No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
34–36
✓ IU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
29–42
✗ LOU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
34–38
✓ FLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
34–31
✓ KU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
35–34
✗ VCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
32–35
✗ SBU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
32–40
✓ MIA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
39–37
✓ NCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
27–38
✓ CONN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
33–44
✓ MICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
36–34
✓ HOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.9
Projected
37–41
✓ VAN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
33–36
✓ INST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
33–38
✓ BU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
35–34
✓ EMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
32–32
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
34–35
✗ LEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.0
Projected
30–33
✓ NHVN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
32–36
✗ UMBC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
37–33
✓ WCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
36–30
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
32–31
✓ APP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
29–42
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
34–41
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.5
Projected
41–37
✗ UGA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.6
Projected
39–43
✗ COR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
32–37
✗ COLG lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
32–33
✗ DAV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
39–36
✓ WIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
42–35
✓ HPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
37–35
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
33–34
✗ PITT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
30–37
✓ NAVY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.8
Projected
41–41
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
38–35
✗ NDSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
37–31
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
35–38
✗ OHIO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
32–36
✗ COLU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
33–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
32–34
✓ STO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
37–34
✓ UML won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.9
Projected
30–31
✗ NJIT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
33–34
✓ UALB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
36–34
✗ W&M lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
34–33
✓ TOW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
31–35
✗ HOF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
34–37
✓ MER won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
31–39
✓ FUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
35–37
✓ USA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.6
Projected
44–38
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
35–37
✓ BELL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
37–32
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
32–38
✓ UVA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
35–37
✗ RAD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
36–33
✓ VILL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
32–41
✓ GW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.8
Projected
39–40
✗ TLSA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
39–39
✗ ASU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
33–34
✓ LONG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
38–27
✓ UNM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
39–35
✗ KENT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
33–42
✓ USM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
33–40
✓ ARST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–34
✓ JAX won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.6
Projected
30–32
✓ UTA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 59.5
Projected
28–32
✗ LT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–38
✓ MASS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.3
Projected
37–41
✓ TA&M won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
36–34
✓ SEMO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
36–36
✓ LIB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
39–33
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
34–43
✓ ISU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
33–39
✓ MUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
40–32
✓ SLU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
34–38
✗ ALST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
31–35
✗ AMER lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.0
Projected
40–39
✗ PROV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
