David R. Stopher Gymnasium · at Nicholls · Conference game
Closing line
NICH -4.5✓ NICH covered by 3.5
Closing total139.5Under by 11.5
| This season | NICH | |
|---|---|---|
| 7-21 | Record | 11-17 |
| 13-15 | ATS | 13-15 |
| 12-16 | O/U | 16-12 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SELA 69–72 NICH · ✓ NICH (61%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SELA | 31 | 29 | 60 |
| NICH | 33 | 35 | 68 |
1st half: SELA 31, NICH 33 (NICH by 2). The model had NICH by 1.8 and a total of 66.3 (actual 64).
Team stats
| SELA | NICH | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-54 43% | Field goals | 25-59 42% |
| 6-23 26% | 3-pointers | 7-26 27% |
| 8-9 89% | Free throws | 11-20 55% |
| 33 8 off | Rebounds | 37 13 off |
| 11 | Assists | 15 |
| 6 | Steals | 9 |
| 5 | Blocks | 4 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 18 | Fouls | 13 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 34 |
| 8 | Fast-break points | 10 |
Players
| SELA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Makhi Myles F | 31 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-3 |
| Jeremy Elyzee G | 30 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-2 |
| CJ Booker PG | 26 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 5-11 | 2-4 |
| Jaiden Lawrence G | 21 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-3 |
| Isaiah Gaines F | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Garrett Shoemaker F | 24 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-1 |
| Ahmed Essahaty G | 21 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-3 |
| Peter Hemschemeier G | 16 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-6 |
| Ethan Pickett G | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| Ubong-Abasi Etim C | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Seth Jones, Kyle Edison, Jalen Forrest, Cody Al-Naziat, Amir Chaney
| NICH | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sincere Malone F | 38 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 5-13 | 1-4 |
| Trae English G | 29 | 16 | 1 | 5 | 5-11 | 2-5 |
| Zee Hamoda G | 28 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 4-11 | 2-7 |
| Jalik Dunkley F | 22 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Nick Krass G | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Grant Sanders F | 29 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-1 |
| Christian Winborne G | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-5 |
| Jalin Rice G | 15 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Jaylen Searles G | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 |
Did not play: Chaydon Stone, Kevin Pazmino, Jordan Matthews, Zaiden Cross, Domanic Betancourt
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenNICH -4.5
no move
CloseNICH -4.5
No change since the open
Total
Open140.5
▼ 1
Close139.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
SELA +160 · NICH -192
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened NICH -4.5 · unchangedmodel NICH -3
model NICH -3
Opened 140.5 · closed 139.5 · moved 1 downmodel 141.5
model 141.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | NICH -4.5 | NICH -3.2 | SELA +1.3 | L NICH covered |
| Total | 139.5 | 141.6 | Over 2.1 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | SELA 69.2 · NICH 72.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NICH -1.8 | NICH -2.0 |
| 1H total | 66.3 | 64 |
| 1H projected score | SELA 32.2 · NICH 34 | SELA 31 · NICH 33 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
SELA 5–5 NICHSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · SELA has won the last 2 meetings · SELA 5-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2025-26 | NICH 61 @ SELA 67 | SELA -2.5 | SELA W |
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | NICH 81 @ SELA 84 | SELA -1.5 | SELA W |
| Dec 5, 2024-25 | SELA 64 @ NICH 67 | NICH -2.5 | NICH W |
| Mar 7, 2023-24 | NICH 80 @ SELA 54 | SELA -3.5 | NICH W |
| Jan 9, 2023-24 | SELA 61 @ NICH 66 | NICH -4.5 | NICH W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SE Louisiana
28 games played
Straight up
7-21
25% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-16
43% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 58-88 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 52-58 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 60-70 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 68-75 | +27.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 57-70 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 76-68 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 69-65 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 68-76 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 74-71 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 132.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 69-70 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 65-78 | +24.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 70-79 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 63-73 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 60-52 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 61-73 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 76-79 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 56-68 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 130.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 65-68 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-61 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 66-76 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 58-85 | +9.5 | L −17.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 54-73 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 55-47 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 102 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 74-62 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 66-69 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 53-70 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 136.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 75-96 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 23 | vs | L 68-73 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 130.5 | O 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MISS
