No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
30–37
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
29–39
✓ HOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.2
Projected
27–35
✗ CONN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
32–34
✗ URI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
37–32
✓ IOWA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
33–35
✗ AMER lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
38–34
✓ NCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
39–36
✓ FSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
34–36
✗ HC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
30–37
✓ VCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
33–36
✓ LAF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.2
Projected
34–40
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
32–34
✓ WAG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
33–38
✓ CCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
32–32
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
30–36
✓ LIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
36–35
✓ UMBC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.1
Projected
37–36
✓ MIZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
34–36
✗ MTSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
36–37
✗ XAV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
36–33
✗ LOU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
39–38
✗ PFW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
33–35
✓ LEH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
32–36
✓ GMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
34–38
✓ CIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
32–35
✗ NU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
33–31
✓ UCLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
32–39
✓ UPST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
34–37
✓ UNCA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
35–35
✗ UNM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
38–37
✓ SDST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
34–34
✗ YSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
35–38
✗ BGSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
34–37
✗ BUF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.3
Projected
31–30
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
32–35
✓ UALB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.7
Projected
32–31
✗ ME lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.6
Projected
39–36
✓ W&M won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
32–35
✗ TOW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
31–38
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
32–39
✓ UTC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
38–39
✓ CARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
34–36
✓ WGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
37–34
✗ FGCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
37–35
✗ APSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
34–35
✗ UTM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
37–37
✓ UK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
30–38
✓ MIA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
37–37
✗ LONG lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
36–41
✗ OAK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
35–37
✓ MONM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
34–39
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
33–35
✗ LT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
31–36
✓ WKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
35–38
✓ ASU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
36–37
✗ SOU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.2
Projected
35–42
✓ UGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
33–36
✗ ISU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
37–34
✗ NEB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
27–39
✓ WYO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
34–31
✓ VAL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
