No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.5
Projected
33–29
✗ UVM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
31–38
✓ UMBC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
32–33
✓ BRY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.8
Projected
31–45
✓ MICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 59.7
Projected
29–31
✓ CIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
36–37
✗ SHU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
32–36
✗ SIE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.9
Projected
32–31
✗ MRMK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
29–38
✓ QUIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.1
Projected
27–35
✓ MRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
36–34
✓ SPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
31–36
✓ CCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
30–35
✓ MERC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.3
Projected
29–35
✓ LIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
34–34
✗ LEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.7
Projected
31–32
✓ FDU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
35–35
✓ NJIT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
33–38
✓ HOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
32–33
✗ STBK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
32–35
✓ CAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
35–38
✓ UNCW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
34–39
✓ COFC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
35–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
38–35
✓ MER won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
34–38
✓ BELL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.2
Projected
38–41
✓ WGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
33–38
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
37–37
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
34–41
✗ NDSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
36–36
✗ UND lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
31–38
✓ SAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
30–37
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
35–34
✓ LIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
39–35
✓ OSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
31–36
✓ TNTC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.6
Projected
28–34
✓ UTM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
33–37
✓ SEMO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
32–37
✓ TNST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
36–37
✗ UAB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
35–35
✗ UCSB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
38–39
✗ WEB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
31–35
✗ IDST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
33–35
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
35–38
✓ MONT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
33–33
✓ UTA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
32–35
✗ WKU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
35–38
✓ CSUF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.7
Projected
41–40
✓ CSUN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
29–38
✓ UCI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
31–37
✓ UCSD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
33–37
✗ CBU lost
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 12-9 · #186 4-18 · #323 |
— | — | UVM -4.1 | — | 61.5 | — | 67% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 2-18 · #272 11-8 · #264 |
— | — | UMBC -7.3 | — | 68.3 | — | 79% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 4-16 · #301 5-15 · #290 |
— | — | BRY -0.8 | — | 65.0 | — | 54% BRY | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #78 20-1 · #8 |
— | — | MICH -14.9 | — | 75.8 | — | 95% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 14-8 · #47 11-11 · #30 |
— | — | CIN -2.2 | — | 59.7 | — | 60% CIN | › | |
| Half final | 13-10 · #239 9-14 · #311 |
— | — | SHU -0.6 | — | 72.6 | — | 52% SHU | › | |
| Half final | 14-9 · #233 16-7 · #260 |
— | — | SIE -4.0 | — | 67.2 | — | 67% SIE | › | |
| Half final | 14-9 · #225 9-14 · #278 |
— | — | MRMK -1.4 | — | 62.9 | — | 56% MRMK | › | |
| Half final | 7-16 · #359 14-9 · #241 |
— | — | QUIN -8.8 | — | 66.7 | — | 83% QUIN | › | |
| Half final | 2-18 · #347 14-7 · #236 |
— | — | MRST -8.2 | — | 62.1 | — | 81% MRST | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #269 8-15 · #330 |
