Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
15-0 · #27 AP #10
30
12-3 · #38
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
34–36
✓ IU won
Half finalConference
7-8 · #95
34
11-4 · #14 AP #20
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
29–42
✗ LOU lost
Half finalConference
11-4 · #7 AP #21
28
10-5 · #1
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
34–38
✓ FLA won
Half finalConference
Kansas
11-4 · #16 AP #22
43
10-5 · #47
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
34–31
✓ KU won
Half finalConference
VCU
11-5 · #61
37
14-1 · #93
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
35–34
✗ VCU lost
Half finalConference
6-7 · #100
39
10-4 · #142
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
32–35
✗ SBU lost
Half finalConference
10-6 · #94
33
Miami
13-2 · #25
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
32–40
✓ MIA won
Half finalConference
11-5 · #48
56
7-8 · #81
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
39–37
✓ NCSU won
Half finalConference
DePaul
10-6 · #66
27
UConn
15-1 · #6 AP #4
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
27–38
✓ CONN won
Half finalConference
10-5 · #41
37
14-0 · #8 AP #2
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
33–44
✓ MICH won
Half finalConference
14-1 · #2 AP #7
33
Baylor
9-4 · #29
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
36–34
✓ HOU won
Half finalConference
LSU
12-3 · #51
38
15-0 · #22 AP #11
52
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.9
Projected
37–41
✓ VAN won
Half finalConference
2-13 · #255
35
6-8 · #207
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
33–36
✓ INST won
Half finalConference
Army
5-9 · #288
39
5-10 · #261
51
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
33–38
✓ BU won
Half finalConference
7-8 · #188
36
5-8 · #187
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
35–34
✓ EMU won
Half finalConference
4-10 · #331
32
Wagner
3-8 · #354
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
32–32
 
Half finalConference
6-6 · #337
26
6-9 · #332
17
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
34–35
✗ LEM lost
Half finalConference
FDU
2-11 · #356
14
3-10 · #355
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.0
Projected
30–33
✓ NHVN won
Half finalConference
2-11 · #286
39
UMBC
6-6 · #264
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
32–36
✗ UMBC lost
Half finalConference
3-9 · #215
40
0-13 · #339
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
37–33
✓ WCU won
Half finalConference
Troy
8-6 · #147
53
4-13 · #221
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
36–30
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
8-7 · #259
32
7-9 · #283
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
32–31
✓ APP won
Half finalConference
9-6 · #78
44
Purdue
14-1 · #23 AP #5
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
29–42
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference
SMU
12-3 · #55 AP #24
35
Duke
14-1 · #3 AP #6
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
34–41
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
13-2 · #34 AP #18
34
10-5 · #79
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.5
Projected
41–37
✗ UGA lost
Half finalConference
5-7 · #251
55
5-7 · #179
51
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.6
Projected
39–43
✗ COR lost
Half finalConference
Lehigh
3-11 · #216
41
7-7 · #211
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
32–37
✗ COLG lost
Half finalConference
9-7 · #105
39
9-5 · #115
23
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
32–33
✗ DAV lost
Half finalConference
7-8 · #205
38
5-9 · #325
19
