No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.0
Projected
31–31
✓ HOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
34–36
✓ FDU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
33–35
✗ BRY lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.4
Projected
29–34
✓ UMBC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
31–37
✗ MSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
29–34
✓ CCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–38
✗ WAG lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
30–36
✓ LIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
32–34
✓ LEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
32–33
✗ NJIT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
30–40
✗ UVM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
36–33
✓ UNCW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.7
Projected
39–37
✓ ELON won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
33–36
✓ CAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
37–36
✗ W&M lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.1
Projected
31–32
✓ DREX won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
33–32
✗ APP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
34–35
✗ CCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.4
Projected
40–39
✓ WGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
38–36
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
35–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
38–32
✗ LIP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
36–37
✓ BELL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
35–37
✗ FGCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.7
Projected
33–30
✓ LIB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
34–32
✗ UTM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
32–38
✓ SHSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
36–40
✗ SDST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
37–32
✓ NDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
34–37
✓ OMA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
33–36
✓ USM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
35–34
✓ WEB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
36–38
✓ UNCO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
30–41
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
32–35
✗ TAR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
29–42
✓ ILL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
37–33
✓ TNST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
36–33
✓ SEMO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.0
Projected
30–33
✓ SIUE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
33–34
✗ EIU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
31–36
✓ UL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
35–36
✓ UCSB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
35–37
✗ IDHO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
38–36
✗ MTST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
34–31
✓ MTSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
36–37
✓ NMSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
33–36
✓ USD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
35–36
✗ CSUB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
34–32
✗ SEA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
35–34
✗ PAC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.2
Projected
39–42
✗ CSUN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
30–36
✓ UCI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.7
Projected
34–42
✗ UCSD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
32–36
✓ CBU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
38–37
✓ OSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.4
Projected
32–32
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
34–43
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 9-4 · #166 6-8 · #165 |
— | — | PK | — | 62.0 | — | 50% TOW | › | |
| Half final | 1-13 · #362 1-11 · #356 |
— | — | FDU -1.7 | — | 69.2 | — | 57% FDU | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #307 3-10 · #290 |
— | — | BRY -2.0 | — | 68.8 | — | 59% BRY | › | |
| Half final | 1-14 · #323 5-6 · #264 |
— | — | UMBC -5.0 | — | 63.4 | — | 71% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 8-6 · #59 13-2 · #10 |
— | — | MSU -6.2 | — | 67.1 | — | 75% MSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-11 · #349 5-6 · #337 |
— | — | CCSU -5.0 | — | 63.3 | — | 71% CCSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-12 · #88 3-7 · #354 |
— | — | WAG -5.7 | — | 69.3 | — | 73% WAG | › | |
| Half final | 4-9 · #331 8-7 · #324 |
— | — | LIU -5.2 | — | 66.0 | — | 72% LIU | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #355 5-9 · #332 |
— | — | LEM -1.7 | — | 65.5 | — | 57% LEM | › | |
| Half final | 2-10 · #286 5-10 · #316 |
— | — | NJIT -0.7 | — | 64.5 | — | 53% NJIT | › | |
| Half final | 1-12 · #272 7-7 · #186 |
— | — | UVM -10.3 | — | 70.2 | — | 87% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 12-2 · #120 5-9 · #229 |
