Detrick Gymnasium · at C Connecticut · Conference game
Closing line
CCSU -8.5✓ LEM covered by 7.5
CCSU -8.5✓ LEM covered by 7.5Closing total165.5Under by 10.5
 LEM | This season | CCSU |
|---|---|---|
| 13-13 | Record | 13-10 |
| 14-12 | ATS | 14-9 |
| 10-16 | O/U | 14-9 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: LEM 72–75 CCSU · ✓ CCSU (61%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEM | 34 | 43 | 77 |
| CCSU | 39 | 39 | 78 |
1st half: LEM 34, CCSU 39 (CCSU by 5). The model had CCSU by 1.7 and a total of 68.6 (actual 73).
Team stats
| LEM | CCSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-56 48% | Field goals | 33-68 49% |
| 10-19 53% | 3-pointers | 11-32 34% |
| 13-17 76% | Free throws | 1-1 100% |
| 35 6 off | Rebounds | 31 6 off |
| 16 | Assists | 21 |
| 5 | Steals | 8 |
| 0 | Blocks | 5 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 9 |
| 10 | Fouls | 12 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 24 |
| 16 | Fast-break points | 2 |
Players
| LEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shilo Jackson F | 39 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 6-15 | 0-0 |
| Trent Mosquera G | 39 | 28 | 5 | 4 | 9-16 | 6-8 |
| Deng Garang G | 33 | 18 | 9 | 2 | 7-9 | 2-3 |
| Jakob Blakley G | 25 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2-6 | 1-3 |
| Eli Greenberg G | 12 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Tennessee Rainwater F | 33 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Trevor Roe F | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Samuel Hincapie G | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Josiah Lee, Jakai Sanders, Sam Donnelly, Isaac Nyakundi, Nate Fouts, Kaelin Thomas, Ametri Moss
| CCSU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darin Smith Jr. G | 33 | 20 | 5 | 4 | 9-21 | 2-8 |
| Max Frazier F | 32 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7-7 | 0-0 |
| James Jones G | 30 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Jay Rodgers G | 29 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 4-12 | 1-6 |
| Melo Sanchez G | 28 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 8-14 | 6-11 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Elijah Parker G | 13 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Roddy Jones G | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
| Ashton Reynolds G | 9 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3-4 | 1-1 |
| Jayden Mott F | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Daniel James F | 6 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Rashawn Tibby, Corsley Edwards Jr., Adam Fox, Ja'Kobe Williams, Nico Ashley, Gabe Spinelli
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCCSU -3.5
5 → CCSU
CloseCCSU -8.5
5 pts toward CCSU
Total
Open146.5
▲ 19
Close165.5
Up 19 since the open
Moneyline
LEM +285 · CCSU -360
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CCSU -3.5 · closed CCSU -8.5 · moved 5 toward CCSUmodel CCSU -3
model CCSU -3
Opened 146.5 · closed 165.5 · moved 19 upmodel 146.5
model 146.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | CCSU -8.5 | CCSU -3.1 | LEM +5.4 | W LEM covered |
| Total | 165.5 | 146.6 | Under 18.9 | W Under |
| Projected score | — | LEM 71.8 · CCSU 74.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CCSU -1.7 | CCSU -5.0 |
| 1H total | 68.6 | 73 |
| 1H projected score | LEM 33.5 · CCSU 35.2 | LEM 34 · CCSU 39 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEM | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
| CCSU | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
LEM 2–4 CCSUCCSU leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · CCSU has won the last 4 meetings · LEM 3-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2025-26 | CCSU 69 @ LEM 59 | LEM -1.5 | CCSU W |
| Mar 5, 2024-25 | LEM 67 @ CCSU 86 | CCSU -13.5 | CCSU W |