35–37
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
31–40
✗ LIU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
32–39
✓ ETSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
34–37
✗ JMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
37–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
37–38
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
36–37
✓ EKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
32–39
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
36–34
✗ WKU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.1
Projected
32–30
✓ NORF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.5
Projected
32–31
✗ HOW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
35–35
✗ SAM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
34–32
✓ AMCC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
35–33
✗ TNTC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
32–37
✗ LIN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
35–33
✗ TNST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
35–37
✗ MORG lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
30–37
✗ ILST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
30–38
✓ SMC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
36–33
✓ TULN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
36–32
✗ NCCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
32–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
32–37
✓ COFC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.5
Projected
39–38
✓ UCD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
29–38
✓ MCN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
34–39
✓ PRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
34–34
✗ IDHO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
38–38
✗ EWU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
35–35
✗ FIU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
34–37
✓ KENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
32–36
✓ AAMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
38–40
✗ TXSO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
34–35
✓ BCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.9
Projected
40–41
✓ AUB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
33–38
✓ UNC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.2
Projected
31–32
✓ BRAD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
36–34
✗ BEL lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
32–41
✗ PV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
33–32
✓ CLEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
34–30
✗ UNCW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.4
Projected
29–36
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
36–37
✗ NOLA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
35–33
✗ RGV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
34–34
✗ MIZ lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
34–32
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
40–35
✓ TTU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
33–37
✗ PAC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
37–35
✗ SOU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
34–36
✓ LBSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.5
Projected
40–40
✗ CSUF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
33–33
✓ LAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
37–39
✗ ELON lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 83.5
Projected
39–45
✗ ALA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
36–31
✓ SF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✗ ORST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
31–38
✓ UCLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
30–37
✓ GCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
38–34
✓ STMN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
34–35
✓ KC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
38–32
✗ UCSD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
37–40
✓ UNCO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
34–32
✓ IDST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
30–39
✓ CBU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
34–40
✓ UK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
34–31
✓ UTM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
36–34
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
34–36
✗ NEV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
32–38
✓ SCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
43–34
✓ BYU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
31–39
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
30–34
✓ HAW won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 15-0 · #27 12-3 · #38 |
— | — | IU -1.8 | — | 70.2 | — | 58% IU | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #95 11-4 · #14 |
— | — | LOU -13.1 | — | 70.9 | — | 92% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 11-4 · #7 10-5 · #1 |
— | — | FLA -4.0 | — | 71.1 | — | 67% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 11-4 · #16 10-5 · #47 |
— | — | KU -2.3 | — | 65.1 | — | 60% KU | › | |
| Half final | 11-5 · #61 14-1 · #93 |