L 58-88
−8.5
7
@
UL
L 52-58
−2.5
10
@
GT
L 60-70
+4.5
15
@
MSST
L 68-75
+20.5
26
@
UNCW
L 57-70
−1.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 76-68
+1.5
29
vs
NAVY
W 69-65
+7.5
7
vs
NWST
L 68-76
−15.5
13
@
HCU
W 74-71
+5.5
15
vs
ETAM
L 69-70
−5.5
19
@
LSU
L 65-78
+11.5
30
@
UIW
L 70-79
−2.5
3
vs
SFA
L 63-73
−6.5
5
vs
LAM
W 60-52
+9.5
10
@
MCN
L 61-73
+4.5
12
vs
NOLA
L 76-79
−5.5
17
@
AMCC
L 56-68
−6.5
19
@
RGV
L 65-68
+2.5
24
vs
NICH
W 67-61
+3.5
27
vs
MCN
L 66-76
+2.5
31
@
SFA
L 58-85
−17.5
2
@
LAM
L 54-73
−13.5
7
vs
HCU
W 55-47
+3.5
9
vs
UIW
W 74-62
+10.5
14
@
NWST
L 66-69
−1.5
16
@
ETAM
L 53-70
−14.5
21
vs
RGV
L 75-96
−16.5
23
vs
AMCC
L 68-73
−3.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MISS
L 58-88
+2.5
7
@
UL
L 52-58
−25.5
10
@
GT
L 60-70
−3.5
15
@
MSST
L 68-75
−7.5
26
@
UNCW
L 57-70
−10.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 76-68
+2.5
29
vs
NAVY
W 69-65
−2.5
7
vs
NWST
L 68-76
+10.5
13
@
HCU
W 74-71
+12.5
15
vs
ETAM
L 69-70
+1.5
19
@
LSU
L 65-78
−1.5
30
@
UIW
L 70-79
+13.5
3
vs
SFA
L 63-73
−1.5
5
vs
LAM
W 60-52
−23.5
10
@
MCN
L 61-73
−4.5
12
vs
NOLA
L 76-79
+12.5
17
@
AMCC
L 56-68
−6.5
19
@
RGV
L 65-68
−2.5
24
vs
NICH
W 67-61
−13.5
27
vs
MCN
L 66-76
+2.5
31
@
SFA
L 58-85
+7.5
2
@
LAM
L 54-73
−5.5
7
vs
HCU
W 55-47
−31.5
9
vs
UIW
W 74-62
−1.5
14
@
NWST
L 66-69
+3.5
16
@
ETAM
L 53-70
−13.5
21
vs
RGV
L 75-96
+32.5
23
vs
AMCC
L 68-73
+10.5
over 12under 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Nicholls
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-12
57% overs · avg +3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 51-77 | +31.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 57-65 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 63-68 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-99 | +14.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 81-95 | +23.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 72-82 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 76-96 | +18.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 74-67 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 82-95 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 76-71 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 71-69 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 80-58 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 74-72 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-77 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 68-94 | +15.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 80-90 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 62-79 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 61-67 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 62-80 | -4.5 | L −22.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 72-68 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 61-58 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 76-83 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 72-92 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 91-83 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 68-72 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 78-81 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 23 | @ | W 53-52 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 105 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
UK
L 51-77
+5.5
7
@
EIU
L 57-65
−10.5
12
@
VAL
L 63-68
−2.5
15
@
MUR
L 79-99
−5.5
22
@
OKST
L 81-95
+9.5
28
@
TULN
L 72-82
−1.5
2
@
CREI
L 76-96
−1.5
6
vs
UIW
W 74-67
+8.5
17
vs
HCU
W 79-64
+11.5
21
@
PAC
L 82-95
−4.5
29
@
AMCC
W 76-71
+10.5
31
@
RGV
W 71-69
+5.5
3
vs
ETAM
W 80-58
+15.5
5
vs
NWST
W 74-72
−6.5
10
@
NOLA
W 90-77
+9.5
12
@
MCN
L 68-94
−10.5
17
vs
LAM
L 80-90
−13.5
19
vs
SFA
L 62-79
−12.5
24
@
SELA
L 61-67
−3.5
27
vs
NOLA
L 62-80
−22.5
31
@
ETAM
W 72-68
+5.5
2
@
NWST
W 61-58
+1.5
7
vs
AMCC
L 76-83
−8.5
9
vs
RGV
L 72-92
−16.5
14
@
UIW
W 91-83
+10.5
16
@
HCU
L 68-72
−2.5
21
@
SFA
L 78-81
+9.5
23
@
LAM
W 53-52
+4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
UK
L 51-77
−29.5
7
@
EIU
L 57-65
−13.5
12
@
VAL
L 63-68
−13.5
15
@
MUR
L 79-99
+20.5
22
@
OKST
L 81-95
+20.5
28
@
TULN
L 72-82
+5.5
2
@
CREI
L 76-96
+28.5
6
vs
UIW
W 74-67
−4.5
17
vs
HCU
W 79-64
+5.5
21
@
PAC
L 82-95
+37.5
29
@
AMCC
W 76-71
+9.5
31
@
RGV
W 71-69
−5.5
3
vs
ETAM
W 80-58
−8.5
5
vs
NWST
W 74-72
+1.5
10
@
NOLA
W 90-77
+12.5
12
@
MCN
L 68-94
+15.5
17
vs
LAM
L 80-90
+30.5
19
vs
SFA
L 62-79
−3.5
24
@
SELA
L 61-67
−13.5
27
vs
NOLA
L 62-80
−15.5
31
@
ETAM
W 72-68
−6.5
2
@
NWST
W 61-58
−28.5
7
vs
AMCC
L 76-83
+21.5
9
vs
RGV
L 72-92
+16.5
14
@
UIW
W 91-83
+25.5
16
@
HCU
L 68-72
+3.5
21
@
SFA
L 78-81
+11.5
23
@
LAM
W 53-52
−38.5
over 16under 12avg +3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SE Louisiana
7-21 overall · 5-15 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas A&M-CC68–73
- Lvs UT Rio Grande75–96
- L@ East Texas A&M53–70
- L@ N'Western St66–69
- Wvs Incarnate Word74–62
5 days since their last game.
Nicholls
11-17 overall · 11-9 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Lamar53–52
- L@ SF Austin78–81
- L@ Hou Christian68–72
- W@ Incarnate Word91–83
- Lvs UT Rio Grande72–92
5 days since their last game.