| Feb 27, 2024-25 | LEM 75 @ CCSU 84 | CCSU -12.5 | LEM W |
| Jan 24, 2024-25 | CCSU 93 @ LEM 70 | LEM +6.5 | CCSU W |
| Feb 15, 2023-24 | CCSU 64 @ LEM 69 | LEM +2.5 | LEM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Le Moyne
26 games played
Straight up
13-13
50% wins
Against the spread
14-12
54% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-16
38% overs · avg +0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ XAV | L 69-74 | +24.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | @ BGSU | L 60-83 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 13 | @ MASS | L 80-94 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 17 | vs NIA | W 74-68 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 22 | vs FAIR | L 83-97 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 28 | @ LAF | W 76-63 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs MONM | W 83-79 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 30 | vs BALL | L 85-96 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 6 | @ BING | W 78-63 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 16 | @ TEX | L 53-95 | +29.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 20 | @ SBU | L 81-92 | +21.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 28 | @ BC | L 64-72 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | @ SFPA | W 84-58 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 4 | @ MERC | L 60-74 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 8 | vs NHVN | W 73-47 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 10 | vsCCSU | L 59-69 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 17 | @ CHST | W 72-57 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 19 | vs LIU | W 83-77 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 23 | vs WAG | W 69-67 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 26 | @ FDU | W 87-74 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | @LIU | L 61-83 | +8.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | vs STO | L 54-65 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 5 | @WAG | L 78-79 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | vsSFPA | W 86-84 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 12 | vsMERC | W 58-57 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 14 | vsCHST | W 81-63 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@XAV
XAVL 69-74
+19.5
9
@BGSU
BGSUL 60-83
−11.5
13
@MASS
MASSL 80-94
+2.5
17
vsNIA
NIAW 74-68
+3.5
22
vsFAIR
FAIRL 83-97
−12.5
28
@LAF
LAFW 76-63
+17.5
29
vsMONM
MONMW 83-79
+10.5
30
vsBALL
BALLL 85-96
−12.5
6
@BING
BINGW 78-63
+12.5
16
@TEX
TEXL 53-95
−12.5
20
@SBU
SBUL 81-92
+10.5
28
@BC
BCL 64-72
+4.5
2
@SFPA
SFPAW 84-58
+20.5
4
@MERC
MERCL 60-74
−11.5
8
vsNHVN
NHVNW 73-47
+20.5
10
vsCCSU
CCSUL 59-69
−11.5
17
@CHST
CHSTW 72-57
+8.5
19
vsLIU
LIUW 83-77
+7.5
23
vsWAG
WAGW 69-67
−5.5
26
@FDU
FDUW 87-74
+14.5
29
@LIU
LIUL 61-83
−13.5
31
vsSTO
STOL 54-65
−13.5
5
@WAG
WAGL 78-79
−2.5
7
vsSFPA
SFPAW 86-84
−5.5
12
vsMERC
MERCW 58-57
−1.5
14
vsCHST
CHSTW 81-63
+11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 12avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@XAV
XAVL 69-74
−13.5
9
@BGSU
BGSUL 60-83
−11.5
13
@MASS
MASSL 80-94
+20.5
17
vsNIA
NIAW 74-68
+3.5
22
vsFAIR
FAIRL 83-97
+34.5
28
@LAF
LAFW 76-63
−12.5
29
vsMONM
MONMW 83-79
+16.5
30
vsBALL
BALLL 85-96
+40.5
6
@BING
BINGW 78-63
−3.5
16
@TEX
TEXL 53-95
−4.5
20
@SBU
SBUL 81-92
+21.5
28
@BC
BCL 64-72
−10.5
2
@SFPA
SFPAW 84-58
−9.5
4
@MERC
MERCL 60-74
−7.5
8
vsNHVN
NHVNW 73-47
−17.5
10
vsCCSU
CCSUL 59-69
−18.5
17
@CHST
CHSTW 72-57
−17.5
19
vsLIU
LIUW 83-77
+9.5
23
vsWAG
WAGW 69-67
−7.5
26
@FDU
FDUW 87-74
+21.5
29
@LIU
LIUL 61-83
−3.5
31
vsSTO
STOL 54-65
−21.5
5
@WAG
WAGL 78-79
+18.5
7
vsSFPA
SFPAW 86-84
+16.5
12
vsMERC
MERCW 58-57
−23.5
14
vsCHST
CHSTW 81-63
−0.5
over 10under 16avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