35–38
✗ PORT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
39–34
✓ HOW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
36–33
✗ RICH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
37–37
✓ WIS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
32–38
✓ WIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
33–35
✗ CAL lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
32–36
✓ NAVY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
37–38
✗ OHIO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
32–33
✓ BRY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
34–36
✗ HAMP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
34–34
✓ MONT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
36–37
✓ IDHO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–37
✓ EWU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
38–37
✓ LIP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
31–34
✓ LR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
29–37
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
33–38
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
38–39
✓ TA&M won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.4
Projected
32–32
✗ NCCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
30–34
✓ UMES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
36–35
✗ ETSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.3
Projected
35–30
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
37–32
✓ LIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 59.7
Projected
28–32
✓ SIUE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.2
Projected
31–31
✓ BALL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
32–34
✓ NICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
36–32
✓ NORF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
36–31
✓ CSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
33–33
✗ LAM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
32–39
✓ NDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
32–36
✗ SEMO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.9
Projected
33–38
✓ KENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
36–32
✗ BYU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
35–38
✓ PV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.0
Projected
39–40
✗ CREI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
36–35
✗ FUR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
31–37
✗ RGV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
34–38
✓ SHSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
36–39
✓ TXSO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
33–34
✗ AAMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
35–38
✗ WAKE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.0
Projected
31–34
✗ GRAM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
33–34
✗ PAC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
33–34
✓ PRIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
38–35
✗ SMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
35–40
✓ COR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
37–34
✓ YALE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.1
Projected
33–33
✗ PENN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
34–39
✓ SAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
39–34
✓ MCN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
36–37
✗ IDST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
36–39
✗ LSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
37–36
✓ JAX won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.8
Projected
33–32
✗ LIB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
39–39
✓ TENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.1
Projected
38–36
✓ TCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
31–39
✓ UAPB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.2
Projected
30–33
✗ AMCC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
35–36
✓ NKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.2
Projected
30–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
