Patrick Gymnasium · at Vermont · Conference game
Closing line
UVM -20.5✓ BING covered by 19.5
UVM -20.5✓ BING covered by 19.5Closing total140.5Under by 21.5
 BING | This season | UVM |
|---|---|---|
| 1-12 | Record | 7-7 |
| 4-9 | ATS | 7-7 |
| 8-5 | O/U | 11-3 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: BING 66–84 UVM · ✓ UVM (94%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BING | 36 | 23 | 59 |
| UVM | 31 | 29 | 60 |
1st half: BING 36, UVM 31 (BING by 5). The model had UVM by 10.3 and a total of 70.2 (actual 67).
Team stats
| BING | UVM | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-55 40% | Field goals | 21-48 44% |
| 6-20 30% | 3-pointers | 5-16 31% |
| 9-14 64% | Free throws | 13-24 54% |
| 32 5 off | Rebounds | 37 8 off |
| 10 | Assists | 8 |
| 3 | Steals | 2 |
| 6 | Blocks | 4 |
| 7 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 19 | Fouls | 13 |
| 12 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 0 | Fast-break points | 2 |
Players
| BING | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremiah Quigley G | 40 | 21 | 10 | 8 | 9-18 | 1-5 |
| Wes Peterson Jr. G | 36 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-2 |
| Jackson Benigni G | 28 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1-6 | 1-6 |
| Ryan Richardson G | 24 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2-7 | 2-5 |
| Stephan Snagg F | 12 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Zyier Beverly F | 28 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 2-8 | 0-0 |
| Bryson Wilson G | 20 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| Jake Blackburn G | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Jayden Lemond, Jayden Kelsey, Sayerr Senghore, Nevin Ibroci, Evan Ashe, Demetrius Lilley
| UVM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJ Long G | 34 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 1-9 | 1-6 |
| TJ Hurley G | 32 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Sean Blake G | 22 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| Lucas Mari G | 20 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Gus Yalden F | 19 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 5-10 | 2-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Benjamin Michaels F | 24 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-1 |
| Jackson Skipper F | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Momo Nkugwa G | 10 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| David Simon F | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Trey Woodyard F | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Ben Johnson G | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Drew Bessette, Sincere Clemons, Chris Kuzemka, Ben Wesson, Noah Barnett
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUVM -19.5
1 → UVM
CloseUVM -20.5
1 pt toward UVM
Total
Open143.5
▼ 3
Close140.5
Down 3 since the open
Moneyline
BING +1300 · UVM -2800
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UVM -19.5 · closed UVM -20.5 · moved 1 toward UVMmodel UVM -17.5
model UVM -17.5
Opened 143.5 · closed 140.5 · moved 3 downmodel 150
model 150
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UVM -20.5 | UVM -17.5 | BING +3.0 | W BING covered |
| Total | 140.5 | 149.8 | Over 9.3 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | BING 66.2 · UVM 83.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UVM -10.3 | BING -5.0 |
| 1H total | 70.2 | 67 |
| 1H projected score | BING 29.9 · UVM 40.2 | BING 36 · UVM 31 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BING | 1-9 10% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
| UVM | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
BING 1–9 UVMUVM leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · BING 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2024-25 | UVM 72 @ BING 75 | BING +4.5 | BING W |
| Jan 16, 2024-25 | BING 64 @ UVM 72 | UVM -10.5 | BING W |
| Feb 3, 2023-24 | BING 49 @ UVM 62 | UVM -15.5 | BING W |
| Jan 18, 2023-24 | UVM 82 @ BING 62 | BING +7 | UVM W |
| Mar 7, 2022-23 | BING 57 @ UVM 79 | UVM -15.5 | UVM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Binghamton
13 games played
Straight up
1-12
8% wins
Against the spread
4-9
31% covers · avg −5.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-5