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
39–36
✓ WIN won
Half finalConference
12-3 · #90
41
8-7 · #326
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
42–35
✓ HPU won
Half finalConference
10-5 · #9
52
10-6 · #37
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
37–35
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference
10-5 · #63
48
Pitt
7-8 · #74
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
33–34
✗ PITT lost
Half finalConference
3-12 · #310
20
Navy
9-5 · #199
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
30–37
✓ NAVY won
Half finalConference
Denver
5-10 · #263
37
5-9 · #291
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.8
Projected
41–41
 
Half finalConference
10-5 · #213
32
Omaha
4-10 · #279
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
38–35
✗ NDSU lost
Half finalConference
Yale
10-2 · #126
22
4-11 · #135
22
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
37–31
 
Half finalConference
11-2 · #237
47
Ohio
7-7 · #128
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
35–38
✗ OHIO lost
Half finalConference
6-8 · #136
38
10-3 · #170
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
32–36
✗ COLU lost
Half finalConference
Brown
4-8 · #156
42
Penn
6-7 · #137
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
33–35
 
Half finalConference
1-14 · #362
33
2-12 · #349
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
32–34
✓ STO won
Half finalConference
4-10 · #307
45
1-13 · #272
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
37–34
✓ UML won
Half finalConference
Maine
1-15 · #323
37
NJIT
6-10 · #316
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.9
Projected
30–31
✗ NJIT lost
Half finalConference
Bryant
3-11 · #290
34
1-12 · #301
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
33–34
✓ UALB won
Half finalConference
9-5 · #217
28
Drexel
6-10 · #262
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
36–34
✗ W&M lost
Half finalConference
Towson
6-9 · #165
42
5-10 · #229
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
34–33
✓ TOW won
Half finalConference
7-8 · #155
29
10-4 · #166
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
31–35
✗ HOF lost
Half finalConference
9-5 · #248
46
Mercer
6-7 · #242
58
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
34–37
✓ MER won
Half finalConference
VMI
3-10 · #320
27
Furman
8-5 · #152
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
31–39
✓ FUR won
Half finalConference
10-5 · #296
32
9-5 · #228
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
35–37
✓ USA won
Half finalConference
40
0-14 · #333
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.6
Projected
44–38
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
3-9 · #292
32
4-9 · #295
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
35–37
✓ BELL won
Half finalConference
7-5 · #210
43
4-10 · #303
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
37–32
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
13-3 · #85
34
13-2 · #20 AP #23
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
32–38
✓ UVA won
Half finalConference
4-10 · #271
45
6-8 · #246
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
35–37
✗ RAD lost
Half finalConference
12-3 · #32
44
6-10 · #42
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
36–33
✓ VILL won
Half finalConference
5-11 · #113
39
10-5 · #101
60
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
32–41
✓ GW won
Half finalConference
8-6 · #84
51
Tulsa
11-2 · #108
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.8
Projected
39–40
✗ TLSA lost
Half finalConference
9-6 · #83
38
9-6 · #60
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
39–39
✗ ASU lost
