No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
38–30
✓ NEB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
33–38
✓ UVA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.7
Projected
41–37
✓ ARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
40–35
✓ LOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
35–33
✓ TEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
35–35
✓ ARMY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
36–38
✓ IU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
35–32
✗ VILL lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
34–40
✓ NCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
32–35
✗ ELON lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
29–40
✓ PUR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
36–35
✓ MASS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.2
Projected
29–32
✓ APP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.6
Projected
29–33
✗ NHVN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
34–38
✓ BU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.4
Projected
32–35
✓ CCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
33–39
✗ LEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
39–30
✓ ETSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
36–35
✓ MIZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
34–31
✓ MTSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
31–37
✓ UVM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
33–40
✓ ISU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
32–35
✓ GAST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
32–35
✗ URI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.9
Projected
38–38
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
33–34
✓ FOR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
35–29
✓ UNT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
34–39
✗ TCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
34–34
✗ HC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
34–40
✓ WIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
30–39
✗ PRES lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
36–36
✗ UPST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.6
Projected
38–38
✗ BTLR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
37–34
✓ SMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
37–31
✓ MIA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.0
Projected
40–41
✗ COLU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
37–39
✗ UND lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
33–38
✓ NDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.2
Projected
40–41
✓ IUIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
35–37
✓ GB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
32–32
✗ SIE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
29–37
✓ QUIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.2
Projected
38–38
✓ SHU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
33–35
✓ PENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
38–36
✓ CAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
31–36
✗ UTC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–38
✓ TEX won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
34–33
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
37–37
✗ FGCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
30–36
✓ LIB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
31–41
✓ KU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
37–35
✓ W&M won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
30–41
✓ SLU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
33–36
✓ TXST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
38–36
✗ KENT lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
36–33
✓ BALL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
36–37
✓ ARST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
36–38
✗ WKU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
34–32
✓ SHSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
35–42
✗ VAN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
32–32
✗ FDU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.7
Projected
34–44
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
39–37
✓ M-OH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
34–35
✓ USA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.6
Projected
31–32
✗ UL lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