— | — | VCU -0.8 | — | 69.1 | — | 54% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #100 10-4 · #142 |
— | — | SBU -3.4 | — | 66.7 | — | 64% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #94 13-2 · #25 |
— | — | MIA -8.3 | — | 72.3 | — | 82% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 11-5 · #48 7-8 · #81 |
— | — | NCSU -2.7 | — | 75.8 | — | 62% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #66 15-1 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -11.1 | — | 64.6 | — | 89% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #41 14-0 · #8 |
— | — | MICH -11.2 | — | 77.1 | — | 89% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 14-1 · #2 9-4 · #29 |
— | — | HOU -2.1 | — | 69.2 | — | 59% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 12-3 · #51 15-0 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -4.6 | — | 77.9 | — | 69% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 2-13 · #255 6-8 · #207 |
— | — | INST -3.2 | — | 69.4 | — | 64% INST | › | |
| Half final | 5-9 · #288 5-10 · #261 |
— | — | BU -4.8 | — | 70.3 | — | 70% BU | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #188 5-8 · #187 |
— | — | EMU -1.3 | — | 68.7 | — | 56% EMU | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #331 3-8 · #354 |
— | — | MERC -0.0 | — | 63.6 | — | 50% WAG | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #337 6-9 · #332 |
— | — | LEM -0.8 | — | 69.0 | — | 53% LEM | › | |
| Half final | 2-11 · #356 3-10 · #355 |
— | — | NHVN -2.2 | — | 63.0 | — | 59% NHVN | › | |
| Half final | 2-11 · #286 6-6 · #264 |
— | — | UMBC -4.8 | — | 68.0 | — | 70% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #215 0-13 · #339 |
— | — | WCU -3.6 | — | 70.5 | — | 65% WCU | › | |
| Half final | 8-6 · #147 4-13 · #221 |
— | — | TROY -5.7 | — | 66.2 | — | 73% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 8-7 · #259 7-9 · #283 |
— | — | APP -0.6 | — | 63.3 | — | 53% APP | › | |
| Half final | 9-6 · #78 14-1 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -12.8 | — | 71.5 | — | 92% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 12-3 · #55 14-1 · #3 |
— | — | DUKE -6.9 | — | 75.0 | — | 77% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 13-2 · #34 10-5 · #79 |
— | — | UGA -4.2 | — | 77.5 | — | 68% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #251 5-7 · #179 |
— | — | COR -4.0 | — | 81.6 | — | 67% COR | › | |
| Half final | 3-11 · #216 7-7 · #211 |
— | — | COLG -5.5 | — | 68.9 | — | 72% COLG | › | |
| Half final | 9-7 · #105 9-5 · #115 |
— | — | DAV -0.8 | — | 64.7 | — | 53% DAV | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #205 5-9 · #325 |
— | — | WIN -2.9 | — | 75.3 | — | 62% WIN | › | |
| Half final | 12-3 · #90 8-7 · #326 |
— | — | HPU -6.2 | — | 76.9 | — | 75% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #9 10-6 · #37 |
— | — | SJU -2.5 | — | 71.4 | — | 61% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #63 7-8 · #74 |
— | — | PITT -0.7 | — | 66.3 | — | 53% PITT | › | |
| Half final | 3-12 · #310 9-5 · #199 |
— | — | NAVY -6.3 | — | 67.0 | — | 75% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 5-10 · #263 5-9 · #291 |
— | — | SDAK -0.6 | — | 81.8 | — | 52% SDAK | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #213 4-10 · #279 |
— | — | NDSU -2.9 | — | 72.1 | — | 62% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-2 · #126 4-11 · #135 |
— | — | YALE -6.0 | — | 68.7 | — | 74% YALE | › | |
| Half final | 11-2 · #237 7-7 · #128 |
— | — | OHIO -3.3 | — | 73.5 | — | 64% OHIO | › | |
| Half final | 6-8 · #136 10-3 · #170 |
— | — | COLU -3.7 | — | 68.1 | — | 66% COLU | › | |
| Half final | 4-8 · #156 6-7 · #137 |
— | — | PENN -2.3 | — | 68.2 | — | 60% PENN | › | |
| Half final | 1-14 · #362 2-12 · #349 |
— | — | STO -1.9 | — | 65.1 | — | 58% STO | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #307 1-13 · #272 |
— | — | UML -3.1 | — | 71.5 | — | 63% UML | › | |
| Half final | 1-15 · #323 6-10 · #316 |
— | — | NJIT -0.8 | — | 60.9 | — | 53% NJIT | › | |
| Half final | 3-11 · #290 1-12 · #301 |
— | — | UALB -0.5 | — | 66.9 | — | 52% UALB | › | |
| Half final | 9-5 · #217 6-10 · #262 |
— | — | W&M -2.7 | — | 70.0 | — | 61% W&M | › | |
| Half final | 6-9 · #165 5-10 · #229 |
— | — | TOW -0.8 | — | 67.0 | — | 54% TOW | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #155 10-4 · #166 |
— | — | HOF -4.8 | — | 65.7 | — | 70% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 9-5 · #248 6-7 · #242 |
— | — | MER -3.0 | — | 71.8 | — | 63% MER | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #320 8-5 · #152 |
— | — | FUR -7.7 | — | 70.1 | — | 80% FUR | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #296 9-5 · #228 |
— | — | USA -2.0 | — | 72.8 | — | 58% USA | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #175 0-14 · #333 |
— | — | QUC -5.3 | — | 81.6 | — | 72% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #292 4-9 · #295 |
— | — | BELL -1.8 | — | 71.3 | — | 58% BELL | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #210 4-10 · #303 |
— | — | APSU -4.9 | — | 68.6 | — | 70% APSU | › | |
| Half final | 13-3 · #85 13-2 · #20 |
— | — | UVA -5.9 | — | 70.1 | — | 74% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #271 6-8 · #246 |