Half finalConference
5-9 · #183
28
6-9 · #218
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
33–34
✓ LONG won
Half finalConference
11-3 · #82
45
3-12 · #220
22
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
38–27
✓ UNM won
Half finalConference
10-3 · #151
43
2-12 · #270
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
39–35
✗ KENT lost
Half finalConference
1-14 · #358
28
8-7 · #224
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
33–42
✓ USM won
Half finalConference
7-8 · #103
37
9-5 · #171
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
33–40
✓ ARST won
Half finalConference
7-6 · #298
23
3-11 · #223
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–34
✓ JAX won
Half finalConference
7-6 · #253
29
8-5 · #257
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.6
Projected
30–32
✓ UTA won
Half finalConference
5-9 · #206
34
5-7 · #244
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 59.5
Projected
28–32
✗ LT lost
Half finalConference
2-11 · #181
25
UMass
8-7 · #209
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–38
✓ MASS won
Half finalConference
11-4 · #31
45
12-3 · #28
48
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.3
Projected
37–41
✓ TA&M won
Half finalConference
6-7 · #306
38
4-9 · #350
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
36–34
✓ SEMO won
Half finalConference
9-3 · #160
34
6-6 · #189
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
36–36
✓ LIB won
Half finalConference
15-0 · #5 AP #1
43
TCU
11-4 · #40
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
39–33
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalConference
13-2 · #45
40
15-0 · #13 AP #3
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
34–43
✓ ISU won
Half finalConference
7-8 · #176
36
14-3 · #132
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
33–39
✓ MUR won
Half finalConference
13-1 · #69
44
4-11 · #124
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
40–32
✓ SLU won
Half finalConference
2-12 · #280
37
3-11 · #302
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
34–38
✗ ALST lost
Half finalConference
4-10 · #317
38
7-7 · #153
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
31–35
✗ AMER lost
Half finalConference
8-7 · #52
35
Xavier
9-7 · #49
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.0
Projected
40–39
✗ PROV lost
Half finalConference
12-3 · #92
37
12-4 · #68
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
35–37
 
Half finalConference
38
9-7 · #324
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
31–40
✗ LIU lost
Half finalConference
4-10 · #284
34
ETSU
9-5 · #173
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
32–39
✓ ETSU won
Half finalConference
4-12 · #234
44
7-8 · #158
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
34–37
✗ JMU lost
Half finalConference
10-5 · #231
38
3-12 · #208
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
37–34
 
Half finalConference
7-7 · #214
28
FGCU
5-9 · #266
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
37–38
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
5-9 · #240
37
3-11 · #294
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
36–37
✓ EKU won
Half finalConference
6-8 · #268
30
10-4 · #150
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
32–39
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
7-6 · #129
31
UTEP
2-10 · #190
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
36–34
✗ WKU lost
Half finalConference
3-11 · #319
34
2-10 · #351
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.1
Projected
32–30
✓ NORF won
Half finalConference
Howard
6-7 · #197
30
3-13 · #364
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.5