37–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
31–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
35–39
✓ CSUN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.4
Projected
36–40
✓ PROV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
36–37
✗ ND lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
30–34
✓ NAVY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.7
Projected
29–35
✗ LIU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 59.8
Projected
29–31
✓ BRY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
31–36
✓ NJIT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.8
Projected
31–32
✓ HOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
35–37
✓ STBK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
35–39
✓ WOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 83.1
Projected
41–42
✓ AUB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 83.4
Projected
38–46
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
30–35
✗ UTM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.0
Projected
31–31
✗ LR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
32–34
✗ TNTC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
31–36
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
30–38
✓ HOW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
33–36
✓ NORF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
37–35
✗ GCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
33–36
✗ YSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
30–33
✓ SELA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
33–33
✓ AMCC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
31–40
✓ TNST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
34–33
✗ UMES lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
31–36
✗ SEMO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
35–33
✓ COLG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
35–39
✓ NKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
34–33
✓ HARV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.2
Projected
37–41
✗ UCD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
30–39
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
34–39
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
31–37
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
35–37
✗ LIP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
32–35
✗ GRAM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
34–40
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
34–31
✗ DSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
41–30
✓ GONZ won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
40–37
✗ AKR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
35–35
✓ FAMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
39–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
33–37
✓ SOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
32–33
✗ CREI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
36–41
✗ SDST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
38–37
✗ MER lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
30–34
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
36–36
✗ NOLA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
33–34
✓ ETAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
37–37
✓ UNCO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
35–36
✗ MONT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.6
Projected
40–40
✓ UGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
37–32
✓ JKST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
37–33
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
✓ UAPB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
38–36
✗ OHIO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.5
Projected
35–43
✓ HPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.1
Projected
34–30
✓ MRMK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
35–40
✓ CSUF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
33–37
✓ WRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
32–36
✗ IONA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.9
Projected
34–31
✗ MRST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
34–36
✗ UALB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
34–34
✓ ILL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
34–32
✓ CLEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
38–33
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
35–33