38–35
✗ HAW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
32–37
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
34–41
✗ SLU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
38–34
✗ WSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
32–41
✓ SCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
38–38
✓ BAY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
37–33
✓ BOIS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
38–36
✗ CSUN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
35–34
✓ ORU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
34–40
✓ STMN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.4
Projected
36–42
✓ FLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
33–39
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
33–40
✗ AUB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
37–36
✗ UTU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.7
Projected
32–32
✓ LMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
31–35
✓ CBU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
36–35
✓ LBSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
37–35
✓ NEV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
32–38
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.4
Projected
35–40
✓ UCSD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
36–33
✓ GONZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
32–35
✓ UCI won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 25-3 · #20 26-2 · #3 |
— | — | DUKE -7.4 | — | 67.5 | — | 79% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 16-12 · #65 23-5 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -10.0 | — | 67.1 | — | 86% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 19-9 · #67 26-3 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -7.8 | — | 61.2 | — | 80% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 16-10 · #114 15-13 · #105 |
— | — | URI -1.7 | — | 66.1 | — | 57% URI | › | |
| Half final | 20-8 · #43 11-17 · #78 |
— | — | IOWA -5.4 | — | 69.1 | — | 72% IOWA | › | |
| Half final | 13-16 · #261 14-14 · #153 |
— | — | AMER -1.6 | — | 68.0 | — | 57% AMER | › | |
| Half final | 19-9 · #48 12-16 · #71 |
— | — | NCSU -3.6 | — | 71.9 | — | 65% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 14-14 · #81 11-17 · #94 |
— | — | FSU -3.0 | — | 74.1 | — | 63% FSU | › | |
| Half final | 9-19 · #314 8-20 · #317 |
— | — | HC -1.3 | — | 69.7 | — | 55% HC | › | |
| Half final | 13-12 · #100 21-7 · #61 |
— | — | VCU -7.0 | — | 67.5 | — | 78% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 9-19 · #288 9-20 · #310 |
— | — | LAF -2.6 | — | 68.4 | — | 61% LAF | › | |
| Half final | 7-20 · #315 18-10 · #168 |
— | — | RMU -6.5 | — | 74.2 | — | 76% RMU | › | |
| Half final | 6-23 · #362 9-16 · #354 |
— | — | WAG -2.6 | — | 65.8 | — | 61% WAG | › | |
| Half final | 5-23 · #88 15-11 · #337 |
— | — | CCSU -5.6 | — | 70.7 | — | 73% CCSU | › | |
| Half final | 14-15 · #332 10-17 · #355 |
— | — | NHVN -0.1 | — | 63.8 | — | 51% NHVN | › | |
| Half final | 8-19 · #356 20-10 · #324 |
— | — | LIU -5.6 | — | 65.8 | — | 73% LIU | › | |
| Half final | 17-8 · #264 10-16 · #307 |
— | — | UMBC -1.1 | — | 70.4 | — | 55% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 19-9 · #54 13-15 · #53 |
— | — | MIZ -0.9 | — | 73.1 | — | 54% MIZ | › | |
| Half final | 10-14 · #133 11-14 · #154 |
— | — | MTSU -2.1 | — | 69.5 | — | 59% MTSU | › | |
| Half final | 13-15 · #64 13-15 · #49 |
— | — | XAV -1.2 | — | 73.0 | — | 55% XAV | › | |
| Half final | 20-8 · #14 20-8 · #35 |
— | — | LOU -2.2 | — | 69.1 | — | 60% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 13-14 · #249 5-23 · #340 |
— | — | PFW -1.5 | — | 76.8 | — | 57% PFW | › | |
| Half final | 9-21 · #299 12-16 · #216 |
— | — | LEH -2.5 | — | 68.0 | — | 61% LEH | › | |
| Half final | 14-13 · #142 20-7 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -3.2 | — | 67.9 | — | 64% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 17-11 · #45 15-13 · #30 |
— | — | CIN -3.3 | — | 71.7 | — | 64% CIN | › | |