— | — | RAD -2.4 | — | 71.6 | — | 60% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 12-3 · #32 6-10 · #42 |
— | — | VILL -3.0 | — | 68.3 | — | 63% VILL | › | |
| Half final | 5-11 · #113 10-5 · #101 |
— | — | GW -9.3 | — | 72.7 | — | 85% GW | › | |
| Half final | 8-6 · #84 11-2 · #108 |
— | — | TLSA -0.1 | — | 78.8 | — | 50% TLSA | › | |
| Half final | 9-6 · #83 9-6 · #60 |
— | — | ASU -0.1 | — | 77.8 | — | 51% ASU | › | |
| Half final | 5-9 · #183 6-9 · #218 |
— | — | LONG -1.7 | — | 66.6 | — | 57% LONG | › | |
| Half final | 11-3 · #82 3-12 · #220 |
— | — | UNM -11.0 | — | 64.7 | — | 88% UNM | › | |
| Half final | 10-3 · #151 2-12 · #270 |
— | — | KENT -4.5 | — | 74.3 | — | 69% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 1-14 · #358 8-7 · #224 |
— | — | USM -9.0 | — | 74.8 | — | 84% USM | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #103 9-5 · #171 |
— | — | ARST -6.6 | — | 73.0 | — | 76% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #298 3-11 · #223 |
— | — | JAX -0.6 | — | 68.3 | — | 52% JAX | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #253 8-5 · #257 |
— | — | UTA -2.1 | — | 62.6 | — | 59% UTA | › | |
| Half final | 5-9 · #206 5-7 · #244 |
— | — | LT -3.5 | — | 59.5 | — | 65% LT | › | |
| Half final | 2-11 · #181 8-7 · #209 |
— | — | MASS -6.1 | — | 69.3 | — | 75% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 11-4 · #31 12-3 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -3.6 | — | 78.3 | — | 65% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #306 4-9 · #350 |
— | — | SEMO -2.3 | — | 70.2 | — | 60% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 9-3 · #160 6-6 · #189 |
— | — | LIB -0.4 | — | 72.1 | — | 52% LIB | › | |
| Half final | 15-0 · #5 11-4 · #40 |
— | — | ARIZ -6.2 | — | 72.2 | — | 75% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 13-2 · #45 15-0 · #13 |
— | — | ISU -9.2 | — | 77.0 | — | 84% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #176 14-3 · #132 |
— | — | MUR -6.0 | — | 72.5 | — | 74% MUR | › | |
| Half final | 13-1 · #69 4-11 · #124 |
— | — | SLU -8.0 | — | 71.5 | — | 81% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 2-12 · #280 3-11 · #302 |
— | — | ALST -4.0 | — | 72.4 | — | 67% ALST | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #317 7-7 · #153 |
— | — | AMER -4.2 | — | 65.5 | — | 68% AMER | › | |
| Half final | 8-7 · #52 9-7 · #49 |
— | — | PROV -1.3 | — | 79.0 | — | 56% PROV | › | |
| Half final | 12-3 · #92 12-4 · #68 |
— | — | VT -1.9 | — | 71.9 | — | 58% VT | › | |
| Half final | 2-12 · #88 9-7 · #324 |
— | — | LIU -9.5 | — | 70.5 | — | 85% LIU | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #284 9-5 · #173 |
— | — | ETSU -7.0 | — | 70.1 | — | 78% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #234 7-8 · #158 |
— | — | JMU -2.5 | — | 71.0 | — | 61% JMU | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #231 3-12 · #208 |
— | — | MRSH -2.9 | — | 70.1 | — | 62% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #214 5-9 · #266 |
— | — | FGCU -0.8 | — | 74.1 | — | 54% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 5-9 · #240 3-11 · #294 |
— | — | EKU -1.0 | — | 73.3 | — | 54% EKU | › | |
| Half final | 6-8 · #268 10-4 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -6.6 | — | 70.3 | — | 76% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #129 2-10 · #190 |
— | — | WKU -1.8 | — | 69.7 | — | 58% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 3-11 · #319 2-10 · #351 |
— | — | NORF -2.3 | — | 62.1 | — | 60% NORF | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #197 3-13 · #364 |
— | — | HOW -0.9 | — | 62.5 | — | 54% HOW | › | |
| Half final | 7-7 · #184 3-10 · #227 |
— | — | SAM -0.3 | — | 70.5 | — | 51% SAM | › | |
| Half final | 4-7 · #238 2-11 · #318 |
— | — | AMCC -2.2 | — | 65.2 | — | 60% AMCC | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #282 1-12 · #365 |
— | — | TNTC -2.1 | — | 67.6 | — | 59% TNTC | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #222 7-6 · #258 |
— | — | LIN -4.3 | — | 68.7 | — | 68% LIN | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #245 3-10 · #361 |
— | — | TNST -1.8 | — | 68.4 | — | 58% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 1-14 · #353 1-12 · #345 |
— | — | MORG -1.3 | — | 71.8 | — | 56% MORG | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #110 11-4 · #116 |
— | — | ILST -6.7 | — | 67.2 | — | 77% ILST | › | |
| Half final | 7-9 · #139 14-2 · #97 |
— | — | SMC -8.3 | — | 67.5 | — | 82% SMC | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #130 2-11 · #192 |
— | — | TULN -3.5 | — | 69.0 | — | 65% TULN | › | |
| Half final | 1-11 · #357 2-15 · #352 |
— | — | NCCU -3.8 | — | 68.5 | — | 66% NCCU | › | |
| Half final | 3-11 · #314 4-12 · #299 |
— | — | BUCK -3.1 | — | 67.8 | — | 63% BUCK | › | |
| Half final | 6-9 · #159 9-6 · #117 |
— | — | COFC -5.0 | — | 68.4 | — | 71% COFC | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #182 4-11 · #164 |
— | — | UCD -1.2 | — | 77.5 | — | 55% UCD | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #252 10-3 · #127 |
— | — | MCN -8.8 | — | 66.1 | — | 83% MCN | › | |