✓ SEA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
35–31
✓ PAC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
33–37
✓ STAN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.4
Projected
39–26
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
31–40
✓ STMN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–37
✗ MTST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
29–35
✓ CBU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
36–35
✗ KENN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.1
Projected
41–37
✓ FLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
35–35
✗ UK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
37–35
✗ TAR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
29–36
✓ CSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
34–37
✓ LMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
33–37
✓ WEB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
33–32
✓ NMSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.9
Projected
37–39
✓ COLO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
31–37
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
34–36
✗ UCLA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
35–37
✗ UNM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
33–33
✗ UCI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
37–35
✓ PRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
36–34
✓ HOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
30–36
✓ SMC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
32–35
✓ HAW won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 20-2 · #27 9-14 · #62 |
— | — | NEB -7.3 | — | 67.9 | — | 79% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 13-10 · #63 19-3 · #20 |
— | — | UVA -5.7 | — | 70.9 | — | 73% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 16-6 · #18 11-11 · #53 |
— | — | ARK -4.0 | — | 77.7 | — | 67% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 16-6 · #14 11-11 · #89 |
— | — | LOU -5.3 | — | 74.7 | — | 72% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #111 6-15 · #145 |
— | — | TEM -1.7 | — | 68.1 | — | 57% TEM | › | |
| Half final | 6-17 · #310 8-14 · #288 |
— | — | ARMY -0.2 | — | 69.1 | — | 51% ARMY | › | |
| Half final | 16-6 · #41 15-8 · #38 |
— | — | IU -1.6 | — | 74.5 | — | 57% IU | › | |
| Half final | 17-5 · #32 13-10 · #64 |
— | — | VILL -3.0 | — | 66.7 | — | 63% VILL | › | |
| Half final | 16-7 · #68 17-6 · #48 |
— | — | NCSU -5.8 | — | 73.7 | — | 74% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 11-12 · #262 11-11 · #232 |
— | — | ELON -2.8 | — | 67.0 | — | 62% ELON | › | |
| Half final | 8-14 · #57 18-4 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -10.7 | — | 69.0 | — | 88% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 14-9 · #209 13-11 · #283 |
— | — | MASS -1.1 | — | 70.9 | — | 55% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 8-14 · #188 14-9 · #259 |
— | — | APP -2.8 | — | 61.2 | — | 62% APP | › | |
| Half final | 2-20 · #362 7-13 · #355 |
— | — | NHVN -3.8 | — | 62.6 | — | 66% NHVN | › | |
| Half final | 7-15 · #314 8-15 · #261 |
— | — | BU -3.3 | — | 72.0 | — | 64% BU | › | |
| Half final | 5-13 · #354 10-10 · #337 |
— | — | CCSU -3.2 | — | 66.4 | — | 63% CCSU | › | |
| Half final | 4-16 · #88 10-13 · #332 |
— | — | LEM -5.6 | — | 71.4 | — | 73% LEM | › | |
| Half final | 15-7 · #173 3-18 · #320 |
— | — | ETSU -8.9 | — | 68.1 | — | 83% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 15-7 · #54 11-12 · #79 |
— | — | MIZ -1.4 | — | 70.3 | — | 56% MIZ | › | |
| Half final | 8-11 · #154 6-15 · #206 |
— | — | MTSU -3.0 | — | 64.6 | — | 63% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-13 · #286 12-10 · #186 |
— | — | UVM -5.7 | — | 67.3 | — | 73% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #29 20-2 · #13 |
— | — | ISU -7.0 | — | 72.9 | — | 78% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 5-14 · #334 7-15 · #208 |
— | — | GAST -3.3 | — | 67.0 | — | 64% GAST | › | |
| Half final | 12-10 · #104 13-9 · #105 |
— | — | URI -3.2 | — | 67.2 | — | 64% URI | › | |
| Half final | 12-10 · #101 11-10 · #107 |
— | — | GW -0.9 | — | 75.9 | — | 54% GW | › | |
| Half final | 12-10 · #142 9-11 · #100 |
— | — | FOR -0.8 | — | 66.1 | — | 54% FOR | › | |
| Half final | 10-11 · #112 2-18 · #192 |
— | — | UNT -5.8 | — | 64.5 | — | 73% UNT | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #83 13-9 · #40 |
— | — | TCU -4.3 | — | 72.8 | — | 68% TCU | › | |
