Spiro Sports Center · at Wagner · Conference game
Closing line
WAG -4.5✓ WAG covered by 14.5
Closing total134.5Over by 6.5
| This season | WAG | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-23 | Record | 9-16 |
| 14-15 | ATS | 14-11 |
| 13-16 | O/U | 14-11 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CHST 68–73 WAG · ✓ WAG (66%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHST | 24 | 37 | 61 |
| WAG | 42 | 38 | 80 |
1st half: CHST 24, WAG 42 (WAG by 18). The model had WAG by 2.6 and a total of 65.8 (actual 66).
Team stats
| CHST | WAG | |
|---|---|---|
| 24-61 39% | Field goals | 28-57 49% |
| 4-16 25% | 3-pointers | 11-21 52% |
| 9-15 60% | Free throws | 13-16 81% |
| 27 8 off | Rebounds | 43 11 off |
| 9 | Assists | 20 |
| 9 | Steals | 6 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
| 8 | Turnovers | 16 |
| 18 | Fouls | 18 |
| 32 | Points in paint | 26 |
| 7 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| CHST | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJ Ray F | 32 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 5-14 | 0-1 |
| Marcus Tankersley G | 22 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 8-11 | 2-2 |
| Corey Sands G | 19 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Malek Robinson G | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Dailliss Cox F | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Braelon Bush G | 32 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 4-10 | 1-5 |
| Doyel Cockrill III G | 30 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1-8 | 0-5 |
| Stephen Byard F | 17 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
| Joseph Owens F | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Dakari Thomas G | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Daniel Zatsepin F | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Lionel Larvadain G | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
Did not play: Greg Spate, DaJuan Bates, Deshawn Jean-Charles, CJ Delancy, Chauncey Gibson
| WAG | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Awoke G | 34 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 1-8 | 1-4 |
| Nick Jones G | 32 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 5-8 | 1-3 |
| Travis Gray G | 32 | 16 | 12 | 1 | 5-10 | 4-7 |
| Bin Basil F | 21 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Bryan Akanmu F | 18 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Michael Cooper G | 20 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 4-5 | 2-2 |
| Zavier Fitch F | 17 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| Eddie Placer G | 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-3 |
| Makhai Anderson G | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-1 |
| Elijah Brown G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Huascar Cuevas, Sam Smith, Jaden Baker
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenWAG -5.5
1 → CHST
CloseWAG -4.5
1 pt toward CHST
Total
Open138.5
▼ 4
Close134.5
Down 4 since the open
Moneyline
CHST +180 · WAG -218
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened WAG -5.5 · closed WAG -4.5 · moved 1 toward CHSTmodel WAG -4.5 matches the line
model WAG -4.5 = line ✓
Opened 138.5 · closed 134.5 · moved 4 downmodel 140.5
model 140.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | WAG -4.5 | WAG -4.6 | WAG +0.1 | W WAG covered |
| Total | 134.5 | 140.6 | Over 6.1 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | CHST 68 · WAG 72.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WAG -2.6 | WAG -18.0 |
| 1H total | 65.8 | 66 |
| 1H projected score | CHST 31.6 · WAG 34.2 | CHST 24 · WAG 42 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CHST 1–2 WAGWAG leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · WAG has won the last 2 meetings · CHST 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2025-26 | WAG 79 @ CHST 72 | CHST +1.5 | WAG W |
| Feb 22, 2024-25 | WAG 64 @ CHST 52 | CHST +3.5 | WAG W |
| Jan 3, 2024-25 | CHST 64 @ WAG 52 | WAG -9.5 | CHST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Chicago St
29 games played
Straight up
6-23
21% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-16
45% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-92 | +24.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 86-108 | +30.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 66-98 | +26.5 | L −5.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 63-67 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 54-66 | +27.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 54-93 | +31.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 77-90 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 64-87 | +14.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 53-95 | +20.5 | L −21.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 14 | @ | W 84-75 | +15.5 | W +24.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 55-76 | +21.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 58-78 | +38.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 72-79 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 55-74 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-85 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 57-72 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 56-62 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 129.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 60-81 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 59-61 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-74 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 67-78 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 63-57 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 127.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 80-75 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 68-55 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 131.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-81 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 59-60 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 70-51 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 56-73 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