| Half final | 11-17 · #57 12-16 · #59 |
— | — | NU -2.4 | — | 67.1 | — | 60% NU | › | |
| Half final | 19-9 · #26 13-15 · #70 |
— | — | UCLA -1.6 | — | 64.5 | — | 57% UCLA | › | |
| Half final | 1-26 · #348 9-18 · #325 |
— | — | UPST -7.6 | — | 71.1 | — | 80% UPST | › | |
| Half final | 11-16 · #326 11-15 · #271 |
— | — | UNCA -2.6 | — | 71.1 | — | 61% UNCA | › | |
| Half final | 18-8 · #75 20-7 · #82 |
— | — | UNM -0.5 | — | 70.2 | — | 52% UNM | › | |
| Half final | 11-16 · #201 12-15 · #291 |
— | — | SDST -1.6 | — | 74.6 | — | 57% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 12-15 · #265 14-14 · #226 |
— | — | YSU -0.4 | — | 67.5 | — | 52% YSU | › | |
| Half final | 14-14 · #209 13-13 · #200 |
— | — | BGSU -2.2 | — | 72.9 | — | 60% BGSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-19 · #270 14-12 · #237 |
— | — | BUF -2.9 | — | 71.5 | — | 62% BUF | › | |
| Half final | 12-16 · #331 9-19 · #349 |
— | — | MERC -0.7 | — | 61.3 | — | 53% MERC | › | |
| Half final | 6-19 · #286 7-19 · #301 |
— | — | UALB -3.4 | — | 66.7 | — | 65% UALB | › | |
| Half final | 7-21 · #323 4-23 · #272 |
— | — | ME -0.8 | — | 62.7 | — | 54% ME | › | |
| Half final | 15-11 · #217 9-16 · #275 |
— | — | W&M -3.3 | — | 75.6 | — | 64% W&M | › | |
| Half final | 11-16 · #243 13-14 · #165 |
— | — | TOW -2.6 | — | 66.7 | — | 61% TOW | › | |
| Half final | 6-21 · #339 17-11 · #248 |
— | — | WOF -7.2 | — | 69.1 | — | 78% WOF | › | |
| Half final | 3-24 · #320 9-18 · #227 |
— | — | UTC -6.7 | — | 70.4 | — | 77% UTC | › | |
| Half final | 17-12 · #175 17-11 · #240 |
— | — | CARK -1.6 | — | 76.6 | — | 57% CARK | › | |
| Half final | 7-19 · #292 11-16 · #298 |
— | — | WGA -2.2 | — | 70.1 | — | 59% WGA | › | |
| Half final | 12-16 · #266 8-20 · #303 |
— | — | FGCU -3.1 | — | 71.6 | — | 63% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 19-7 · #210 9-18 · #295 |
— | — | APSU -2.1 | — | 72.1 | — | 59% APSU | › | |
| Half final | 17-9 · #245 18-9 · #341 |
— | — | UTM -1.4 | — | 68.6 | — | 56% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 22-6 · #22 18-10 · #19 |
— | — | UK -0.4 | — | 74.0 | — | 52% UK | › | |
| Half final | 10-18 · #95 22-6 · #25 |
— | — | MIA -8.5 | — | 67.9 | — | 82% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 13-14 · #246 12-15 · #218 |
— | — | LONG -0.6 | — | 73.8 | — | 53% LONG | › | |
| Half final | 12-14 · #277 15-14 · #204 |
— | — | OAK -5.0 | — | 76.3 | — | 71% OAK | › | |
| Half final | 12-15 · #232 14-14 · #155 |
— | — | MONM -2.1 | — | 71.5 | — | 59% MONM | › | |
| Half final | 6-19 · #196 13-13 · #162 |
— | — | MTST -5.0 | — | 73.4 | — | 71% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #178 13-12 · #244 |
— | — | LT -1.3 | — | 68.1 | — | 56% LT | › | |
| Half final | 7-18 · #190 15-11 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -4.9 | — | 67.5 | — | 70% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 10-18 · #73 14-14 · #60 |
— | — | ASU -3.4 | — | 73.0 | — | 64% ASU | › | |
| Half final | 15-13 · #202 10-15 · #309 |
— | — | SOU -0.7 | — | 72.8 | — | 53% SOU | › | |
| Half final | 12-16 · #79 19-9 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -6.9 | — | 76.2 | — | 77% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 21-7 · #12 24-4 · #13 |
— | — | ISU -3.3 | — | 69.2 | — | 64% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 24-4 · #27 17-10 · #36 |
— | — | NEB -3.2 | — | 70.6 | — | 64% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 3-25 · #220 14-13 · #122 |
— | — | WYO -12.0 | — | 66.0 | — | 90% WYO | › | |
| Half final | 16-13 · #176 4-23 · #255 |
— | — | VAL -2.8 | — | 65.3 | — | 62% VAL | › | |
| Half final | 9-19 · #146 10-18 · #169 |
— | — | PORT -2.2 | — | 72.8 | — | 59% PORT | › | |
| Half final | 14-10 · #197 9-14 · #345 |
— | — | HOW -5.3 | — | 72.6 | — | 72% HOW | › | |
| Half final | 14-13 · #104 6-22 · #113 |
— | — | RICH -2.6 | — | 69.0 | — | 61% RICH | › | |
| Half final | 19-9 · #41 14-14 · #56 |
— | — | WIS -0.3 | — | 73.4 | — | 51% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 11-16 · #183 17-10 · #205 |
