Chesapeake Employers Insurance Arena · at UMBC · Conference game
Closing line
UMBC -11.5✓ UMBC covered by 5.5
Closing total138.5Over by 2.5
| This season | UMBC | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-18 | Record | 11-8 |
| 8-12 | ATS | 9-10 |
| 10-10 | O/U | 8-11 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: BING 67–79 UMBC · ✓ UMBC (86%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BING | 26 | 36 | 62 |
| UMBC | 39 | 40 | 79 |
1st half: BING 26, UMBC 39 (UMBC by 13). The model had UMBC by 7.3 and a total of 68.3 (actual 65).
Team stats
| BING | UMBC | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-52 40% | Field goals | 28-64 44% |
| 5-20 25% | 3-pointers | 9-26 35% |
| 15-18 83% | Free throws | 14-19 74% |
| 32 2 off | Rebounds | 40 10 off |
| 9 | Assists | 14 |
| 3 | Steals | 4 |
| 2 | Blocks | 1 |
| 8 | Turnovers | 3 |
| 13 | Fouls | 10 |
| 18 | Points in paint | 38 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 9 |
Players
| BING | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wes Peterson Jr. G | 40 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1-10 | 1-4 |
| Jeremiah Quigley G | 40 | 20 | 11 | 5 | 9-13 | 0-2 |
| Stephan Snagg F | 40 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Bryson Wilson G | 39 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 4-11 | 1-4 |
| Jackson Benigni G | 33 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 4-8 | 3-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nevin Ibroci G | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| Ryan Richardson G | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Evan Ashe, Jake Blackburn, Zyier Beverly, Jayden Kelsey, Sayerr Senghore, Demetrius Lilley, Jayden Lemond
| UMBC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jah'Likai King G | 36 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 5-14 | 2-7 |
| Ace Valentine G | 35 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 3-5 | 1-3 |
| DJ Armstrong Jr. G | 33 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 6-12 | 5-11 |
| Josh Odunowo F | 27 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 6-11 | 0-0 |
| Jose Roberto Tanchyn F | 26 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4-11 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Caden Diggs F | 18 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Riley Jacobs F | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Cougar Downing G | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| Daylon Dickerson F | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Saahil Thakkar, Paul Greene, Devin Ceaser, Jake Stout, Tim Eze, Regimantas Ciunys
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUMBC -11.5
no move
CloseUMBC -11.5
No change since the open
Total
Open138.5
no move
Close138.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
BING +575 · UMBC -850
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UMBC -11.5 · unchangedmodel UMBC -12.5
model UMBC -12.5
Opened 138.5 · unchangedmodel 146
model 146
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UMBC -11.5 | UMBC -12.4 | UMBC +0.9 | W UMBC covered |
| Total | 138.5 | 145.8 | Over 7.3 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | BING 66.7 · UMBC 79.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UMBC -7.3 | UMBC -13.0 |
| 1H total | 68.3 | 65 |
| 1H projected score | BING 30.5 · UMBC 37.8 | BING 26 · UMBC 39 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
BING 3–7 UMBCUMBC leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · UMBC has won the last 2 meetings · BING 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2025-26 | UMBC 78 @ BING 60 | BING +4.5 | UMBC W |
| Feb 13, 2024-25 | BING 77 @ UMBC 81 | UMBC -4.5 | BING W |
| Jan 4, 2024-25 | UMBC 82 @ BING 87 | BING +2.5 | BING W |
| Mar 5, 2023-24 | BING 72 @ UMBC 71 | UMBC -2.5 | BING W |
| Feb 15, 2023-24 | UMBC 89 @ BING 78 | BING -3.5 | UMBC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Binghamton
20 games played
Straight up
2-18
10% wins
Against the spread
8-12
40% covers · avg −3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-10
50% overs · avg +5.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 47-85 | +21.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 59-67 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 70-83 | +27.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 82-90 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 52-63 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 66-75 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 80-71 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 63-78 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 67-84 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 63-103 | +24.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 61-82 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-95 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 59-60 | +20.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 53-69 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 60-78 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 82-88 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 63-79 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 63-60 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−16.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−10.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+14.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+7.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−16.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
−6.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+12.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−12.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
−9.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
−15.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
−13.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+2.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−11.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
+19.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
+1.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−7.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−13.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+3.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
−10.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
+5.5
covered 8didn’t cover 12avg −3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−21.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+11.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+24.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−10.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
+11.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+11.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−3.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
+17.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
+31.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
+10.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+39.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−2.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
−21.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
−5.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−16.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−2.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+34.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
+17.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
−7.5
over 10under 10avg +5.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
UMBC
19 games played
Straight up
11-8
58% wins
Against the spread
9-10
47% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-11
42% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-77 | +25.5 | W +19.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 81-79 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 71-70 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 52-89 | +22.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 71-57 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 81-90 | +19.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 73-66 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 12 | vs | L 60-63 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 69-94 | +22.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 93-59 | -10.5 | W +23.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 69-62 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-74 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 74-79 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 78-60 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 87-74 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 79-56 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 55-64 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 68-65 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
DAY
L 71-77
+19.5
11
@
MORG
W 81-79
−2.5
16
vs
WAG
W 71-70
−5.5
19
@
GW
L 52-89
−14.5
29
vs
DSU
W 71-57
+0.5
3
@
GTWN
L 81-90
+10.5
6
@
BUCK
W 73-66
+8.5
9
vs
BUF
L 79-83
−0.5
12
vs
ARMY
L 60-63
−10.5
21
@
USF
L 69-94
−2.5
29
@
COPP
W 93-59
+23.5
8
vs
ME
W 69-62
−0.5
10
vs
UNH
W 75-74
−5.5
15
@
BRY
L 74-79
−6.5
19
@
BING
W 78-60
+13.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 87-74
+6.5
24
vs
UML
W 79-56
+20.5
29
@
UVM
L 55-64
−0.5
31
@
UALB
W 68-65
+1.5
covered 9didn’t cover 10avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
DAY
L 71-77
−6.5
11
@
MORG
W 81-79
−2.5
16
vs
WAG
W 71-70
+0.5
19
@
GW
L 52-89
−19.5
29
vs
DSU
W 71-57
−10.5
3
@
GTWN
L 81-90
+21.5
6
@
BUCK
W 73-66
−4.5
9
vs
BUF
L 79-83
+16.5
12
vs
ARMY
L 60-63
−23.5
21
@
USF
L 69-94
+2.5
29
@
COPP
W 93-59
+3.5
8
vs
ME
W 69-62
−2.5
10
vs
UNH
W 75-74
+5.5
15
@
BRY
L 74-79
+17.5
19
@
BING
W 78-60
−2.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 87-74
+17.5
24
vs
UML
W 79-56
−16.5
29
@
UVM
L 55-64
−22.5
31
@
UALB
W 68-65
−8.5
over 8under 11avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Binghamton
2-18 overall · 1-7 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Bryant63–60
- L@ Maine63–79
- L@ New Hampshire82–88
- Lvs UMBC60–78
- L@ UAlbany53–69
A week or more of rest.
UMBC
11-8 overall · 6-2 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ UAlbany68–65
- L@ Vermont55–64
- Wvs UMass Lowell79–56
- Wvs NJIT87–74
- W@ Binghamton78–60
5 days since their last game.