| Half final | 8-14 · #216 6-16 · #317 |
— | — | HC -0.1 | — | 67.0 | — | 51% HC | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #218 14-8 · #205 |
— | — | WIN -5.5 | — | 73.4 | — | 72% WIN | › | |
| Half final | 1-20 · #348 8-13 · #183 |
— | — | PRES -9.4 | — | 68.4 | — | 85% PRES | › | |
| Half final | 8-13 · #326 7-14 · #325 |
— | — | UPST -0.3 | — | 71.9 | — | 51% UPST | › | |
| Half final | 13-10 · #72 8-15 · #42 |
— | — | BTLR -0.1 | — | 75.6 | — | 51% BTLR | › | |
| Half final | 15-7 · #55 9-14 · #74 |
— | — | SMU -2.8 | — | 71.0 | — | 62% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 17-5 · #25 9-13 · #95 |
— | — | MIA -5.3 | — | 68.1 | — | 72% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 8-10 · #179 12-7 · #170 |
— | — | COLU -1.7 | — | 81.0 | — | 57% COLU | › | |
| Half final | 8-14 · #263 11-12 · #336 |
— | — | UND -1.4 | — | 76.0 | — | 56% UND | › | |
| Half final | 8-13 · #279 16-6 · #213 |
— | — | NDSU -4.9 | — | 70.2 | — | 70% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-14 · #315 4-18 · #340 |
— | — | IUIN -1.0 | — | 81.2 | — | 54% IUIN | › | |
| Half final | 8-12 · #277 11-12 · #226 |
— | — | GB -1.8 | — | 71.5 | — | 58% GB | › | |
| Half final | 17-7 · #260 12-8 · #269 |
— | — | SIE -0.6 | — | 64.3 | — | 52% SIE | › | |
| Half final | 5-17 · #346 15-9 · #241 |
— | — | QUIN -8.2 | — | 65.5 | — | 81% QUIN | › | |
| Half final | 9-15 · #311 8-16 · #330 |
— | — | SHU -0.2 | — | 76.2 | — | 51% SHU | › | |
| Half final | 7-14 · #135 9-10 · #137 |
— | — | PENN -2.3 | — | 67.7 | — | 60% PENN | › | |
| Half final | 9-13 · #243 7-13 · #275 |
— | — | CAM -1.6 | — | 74.1 | — | 57% CAM | › | |
| Half final | 5-16 · #339 7-14 · #227 |
— | — | UTC -5.2 | — | 67.3 | — | 71% UTC | › | |
| Half final | 11-11 · #46 13-9 · #11 |
— | — | TEX -5.0 | — | 70.5 | — | 70% TEX | › | |
| Half final | 7-15 · #223 8-13 · #298 |
— | — | JAX -0.4 | — | 66.9 | — | 52% JAX | › | |
| Half final | 8-14 · #266 8-13 · #295 |
— | — | FGCU -0.5 | — | 73.7 | — | 52% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 10-9 · #250 16-3 · #160 |
— | — | LIB -5.5 | — | 66.2 | — | 73% LIB | › | |
| Half final | 9-13 · #73 17-5 · #16 |
— | — | KU -9.8 | — | 71.7 | — | 86% KU | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #217 9-13 · #159 |
— | — | W&M -2.0 | — | 71.6 | — | 59% W&M | › | |
| Half final | 6-16 · #124 21-1 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -11.3 | — | 70.5 | — | 89% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 7-13 · #187 12-11 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -2.8 | — | 69.3 | — | 62% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 15-6 · #151 10-13 · #224 |
— | — | KENT -1.6 | — | 73.7 | — | 57% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 5-15 · #181 2-20 · #358 |
— | — | BALL -2.6 | — | 68.4 | — | 61% BALL | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #200 12-10 · #171 |
— | — | ARST -0.8 | — | 73.6 | — | 54% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 8-11 · #178 10-11 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -2.2 | — | 74.3 | — | 60% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 13-7 · #189 9-10 · #244 |
— | — | SHSU -1.9 | — | 66.6 | — | 58% SHSU | › | |
| Half final | 11-12 · #31 19-3 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -6.9 | — | 76.6 | — | 77% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #331 5-16 · #356 |
— | — | FDU -0.3 | — | 63.5 | — | 51% FDU | › | |
| Half final | 16-6 · #45 22-0 · #5 |
— | — | ARIZ -10.0 | — | 78.7 | — | 86% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 20-0 · #125 14-8 · #231 |
— | — | M-OH -1.6 | — | 76.3 | — | 57% M-OH | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #237 14-7 · #228 |
— | — | USA -1.7 | — | 69.2 | — | 58% USA | › | |
| Half final | 5-16 · #270 8-16 · #221 |
— | — | UL -0.6 | — | 62.6 | — | 53% UL | › | |
| Half final | 10-11 · #157 10-13 · #158 |
— | — | TOL -0.6 | — | 72.4 | — | 52% TOL | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #114 19-3 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -4.3 | — | 66.2 | — | 68% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 6-16 · #281 12-10 · #194 |
— | — | CSUN -4.5 | — | 74.4 | — | 69% CSUN | › | |
| Half final | 12-11 · #66 10-13 · #52 |
— | — | PROV -3.7 | — | 75.4 | — | 66% PROV | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #81 11-12 · #71 |
