William R. Johnson Coliseum · at SF Austin · Conference game
Closing line
SFA -12.5✓ NICH covered by 9.5
Closing total147.5Over by 11.5
| This season | SFA | |
|---|---|---|
| 10-16 | Record | 22-3 |
| 11-15 | ATS | 20-5 |
| 15-11 | O/U | 10-15 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: NICH 67–79 SFA · ✓ SFA (85%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NICH | 34 | 44 | 78 |
| SFA | 39 | 42 | 81 |
1st half: NICH 34, SFA 39 (SFA by 5). The model had SFA by 6.8 and a total of 68.4 (actual 73).
Team stats
| NICH | SFA | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-52 54% | Field goals | 28-59 47% |
| 13-26 50% | 3-pointers | 13-33 39% |
| 9-11 82% | Free throws | 12-18 67% |
| 24 3 off | Rebounds | 34 12 off |
| 16 | Assists | 18 |
| 5 | Steals | 9 |
| 1 | Blocks | 3 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 18 | Fouls | 14 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 26 |
| 10 | Fast-break points | 6 |
Players
| NICH | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zee Hamoda G | 37 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 8-11 | 4-6 |
| Sincere Malone F | 36 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 4-9 | 1-3 |
| Trae English G | 31 | 15 | 1 | 6 | 6-11 | 3-5 |
| Jalik Dunkley F | 18 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3-5 | 2-2 |
| Nick Krass G | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Christian Winborne G | 28 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4-5 | 2-3 |
| Jaylen Searles G | 24 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 |
| Jalin Rice G | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Grant Sanders F | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Chaydon Stone, Kevin Pazmino, Jordan Matthews, Zaiden Cross, Domanic Betancourt
| SFA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keon Thompson G | 33 | 16 | 3 | 9 | 4-9 | 2-4 |
| Chrishawn Christmas G | 31 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Jerald Colonel F | 29 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Lateef Patrick Jr. G | 23 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 7-18 | 2-9 |
| Kam Burton G | 16 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 5-9 | 5-9 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Narit Chotikavanic G | 26 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4-8 | 3-7 |
| Ahamed Mohammed G | 19 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-3 |
| Gediminas Alisas F | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Christian Green G | 9 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Marcus Scurry G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Bryceson Melvin, Harris Dar, Yohan Gutierrez, Tichyque Musaka, Eltramon Smith
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSFA -13.5
1 → NICH
CloseSFA -12.5
1 pt toward NICH
Total
Open147.5
no move
Close147.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
NICH +650 · SFA -1000
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SFA -13.5 · closed SFA -12.5 · moved 1 toward NICHmodel SFA -11.5
model SFA -11.5
Opened 147.5 · unchangedmodel 146
model 146
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | SFA -12.5 | SFA -11.7 | NICH +0.8 | W NICH covered |
| Total | 147.5 | 146.1 | Under 1.4 | L Over |
| Projected score | — | NICH 67.2 · SFA 78.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SFA -6.8 | SFA -5.0 |
| 1H total | 68.4 | 73 |
| 1H projected score | NICH 30.8 · SFA 37.6 | NICH 34 · SFA 39 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 10-0 100% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NICH 2–1 SFANICH leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · NICH 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2025-26 | SFA 79 @ NICH 62 | NICH +4.5 | SFA W |
| Mar 1, 2024-25 | NICH 94 @ SFA 70 | SFA -1.5 | NICH W |
| Jan 18, 2024-25 | SFA 61 @ NICH 73 | NICH -3.5 | NICH W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Nicholls
26 games played
Straight up
10-16
38% wins
Against the spread
11-15
42% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-11
58% overs · avg +4.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 51-77 | +31.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 57-65 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 63-68 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-99 | +14.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 81-95 | +23.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 72-82 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 76-96 | +18.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 74-67 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 82-95 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 76-71 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 71-69 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 80-58 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 74-72 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-77 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 68-94 | +15.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 80-90 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 62-79 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 61-67 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 62-80 | -4.5 | L −22.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 72-68 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 61-58 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 76-83 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 72-92 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 91-83 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 68-72 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
