Ted Grant Court · at Le Moyne · Conference game
Closing line
LEM -1.5✓ CCSU covered by 11.5
LEM -1.5✓ CCSU covered by 11.5Closing total146.5Under by 18.5
 CCSU | This season | LEM |
|---|---|---|
| 6-6 | Record | 6-9 |
| 7-5 | ATS | 10-5 |
| 8-4 | O/U | 6-9 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CCSU 73–74 LEM · ✗ LEM (55%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCSU | 26 | 43 | 69 |
| LEM | 17 | 42 | 59 |
1st half: CCSU 26, LEM 17 (CCSU by 9). The model had LEM by 0.8 and a total of 69.0 (actual 43).
Team stats
| CCSU | LEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-59 37% | Field goals | 20-62 32% |
| 4-22 18% | 3-pointers | 5-27 19% |
| 21-26 81% | Free throws | 14-16 88% |
| 46 13 off | Rebounds | 36 11 off |
| 8 | Assists | 7 |
| 7 | Steals | 6 |
| 6 | Blocks | 3 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 16 | Fouls | 21 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 9 | Fast-break points | 6 |
Players
| CCSU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darin Smith Jr. G | 36 | 24 | 12 | 1 | 7-22 | 0-5 |
| Max Frazier F | 33 | 14 | 9 | 1 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| James Jones G | 32 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| Jay Rodgers G | 31 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 4-11 | 1-3 |
| Melo Sanchez G | 20 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4-8 | 3-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Elijah Parker G | 21 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Ashton Reynolds G | 12 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Roddy Jones G | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-4 |
| Daniel James F | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Rashawn Tibby, Adam Fox, Corsley Edwards Jr., Jayden Mott, Ja'Kobe Williams, Nico Ashley, Gabe Spinelli
| LEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shilo Jackson F | 34 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 5-7 | 0-0 |
| Deng Garang G | 33 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2-14 | 0-7 |
| Trent Mosquera G | 28 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 3-10 | 1-6 |
| Jakai Sanders G | 27 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-1 |
| Jakob Blakley G | 23 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Samuel Hincapie G | 19 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-2 |
| Tennessee Rainwater F | 18 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-3 |
| Eli Greenberg G | 13 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-2 |
| Isaac Nyakundi F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Trevor Roe F | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Josiah Lee, Sam Donnelly, Nate Fouts, Kaelin Thomas, Ametri Moss
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLEM -1.5
no move
CloseLEM -1.5
No change since the open
Total
Open145.5
▲ 1
Close146.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
CCSU +102 · LEM -122
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LEM -1.5 · unchangedmodel LEM -1.5 matches the line
model LEM -1.5 = line ✓
Opened 145.5 · closed 146.5 · moved 1 upmodel 147.5
model 147.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | LEM -1.5 | LEM -1.5 | — | CCSU covered |
| Total | 146.5 | 147.3 | Over 0.8 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | CCSU 72.9 · LEM 74.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LEM -0.8 | CCSU -9.0 |
| 1H total | 69.0 | 43 |
| 1H projected score | CCSU 34.1 · LEM 34.9 | CCSU 26 · LEM 17 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCSU | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 8-2 80% |
| LEM | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CCSU 3–2 LEMCCSU leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · CCSU has won the last 3 meetings · CCSU 2-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2024-25 | LEM 67 @ CCSU 86 | CCSU -13.5 | CCSU W |
| Feb 27, 2024-25 | LEM 75 @ CCSU 84 | CCSU -12.5 | LEM W |
| Jan 24, 2024-25 | CCSU 93 @ LEM 70 | LEM +6.5 | CCSU W |
| Feb 15, 2023-24 | CCSU 64 @ LEM 69 | LEM +2.5 | LEM W |
| Jan 19, 2023-24 | LEM 75 @ CCSU 73 | CCSU -7 | LEM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
C Connecticut
12 games played
Straight up
6-6
50% wins
Against the spread
7-5
58% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-4