| Half final | 1-10 · #196 5-5 · #274 |
— | — | PRST -5.2 | — | 72.8 | — | 72% PRST | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #162 6-6 · #247 |
— | — | IDHO -0.2 | — | 68.1 | — | 51% IDHO | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #273 1-13 · #254 |
— | — | EWU -0.3 | — | 76.3 | — | 51% EWU | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #178 6-6 · #250 |
— | — | FIU -0.0 | — | 70.7 | — | 50% MOST | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #198 6-6 · #148 |
— | — | KENN -3.5 | — | 71.0 | — | 65% KENN | › | |
| Half final | 1-12 · #360 5-7 · #328 |
— | — | AAMU -4.5 | — | 68.3 | — | 69% AAMU | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #363 0-11 · #322 |
— | — | TXSO -2.2 | — | 77.6 | — | 59% TXSO | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #338 3-10 · #202 |
— | — | BCU -1.4 | — | 68.9 | — | 56% BCU | › | |
| Half final | 12-3 · #18 9-6 · #21 |
— | — | AUB -1.6 | — | 80.9 | — | 57% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 10-6 · #89 13-2 · #44 |
— | — | UNC -4.9 | — | 71.0 | — | 70% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 11-4 · #131 10-6 · #167 |
— | — | BRAD -0.9 | — | 62.2 | — | 54% BRAD | › | |
| Half final | 13-3 · #138 6-8 · #144 |
— | — | BEL -2.2 | — | 70.1 | — | 59% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 0-15 · #366 2-9 · #343 |
— | — | PV -9.6 | — | 73.2 | — | 85% PV | › | |
| Half final | 13-3 · #35 10-5 · #71 |
— | — | CLEM -1.6 | — | 65.2 | — | 57% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 13-2 · #120 7-8 · #191 |
— | — | UNCW -4.4 | — | 63.6 | — | 68% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #300 10-3 · #193 |
— | — | SFA -7.4 | — | 64.4 | — | 79% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 6-8 · #285 5-10 · #276 |
— | — | NOLA -0.9 | — | 72.9 | — | 54% NOLA | › | |
| Half final | 4-9 · #287 4-10 · #342 |
— | — | RGV -2.2 | — | 67.8 | — | 59% RGV | › | |
| Half final | 12-3 · #54 8-7 · #46 |
— | — | MIZ -0.1 | — | 68.8 | — | 50% MISS | › | |
| Half final | 13-2 · #67 9-6 · #64 |
— | — | HALL -1.5 | — | 65.7 | — | 57% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 11-4 · #12 12-3 · #65 |
— | — | TTU -4.3 | — | 74.9 | — | 68% TTU | › | |
| Half final | 6-10 · #146 9-7 · #163 |
— | — | PAC -4.4 | — | 69.7 | — | 68% PAC | › | |
| Half final | 2-10 · #309 1-9 · #327 |
— | — | SOU -2.2 | — | 71.9 | — | 60% SOU | › | |
| Half final | 6-9 · #329 3-11 · #297 |
— | — | LBSU -2.7 | — | 70.0 | — | 62% LBSU | › | |
| Half final | 8-7 · #194 5-10 · #312 |
— | — | CSUF -0.4 | — | 79.5 | — | 52% CSUF | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #289 5-8 · #293 |
— | — | LAM -0.3 | — | 65.9 | — | 51% LAM | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #243 8-6 · #232 |
— | — | ELON -1.9 | — | 76.3 | — | 58% ELON | › | |
| Half final | 8-6 · #11 11-4 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -6.5 | — | 83.5 | — | 76% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #161 3-13 · #172 |
— | — | SF -5.3 | — | 66.3 | — | 72% SF | › | |
| Half final | 9-9 · #99 6-10 · #169 |
— | — | PK | — | 70.3 | — | 50% PORT | › | |
| Half final | 7-8 · #50 10-5 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -7.0 | — | 68.8 | — | 78% UCLA | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #143 9-5 · #80 |
— | — | GCU -7.3 | — | 67.4 | — | 79% GCU | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #212 2-12 · #305 |
— | — | STMN -4.2 | — | 71.5 | — | 68% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 5-11 · #336 1-13 · #335 |
— | — | KC -0.6 | — | 69.4 | — | 52% KC | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #123 4-10 · #281 |
— | — | UCSD -5.8 | — | 70.2 | — | 74% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 6-8 · #313 8-5 · #219 |
— | — | UNCO -2.7 | — | 77.1 | — | 62% UNCO | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #344 3-10 · #321 |
— | — | IDST -1.8 | — | 65.8 | — | 58% IDST | › | |
| Half final | 1-12 · #267 11-6 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -8.3 | — | 69.1 | — | 82% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #154 6-5 · #133 |
— | — | NMSU -1.2 | — | 68.3 | — | 55% NMSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #53 9-6 · #19 |
— | — | UK -5.6 | — | 74.4 | — | 73% UK | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #341 1-12 · #304 |
— | — | UTM -2.9 | — | 65.5 | — | 62% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 12-1 · #58 8-5 · #86 |
— | — | USU -1.9 | — | 70.5 | — | 58% USU | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #122 11-4 · #96 |
— | — | NEV -1.9 | — | 69.0 | — | 58% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 10-7 · #121 12-5 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -6.6 | — | 70.0 | — | 76% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 14-1 · #24 8-7 · #73 |
— | — | BYU -8.7 | — | 76.3 | — | 83% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 6-8 · #174 9-4 · #75 |
— | — | SDSU -7.4 | — | 69.9 | — | 79% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #149 9-3 · #140 |
— | — | HAW -3.5 | — | 63.8 | — | 65% HAW | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record