— | — | ND -1.0 | — | 72.6 | — | 54% ND | › | |
| Half final | 11-11 · #153 16-6 · #199 |
— | — | NAVY -3.9 | — | 64.6 | — | 66% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 7-15 · #349 15-8 · #324 |
— | — | LIU -6.0 | — | 63.7 | — | 74% LIU | › | |
| Half final | 5-18 · #323 5-16 · #290 |
— | — | BRY -2.3 | — | 59.8 | — | 60% BRY | › | |
| Half final | 2-19 · #272 11-12 · #316 |
— | — | NJIT -4.9 | — | 67.5 | — | 70% NJIT | › | |
| Half final | 11-11 · #165 13-9 · #166 |
— | — | HOF -1.8 | — | 62.8 | — | 58% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 6-16 · #229 12-10 · #191 |
— | — | STBK -1.8 | — | 71.3 | — | 58% STBK | › | |
| Half final | 6-14 · #215 14-8 · #248 |
— | — | WOF -3.3 | — | 73.7 | — | 64% WOF | › | |
| Half final | 15-7 · #15 14-8 · #21 |
— | — | AUB -0.6 | — | 83.1 | — | 53% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 4-18 · #333 12-11 · #175 |
— | — | QUC -7.7 | — | 83.4 | — | 80% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 9-12 · #350 16-5 · #341 |
— | — | UTM -4.7 | — | 65.1 | — | 69% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #256 7-15 · #222 |
— | — | LR -0.4 | — | 62.0 | — | 52% LR | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #361 7-14 · #282 |
— | — | TNTC -1.9 | — | 65.8 | — | 58% TNTC | › | |
| Half final | 12-8 · #257 14-6 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -5.2 | — | 67.2 | — | 71% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 4-16 · #353 10-9 · #197 |
— | — | HOW -7.4 | — | 67.8 | — | 79% HOW | › | |
| Half final | 4-12 · #357 6-14 · #319 |
— | — | NORF -2.8 | — | 68.6 | — | 62% NORF | › | |
| Half final | 15-7 · #80 9-12 · #98 |
— | — | GCU -2.2 | — | 71.3 | — | 59% GCU | › | |
| Half final | 13-10 · #168 9-12 · #265 |
— | — | YSU -2.4 | — | 69.1 | — | 60% YSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #300 5-17 · #252 |
— | — | SELA -2.9 | — | 63.6 | — | 62% SELA | › | |
| Half final | 8-11 · #238 9-13 · #285 |
— | — | AMCC -0.1 | — | 65.2 | — | 51% AMCC | › | |
| Half final | 1-20 · #365 12-8 · #245 |
— | — | TNST -8.6 | — | 71.1 | — | 83% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 6-16 · #364 6-13 · #345 |
— | — | UMES -0.9 | — | 67.1 | — | 54% UMES | › | |
| Half final | 3-18 · #304 11-10 · #306 |
— | — | SEMO -5.9 | — | 67.0 | — | 74% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 12-10 · #211 8-16 · #299 |
— | — | COLG -2.2 | — | 68.6 | — | 59% COLG | › | |
| Half final | 8-16 · #235 11-11 · #230 |
— | — | NKU -3.4 | — | 73.5 | — | 65% NKU | › | |
| Half final | 11-9 · #136 8-10 · #251 |
— | — | HARV -0.9 | — | 67.3 | — | 54% HARV | › | |
| Half final | 7-15 · #164 12-9 · #182 |
— | — | UCD -3.5 | — | 78.2 | — | 65% UCD | › | |
| Half final | 7-13 · #289 16-5 · #127 |
— | — | MCN -9.2 | — | 69.1 | — | 84% MCN | › | |
| Half final | 6-16 · #303 6-16 · #294 |
— | — | EKU -4.8 | — | 72.6 | — | 70% EKU | › | |
| Half final | 5-14 · #292 14-6 · #210 |
— | — | APSU -6.2 | — | 68.5 | — | 75% APSU | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #240 13-9 · #214 |
— | — | LIP -2.0 | — | 72.4 | — | 59% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #302 8-11 · #338 |
— | — | GRAM -2.9 | — | 67.6 | — | 62% GRAM | › | |
| Half final | 5-13 · #343 10-11 · #202 |
— | — | BCU -5.8 | — | 73.5 | — | 74% BCU | › | |
| Half final | 3-14 · #351 2-21 · #352 |
— | — | DSU -2.5 | — | 65.2 | — | 61% DSU | › | |
| Half final | 22-2 · #17 13-12 · #99 |
— | — | GONZ -11.9 | — | 70.8 | — | 90% GONZ | › | |
| Half final | 17-4 · #118 14-8 · #147 |
— | — | AKR -2.3 | — | 77.0 | — | 60% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 4-14 · #322 6-12 · #327 |
— | — | FAMU -0.4 | — | 69.6 | — | 52% FAMU | › | |
| Half final | 19-5 · #106 10-14 · #139 |
— | — | SCU -4.8 | — | 73.9 | — | 70% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 9-10 · #328 6-13 · #309 |
— | — | SOU -3.3 | — | 70.0 | — | 64% SOU | › | |
| Half final | 16-7 · #67 12-11 · #37 |
— | — | CREI -1.2 | — | 65.4 | — | 55% CREI | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #291 8-13 · #201 |
— | — | SDST -5.0 | — | 77.6 | — | 71% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #242 10-12 · #184 |
— | — | MER -1.0 | — | 74.9 | — | 54% MER | › | |
| Half final | 10-11 · #293 18-3 · #193 |
— | — | SFA -4.6 | — | 63.8 | — | 69% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 10-11 · #287 10-13 · #276 |
— | — | NOLA -0.2 | — | 72.0 | — | 51% NOLA | › | |