— | — | WIN -5.4 | — | 69.6 | — | 72% WIN | › | |
| Half final | 10-18 · #74 19-8 · #92 |
— | — | CAL -2.4 | — | 67.3 | — | 60% CAL | › | |
| Half final | 15-13 · #211 22-6 · #199 |
— | — | NAVY -4.0 | — | 67.6 | — | 67% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 13-13 · #157 13-13 · #128 |
— | — | OHIO -0.9 | — | 74.7 | — | 54% OHIO | › | |
| Half final | 14-14 · #316 6-20 · #290 |
— | — | BRY -0.4 | — | 65.2 | — | 52% BRY | › | |
| Half final | 6-21 · #229 10-17 · #159 |
— | — | HAMP -1.8 | — | 69.4 | — | 58% HAMP | › | |
| Half final | 15-9 · #274 12-13 · #273 |
— | — | MONT -0.1 | — | 67.3 | — | 51% MONT | › | |
| Half final | 15-11 · #219 13-13 · #247 |
— | — | IDHO -1.4 | — | 73.0 | — | 56% IDHO | › | |
| Half final | 7-19 · #321 11-17 · #254 |
— | — | EWU -5.0 | — | 69.3 | — | 71% EWU | › | |
| Half final | 16-12 · #214 9-19 · #294 |
— | — | LIP -1.4 | — | 74.5 | — | 56% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 5-22 · #304 9-19 · #222 |
— | — | LR -3.0 | — | 65.3 | — | 63% LR | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #253 18-7 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -7.2 | — | 66.0 | — | 78% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 21-7 · #16 26-2 · #5 |
— | — | ARIZ -5.7 | — | 71.2 | — | 73% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 16-11 · #11 19-9 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -0.9 | — | 77.8 | — | 54% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 6-16 · #357 3-19 · #351 |
— | — | NCCU -0.4 | — | 64.4 | — | 52% NCCU | › | |
| Half final | 5-20 · #353 6-20 · #364 |
— | — | UMES -3.3 | — | 63.8 | — | 64% UMES | › | |
| Half final | 19-9 · #173 15-12 · #242 |
— | — | ETSU -0.3 | — | 71.2 | — | 51% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 23-4 · #193 9-18 · #300 |
— | — | SFA -4.8 | — | 64.3 | — | 70% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 13-14 · #258 2-25 · #365 |
— | — | LIN -5.6 | — | 69.2 | — | 73% LIN | › | |
| Half final | 9-18 · #361 15-12 · #256 |
— | — | SIUE -3.7 | — | 59.7 | — | 66% SIUE | › | |
| Half final | 7-19 · #181 7-18 · #334 |
— | — | BALL -0.1 | — | 62.2 | — | 50% NIU | › | |
| Half final | 7-21 · #252 11-17 · #285 |
— | — | NICH -1.8 | — | 66.3 | — | 58% NICH | › | |
| Half final | 10-14 · #319 6-21 · #352 |
— | — | NORF -4.5 | — | 67.9 | — | 69% NORF | › | |
| Half final | 17-10 · #87 7-20 · #143 |
— | — | CSU -4.3 | — | 67.1 | — | 68% CSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-17 · #293 8-18 · #289 |
— | — | LAM -0.3 | — | 65.7 | — | 51% LAM | › | |
| Half final | 13-15 · #336 20-7 · #213 |
— | — | NDSU -6.6 | — | 71.5 | — | 76% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-17 · #282 15-12 · #306 |
— | — | SEMO -4.5 | — | 68.2 | — | 69% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 9-18 · #206 14-11 · #148 |
— | — | KENN -5.7 | — | 70.9 | — | 73% KENN | › | |
| Half final | 20-8 · #24 16-12 · #47 |
— | — | BYU -3.4 | — | 68.2 | — | 64% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 7-20 · #360 8-17 · #343 |
— | — | PV -2.8 | — | 73.2 | — | 62% PV | › | |
| Half final | 13-15 · #52 14-15 · #37 |
— | — | CREI -1.2 | — | 79.0 | — | 55% CREI | › | |
| Half final | 16-11 · #152 11-15 · #215 |
— | — | FUR -0.6 | — | 70.5 | — | 52% FUR | › | |
| Half final | 9-19 · #342 14-13 · #287 |
— | — | RGV -6.0 | — | 67.4 | — | 74% RGV | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #250 17-8 · #189 |
— | — | SHSU -4.5 | — | 71.5 | — | 69% SHSU | › | |
| Half final | 9-19 · #280 9-16 · #322 |
— | — | TXSO -3.4 | — | 74.4 | — | 64% TXSO | › | |
| Half final | 8-19 · #302 13-12 · #328 |
— | — | AAMU -1.2 | — | 67.1 | — | 55% AAMU | › | |
| Half final | 15-13 · #63 14-14 · #89 |
— | — | WAKE -2.0 | — | 72.9 | — | 59% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #327 10-16 · #338 |
— | — | GRAM -3.0 | — | 64.0 | — | 63% GRAM | › | |
| Half final | 14-15 · #161 15-13 · #163 |
— | — | PAC -0.9 | — | 66.1 | — | 54% PAC | › | |
| Half final | 9-14 · #251 7-19 · #135 |