Projected
32–31
✗ HOW lost
Half finalConference
7-7 · #184
28
3-10 · #227
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
35–35
✗ SAM lost
Half finalConference
4-7 · #238
40
2-11 · #318
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
34–32
✓ AMCC won
Half finalConference
3-10 · #282
18
1-12 · #365
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
35–33
✗ TNTC lost
Half finalConference
4-10 · #222
37
7-6 · #258
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
32–37
✗ LIN lost
Half finalConference
7-5 · #245
33
3-10 · #361
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
35–33
✗ TNST lost
Half finalConference
1-14 · #353
34
1-12 · #345
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
35–37
✗ MORG lost
Half finalConference
UIC
4-10 · #110
28
11-4 · #116
25
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
30–37
✗ ILST lost
Half finalConference
7-9 · #139
38
14-2 · #97
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
30–38
✓ SMC won
Half finalConference
Tulane
10-4 · #130
39
UTSA
2-11 · #192
21
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
36–33
✓ TULN won
Half finalConference
1-11 · #357
31
2-15 · #352
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
36–32
✗ NCCU lost
Half finalConference
3-11 · #314
28
4-12 · #299
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
32–36
 
Half finalConference
6-9 · #159
26
9-6 · #117
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
32–37
✓ COFC won
Half finalConference
7-6 · #182
40
4-11 · #164
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.5
Projected
39–38
✓ UCD won
Half finalConference
4-10 · #252
27
10-3 · #127
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
29–38
✓ MCN won
Half finalConference
1-10 · #196
32
5-5 · #274
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
34–39
✓ PRST won
Half finalConference
6-7 · #162
48
Idaho
6-6 · #247
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
34–34
✗ IDHO lost
Half finalConference
6-6 · #273
33
1-13 · #254
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
38–38
✗ EWU lost
Half finalConference
FIU
6-6 · #178
30
6-6 · #250
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
35–35
✗ FIU lost
Half finalConference
5-7 · #198
43
6-6 · #148
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
34–37
✓ KENN won
Half finalConference
1-12 · #360
29
5-7 · #328
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
32–36
✓ AAMU won
Half finalConference
3-10 · #363
34
0-11 · #322
25
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
38–40
✗ TXSO lost
Half finalConference
6-7 · #338
24
3-10 · #202
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
34–35
✓ BCU won
Half finalConference
12-3 · #18 AP #15
34
Auburn
9-6 · #21
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.9
Projected
40–41
✓ AUB won
Half finalConference
10-6 · #89
38
13-2 · #44 AP #17
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
33–38
✓ UNC won
Half finalConference
11-4 · #131
37
10-6 · #167
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.2
Projected
31–32
✓ BRAD won
Half finalConference
13-3 · #138
25
Drake
6-8 · #144
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
36–34
✗ BEL lost
Half finalConference
0-15 · #366
37
2-9 · #343
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
32–41
✗ PV lost
Half finalConference
13-3 · #35
39
10-5 · #71
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
33–32
✓ CLEM won
Half finalConference
13-2 · #120
21
7-8 · #191
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
34–30
✗ UNCW lost
Half finalConference
3-10 · #300
28
10-3 · #193
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.4
