Jones Convocation Center · at Chicago St · Conference game
Closing line
CCSU -3.5✓ CHST covered by 22.5
Closing total138.5Under by 17.5
| This season | CHST | |
|---|---|---|
| 14-10 | Record | 5-22 |
| 14-10 | ATS | 13-14 |
| 14-10 | O/U | 13-14 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CCSU 73–70 CHST · ✗ CCSU (62%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCSU | 25 | 26 | 51 |
| CHST | 28 | 42 | 70 |
1st half: CCSU 25, CHST 28 (CHST by 3). The model had CCSU by 2.2 and a total of 66.9 (actual 53).
Team stats
| CCSU | CHST | |
|---|---|---|
| 17-55 31% | Field goals | 26-62 42% |
| 5-24 21% | 3-pointers | 8-28 29% |
| 12-15 80% | Free throws | 10-12 83% |
| 40 14 off | Rebounds | 37 11 off |
| 11 | Assists | 21 |
| 3 | Steals | 10 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 5 |
| 13 | Fouls | 18 |
| 22 | Points in paint | 30 |
| 5 | Fast-break points | 13 |
Players
| CCSU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darin Smith Jr. G | 38 | 19 | 6 | 2 | 6-18 | 2-6 |
| Jay Rodgers G | 34 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-2 |
| James Jones G | 32 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-3 |
| Max Frazier F | 27 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-0 |
| Melo Sanchez G | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Roddy Jones G | 17 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-7 | 1-6 |
| Elijah Parker G | 14 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Ashton Reynolds G | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Jayden Mott F | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Daniel James F | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Nico Ashley F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Gabe Spinelli, Rashawn Tibby, Corsley Edwards Jr., Adam Fox, Ja'Kobe Williams
| CHST | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJ Ray F | 33 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 7-12 | 1-2 |
| Marcus Tankersley G | 32 | 14 | 4 | 7 | 3-9 | 1-2 |
| Malek Robinson G | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-2 |
| Corey Sands G | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| Dailliss Cox F | 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Doyel Cockrill III G | 30 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 4-14 | 4-13 |
| Braelon Bush G | 28 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| Stephen Byard F | 26 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 6-6 | 1-1 |
| Chauncey Gibson G | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Joseph Owens F | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Daniel Zatsepin F | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: CJ Delancy, Lionel Larvadain, Deshawn Jean-Charles, Dakari Thomas, DaJuan Bates, Greg Spate
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCCSU -3.5
no move
CloseCCSU -3.5
No change since the open
Total
Open138.5
no move
Close138.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
CCSU -180 · CHST +150
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CCSU -3.5 · unchangedmodel CCSU -3.5 matches the line
model CCSU -3.5 = line ✓
Opened 138.5 · unchangedmodel 143
model 143
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | CCSU -3.5 | CCSU -3.5 | — | CHST covered |
| Total | 138.5 | 143.0 | Over 4.5 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | CCSU 73.2 · CHST 69.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CCSU -2.2 | CHST -3.0 |
| 1H total | 66.9 | 53 |
| 1H projected score | CCSU 34.6 · CHST 32.4 | CCSU 25 · CHST 28 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CCSU 3–0 CHSTCCSU leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · CCSU has won the last 3 meetings · CCSU 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2025-26 | CHST 67 @ CCSU 78 | CCSU -8.5 | CCSU W |
| Feb 20, 2024-25 | CCSU 81 @ CHST 75 | CHST +11.5 | CHST W |
| Jan 26, 2024-25 | CHST 64 @ CCSU 81 | CCSU -14.5 | CCSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
C Connecticut
24 games played
Straight up
14-10
58% wins
Against the spread
14-10
58% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-10
58% overs · avg +4.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 49-71 | +9.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 60-59 | +17.5 | W +18.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 77-84 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 67-54 | +15.5 | W +28.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 108-106 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 214 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 61-77 | +18.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 56-73 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 84-67 | -7.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 70-84 | -6.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 78-84 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 72-61 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 76-69 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 69-59 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 98-90 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 61-79 | +1.5 | L −16.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 66-76 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 59-61 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 62-55 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 59-80 | +2.5 | L −18.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 78-67 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-67 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 81-76 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 128.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 63-57 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 133.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 78-77 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