— | — | PRIN -1.3 | — | 67.4 | — | 55% PRIN | › | |
| Half final | 19-9 · #55 17-11 · #85 |
— | — | SMU -2.6 | — | 73.3 | — | 61% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 7-16 · #156 11-12 · #179 |
— | — | COR -4.8 | — | 74.8 | — | 70% COR | › | |
| Half final | 19-5 · #126 14-10 · #170 |
— | — | YALE -3.2 | — | 71.2 | — | 64% YALE | › | |
| Half final | 15-10 · #136 13-11 · #137 |
— | — | PENN -0.2 | — | 65.1 | — | 51% PENN | › | |
| Half final | 11-17 · #284 15-13 · #184 |
— | — | SAM -4.8 | — | 73.7 | — | 70% SAM | › | |
| Half final | 22-5 · #127 14-15 · #276 |
— | — | MCN -5.3 | — | 72.4 | — | 72% MCN | › | |
| Half final | 13-14 · #313 9-17 · #344 |
— | — | IDST -0.4 | — | 72.7 | — | 52% IDST | › | |
| Half final | 14-14 · #31 15-13 · #51 |
— | — | LSU -2.4 | — | 75.1 | — | 60% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 9-19 · #223 5-23 · #333 |
— | — | JAX -1.4 | — | 72.4 | — | 56% JAX | › | |
| Half final | 20-5 · #160 11-14 · #198 |
— | — | LIB -1.8 | — | 64.8 | — | 58% LIB | › | |
| Half final | 21-7 · #15 20-8 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -0.5 | — | 77.8 | — | 52% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 18-10 · #40 11-17 · #83 |
— | — | TCU -1.9 | — | 73.1 | — | 58% TCU | › | |
| Half final | 1-27 · #366 10-16 · #363 |
— | — | UAPB -7.6 | — | 70.5 | — | 80% UAPB | › | |
| Half final | 8-19 · #318 11-14 · #238 |
— | — | AMCC -3.5 | — | 63.2 | — | 65% AMCC | › | |
| Half final | 17-11 · #180 15-12 · #230 |
— | — | NKU -1.2 | — | 71.7 | — | 55% NKU | › | |
| Half final | 15-12 · #191 17-10 · #166 |
— | — | HOF -5.9 | — | 65.2 | — | 74% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 18-7 · #140 13-14 · #312 |
— | — | HAW -3.2 | — | 73.4 | — | 63% HAW | › | |
| Half final | 22-6 · #32 22-6 · #9 |
— | — | SJU -4.8 | — | 69.4 | — | 70% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 14-12 · #107 24-3 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -7.3 | — | 75.5 | — | 79% SLU | › | |
| Half final | 11-18 · #139 6-22 · #172 |
— | — | WSU -3.9 | — | 72.0 | — | 66% WSU | › | |
| Half final | 16-14 · #99 22-7 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -9.1 | — | 72.2 | — | 84% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 13-14 · #29 20-7 · #39 |
— | — | UCF -0.1 | — | 76.6 | — | 50% UCF | › | |
| Half final | 16-10 · #86 11-16 · #174 |
— | — | BOIS -3.7 | — | 69.9 | — | 66% BOIS | › | |
| Half final | 16-11 · #194 7-21 · #281 |
— | — | CSUN -2.3 | — | 73.7 | — | 60% CSUN | › | |
| Half final | 5-22 · #305 1-25 · #335 |
— | — | ORU -1.6 | — | 68.6 | — | 57% ORU | › | |
| Half final | 11-15 · #279 19-8 · #212 |
— | — | STMN -6.1 | — | 73.7 | — | 75% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 21-7 · #18 22-6 · #1 |
— | — | FLA -5.6 | — | 78.4 | — | 73% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 18-10 · #68 22-6 · #44 |
— | — | UNC -5.7 | — | 71.5 | — | 73% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 11-17 · #46 15-13 · #21 |
— | — | AUB -6.3 | — | 73.0 | — | 75% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 15-12 · #268 6-19 · #267 |
— | — | UTU -0.8 | — | 72.7 | — | 54% UTU | › | |
| Half final | 16-12 · #119 14-15 · #121 |
— | — | LMU -0.1 | — | 63.7 | — | 50% LMU | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #185 20-8 · #203 |
— | — | CBU -3.7 | — | 66.2 | — | 66% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 6-21 · #297 6-21 · #329 |
— | — | LBSU -1.1 | — | 71.3 | — | 55% LBSU | › | |
| Half final | 19-9 · #96 13-14 · #98 |
— | — | NEV -1.3 | — | 72.1 | — | 56% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 18-10 · #80 22-5 · #58 |
— | — | USU -5.1 | — | 69.9 | — | 71% USU | › | |
| Half final | 11-16 · #164 18-9 · #123 |
— | — | UCSD -5.1 | — | 75.4 | — | 71% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 28-2 · #17 25-4 · #97 |
— | — | GONZ -3.3 | — | 68.4 | — | 64% GONZ | › | |
| Half final | 16-11 · #134 17-10 · #149 |
— | — | UCI -2.8 | — | 66.1 | — | 62% UCI | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record