Projected
29–36
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
6-8 · #285
47
5-10 · #276
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
36–37
✗ NOLA lost
Half finalConference
4-9 · #287
33
4-10 · #342
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
35–33
✗ RGV lost
Half finalConference
12-3 · #54
36
8-7 · #46
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
34–34
✗ MIZ lost
Half finalConference
13-2 · #67
29
9-6 · #64
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
34–32
 
Half finalConference
11-4 · #12 AP #14
43
12-3 · #65
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
40–35
✓ TTU won
Half finalConference
6-10 · #146
34
9-7 · #163
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
33–37
✗ PAC lost
Half finalConference
2-10 · #309
25
1-9 · #327
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
37–35
✗ SOU lost
Half finalConference
6-9 · #329
36
3-11 · #297
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
34–36
✓ LBSU won
Half finalConference
8-7 · #194
40
5-10 · #312
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.5
Projected
40–40
✗ CSUF lost
Half finalConference
5-7 · #289
19
Lamar
5-8 · #293
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
33–33
✓ LAM won
Half finalConference
7-8 · #243
43
Elon
8-6 · #232
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
37–39
✗ ELON lost
Half finalConference
Texas
8-6 · #11
46
11-4 · #15 AP #13
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 83.5
Projected
39–45
✗ ALA lost
Half finalConference
10-7 · #161
32
3-13 · #172
21
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
36–31
✓ SF won
Half finalConference
9-9 · #99
38
6-10 · #169
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✗ ORST lost
Half finalConference
7-8 · #50
21
UCLA
10-5 · #26
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
31–38
✓ UCLA won
Half finalConference
4-10 · #143
26
9-5 · #80
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
30–37
✓ GCU won
Half finalConference
10-4 · #212
43
2-12 · #305
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
38–34
✓ STMN won
Half finalConference
5-11 · #336
37
1-13 · #335
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
34–35
✓ KC won
Half finalConference
10-4 · #123
26
4-10 · #281
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
38–32
✗ UCSD lost
Half finalConference
6-8 · #313
34
8-5 · #219
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
37–40
✓ UNCO won
Half finalConference
5-8 · #344
40
3-10 · #321
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
34–32
✓ IDST won
Half finalConference
1-12 · #267
22
11-6 · #203
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
30–39
✓ CBU won
Half finalConference
MTSU
6-6 · #154
29
6-5 · #133
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–35
 
Half finalConference
10-5 · #53
39
9-6 · #19
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
34–40
✓ UK won
Half finalConference
9-4 · #341
35
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
34–31
✓ UTM won
Half finalConference
12-1 · #58
46
8-5 · #86
23
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
36–34
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
10-4 · #122
39
Nevada
11-4 · #96
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
34–36
✗ NEV lost
Half finalConference
LMU
10-7 · #121
30
12-5 · #106
45
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
32–38
✓ SCU won
Half finalConference
BYU
14-1 · #24 AP #9
45
Utah
8-7 · #73
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
43–34
✓ BYU won
Half finalConference
6-8 · #174
21
9-4 · #75
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
31–39