DEP
L 62-92
−5.5
6
@
SLU
L 86-108
+8.5
11
@
BTLR
L 66-98
−5.5
15
vs
UIC
L 63-67
+5.5
18
@
MINN
L 54-66
+15.5
20
@
IOWA
L 54-93
−7.5
25
@
PFW
L 77-90
−0.5
28
@
YSU
L 64-87
−8.5
6
@
ILST
L 53-95
−21.5
14
@
LUC
W 84-75
+24.5
16
@
BGSU
L 55-76
+0.5
20
@
IU
L 58-78
+18.5
2
vs
WAG
L 72-79
−5.5
4
vs
LIU
L 55-74
−11.5
8
@
FDU
L 63-70
−2.5
10
@
STO
L 82-85
+1.5
17
vs
LEM
L 57-72
−8.5
19
vs
NHVN
L 56-62
−7.5
23
@
SFPA
L 60-81
−17.5
25
@
MERC
L 59-61
+7.5
31
vs
MERC
W 78-74
+6.5
5
@
CCSU
L 67-78
−2.5
7
@
NHVN
W 63-57
+11.5
9
vs
SFPA
W 80-75
+1.5
12
vs
STO
W 68-55
+15.5
14
@
LEM
L 63-81
−11.5
19
vs
FDU
L 59-60
+0.5
21
vs
CCSU
W 70-51
+22.5
26
@
LIU
L 56-73
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
DEP
L 62-92
+10.5
6
@
SLU
L 86-108
+38.5
11
@
BTLR
L 66-98
+5.5
15
vs
UIC
L 63-67
−26.5
18
@
MINN
L 54-66
−24.5
20
@
IOWA
L 54-93
+4.5
25
@
PFW
L 77-90
+17.5
28
@
YSU
L 64-87
+4.5
6
@
ILST
L 53-95
+3.5
14
@
LUC
W 84-75
+18.5
16
@
BGSU
L 55-76
−17.5
20
@
IU
L 58-78
−16.5
2
vs
WAG
L 72-79
+4.5
4
vs
LIU
L 55-74
−22.5
8
@
FDU
L 63-70
−10.5
10
@
STO
L 82-85
+31.5
17
vs
LEM
L 57-72
−17.5
19
vs
NHVN
L 56-62
−11.5
23
@
SFPA
L 60-81
−2.5
25
@
MERC
L 59-61
−11.5
31
vs
MERC
W 78-74
+22.5
5
@
CCSU
L 67-78
+6.5
7
@
NHVN
W 63-57
−7.5
9
vs
SFPA
W 80-75
+10.5
12
vs
STO
W 68-55
−8.5
14
@
LEM
L 63-81
−0.5
19
vs
FDU
L 59-60
−12.5
21
vs
CCSU
W 70-51
−17.5
26
@
LIU
L 56-73
−12.5
over 13under 16avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wagner
25 games played
Straight up
9-16
36% wins
Against the spread
14-11
56% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-11
56% overs · avg +5.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 74-103 | +25.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 61-68 | +21.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 61-63 | +12.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 70-71 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 75-92 | +25.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 103-101 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 63-89 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 78-64 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 131.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 79-72 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 60-69 | -7.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 69-71 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 69-70 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 132.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-80 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 129.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 61-68 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 67-69 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 55-62 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 75-72 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 133.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 79-78 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 67-84 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 57-67 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 68-57 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 65-83 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 83-80 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 65-56 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 65-62 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
VCU
L 74-103
−3.5
7
@
HALL
L 61-68
+14.5
11
@
FOR
L 61-63
+10.5
16
@
UMBC
L 70-71
+5.5
22
@
GTWN
L 75-92
+8.5
26
@
MAN
W 103-101
+4.5
2
@
MD
L 63-89
−3.5
17
vs
UMES
W 78-64
+9.5
2
@
CHST
W 79-72
+5.5
4
vs
STO
L 60-69
−16.5
8
vs
SFPA
L 69-71
−9.5
10
vs
MERC
L 69-70
−2.5
17
@
NHVN
L 74-80
−4.5
19
@
FDU
L 61-68
−4.5
23
@
LEM
L 67-69
+5.5
29
vs
CCSU
L 55-62
−4.5
31
vs
FDU
W 75-72
+1.5
5
vs
LEM
W 79-78
+2.5
7
@
CCSU
L 67-84
−11.5
12
vs
LIU
L 57-67
−3.5
14
@
STO
W 68-57
+14.5
16
@
LIU
L 65-83
−7.5
19
@
MERC
W 83-80
+6.5
21
@
SFPA
W 65-56
+7.5
26
vs
NHVN
W 65-62
+0.5
covered 14didn’t cover 11avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
VCU
L 74-103
+43.5
7
@
HALL
L 61-68
−5.5
11
@
FOR
L 61-63
−15.5
16
@
UMBC
L 70-71
+0.5
22
@
GTWN
L 75-92
+26.5
26
@
MAN
W 103-101
+59.5
2
@
MD
L 63-89
+8.5
17
vs
UMES
W 78-64
+10.5
2
@
CHST
W 79-72
+4.5
4
vs
STO
L 60-69
−10.5
8
vs
SFPA
L 69-71
−4.5
10
vs
MERC
L 69-70
+6.5
17
@
NHVN
L 74-80
+24.5
19
@
FDU
L 61-68
−8.5
23
@
LEM
L 67-69
−7.5
29
vs
CCSU
L 55-62
−19.5
31
vs
FDU
W 75-72
+13.5
5
vs
LEM
W 79-78
+18.5
7
@
CCSU
L 67-84
+14.5
12
vs
LIU
L 57-67
−11.5
14
@
STO
W 68-57
−3.5
16
@
LIU
L 65-83
+9.5
19
@
MERC
W 83-80
+29.5
21
@
SFPA
W 65-56
−30.5
26
vs
NHVN
W 65-62
−4.5
over 14under 11avg +5.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Chicago St
6-23 overall · 5-12 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Long Island56–73
- Wvs C Connecticut70–51
- Lvs FDU59–60
- L@ Le Moyne63–81
- Wvs Stonehill68–55
2 days since their last game.
Wagner
9-16 overall · 7-10 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs New Haven65–62
- W@ Saint Francis Red Wolves65–56
- W@ Mercyhurst83–80
- L@ Long Island65–83
- W@ Stonehill68–57
2 days since their last game.