62% overs · avg +8.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ SYR | L 47-85 | +21.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs NIA | L 59-67 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 12 | @ GTWN | L 70-83 | +27.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | @ LONG | L 82-90 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 22 | vs UMES | L 52-63 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 23 | @ CAN | L 66-75 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 2 | vs LEH | W 80-71 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs LEM | L 63-78 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs CCSU | L 67-84 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 17 | @ PITT | L 63-103 | +24.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | @ MERC | L 61-82 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ ARMY | L 85-95 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs NJIT | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@SYR
SYRL 47-85
−16.5
8
vsNIA
NIAL 59-67
−10.5
12
@GTWN
GTWNL 70-83
+14.5
15
@LONG
LONGL 82-90
+7.5
22
vsUMES
UMESL 52-63
−16.5
23
@CAN
CANL 66-75
−6.5
2
vsLEH
LEHW 80-71
+12.5
6
vsLEM
LEML 63-78
−12.5
13
vsCCSU
CCSUL 67-84
−9.5
17
@PITT
PITTL 63-103
−15.5
20
@MERC
MERCL 61-82
−13.5
23
@ARMY
ARMYL 85-95
+2.5
3
vsNJIT
NJITL 65-73
−11.5
covered 4didn’t cover 9avg −5.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@SYR
SYRL 47-85
−21.5
8
vsNIA
NIAL 59-67
−12.5
12
@GTWN
GTWNL 70-83
+11.5
15
@LONG
LONGL 82-90
+24.5
22
vsUMES
UMESL 52-63
−10.5
23
@CAN
CANL 66-75
+11.5
2
vsLEH
LEHW 80-71
+11.5
6
vsLEM
LEML 63-78
−3.5
13
vsCCSU
CCSUL 67-84
+17.5
17
@PITT
PITTL 63-103
+31.5
20
@MERC
MERCL 61-82
+10.5
23
@ARMY
ARMYL 85-95
+39.5
3
vsNJIT
NJITL 65-73
−2.5
over 8under 5avg +8.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Vermont
14 games played
Straight up
7-7
50% wins
Against the spread
7-7
50% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-3
79% overs · avg +9.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ BRWN | W 89-84 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 131.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | @ NE | W 85-74 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 18 | @ BUF | L 90-94 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 24 | vs LIB | L 73-79 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs URI | L 65-80 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 26 | vs PRIN | W 79-74 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 30 | vs YALE | L 74-77 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 3 | @ ORST | L 58-80 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 6 | @ PEPP | W 65-56 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 14 | vs MRMK | W 66-59 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 17 | vs SIE | W 83-69 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 20 | vs IONA | L 78-83 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | @PRIN | L 69-75 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 3 | @ UNH | W 80-61 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@BRWN
BRWNW 89-84
−0.5
15
@NE
NEW 85-74
+12.5
18
@BUF
BUFL 90-94
−5.5
24
vsLIB
LIBL 73-79
+2.5
25
vsURI
URIL 65-80
−10.5
26
vsPRIN
PRINW 79-74
−0.5
30
vsYALE
YALEL 74-77
+3.5
3
@ORST
ORSTL 58-80
−18.5
6
@PEPP
PEPPW 65-56
+7.5
14
vsMRMK
MRMKW 66-59
+0.5
17
vsSIE
SIEW 83-69
+11.5
20
vsIONA
IONAL 78-83
−11.5
30
@PRIN
PRINL 69-75
−9.5
3
@UNH
UNHW 80-61
+11.5
covered 7didn’t cover 7avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@BRWN
BRWNW 89-84
+41.5
15
@NE
NEW 85-74
+24.5
18
@BUF
BUFL 90-94
+42.5
24
vsLIB
LIBL 73-79
+10.5
25
vsURI
URIL 65-80
+0.5
26
vsPRIN
PRINW 79-74
+12.5
30
vsYALE
YALEL 74-77
+3.5
3
@ORST
ORSTL 58-80
−5.5
6
@PEPP
PEPPW 65-56
−21.5
14
vsMRMK
MRMKW 66-59
−11.5
17
vsSIE
SIEW 83-69
+17.5
20
vsIONA
IONAL 78-83
+8.5
30
@PRIN
PRINL 69-75
+7.5
3
@UNH
UNHW 80-61
+1.5
over 11under 3avg +9.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Binghamton
1-12 overall · 0-1 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NJIT65–73
- L@ Army85–95
- L@ Mercyhurst61–82
- L@ Pitt63–103
- Lvs C Connecticut67–84
5 days since their last game.
Vermont
7-7 overall · 1-0 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ New Hampshire80–61
- L@ Princeton69–75
- Lvs Iona78–83
- Wvs Siena83–69
- Wvs Merrimack66–59
5 days since their last game.