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
10-5 · #149
27
9-3 · #140
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
30–34
✓ HAW won
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Half final
15-0 · #27
30
12-3 · #38
39
— — IU -1.8 — 70.2 — 58% IU ›
Half final
7-8 · #95
34
11-4 · #14
30
— — LOU -13.1 — 70.9 — 92% LOU ›
Half final
11-4 · #7
28
10-5 · #1
41
— — FLA -4.0 — 71.1 — 67% FLA ›
Half final
11-4 · #16
43
10-5 · #47
39
— — KU -2.3 — 65.1 — 60% KU ›
Half final
11-5 · #61
37
14-1 · #93
38
— — VCU -0.8 — 69.1 — 54% VCU ›
Half final
6-7 · #100
39
10-4 · #142
34
— — SBU -3.4 — 66.7 — 64% SBU ›
Half final
10-6 · #94
33
13-2 · #25
47
— — MIA -8.3 — 72.3 — 82% MIA ›
Half final
11-5 · #48
56
7-8 · #81
31
— — NCSU -2.7 — 75.8 — 62% NCSU ›
Half final
10-6 · #66
27
15-1 · #6
37
— — CONN -11.1 — 64.6 — 89% CONN ›
Half final
10-5 · #41
37
14-0 · #8
38
— — MICH -11.2 — 77.1 — 89% MICH ›
Half final
14-1 · #2
33
9-4 · #29
26
— — HOU -2.1 — 69.2 — 59% HOU ›
Half final
12-3 · #51
38
15-0 · #22
52
— — VAN -4.6 — 77.9 — 69% VAN ›
Half final
2-13 · #255
35
6-8 · #207
38
— — INST -3.2 — 69.4 — 64% INST ›
Half final
5-9 · #288
39
5-10 · #261
51
— — BU -4.8 — 70.3 — 70% BU ›
Half final
7-8 · #188
36
5-8 · #187
30
— — EMU -1.3 — 68.7 — 56% EMU ›
Half final
4-10 · #331
32
3-8 · #354
32
— — MERC -0.0 — 63.6 — 50% WAG ›
Half final
6-6 · #337
26
6-9 · #332
17
— — LEM -0.8 — 69.0 — 53% LEM ›
Half final
2-11 · #356
14
3-10 · #355
27
— — NHVN -2.2 — 63.0 — 59% NHVN ›
Half final
2-11 · #286
39
6-6 · #264
30
— — UMBC -4.8 — 68.0 — 70% UMBC ›
Half final
3-9 · #215
40
0-13 · #339
33
— — WCU -3.6 — 70.5 — 65% WCU ›
Half final
8-6 · #147
53
4-13 · #221
35
— — TROY -5.7 — 66.2 — 73% TROY ›
Half final
8-7 · #259
32
7-9 · #283
26
— — APP -0.6 — 63.3 — 53% APP ›
Half final
9-6 · #78
44
14-1 · #23
45
— — PUR -12.8 — 71.5 — 92% PUR ›
Half final
12-3 · #55
35
14-1 · #3
41
— — DUKE -6.9 — 75.0 — 77% DUKE ›
Half final
13-2 · #34
34
10-5 · #79
40
— — UGA -4.2 — 77.5 — 68% UGA ›
Half final
5-7 · #251
55
5-7 · #179
51
— — COR -4.0 — 81.6 — 67% COR ›
Half final
3-11 · #216
41
7-7 · #211
38
— — COLG -5.5 — 68.9 — 72% COLG ›
Half final
9-7 · #105
39
9-5 · #115
23
— — DAV -0.8 — 64.7 — 53% DAV ›
Half final
7-8 · #205
38
5-9 · #325
19
— — WIN -2.9 — 75.3 — 62% WIN ›
Half final
12-3 · #90
41
8-7 · #326
40
— — HPU -6.2 — 76.9 — 75% HPU ›
Half final
10-5 · #9
52
10-6 · #37
34
— — SJU -2.5 — 71.4 — 61% SJU ›
Half final
10-5 · #63
48
7-8 · #74
37
— — PITT -0.7 — 66.3 — 53% PITT ›
Half final
3-12 · #310
20
9-5 · #199
39
— — NAVY -6.3 — 67.0 — 75% NAVY ›
Half final
5-10 · #263
37
5-9 · #291
37
— — SDAK -0.6 — 81.8 — 52% SDAK ›
Half final
10-5 · #213
32
4-10 · #279
44
— — NDSU -2.9 — 72.1 — 62% NDSU ›
Half final
10-2 · #126
22
4-11 · #135
22
— — YALE -6.0 — 68.7 — 74% YALE ›
Half final
11-2 · #237
47
7-7 · #128
44
— — OHIO -3.3 — 73.5 — 64% OHIO ›
Half final
6-8 · #136
38
10-3 · #170
29
— — COLU -3.7 — 68.1 — 66% COLU ›
Half final
4-8 · #156
42
6-7 · #137
42
— — PENN -2.3 — 68.2 — 60% PENN ›
Half final
1-14 · #362
33
2-12 · #349
35
— — STO -1.9 — 65.1 — 58% STO ›
Half final
4-10 · #307
45
1-13 · #272
36
— — UML -3.1 — 71.5 — 63% UML ›
Half final
1-15 · #323
37
6-10 · #316
29
— — NJIT -0.8 — 60.9 — 53% NJIT ›
Half final
3-11 · #290
34
1-12 · #301
41
— — UALB -0.5 — 66.9 — 52% UALB ›
Half final
9-5 · #217
28
6-10 · #262
37
— — W&M -2.7 — 70.0 — 61% W&M ›
Half final
6-9 · #165
42
5-10 · #229
32
— — TOW -0.8 — 67.0 — 54% TOW ›
Half final
7-8 · #155
29
10-4 · #166
24
— — HOF -4.8 — 65.7 — 70% HOF ›
Half final
9-5 · #248
46
6-7 · #242
58
— — MER -3.0 — 71.8 — 63% MER ›
Half final
3-10 · #320
27
8-5 · #152
34
— — FUR -7.7 — 70.1 — 80% FUR ›
Half final