C Connecticut
23 games played
Straight up
13-10
57% wins
Against the spread
14-9
61% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-9
61% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ QUIN | L 49-71 | +9.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 11 | @BC | W 60-59 | +17.5 | W +18.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 16 | @MASS | L 77-84 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 21 | @ RUTG | W 67-54 | +15.5 | W +28.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs SHU | W 108-106 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 214 |
| Dec 3 | @ HALL | L 61-77 | +18.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 7 | @ NE | L 56-73 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 13 | @BING | W 84-67 | -7.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 18 | vsFAIR | L 70-84 | -6.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 2 | @LIU | L 78-84 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 4 | vsNHVN | W 72-61 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 8 | vsSTO | W 76-69 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | @LEM | W 69-59 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 17 | @SFPA | W 98-90 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 19 | @MERC | L 61-79 | +1.5 | L −16.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 23 | vsFDU | L 66-76 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 26 | @STO | L 59-61 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | @WAG | W 62-55 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 31 | vsLIU | L 59-80 | +2.5 | L −18.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 5 | vsCHST | W 78-67 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | vsWAG | W 84-67 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 12 | @NHVN | W 81-76 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 128.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @FDU | W 63-57 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 133.5 | U 120 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@QUIN
QUINL 49-71
−12.5
11
@BC
BCW 60-59
+18.5
16
@MASS
MASSL 77-84
+5.5
21
@RUTG
RUTGW 67-54
+28.5
24
vsSHU
SHUW 108-106
−1.5
3
@HALL
HALLL 61-77
+2.5
7
@NE
NEL 56-73
−15.5
13
@BING
BINGW 84-67
+9.5
18
vsFAIR
FAIRL 70-84
−20.5
2
@LIU
LIUL 78-84
+0.5
4
vsNHVN
NHVNW 72-61
+3.5
8
vsSTO
STOW 76-69
−0.5
10
@LEM
LEMW 69-59
+11.5
17
@SFPA
SFPAW 98-90
+1.5
19
@MERC
MERCL 61-79
−16.5
23
vsFDU
FDUL 66-76
−17.5
26
@STO
STOL 59-61
−3.5
29
@WAG
WAGW 62-55
+4.5
31
vsLIU
LIUL 59-80
−18.5
5
vsCHST
CHSTW 78-67
+2.5
7
vsWAG
WAGW 84-67
+11.5
12
@NHVN
NHVNW 81-76
+1.5
14
@FDU
FDUW 63-57
+7.5
covered 14didn’t cover 9avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@QUIN
QUINL 49-71
−30.5
11
@BC
BCW 60-59
−17.5
16
@MASS
MASSL 77-84
+16.5
21
@RUTG
RUTGW 67-54
−16.5
24
vsSHU
SHUW 108-106
+70.5
3
@HALL
HALLL 61-77
+9.5
7
@NE
NEL 56-73
−9.5
13
@BING
BINGW 84-67
+17.5
18
vsFAIR
FAIRL 70-84
+10.5
2
@LIU
LIUL 78-84
+15.5
4
vsNHVN
NHVNW 72-61
+2.5
8
vsSTO
STOW 76-69
+10.5
10
@LEM
LEMW 69-59
−18.5
17
@SFPA
SFPAW 98-90
+43.5
19
@MERC
MERCL 61-79
+7.5
23
vsFDU
FDUL 66-76
+1.5
26
@STO
STOL 59-61
−15.5
29
@WAG
WAGW 62-55
−19.5
31
vsLIU
LIUL 59-80
−3.5
5
vsCHST
CHSTW 78-67
+6.5
7
vsWAG
WAGW 84-67
+14.5
12
@NHVN
NHVNW 81-76
+28.5
14
@FDU
FDUW 63-57
−13.5
over 14under 9avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Le Moyne
13-13 overall · 9-5 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Chicago St81–63
- Wvs Mercyhurst58–57
- Wvs Saint Francis Red Wolves86–84
- L@ Wagner78–79
- Lvs Stonehill54–65
5 days since their last game.
C Connecticut
13-10 overall · 9-5 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ FDU63–57
- W@ New Haven81–76
- Wvs Wagner84–67
- Wvs Chicago St78–67
- Lvs Long Island59–80
5 days since their last game.