— | — | SPU -2.6 | — | 70.0 | — | 61% SPU | › | |
| Half final | 2-19 · #362 9-10 · #337 |
— | — | CCSU -5.0 | — | 67.2 | — | 71% CCSU | › | |
| Half final | 4-15 · #88 9-12 · #331 |
— | — | MERC -5.5 | — | 64.6 | — | 72% MERC | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #355 14-8 · #324 |
— | — | LIU -5.6 | — | 63.3 | — | 73% LIU | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #332 4-13 · #354 |
— | — | LEM -0.3 | — | 68.5 | — | 52% LEM | › | |
| Half final | 7-14 · #349 4-16 · #356 |
— | — | FDU -1.4 | — | 62.7 | — | 56% FDU | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #307 10-12 · #316 |
— | — | NJIT -0.4 | — | 69.9 | — | 52% NJIT | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #229 12-9 · #166 |
— | — | HOF -5.1 | — | 71.6 | — | 71% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #155 12-9 · #191 |
— | — | STBK -0.5 | — | 65.3 | — | 52% STBK | › | |
| Half final | 11-11 · #262 8-13 · #243 |
— | — | CAM -2.4 | — | 67.1 | — | 60% CAM | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #217 17-3 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -2.5 | — | 73.4 | — | 61% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #275 14-8 · #117 |
— | — | COFC -5.5 | — | 73.3 | — | 73% COFC | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #232 8-13 · #159 |
— | — | ELON -0.5 | — | 69.1 | — | 52% ELON | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #242 6-14 · #227 |
— | — | MER -2.9 | — | 72.9 | — | 62% MER | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #303 7-13 · #295 |
— | — | BELL -4.2 | — | 72.5 | — | 68% BELL | › | |
| Half final | 3-18 · #333 8-12 · #298 |
— | — | WGA -3.5 | — | 79.2 | — | 65% WGA | › | |
| Half final | 7-14 · #223 11-11 · #175 |
— | — | QUC -4.2 | — | 70.8 | — | 67% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 8-13 · #266 5-16 · #294 |
— | — | FGCU -0.5 | — | 74.2 | — | 52% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 7-14 · #263 16-5 · #213 |
— | — | NDSU -6.5 | — | 74.9 | — | 76% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 8-12 · #279 10-12 · #336 |
— | — | UND -0.3 | — | 71.5 | — | 51% UND | › | |
| Half final | 5-15 · #339 9-12 · #184 |
— | — | SAM -7.0 | — | 69.6 | — | 78% SAM | › | |
| Half final | 7-11 · #253 13-6 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -7.5 | — | 67.2 | — | 79% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #258 7-14 · #222 |
— | — | LIN -0.9 | — | 69.6 | — | 54% LIN | › | |
| Half final | 14-7 · #33 8-13 · #50 |
— | — | OSU -4.5 | — | 73.4 | — | 69% OSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-19 · #365 6-14 · #282 |
— | — | TNTC -4.9 | — | 67.3 | — | 70% TNTC | › | |
| Half final | 3-17 · #304 15-5 · #341 |
— | — | UTM -6.1 | — | 62.6 | — | 75% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 9-11 · #350 10-10 · #306 |
— | — | SEMO -3.9 | — | 69.6 | — | 66% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #361 11-8 · #245 |
— | — | TNST -5.0 | — | 69.0 | — | 71% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 10-11 · #76 13-8 · #102 |
— | — | UAB -0.6 | — | 72.4 | — | 53% UAB | › | |
| Half final | 13-7 · #134 11-9 · #182 |
— | — | UCSB -0.5 | — | 69.8 | — | 52% UCSB | › | |
| Half final | 10-10 · #219 9-12 · #313 |
— | — | WEB -0.2 | — | 76.9 | — | 51% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 5-15 · #321 7-13 · #344 |
— | — | IDST -4.1 | — | 66.5 | — | 67% IDST | › | |
| Half final | 10-9 · #247 10-10 · #162 |
— | — | MTST -2.0 | — | 68.5 | — | 59% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 4-17 · #254 10-9 · #273 |
— | — | MONT -3.6 | — | 72.8 | — | 65% MONT | › | |
| Half final | 12-7 · #257 10-11 · #268 |
— | — | UTA -0.3 | — | 66.4 | — | 51% UTA | › | |
| Half final | 8-10 · #198 10-10 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -3.0 | — | 66.1 | — | 63% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #281 8-13 · #312 |
— | — | CSUF -3.1 | — | 73.5 | — | 63% CSUF | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #194 7-14 · #164 |
— | — | CSUN -1.0 | — | 81.7 | — | 54% CSUN | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #329 13-7 · #149 |
— | — | UCI -9.2 | — | 67.7 | — | 84% UCI | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #297 13-8 · #123 |
— | — | UCSD -6.3 | — | 68.6 | — | 75% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 7-11 · #185 16-6 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -3.7 | — | 69.3 | — | 66% CBU | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record