— | — | UNCW -2.2 | — | 69.0 | — | 59% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #232 5-7 · #275 |
— | — | ELON -2.6 | — | 75.7 | — | 61% ELON | › | |
| Half final | 6-8 · #159 6-8 · #243 |
— | — | CAM -3.2 | — | 69.2 | — | 64% CAM | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #217 6-8 · #155 |
— | — | W&M -1.1 | — | 72.7 | — | 55% W&M | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #191 5-10 · #262 |
— | — | DREX -1.7 | — | 63.1 | — | 57% DREX | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #259 3-11 · #208 |
— | — | APP -1.2 | — | 65.2 | — | 55% APP | › | |
| Half final | 3-12 · #234 7-8 · #283 |
— | — | CCU -0.7 | — | 69.5 | — | 53% CCU | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #298 0-13 · #333 |
— | — | WGA -1.4 | — | 78.4 | — | 56% WGA | › | |
| Half final | 6-8 · #175 3-10 · #223 |
— | — | QUC -1.6 | — | 73.6 | — | 57% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #292 2-11 · #294 |
— | — | EKU -1.4 | — | 70.6 | — | 56% EKU | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #214 3-10 · #303 |
— | — | LIP -6.4 | — | 69.8 | — | 76% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #240 3-9 · #295 |
— | — | BELL -0.6 | — | 72.8 | — | 53% BELL | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #210 5-8 · #266 |
— | — | FGCU -1.9 | — | 71.7 | — | 58% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #160 5-6 · #244 |
— | — | LIB -2.3 | — | 62.7 | — | 60% LIB | › | |
| Half final | 8-4 · #341 4-8 · #350 |
— | — | UTM -1.4 | — | 65.7 | — | 56% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #206 5-6 · #189 |
— | — | SHSU -6.2 | — | 70.2 | — | 75% SHSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-9 · #263 5-9 · #201 |
— | — | SDST -4.4 | — | 76.5 | — | 68% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 9-5 · #213 1-12 · #335 |
— | — | NDSU -4.7 | — | 68.7 | — | 70% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-10 · #336 3-10 · #279 |
— | — | OMA -3.1 | — | 71.2 | — | 63% OMA | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #103 7-7 · #224 |
— | — | USM -3.1 | — | 68.4 | — | 63% USM | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #313 3-9 · #321 |
— | — | WEB -1.0 | — | 69.8 | — | 54% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #344 7-5 · #219 |
— | — | UNCO -2.1 | — | 73.7 | — | 59% UNCO | › | |
| Half final | 1-11 · #267 9-4 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -10.1 | — | 70.8 | — | 86% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #253 7-5 · #185 |
— | — | TAR -3.2 | — | 67.2 | — | 64% TAR | › | |
| Half final | 8-7 · #62 11-3 · #4 |
— | — | ILL -12.9 | — | 71.0 | — | 92% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #245 1-11 · #365 |
— | — | TNST -4.1 | — | 69.0 | — | 67% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #306 1-11 · #304 |
— | — | SEMO -3.5 | — | 69.3 | — | 65% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #222 7-6 · #256 |
— | — | SIUE -2.6 | — | 63.0 | — | 61% SIUE | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #282 2-10 · #361 |
— | — | EIU -0.6 | — | 67.1 | — | 53% EIU | › | |
| Half final | 1-13 · #358 3-13 · #221 |
— | — | UL -4.1 | — | 66.9 | — | 67% UL | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #182 7-6 · #134 |
— | — | UCSB -1.4 | — | 70.6 | — | 56% UCSB | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #273 6-5 · #247 |
— | — | IDHO -2.5 | — | 71.9 | — | 61% IDHO | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #162 1-12 · #254 |
— | — | MTST -1.4 | — | 73.6 | — | 56% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #154 1-10 · #190 |
— | — | MTSU -3.2 | — | 64.6 | — | 63% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #129 5-5 · #133 |
— | — | NMSU -1.6 | — | 72.5 | — | 57% NMSU | › | |
| Half final | 3-12 · #172 5-10 · #146 |
— | — | USD -2.7 | — | 69.3 | — | 62% USD | › | |
| Half final | 4-9 · #281 5-9 · #329 |
— | — | CSUB -0.9 | — | 71.4 | — | 54% CSUB | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #119 8-9 · #99 |
— | — | SEA -1.8 | — | 66.3 | — | 58% SEA | › | |
| Half final | 9-6 · #163 5-10 · #169 |
— | — | PAC -1.7 | — | 69.0 | — | 57% PAC | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #164 7-7 · #194 |
— | — | CSUN -3.0 | — | 80.2 | — | 63% CSUN | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #297 9-5 · #149 |
— | — | UCI -6.4 | — | 66.4 | — | 76% UCI | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #312 10-3 · #123 |
— | — | UCSD -8.7 | — | 75.7 | — | 83% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #268 10-6 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -4.5 | — | 67.9 | — | 69% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #33 8-7 · #57 |
— | — | OSU -1.3 | — | 74.4 | — | 56% OSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #161 9-7 · #121 |
— | — | SF -0.3 | — | 64.4 | — | 51% SF | › | |
| Half final | 12-4 · #106 16-1 · #17 |
— | — | GONZ -9.1 | — | 76.3 | — | 84% GONZ | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record