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Lucas Mari G | 29 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-4 |
| TJ Long G | 27 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-4 |
| Momo Nkugwa G | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Benjamin Michaels F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Sincere Clemons, Drew Bessette, Jackson Skipper, Ben Wesson, David Simon, Trey Woodyard, Chris Kuzemka
| BING | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremiah Quigley G | 40 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 5-13 | 1-1 |
| Wes Peterson Jr. G | 40 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1-8 | 0-3 |
| Bryson Wilson G | 34 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-0 |
| Jackson Benigni G | 33 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 5-6 | 5-6 |
| Stephan Snagg F | 16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Zyier Beverly F | 23 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-1 |
| Jake Blackburn G | 14 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
Did not play: Nevin Ibroci, Jayden Lemond, Ryan Richardson, Jayden Kelsey, Sayerr Senghore, Demetrius Lilley, Evan Ashe
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUVM -11.5
no move
CloseUVM -11.5
No change since the open
Total
Open137.5
▼ 1
Close136.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
UVM -900 · BING +600
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UVM -11.5 · unchangedmodel UVM -10.5
model UVM -10.5
Opened 137.5 · closed 136.5 · moved 1 downmodel 143
model 143
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UVM -11.5 | UVM -10.5 | BING +1.0 | W BING covered |
| Total | 136.5 | 142.9 | Over 6.4 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | UVM 76.7 · BING 66.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UVM -6.4 | UVM -3.0 |
| 1H total | 66.9 | 67 |
| 1H projected score | UVM 36.7 · BING 30.3 | UVM 35 · BING 32 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 1-9 10% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
UVM 10–1 BINGUVM leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · UVM 6-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2025-26 | BING 59 @ UVM 60 | UVM -20.5 | BING W |
| Jan 30, 2024-25 | UVM 72 @ BING 75 | BING +4.5 | BING W |
| Jan 16, 2024-25 | BING 64 @ UVM 72 | UVM -10.5 | BING W |
| Feb 3, 2023-24 | BING 49 @ UVM 62 | UVM -15.5 | BING W |
| Jan 18, 2023-24 | UVM 82 @ BING 62 | BING +7 | UVM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Vermont
23 games played
Straight up
13-10
57% wins
Against the spread
11-12
48% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-9
61% overs · avg +4.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ | W 89-84 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 131.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 85-74 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 90-94 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 73-79 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 65-80 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 79-74 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 74-77 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 58-80 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 65-56 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 66-59 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 83-69 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 78-83 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 69-75 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 80-61 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 60-59 | -20.5 | L −19.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 67-62 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 130.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 68-75 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 77-68 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 62-52 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 64-55 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-79 | -13.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 70-76 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 130.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 80-57 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@
BRWN
W 89-84
−0.5
15
@
NE
W 85-74
+12.5
18
@
BUF
L 90-94
−5.5
24
vs
LIB
L 73-79
+2.5
25
vs
URI
L 65-80
−10.5
26
vs
PRIN
W 79-74
−0.5
30
vs
YALE
L 74-77
+3.5
3
@
ORST
L 58-80
−18.5
6
@
PEPP
W 65-56
+7.5
14
vs
MRMK
W 66-59
+0.5
17
vs
SIE
W 83-69
+11.5
20
vs
IONA
L 78-83
−11.5
30
@
PRIN
L 69-75
−9.5
3
@
UNH
W 80-61
+11.5
8
vs
BING
W 60-59
−19.5
15
vs
ME
W 67-62
−9.5
19
@
UALB
L 68-75
−12.5
22
@
UML
W 77-68
+4.5
24
@
BRY
W 62-52
+1.5
29
vs
UMBC
W 64-55
+0.5
31
vs
NJIT
L 77-79
−15.5
5
@
ME
L 70-76
−14.5
7
vs
UNH
W 80-57
+13.5
covered 11didn’t cover 12avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@
BRWN
W 89-84
+41.5
15
@
NE
W 85-74
+24.5
18
@
BUF
L 90-94
+42.5
24
vs
LIB
L 73-79
+10.5
25
vs
URI
L 65-80
+0.5
26
vs
PRIN
W 79-74
+12.5
30
vs
YALE
L 74-77
+3.5
3
@
ORST
L 58-80
−5.5
6
@
PEPP
W 65-56
−21.5
14
vs
MRMK
W 66-59
−11.5
17
vs
SIE
W 83-69
+17.5
20
vs
IONA
L 78-83
+8.5
30
@
PRIN
L 69-75
+7.5
3
@
UNH
W 80-61
+1.5
8
vs
BING
W 60-59
−21.5
15
vs
ME
W 67-62
−1.5
19
@
UALB
L 68-75
+3.5
22
@
UML
W 77-68
−0.5
24
@
BRY
W 62-52
−19.5
29
vs
UMBC
W 64-55
−22.5
31
vs
NJIT
L 77-79
+16.5
5
@
ME
L 70-76
+15.5
7
vs
UNH
W 80-57
−1.5
over 14under 9avg +4.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Binghamton
22 games played
Straight up
2-20
9% wins
Against the spread
8-14
36% covers · avg −3.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-11
50% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 47-85 | +21.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 59-67 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 70-83 | +27.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 82-90 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 52-63 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 66-75 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 80-71 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 63-78 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 67-84 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 63-103 | +24.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 61-82 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-95 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 59-60 | +20.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 53-69 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 60-78 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 82-88 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 63-79 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 63-60 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 62-79 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 64-73 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−16.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−10.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+14.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+7.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−16.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
−6.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+12.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−12.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
−9.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
−15.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
−13.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+2.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−11.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
+19.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
+1.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−7.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−13.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+3.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
−10.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
+5.5
5
@
UMBC
L 62-79
−5.5
7
@
NJIT
L 64-73
−0.5
covered 8didn’t cover 14avg −3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−21.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+11.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+24.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−10.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
+11.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+11.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−3.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
+17.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
+31.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
+10.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+39.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−2.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
−21.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
−5.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−16.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−2.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+34.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
+17.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
−7.5
5
@
UMBC
L 62-79
+2.5
7
@
NJIT
L 64-73
−3.5
over 11under 11avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Vermont
13-10 overall · 7-3 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs New Hampshire80–57
- L@ Maine70–76
- Lvs NJIT77–79
- Wvs UMBC64–55
- W@ Bryant62–52
5 days since their last game.
Binghamton
2-20 overall · 1-9 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ NJIT64–73
- L@ UMBC62–79
- Wvs Bryant63–60
- L@ Maine63–79
- L@ New Hampshire82–88
5 days since their last game.