Mackey Arena · at Purdue · Conference game
Closing line
PUR -5.5✓ MSU covered by 7.5
Closing total143.5Over by 6.5
| This season | PUR | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-5 | Record | 22-5 |
| 13-14 | ATS | 13-14 |
| 11-16 | O/U | 12-15 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: MSU 69–76 PUR · ✗ PUR (72%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSU | 36 | 40 | 76 |
| PUR | 39 | 35 | 74 |
1st half: MSU 36, PUR 39 (PUR by 3). The model had PUR by 3.9 and a total of 68.0 (actual 75).
Team stats
| MSU | PUR | |
|---|---|---|
| 29-55 53% | Field goals | 28-57 49% |
| 6-19 32% | 3-pointers | 12-25 48% |
| 12-16 75% | Free throws | 6-9 67% |
| 25 6 off | Rebounds | 27 8 off |
| 15 | Assists | 23 |
| 6 | Steals | 3 |
| 1 | Blocks | 3 |
| 6 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 13 | Fouls | 15 |
| 40 | Points in paint | 32 |
| 10 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| MSU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Fears Jr. G | 36 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 5-10 | 1-3 |
| Jordan Scott F | 34 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| Coen Carr F | 31 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-2 |
| Carson Cooper C | 30 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-0 |
| Jaxon Kohler F | 25 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 3-10 | 1-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Cam Ward F | 20 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| Kur Teng G | 20 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 4-8 | 3-6 |
| Denham Wojcik G | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Nick Sanders, Jesse McCulloch, Brennan Walton, Colin Walton, Divine Ugochukwu, Trey Fort, Kaleb Glenn
| PUR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braden Smith G | 37 | 12 | 5 | 10 | 4-10 | 2-7 |
| Trey Kaufman-Renn F | 33 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 4-8 | 0-0 |
| Fletcher Loyer G | 31 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 3-7 | 2-5 |
| Oscar Cluff C | 21 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 5-9 | 0-0 |
| C.J. Cox G | 19 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jack Benter G | 17 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 4-6 | 3-5 |
| Omer Mayer G | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-3 |
| Gicarri Harris G | 15 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| Daniel Jacobsen C | 11 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jack Lusk, Aaron Fine, Jace Rayl, Antione West Jr, Sam King, Raleigh Burgess, Liam Murphy
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenPUR -5.5
no move
ClosePUR -5.5
No change since the open
Total
Open139.5
▲ 4
Close143.5
Up 4 since the open
Moneyline
MSU +225 · PUR -278
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened PUR -5.5 · unchangedmodel PUR -7
model PUR -7
Opened 139.5 · closed 143.5 · moved 4 upmodel 145
model 145
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | PUR -5.5 | PUR -6.8 | PUR +1.3 | L MSU covered |
| Total | 143.5 | 145.2 | Over 1.7 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | MSU 69.2 · PUR 76 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PUR -3.9 | PUR -3.0 |
| 1H total | 68.0 | 75 |
| 1H projected score | MSU 32 · PUR 35.9 | MSU 36 · PUR 39 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 7 since 2021-22
MSU 2–5 PURPUR leads · 7 games since 2021-22 · MSU 6-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2024-25 | PUR 66 @ MSU 75 | MSU -3.5 | MSU W |
| Mar 15, 2023-24 | MSU 62 vs PUR 67 | PUR -7.5 | MSU W |
| Mar 2, 2023-24 | MSU 74 @ PUR 80 | PUR -10.5 | MSU W |
| Jan 29, 2022-23 | MSU 61 @ PUR 77 | PUR -8.5 | PUR W |
| Jan 16, 2022-23 | PUR 64 @ MSU 63 | MSU +3.5 | MSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Michigan St
27 games played
Straight up
22-5
81% wins
Against the spread
13-14
48% covers · avg +1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-16
41% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-69 | -22.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 69-66 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 79-60 | -24.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 83-66 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 84-56 | -30.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-56 | -19.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 74-58 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 71-52 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 60-66 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 76-72 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 92-69 | -23.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 79-70 | -19.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 114-97 | -23.5 | L −6.5 | 160.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 56-58 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 80-51 | -11.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 76-66 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 81-60 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-63 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 68-52 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 91-48 | -18.5 | W +24.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 88-79 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 73-76 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-82 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 71-92 | -1.5 | L −22.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-59 | -8.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 66-60 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