UK
L 51-77
+5.5
7
@
EIU
L 57-65
−10.5
12
@
VAL
L 63-68
−2.5
15
@
MUR
L 79-99
−5.5
22
@
OKST
L 81-95
+9.5
28
@
TULN
L 72-82
−1.5
2
@
CREI
L 76-96
−1.5
6
vs
UIW
W 74-67
+8.5
17
vs
HCU
W 79-64
+11.5
21
@
PAC
L 82-95
−4.5
29
@
AMCC
W 76-71
+10.5
31
@
RGV
W 71-69
+5.5
3
vs
ETAM
W 80-58
+15.5
5
vs
NWST
W 74-72
−6.5
10
@
NOLA
W 90-77
+9.5
12
@
MCN
L 68-94
−10.5
17
vs
LAM
L 80-90
−13.5
19
vs
SFA
L 62-79
−12.5
24
@
SELA
L 61-67
−3.5
27
vs
NOLA
L 62-80
−22.5
31
@
ETAM
W 72-68
+5.5
2
@
NWST
W 61-58
+1.5
7
vs
AMCC
L 76-83
−8.5
9
vs
RGV
L 72-92
−16.5
14
@
UIW
W 91-83
+10.5
16
@
HCU
L 68-72
−2.5
covered 11didn’t cover 15avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
UK
L 51-77
−29.5
7
@
EIU
L 57-65
−13.5
12
@
VAL
L 63-68
−13.5
15
@
MUR
L 79-99
+20.5
22
@
OKST
L 81-95
+20.5
28
@
TULN
L 72-82
+5.5
2
@
CREI
L 76-96
+28.5
6
vs
UIW
W 74-67
−4.5
17
vs
HCU
W 79-64
+5.5
21
@
PAC
L 82-95
+37.5
29
@
AMCC
W 76-71
+9.5
31
@
RGV
W 71-69
−5.5
3
vs
ETAM
W 80-58
−8.5
5
vs
NWST
W 74-72
+1.5
10
@
NOLA
W 90-77
+12.5
12
@
MCN
L 68-94
+15.5
17
vs
LAM
L 80-90
+30.5
19
vs
SFA
L 62-79
−3.5
24
@
SELA
L 61-67
−13.5
27
vs
NOLA
L 62-80
−15.5
31
@
ETAM
W 72-68
−6.5
2
@
NWST
W 61-58
−28.5
7
vs
AMCC
L 76-83
+21.5
9
vs
RGV
L 72-92
+16.5
14
@
UIW
W 91-83
+25.5
16
@
HCU
L 68-72
+3.5
over 15under 11avg +4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
SF Austin
25 games played
Straight up
22-3
88% wins
Against the spread
20-5
80% covers · avg +4.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-15
40% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 90-65 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 81-69 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 76-66 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 78-80 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 63-60 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 61-66 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 73-60 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 96-76 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 69-60 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 75-48 | -4.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 74-64 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-63 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 64-66 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 85-67 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 56-46 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 102 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-79 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 79-62 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-81 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 69-67 | -14.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 85-58 | -9.5 | W +17.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 67-60 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-74 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 74-70 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 66-57 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 78-68 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
ARST
W 90-65
+26.5
11
@
RICE
W 81-69
+14.5
14
vs
ACU
W 76-66
+3.5
18
@
FRES
L 78-80
−4.5
21
@
PEPP
W 63-60
+1.5
29
@
UTA
L 61-66
−3.5
3
vs
RGV
W 73-60
+6.5
7
vs
ULM
W 96-76
+0.5
17
vs
AMCC
W 69-60
+2.5
29
@
ETAM
W 75-48
+22.5
31
@
NWST
W 74-64
+1.5
3
@
SELA
W 73-63
+6.5
5
@
MCN
L 64-66
+8.5
10
vs
HCU
W 85-67
+5.5
12
vs
UIW
W 56-46
+2.5
17
@
NOLA
W 84-79
−1.5
19
@
NICH
W 79-62
+12.5
24
@
LAM
W 88-81
+2.5
27
vs
NWST
W 69-67
−12.5
31
vs
SELA
W 85-58
+17.5
2
vs
MCN
W 67-60
+9.5
7
vs
LAM
W 84-74
+1.5
9
vs
ETAM
W 74-70
−12.5
14
@
RGV
W 66-57
+7.5
16
@
AMCC
W 78-68
+4.5
covered 20didn’t cover 5avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
ARST
W 90-65
−0.5
11
@
RICE
W 81-69
+0.5
14
vs
ACU
W 76-66
−0.5
18
@
FRES
L 78-80
+11.5
21
@
PEPP
W 63-60
−25.5
29
@
UTA
L 61-66
−11.5
3
vs
RGV
W 73-60
−10.5
7
vs
ULM
W 96-76
+29.5
17
vs
AMCC
W 69-60
−10.5
29
@
ETAM
W 75-48
−23.5
31
@
NWST
W 74-64
−0.5
3
@
SELA
W 73-63
−1.5
5
@
MCN
L 64-66
−14.5
10
vs
HCU
W 85-67
+14.5
12
vs
UIW
W 56-46
−38.5
17
@
NOLA
W 84-79
+15.5
19
@
NICH
W 79-62
−3.5
24
@
LAM
W 88-81
+32.5
27
vs
NWST
W 69-67
−5.5
31
vs
SELA
W 85-58
+7.5
2
vs
MCN
W 67-60
−14.5
7
vs
LAM
W 84-74
+19.5
9
vs
ETAM
W 74-70
+0.5
14
@
RGV
W 66-57
−21.5
16
@
AMCC
W 78-68
+10.5
over 10under 15avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Nicholls
10-16 overall · 10-8 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Hou Christian68–72
- W@ Incarnate Word91–83
- Lvs UT Rio Grande72–92
- Lvs Texas A&M-CC76–83
- W@ N'Western St61–58
5 days since their last game.
SF Austin
22-3 overall · 17-1 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Texas A&M-CC78–68
- W@ UT Rio Grande66–57
- Wvs East Texas A&M74–70
- Wvs Lamar84–74
- Wvs McNeese67–60
5 days since their last game.