67% overs · avg +6.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ QUIN | L 49-71 | +9.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 11 | @ BC | W 60-59 | +17.5 | W +18.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 16 | @ MASS | L 77-84 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 21 | @ RUTG | W 67-54 | +15.5 | W +28.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs SHU | W 108-106 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 214 |
| Dec 3 | @ HALL | L 61-77 | +18.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 7 | @ NE | L 56-73 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 13 | @ BING | W 84-67 | -7.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 18 | vs FAIR | L 70-84 | -6.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 2 | @ LIU | L 78-84 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 4 | vs NHVN | W 72-61 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 8 | vs STO | W 76-69 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@QUIN
QUINL 49-71
−12.5
11
@BC
BCW 60-59
+18.5
16
@MASS
MASSL 77-84
+5.5
21
@RUTG
RUTGW 67-54
+28.5
24
vsSHU
SHUW 108-106
−1.5
3
@HALL
HALLL 61-77
+2.5
7
@NE
NEL 56-73
−15.5
13
@BING
BINGW 84-67
+9.5
18
vsFAIR
FAIRL 70-84
−20.5
2
@LIU
LIUL 78-84
+0.5
4
vsNHVN
NHVNW 72-61
+3.5
8
vsSTO
STOW 76-69
−0.5
covered 7didn’t cover 5avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@QUIN
QUINL 49-71
−30.5
11
@BC
BCW 60-59
−17.5
16
@MASS
MASSL 77-84
+16.5
21
@RUTG
RUTGW 67-54
−16.5
24
vsSHU
SHUW 108-106
+70.5
3
@HALL
HALLL 61-77
+9.5
7
@NE
NEL 56-73
−9.5
13
@BING
BINGW 84-67
+17.5
18
vsFAIR
FAIRL 70-84
+10.5
2
@LIU
LIUL 78-84
+15.5
4
vsNHVN
NHVNW 72-61
+2.5
8
vsSTO
STOW 76-69
+10.5
over 8under 4avg +6.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Le Moyne
15 games played
Straight up
6-9
40% wins
Against the spread
10-5
67% covers · avg +4.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
6-9
40% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ XAV | L 69-74 | +24.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | @ BGSU | L 60-83 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 13 | @MASS | L 80-94 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 17 | vs NIA | W 74-68 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 22 | vsFAIR | L 83-97 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 28 | @ LAF | W 76-63 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs MONM | W 83-79 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 30 | vs BALL | L 85-96 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 6 | @BING | W 78-63 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 16 | @ TEX | L 53-95 | +29.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 20 | @ SBU | L 81-92 | +21.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 28 | @BC | L 64-72 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | @ SFPA | W 84-58 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 4 | @ MERC | L 60-74 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 8 | vsNHVN | W 73-47 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@XAV
XAVL 69-74
+19.5
9
@BGSU
BGSUL 60-83
−11.5
13
@MASS
MASSL 80-94
+2.5
17
vsNIA
NIAW 74-68
+3.5
22
vsFAIR
FAIRL 83-97
−12.5
28
@LAF
LAFW 76-63
+17.5
29
vsMONM
MONMW 83-79
+10.5
30
vsBALL
BALLL 85-96
−12.5
6
@BING
BINGW 78-63
+12.5
16
@TEX
TEXL 53-95
−12.5
20
@SBU
SBUL 81-92
+10.5
28
@BC
BCL 64-72
+4.5
2
@SFPA
SFPAW 84-58
+20.5
4
@MERC
MERCL 60-74
−11.5
8
vsNHVN
NHVNW 73-47
+20.5
covered 10didn’t cover 5avg +4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@XAV
XAVL 69-74
−13.5
9
@BGSU
BGSUL 60-83
−11.5
13
@MASS
MASSL 80-94
+20.5
17
vsNIA
NIAW 74-68
+3.5
22
vsFAIR
FAIRL 83-97
+34.5
28
@LAF
LAFW 76-63
−12.5
29
vsMONM
MONMW 83-79
+16.5
30
vsBALL
BALLL 85-96
+40.5
6
@BING
BINGW 78-63
−3.5
16
@TEX
TEXL 53-95
−4.5
20
@SBU
SBUL 81-92
+21.5
28
@BC
BCL 64-72
−10.5
2
@SFPA
SFPAW 84-58
−9.5
4
@MERC
MERCL 60-74
−7.5
8
vsNHVN
NHVNW 73-47
−17.5
over 6under 9avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
C Connecticut
6-6 overall · 2-1 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Stonehill76–69
- Wvs New Haven72–61
- L@ Long Island78–84
- Lvs Fairfield70–84
- W@ Binghamton84–67
2 days since their last game.
Le Moyne
6-9 overall · 2-1 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs New Haven73–47
- L@ Mercyhurst60–74
- W@ Saint Francis Red Wolves84–58
- L@ Boston College64–72
- L@ St Bonaventure81–92
2 days since their last game.