| Half final | 4-17 · #318 7-15 · #342 |
— | — | ETAM -0.7 | — | 66.9 | — | 53% ETAM | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #219 7-14 · #344 |
— | — | UNCO -0.3 | — | 73.2 | — | 51% UNCO | › | |
| Half final | 10-10 · #247 10-10 · #273 |
— | — | MONT -1.3 | — | 70.5 | — | 55% MONT | › | |
| Half final | 16-6 · #34 14-8 · #51 |
— | — | UGA -0.6 | — | 79.6 | — | 53% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 6-16 · #280 0-21 · #366 |
— | — | JKST -4.9 | — | 69.7 | — | 70% JKST | › | |
| Half final | 21-1 · #3 18-4 · #44 |
— | — | DUKE -4.3 | — | 70.3 | — | 68% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 4-17 · #360 7-13 · #363 |
— | — | UAPB -2.7 | — | 72.7 | — | 61% UAPB | › | |
| Half final | 11-11 · #128 6-17 · #234 |
— | — | OHIO -1.4 | — | 73.6 | — | 56% OHIO | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #246 18-4 · #90 |
— | — | HPU -8.0 | — | 77.5 | — | 81% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 15-9 · #225 2-19 · #347 |
— | — | MRMK -4.1 | — | 63.1 | — | 67% MRMK | › | |
| Half final | 6-16 · #329 9-13 · #312 |
— | — | CSUF -4.8 | — | 74.6 | — | 70% CSUF | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #249 13-9 · #180 |
— | — | WRST -4.0 | — | 70.6 | — | 67% WRST | › | |
| Half final | 9-15 · #278 14-10 · #233 |
— | — | IONA -3.2 | — | 68.0 | — | 63% IONA | › | |
| Half final | 15-7 · #236 14-10 · #239 |
— | — | MRST -2.2 | — | 64.9 | — | 59% MRST | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #307 5-16 · #301 |
— | — | UALB -2.1 | — | 69.4 | — | 59% UALB | › | |
| Half final | 20-3 · #4 19-4 · #10 |
— | — | ILL -0.2 | — | 68.5 | — | 51% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 19-4 · #35 16-6 · #92 |
— | — | CLEM -2.5 | — | 66.1 | — | 61% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 18-3 · #58 12-10 · #122 |
— | — | USU -5.5 | — | 70.4 | — | 72% USU | › | |
| Half final | 13-9 · #119 9-14 · #169 |
— | — | SEA -1.5 | — | 67.6 | — | 56% SEA | › | |
| Half final | 13-10 · #163 4-18 · #172 |
— | — | PAC -3.6 | — | 66.2 | — | 65% PAC | › | |
| Half final | 11-12 · #94 14-9 · #85 |
— | — | STAN -3.9 | — | 70.1 | — | 67% STAN | › | |
| Half final | 15-6 · #75 3-19 · #220 |
— | — | SDSU -12.5 | — | 64.4 | — | 91% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-19 · #305 16-6 · #212 |
— | — | STMN -8.7 | — | 70.9 | — | 83% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 5-17 · #254 11-10 · #162 |
— | — | MTST -3.9 | — | 70.5 | — | 66% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #253 17-6 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -5.5 | — | 63.5 | — | 73% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 11-8 · #148 9-10 · #198 |
— | — | KENN -0.7 | — | 70.8 | — | 53% KENN | › | |
| Half final | 16-6 · #1 17-5 · #28 |
— | — | FLA -4.3 | — | 78.1 | — | 68% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 16-6 · #7 16-7 · #19 |
— | — | UK -0.5 | — | 70.1 | — | 52% UK | › | |
| Half final | 7-12 · #185 5-15 · #267 |
— | — | TAR -2.0 | — | 72.6 | — | 58% TAR | › | |
| Half final | 5-16 · #143 11-10 · #87 |
— | — | CSU -6.8 | — | 65.3 | — | 77% CSU | › | |
| Half final | 8-15 · #146 11-13 · #121 |
— | — | LMU -3.3 | — | 70.8 | — | 64% LMU | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #321 9-13 · #313 |
— | — | WEB -3.9 | — | 70.4 | — | 66% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 8-11 · #133 5-15 · #190 |
— | — | NMSU -1.7 | — | 65.0 | — | 57% NMSU | › | |
| Half final | 12-11 · #60 13-10 · #65 |
— | — | COLO -1.3 | — | 75.9 | — | 56% COLO | › | |
| Half final | 10-11 · #174 16-7 · #96 |
— | — | NEV -6.2 | — | 68.5 | — | 75% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 12-11 · #56 16-7 · #26 |
— | — | UCLA -2.5 | — | 69.5 | — | 61% UCLA | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #86 17-5 · #82 |
— | — | UNM -1.6 | — | 71.4 | — | 57% UNM | › | |
| Half final | 14-7 · #149 13-8 · #134 |
— | — | UCI -0.2 | — | 65.8 | — | 51% UCI | › | |
| Half final | 12-6 · #274 6-13 · #196 |
— | — | PRST -2.5 | — | 71.6 | — | 61% PRST | › | |
| Half final | 20-2 · #2 17-5 · #24 |
— | — | HOU -1.5 | — | 69.9 | — | 56% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 13-11 · #161 19-4 · #97 |
— | — | SMC -6.3 | — | 66.1 | — | 76% SMC | › | |
| Half final | 14-8 · #123 14-5 · #140 |
— | — | HAW -3.0 | — | 67.7 | — | 63% HAW | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record