QUIN
L 49-71
−12.5
11
@
BC
W 60-59
+18.5
16
@
MASS
L 77-84
+5.5
21
@
RUTG
W 67-54
+28.5
24
vs
SHU
W 108-106
−1.5
3
@
HALL
L 61-77
+2.5
7
@
NE
L 56-73
−15.5
13
@
BING
W 84-67
+9.5
18
vs
FAIR
L 70-84
−20.5
2
@
LIU
L 78-84
+0.5
4
vs
NHVN
W 72-61
+3.5
8
vs
STO
W 76-69
−0.5
10
@
LEM
W 69-59
+11.5
17
@
SFPA
W 98-90
+1.5
19
@
MERC
L 61-79
−16.5
23
vs
FDU
L 66-76
−17.5
26
@
STO
L 59-61
−3.5
29
@
WAG
W 62-55
+4.5
31
vs
LIU
L 59-80
−18.5
5
vs
CHST
W 78-67
+2.5
7
vs
WAG
W 84-67
+11.5
12
@
NHVN
W 81-76
+1.5
14
@
FDU
W 63-57
+7.5
19
vs
LEM
W 78-77
−7.5
covered 14didn’t cover 10avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
QUIN
L 49-71
−30.5
11
@
BC
W 60-59
−17.5
16
@
MASS
L 77-84
+16.5
21
@
RUTG
W 67-54
−16.5
24
vs
SHU
W 108-106
+70.5
3
@
HALL
L 61-77
+9.5
7
@
NE
L 56-73
−9.5
13
@
BING
W 84-67
+17.5
18
vs
FAIR
L 70-84
+10.5
2
@
LIU
L 78-84
+15.5
4
vs
NHVN
W 72-61
+2.5
8
vs
STO
W 76-69
+10.5
10
@
LEM
W 69-59
−18.5
17
@
SFPA
W 98-90
+43.5
19
@
MERC
L 61-79
+7.5
23
vs
FDU
L 66-76
+1.5
26
@
STO
L 59-61
−15.5
29
@
WAG
W 62-55
−19.5
31
vs
LIU
L 59-80
−3.5
5
vs
CHST
W 78-67
+6.5
7
vs
WAG
W 84-67
+14.5
12
@
NHVN
W 81-76
+28.5
14
@
FDU
W 63-57
−13.5
19
vs
LEM
W 78-77
−10.5
over 14under 10avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Chicago St
27 games played
Straight up
5-22
19% wins
Against the spread
13-14
48% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-14
48% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-92 | +24.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 86-108 | +30.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 66-98 | +26.5 | L −5.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 63-67 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 54-66 | +27.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 54-93 | +31.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 77-90 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 64-87 | +14.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 53-95 | +20.5 | L −21.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 14 | @ | W 84-75 | +15.5 | W +24.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 55-76 | +21.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 58-78 | +38.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 72-79 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 55-74 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-85 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 57-72 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 56-62 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 129.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 60-81 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 59-61 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-74 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 67-78 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 63-57 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 127.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 80-75 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 68-55 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 131.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-81 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 59-60 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
DEP
L 62-92
−5.5
6
@
SLU
L 86-108
+8.5
11
@
BTLR
L 66-98
−5.5
15
vs
UIC
L 63-67
+5.5
18
@
MINN
L 54-66
+15.5
20
@
IOWA
L 54-93
−7.5
25
@
PFW
L 77-90
−0.5
28
@
YSU
L 64-87
−8.5
6
@
ILST
L 53-95
−21.5
14
@
LUC
W 84-75
+24.5
16
@
BGSU
L 55-76
+0.5
20
@
IU
L 58-78
+18.5
2
vs
WAG
L 72-79
−5.5
4
vs
LIU
L 55-74
−11.5
8
@
FDU
L 63-70
−2.5
10
@
STO
L 82-85
+1.5
17
vs
LEM
L 57-72
−8.5
19
vs
NHVN
L 56-62
−7.5
23
@
SFPA
L 60-81
−17.5
25
@
MERC
L 59-61
+7.5
31
vs
MERC
W 78-74
+6.5
5
@
CCSU
L 67-78
−2.5
7
@
NHVN
W 63-57
+11.5
9
vs
SFPA
W 80-75
+1.5
12
vs
STO
W 68-55
+15.5
14
@
LEM
L 63-81
−11.5
19
vs
FDU
L 59-60
+0.5
covered 13didn’t cover 14avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
DEP
L 62-92
+10.5
6
@
SLU
L 86-108
+38.5
11
@
BTLR
L 66-98
+5.5
15
vs
UIC
L 63-67
−26.5
18
@
MINN
L 54-66
−24.5
20
@
IOWA
L 54-93
+4.5
25
@
PFW
L 77-90
+17.5
28
@
YSU
L 64-87
+4.5
6
@
ILST
L 53-95
+3.5
14
@
LUC
W 84-75
+18.5
16
@
BGSU
L 55-76
−17.5
20
@
IU
L 58-78
−16.5
2
vs
WAG
L 72-79
+4.5
4
vs
LIU
L 55-74
−22.5
8
@
FDU
L 63-70
−10.5
10
@
STO
L 82-85
+31.5
17
vs
LEM
L 57-72
−17.5
19
vs
NHVN
L 56-62
−11.5
23
@
SFPA
L 60-81
−2.5
25
@
MERC
L 59-61
−11.5
31
vs
MERC
W 78-74
+22.5
5
@
CCSU
L 67-78
+6.5
7
@
NHVN
W 63-57
−7.5
9
vs
SFPA
W 80-75
+10.5
12
vs
STO
W 68-55
−8.5
14
@
LEM
L 63-81
−0.5
19
vs
FDU
L 59-60
−12.5
over 13under 14avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
C Connecticut
14-10 overall · 10-5 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Le Moyne78–77
- W@ FDU63–57
- W@ New Haven81–76
- Wvs Wagner84–67
- Wvs Chicago St78–67
2 days since their last game.
Chicago St
5-22 overall · 4-11 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs FDU59–60
- L@ Le Moyne63–81
- Wvs Stonehill68–55
- Wvs Saint Francis Red Wolves80–75
- W@ New Haven63–57
2 days since their last game.