10-5 · #296
32
9-5 · #228
44
— — USA -2.0 — 72.8 — 58% USA ›
Half final
0-14 · #333
36
— — QUC -5.3 — 81.6 — 72% QUC ›
Half final
3-9 · #292
32
4-9 · #295
33
— — BELL -1.8 — 71.3 — 58% BELL ›
Half final
7-5 · #210
43
4-10 · #303
31
— — APSU -4.9 — 68.6 — 70% APSU ›
Half final
13-3 · #85
34
13-2 · #20
41
— — UVA -5.9 — 70.1 — 74% UVA ›
Half final
4-10 · #271
45
6-8 · #246
36
— — RAD -2.4 — 71.6 — 60% RAD ›
Half final
12-3 · #32
44
6-10 · #42
38
— — VILL -3.0 — 68.3 — 63% VILL ›
Half final
5-11 · #113
39
10-5 · #101
60
— — GW -9.3 — 72.7 — 85% GW ›
Half final
8-6 · #84
51
11-2 · #108
36
— — TLSA -0.1 — 78.8 — 50% TLSA ›
Half final
9-6 · #83
38
9-6 · #60
36
— — ASU -0.1 — 77.8 — 51% ASU ›
Half final
5-9 · #183
28
6-9 · #218
40
— — LONG -1.7 — 66.6 — 57% LONG ›
Half final
11-3 · #82
45
3-12 · #220
22
— — UNM -11.0 — 64.7 — 88% UNM ›
Half final
10-3 · #151
43
2-12 · #270
49
— — KENT -4.5 — 74.3 — 69% KENT ›
Half final
1-14 · #358
28
8-7 · #224
31
— — USM -9.0 — 74.8 — 84% USM ›
Half final
7-8 · #103
37
9-5 · #171
43
— — ARST -6.6 — 73.0 — 76% ARST ›
Half final
7-6 · #298
23
3-11 · #223
40
— — JAX -0.6 — 68.3 — 52% JAX ›
Half final
7-6 · #253
29
8-5 · #257
37
— — UTA -2.1 — 62.6 — 59% UTA ›
Half final
5-9 · #206
34
5-7 · #244
29
— — LT -3.5 — 59.5 — 65% LT ›
Half final
2-11 · #181
25
8-7 · #209
28
— — MASS -6.1 — 69.3 — 75% MASS ›
Half final
11-4 · #31
45
12-3 · #28
48
— — TA&M -3.6 — 78.3 — 65% TA&M ›
Half final
6-7 · #306
38
4-9 · #350
30
— — SEMO -2.3 — 70.2 — 60% SEMO ›
Half final
9-3 · #160
34
6-6 · #189
33
— — LIB -0.4 — 72.1 — 52% LIB ›
Half final
15-0 · #5
43
11-4 · #40
27
— — ARIZ -6.2 — 72.2 — 75% ARIZ ›
Half final
13-2 · #45
40
15-0 · #13
42
— — ISU -9.2 — 77.0 — 84% ISU ›
Half final
7-8 · #176
36
14-3 · #132
45
— — MUR -6.0 — 72.5 — 74% MUR ›
Half final
13-1 · #69
44
4-11 · #124
24
— — SLU -8.0 — 71.5 — 81% SLU ›
Half final
2-12 · #280
37
3-11 · #302
27
— — ALST -4.0 — 72.4 — 67% ALST ›
Half final
4-10 · #317
38
7-7 · #153
37
— — AMER -4.2 — 65.5 — 68% AMER ›
Half final
8-7 · #52
35
9-7 · #49
44
— — PROV -1.3 — 79.0 — 56% PROV ›
Half final
12-3 · #92
37
12-4 · #68
37
— — VT -1.9 — 71.9 — 58% VT ›
Half final
9-7 · #324
31
— — LIU -9.5 — 70.5 — 85% LIU ›
Half final
4-10 · #284
34
9-5 · #173
38
— — ETSU -7.0 — 70.1 — 78% ETSU ›
Half final
4-12 · #234
44
7-8 · #158
27
— — JMU -2.5 — 71.0 — 61% JMU ›
Half final
10-5 · #231
38
3-12 · #208
38
— — MRSH -2.9 — 70.1 — 62% MRSH ›
Half final
7-7 · #214
28
5-9 · #266
30
— — FGCU -0.8 — 74.1 — 54% FGCU ›
Half final
5-9 · #240
37
3-11 · #294
40
— — EKU -1.0 — 73.3 — 54% EKU ›
Half final
6-8 · #268
30
10-4 · #150
31
— — UVU -6.6 — 70.3 — 76% UVU ›
Half final
7-6 · #129
31
2-10 · #190
35
— — WKU -1.8 — 69.7 — 58% WKU ›
Half final
3-11 · #319
34
2-10 · #351
31
— — NORF -2.3 — 62.1 — 60% NORF ›
Half final
6-7 · #197
30
3-13 · #364
34
— — HOW -0.9 — 62.5 — 54% HOW ›
Half final
7-7 · #184
28
3-10 · #227
49
— — SAM -0.3 — 70.5 — 51% SAM ›
Half final
4-7 · #238
40
2-11 · #318
36
— — AMCC -2.2 — 65.2 — 60% AMCC ›
Half final
3-10 · #282
18
1-12 · #365
26
— — TNTC -2.1 — 67.6 — 59% TNTC ›
Half final
4-10 · #222
37
7-6 · #258
31
— — LIN -4.3 — 68.7 — 68% LIN ›
Half final
7-5 · #245
33
3-10 · #361
42
— — TNST -1.8 — 68.4 — 58% TNST ›
Half final
1-14 · #353
34
1-12 · #345
32
— — MORG -1.3 — 71.8 — 56% MORG ›
Half final
4-10 · #110
28
11-4 · #116
25
— — ILST -6.7 — 67.2 — 77% ILST ›
Half final
7-9 · #139
38
14-2 · #97
50
— — SMC -8.3 — 67.5 — 82% SMC ›
Half final
10-4 · #130
39
2-11 · #192
21
— — TULN -3.5 — 69.0 — 65% TULN ›
Half final
1-11 · #357
31
2-15 · #352
45
— — NCCU -3.8 — 68.5 — 66% NCCU ›
Half final
3-11 · #314
28
4-12 · #299
28
— — BUCK -3.1 — 67.8 — 63% BUCK ›