COLG
W 80-69
−11.5
8
vs
ARK
W 69-66
+0.5
13
vs
SJSU
W 79-60
−5.5
18
vs
UK
W 83-66
+20.5
21
vs
DETM
W 84-56
−2.5
25
vs
ECU
W 89-56
+13.5
27
vs
UNC
W 74-58
+14.5
2
vs
IOWA
W 71-52
+13.5
6
vs
DUKE
L 60-66
−4.5
13
@
PSU
W 76-72
−8.5
16
vs
TOL
W 92-69
−0.5
20
vs
OAK
W 79-70
−10.5
29
vs
COR
W 114-97
−6.5
2
@
NEB
L 56-58
+0.5
5
vs
USC
W 80-51
+17.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-66
−3.5
13
vs
IU
W 81-60
+14.5
17
@
WASH
W 80-63
+13.5
20
@
ORE
W 68-52
+5.5
24
vs
MD
W 91-48
+24.5
27
@
RUTG
W 88-79
−5.5
30
vs
MICH
L 71-83
−9.5
4
@
MINN
L 73-76
−11.5
7
vs
ILL
W 85-82
+1.5
13
@
WIS
L 71-92
−22.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 82-59
+14.5
22
vs
OSU
W 66-60
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 14avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
COLG
W 80-69
+4.5
8
vs
ARK
W 69-66
−20.5
13
vs
SJSU
W 79-60
−4.5
18
vs
UK
W 83-66
−3.5
21
vs
DETM
W 84-56
−9.5
25
vs
ECU
W 89-56
+4.5
27
vs
UNC
W 74-58
−20.5
2
vs
IOWA
W 71-52
−10.5
6
vs
DUKE
L 60-66
−15.5
13
@
PSU
W 76-72
+2.5
16
vs
TOL
W 92-69
+10.5
20
vs
OAK
W 79-70
−6.5
29
vs
COR
W 114-97
+50.5
2
@
NEB
L 56-58
−32.5
5
vs
USC
W 80-51
−20.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-66
−1.5
13
vs
IU
W 81-60
−4.5
17
@
WASH
W 80-63
−2.5
20
@
ORE
W 68-52
−19.5
24
vs
MD
W 91-48
−2.5
27
@
RUTG
W 88-79
+28.5
30
vs
MICH
L 71-83
+4.5
4
@
MINN
L 73-76
+12.5
7
vs
ILL
W 85-82
+24.5
13
@
WIS
L 71-92
+13.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 82-59
+1.5
22
vs
OSU
W 66-60
−20.5
over 11under 16avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Purdue
27 games played
Straight up
22-5
81% wins
Against the spread
13-14
48% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-15
44% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 82-51 | -33.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-77 | -31.5 | L −21.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 13 | @ | W 87-80 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 97-79 | -18.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 80-71 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 86-56 | -3.5 | W +26.5 | 153.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 109-62 | -40.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 81-65 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 58-81 | -4.5 | L −27.5 | 154.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-57 | -19.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 79-59 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 88-60 | -7.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 101-60 | -24.5 | W +16.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 89-73 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-73 | -16.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 93-85 | -22.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 79-72 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 69-64 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 67-69 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 82-88 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 67-72 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 93-63 | -15.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 68-64 | -19.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 80-77 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-57 | -2.5 | W +18.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 80-91 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 93-64 | -11.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
EVAN
W 82-51
−2.5
7
vs
OAK
W 87-77
−21.5
13
@
ALA
W 87-80
+10.5
16
vs
AKR
W 97-79
−0.5
20
vs
MEM
W 80-71
−5.5
21
vs
TTU
W 86-56
+26.5
28
vs
EIU
W 109-62
+6.5
2
@
RUTG
W 81-65
+2.5
6
vs
ISU
L 58-81
−27.5
10
vs
MINN
W 85-57
+8.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 79-59
+3.5
20
vs
AUB
W 88-60
+20.5
29
vs
KENT
W 101-60
+16.5
3
@
WIS
W 89-73
+10.5
7
vs
WASH
W 81-73
−8.5
10
vs
PSU
W 93-85
−14.5
14
vs
IOWA
W 79-72
−3.5
17
@
USC
W 69-64
−4.5
20
@
UCLA
L 67-69
−7.5
24
vs
ILL
L 82-88
−11.5
27
@
IU
L 67-72
−9.5
1
@
MD
W 93-63
+14.5
7
vs
ORE
W 68-64
−15.5
10
@
NEB
W 80-77
+5.5
14
@
IOWA
W 78-57
+18.5
17
vs
MICH
L 80-91
−8.5
20
vs
IU
W 93-64
+17.5
covered 13didn’t cover 14avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
EVAN
W 82-51
−17.5
7
vs
OAK
W 87-77
+5.5
13
@
ALA
W 87-80
−5.5
16
vs
AKR
W 97-79
+12.5
20
vs
MEM
W 80-71
−5.5
21
vs
TTU
W 86-56
−11.5
28
vs
EIU
W 109-62
+29.5
2
@
RUTG
W 81-65
−0.5
6
vs
ISU
L 58-81
−15.5
10
vs
MINN
W 85-57
−1.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 79-59
−16.5
20
vs
AUB
W 88-60
−4.5
29
vs
KENT
W 101-60
+5.5
3
@
WIS
W 89-73
+8.5
7
vs
WASH
W 81-73
−0.5
10
vs
PSU
W 93-85
+25.5
14
vs
IOWA
W 79-72
+5.5
17
@
USC
W 69-64
−22.5
20
@
UCLA
L 67-69
−11.5
24
vs
ILL
L 82-88
+17.5
27
@
IU
L 67-72
−11.5
1
@
MD
W 93-63
+7.5
7
vs
ORE
W 68-64
−12.5
10
@
NEB
W 80-77
+10.5
14
@
IOWA
W 78-57
−7.5
17
vs
MICH
L 80-91
+14.5
20
vs
IU
W 93-64
+6.5
over 12under 15avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Michigan St
22-5 overall · 12-4 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Ohio State66–60
- Wvs UCLA82–59
- L@ Wisconsin71–92
- Wvs Illinois85–82
- L@ Minnesota73–76
4 days since their last game.
Purdue
22-5 overall · 12-4 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Indiana93–64
- Lvs Michigan80–91
- W@ Iowa78–57
- W@ Nebraska80–77
- Wvs Oregon68–64
6 days since their last game.