Kennedy Family Athletic Complex · at UMass Lowell · Conference game
Closing line
UML -9.5✓ UML covered by 3.5
Closing total146.5Over by 24.5
| This season | UML | |
|---|---|---|
| 3-22 | Record | 9-15 |
| 11-14 | ATS | 12-12 |
| 14-11 | O/U | 11-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: BING 71–80 UML · ✓ UML (79%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BING | 35 | 44 | 79 |
| UML | 43 | 49 | 92 |
1st half: BING 35, UML 43 (UML by 8). The model had UML by 5.3 and a total of 70.3 (actual 78).
Team stats
| BING | UML | |
|---|---|---|
| 34-54 63% | Field goals | 32-54 59% |
| 6-11 55% | 3-pointers | 8-16 50% |
| 5-11 45% | Free throws | 20-30 67% |
| 22 3 off | Rebounds | 31 10 off |
| 18 | Assists | 22 |
| 0 | Steals | 3 |
| 1 | Blocks | 0 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 5 |
| 19 | Fouls | 12 |
| 52 | Points in paint | 46 |
| 4 | Fast-break points | 3 |
Players
| BING | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wes Peterson Jr. G | 40 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 9-12 | 2-2 |
| Jeremiah Quigley G | 37 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 7-13 | 0-2 |
| Stephan Snagg F | 30 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Jackson Benigni G | 24 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| Bryson Wilson G | 23 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Zyier Beverly F | 26 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 9-11 | 0-0 |
| Jake Blackburn G | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Sayerr Senghore, Jayden Lemond, Ryan Richardson, Jayden Kelsey, Evan Ashe, Nevin Ibroci, Demetrius Lilley
| UML | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angel Montas Jr. G | 39 | 30 | 5 | 1 | 12-15 | 2-4 |
| Austin Green F | 38 | 20 | 13 | 3 | 6-9 | 0-0 |
| Xavier Spencer G | 37 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 3-6 | 2-3 |
| Darrel Yepdo G | 35 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 3-8 | 3-6 |
| Shawn Simmons II F | 27 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Victor Okojie F | 15 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| Khalil Farmer G | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: JJ Massaquoi, Isaiah Walter, Kris Johnson, Jared Frey, Keenan Bey, Jerrell Roberson II
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUML -9.5
ModelUML -9.1
Model edgeBING +0.4
L UML covered
Total
Market146.5
Model150.2
Model edgeOver 3.7
W Over
Projected score
BING 70.6 · UML 79.7
BING 79 · UML 92
Win probability
UML 79%
1st half
Spread
UML -5.3
UML -8.0
Total
70.3
78 points
Projected score
BING 32.5 · UML 37.8
BING 35 · UML 43
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUML -8.5
1 → UML
CloseUML -9.5
1 pt toward UML
Total
Open145.5
▲ 1
Close146.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
BING +390 · UML -520
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UML -8.5 · closed UML -9.5 · moved 1 toward UMLmodel UML -9
model UML -9
Opened 145.5 · closed 146.5 · moved 1 upmodel 150
model 150
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
BING 4–5 UMLUML leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · UML has won the last 2 meetings · BING 6-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2025-26 | UML 73 @ BING 68 | BING +6.5 | BING W |
| Mar 1, 2024-25 | BING 53 @ UML 79 | UML -8.5 | UML W |
| Feb 6, 2024-25 | UML 54 @ BING 66 | BING +4.5 | BING W |
| Feb 22, 2023-24 | BING 80 @ UML 87 | UML -9.5 | BING W |
| Jan 20, 2023-24 | UML 80 @ BING 60 | BING +7.5 | UML W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Binghamton
25 games played
Straight up
3-22
12% wins
Against the spread
11-14
44% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-11
56% overs · avg +5.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 47-85 | +21.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 59-67 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 70-83 | +27.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 82-90 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 52-63 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 66-75 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 80-71 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 63-78 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 67-84 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 63-103 | +24.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 61-82 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-95 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 59-60 | +20.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 53-69 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 60-78 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 82-88 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 63-79 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 63-60 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 62-79 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 64-73 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 65-73 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 74-77 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 79-67 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 134.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−16.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−10.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+14.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+7.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−16.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