Half final
6-9 · #159
26
9-6 · #117
28
— — COFC -5.0 — 68.4 — 71% COFC ›
Half final
7-6 · #182
40
4-11 · #164
30
— — UCD -1.2 — 77.5 — 55% UCD ›
Half final
4-10 · #252
27
10-3 · #127
40
— — MCN -8.8 — 66.1 — 83% MCN ›
Half final
1-10 · #196
32
5-5 · #274
46
— — PRST -5.2 — 72.8 — 72% PRST ›
Half final
6-7 · #162
48
6-6 · #247
30
— — IDHO -0.2 — 68.1 — 51% IDHO ›
Half final
6-6 · #273
33
1-13 · #254
28
— — EWU -0.3 — 76.3 — 51% EWU ›
Half final
6-6 · #178
30
6-6 · #250
35
— — FIU -0.0 — 70.7 — 50% MOST ›
Half final
5-7 · #198
43
6-6 · #148
46
— — KENN -3.5 — 71.0 — 65% KENN ›
Half final
1-12 · #360
29
5-7 · #328
34
— — AAMU -4.5 — 68.3 — 69% AAMU ›
Half final
3-10 · #363
34
0-11 · #322
25
— — TXSO -2.2 — 77.6 — 59% TXSO ›
Half final
6-7 · #338
24
3-10 · #202
35
— — BCU -1.4 — 68.9 — 56% BCU ›
Half final
12-3 · #18
34
9-6 · #21
49
— — AUB -1.6 — 80.9 — 57% AUB ›
Half final
10-6 · #89
38
13-2 · #44
49
— — UNC -4.9 — 71.0 — 70% UNC ›
Half final
11-4 · #131
37
10-6 · #167
40
— — BRAD -0.9 — 62.2 — 54% BRAD ›
Half final
13-3 · #138
25
6-8 · #144
44
— — BEL -2.2 — 70.1 — 59% BEL ›
Half final
0-15 · #366
37
2-9 · #343
32
— — PV -9.6 — 73.2 — 85% PV ›
Half final
13-3 · #35
39
10-5 · #71
34
— — CLEM -1.6 — 65.2 — 57% CLEM ›
Half final
13-2 · #120
21
7-8 · #191
43
— — UNCW -4.4 — 63.6 — 68% UNCW ›
Half final
3-10 · #300
28
10-3 · #193
43
— — SFA -7.4 — 64.4 — 79% SFA ›
Half final
6-8 · #285
47
5-10 · #276
43
— — NOLA -0.9 — 72.9 — 54% NOLA ›
Half final
4-9 · #287
33
4-10 · #342
42
— — RGV -2.2 — 67.8 — 59% RGV ›
Half final
12-3 · #54
36
8-7 · #46
37
— — MIZ -0.1 — 68.8 — 50% MISS ›
Half final
13-2 · #67
29
9-6 · #64
29
— — HALL -1.5 — 65.7 — 57% HALL ›
Half final
11-4 · #12
43
12-3 · #65
27
— — TTU -4.3 — 74.9 — 68% TTU ›
Half final
6-10 · #146
34
9-7 · #163
24
— — PAC -4.4 — 69.7 — 68% PAC ›
Half final
2-10 · #309
25
1-9 · #327
30
— — SOU -2.2 — 71.9 — 60% SOU ›
Half final
6-9 · #329
36
3-11 · #297
42
— — LBSU -2.7 — 70.0 — 62% LBSU ›
Half final
8-7 · #194
40
5-10 · #312
31
— — CSUF -0.4 — 79.5 — 52% CSUF ›
Half final
5-7 · #289
19
5-8 · #293
28
— — LAM -0.3 — 65.9 — 51% LAM ›
Half final
7-8 · #243
43
8-6 · #232
37
— — ELON -1.9 — 76.3 — 58% ELON ›
Half final
8-6 · #11
46
11-4 · #15
45
— — ALA -6.5 — 83.5 — 76% ALA ›
Half final
10-7 · #161
32
3-13 · #172
21
— — SF -5.3 — 66.3 — 72% SF ›
Half final
9-9 · #99
38
6-10 · #169
39
— — PK — 70.3 — 50% PORT ›
Half final
7-8 · #50
21
10-5 · #26
38
— — UCLA -7.0 — 68.8 — 78% UCLA ›
Half final
4-10 · #143
26
9-5 · #80
42
— — GCU -7.3 — 67.4 — 79% GCU ›
Half final
10-4 · #212
43
2-12 · #305
40
— — STMN -4.2 — 71.5 — 68% STMN ›
Half final
5-11 · #336
37
1-13 · #335
44
— — KC -0.6 — 69.4 — 52% KC ›
Half final
10-4 · #123
26
4-10 · #281
32
— — UCSD -5.8 — 70.2 — 74% UCSD ›
Half final
6-8 · #313
34
8-5 · #219
37
— — UNCO -2.7 — 77.1 — 62% UNCO ›
Half final
5-8 · #344
40
3-10 · #321
39
— — IDST -1.8 — 65.8 — 58% IDST ›
Half final
1-12 · #267
22
11-6 · #203
24
— — CBU -8.3 — 69.1 — 82% CBU ›
Half final
6-6 · #154
29
6-5 · #133
29
— — NMSU -1.2 — 68.3 — 55% NMSU ›
Half final
10-5 · #53
39
9-6 · #19
44
— — UK -5.6 — 74.4 — 73% UK ›
Half final
9-4 · #341
35
— — UTM -2.9 — 65.5 — 62% UTM ›
Half final
12-1 · #58
46
8-5 · #86
23
— — USU -1.9 — 70.5 — 58% USU ›
Half final
10-4 · #122
39
11-4 · #96
38
— — NEV -1.9 — 69.0 — 58% NEV ›
Half final
10-7 · #121
30
12-5 · #106
45
— — SCU -6.6 — 70.0 — 76% SCU ›
Half final
14-1 · #24
45
8-7 · #73
43
— — BYU -8.7 — 76.3 — 83% BYU ›
Half final
6-8 · #174
21
9-4 · #75
36
— — SDSU -7.4 — 69.9 — 79% SDSU ›
Half final
10-5 · #149
27
9-3 · #140
29
— — HAW -3.5 — 63.8 — 65% HAW ›
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record