−6.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+12.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−12.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
−9.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
−15.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
−13.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+2.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−11.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
+19.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
+1.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−7.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−13.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+3.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
−10.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
+5.5
5
@
UMBC
L 62-79
−5.5
7
@
NJIT
L 64-73
−0.5
12
vs
UVM
L 65-73
+3.5
14
vs
UALB
L 74-77
+1.5
19
@
BRY
W 79-67
+16.5
covered 11didn’t cover 14avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SYR
L 47-85
−21.5
8
vs
NIA
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
GTWN
L 70-83
+11.5
15
@
LONG
L 82-90
+24.5
22
vs
UMES
L 52-63
−10.5
23
@
CAN
L 66-75
+11.5
2
vs
LEH
W 80-71
+11.5
6
vs
LEM
L 63-78
−3.5
13
vs
CCSU
L 67-84
+17.5
17
@
PITT
L 63-103
+31.5
20
@
MERC
L 61-82
+10.5
23
@
ARMY
L 85-95
+39.5
3
vs
NJIT
L 65-73
−2.5
8
@
UVM
L 59-60
−21.5
10
vs
UML
L 68-73
−5.5
15
@
UALB
L 53-69
−16.5
19
vs
UMBC
L 60-78
−2.5
22
@
UNH
L 82-88
+34.5
24
@
ME
L 63-79
+17.5
29
vs
BRY
W 63-60
−7.5
5
@
UMBC
L 62-79
+2.5
7
@
NJIT
L 64-73
−3.5
12
vs
UVM
L 65-73
+1.5
14
vs
UALB
L 74-77
+14.5
19
@
BRY
W 79-67
+11.5
over 14under 11avg +5.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
UMass Lowell
24 games played
Straight up
9-15
38% wins
Against the spread
12-12
50% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-13
46% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 47-110 | +36.5 | L −26.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 67-73 | -10.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 72-86 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 75-109 | +30.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 77-87 | +21.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 66-68 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 75-64 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 60-80 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 71-75 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 87-82 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 76-88 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 62-90 | +33.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 83-71 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 77-63 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 73-68 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 64-73 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 68-77 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 56-79 | +2.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 61-66 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 91-77 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 56-81 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 89-79 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 88-69 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 78-56 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
CONN
L 47-110
−26.5
10
vs
NHVN
L 67-73
−16.5
13
@
COLU
L 72-86
−0.5
16
@
WAKE
L 75-109
−3.5
19
@
BRAD
L 77-87
+11.5
22
@
SPU
L 66-68
+6.5
26
@
STO
W 75-64
+13.5
6
@
MASS
L 60-80
−8.5
13
@
QUIN
L 71-75
+8.5
16
vs
SHU
W 87-82
+7.5
21
@
BU
L 76-88
−6.5
29
@
IOWA
L 62-90
+5.5
3
vs
UALB
W 83-71
+9.5
8
@
BRY
W 77-63
+16.5
10
@
BING
W 73-68
−1.5
15
vs
NJIT
L 64-73
−17.5
22
vs
UVM
L 68-77
−4.5
24
@
UMBC
L 56-79
−20.5
29
@
UNH
L 61-66
−1.5
31
vs
ME
W 91-77
+9.5
5
@
NJIT
L 56-81
−23.5
7
@
UALB
W 89-79
+14.5
12
vs
BRY
W 88-69
+14.5
19
vs
UNH
W 78-56
+18.5
covered 12didn’t cover 12avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
CONN
L 47-110
+5.5
10
vs
NHVN
L 67-73
−2.5
13
@
COLU
L 72-86
+1.5
16
@
WAKE
L 75-109
+18.5
19
@
BRAD
L 77-87
+14.5
22
@
SPU
L 66-68
−13.5
26
@
STO
W 75-64
−9.5
6
@
MASS
L 60-80
−15.5
13
@
QUIN
L 71-75
−7.5
16
vs
SHU
W 87-82
+17.5
21
@
BU
L 76-88
+18.5
29
@
IOWA
L 62-90
+6.5
3
vs
UALB
W 83-71
+3.5
8
@
BRY
W 77-63
−3.5
10
@
BING
W 73-68
−5.5
15
vs
NJIT
L 64-73
−8.5
22
vs
UVM
L 68-77
−0.5
24
@
UMBC
L 56-79
−16.5
29
@
UNH
L 61-66
−19.5
31
vs
ME
W 91-77
+31.5
5
@
NJIT
L 56-81
−12.5
7
@
UALB
W 89-79
+24.5
12
vs
BRY
W 88-69
+15.5
19
vs
UNH
W 78-56
−17.5
over 11under 13avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Binghamton
3-22 overall · 2-11 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Bryant79–67
- Lvs UAlbany74–77
- Lvs Vermont65–73
- L@ NJIT64–73
- L@ UMBC62–79
2 days since their last game.
UMass Lowell
9-15 overall · 7-5 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs New Hampshire78–56
- Wvs Bryant88–69
- W@ UAlbany89–79
- L@ NJIT56–81
- Wvs Maine91–77
2 days since their last game.