UTRGV Fieldhouse · at UT Rio Grande · Conference game
Closing line
RGV -5.5✓ SELA covered by 2.5
Closing total135.5Under by 2.5
| This season | RGV | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-13 | Record | 5-11 |
| 8-9 | ATS | 7-9 |
| 7-10 | O/U | 7-9 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SELA 68–71 RGV · ✓ RGV (61%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SELA | 29 | 36 | 65 |
| RGV | 31 | 37 | 68 |
1st half: SELA 29, RGV 31 (RGV by 2). The model had RGV by 1.8 and a total of 64.8 (actual 60).
Team stats
| SELA | RGV | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-57 40% | Field goals | 22-52 42% |
| 7-23 30% | 3-pointers | 7-27 26% |
| 12-18 67% | Free throws | 17-25 68% |
| 35 9 off | Rebounds | 37 9 off |
| 18 | Assists | 17 |
| 5 | Steals | 4 |
| 2 | Blocks | 1 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 23 | Fouls | 16 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 22 |
| 11 | Fast-break points | 9 |
Players
| SELA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaiah Gaines F | 34 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-1 |
| Ethan Pickett G | 29 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Jeremy Elyzee G | 26 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-0 |
| Makhi Myles F | 20 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2-6 | 2-4 |
| Kyle Edison G | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Peter Hemschemeier G | 28 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3-12 | 1-5 |
| Jaiden Lawrence G | 23 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 3-6 |
| Jalen Forrest G | 14 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| CJ Booker PG | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Ubong-Abasi Etim C | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Garrett Shoemaker F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Seth Jones, Cody Al-Naziat, Amir Chaney, Ahmed Essahaty
| RGV | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marvin McGhee III G | 37 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 5-12 | 5-11 |
| Jaylen Washington Jr. G | 35 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 3-7 | 1-2 |
| Julien Gomez G | 28 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 |
| Filip Brankovic F | 24 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 6-12 | 0-2 |
| Koree Cotton G | 21 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Kwo Agwa F | 15 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Jalen Ricks G | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
| Zae Blake G | 13 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Always Wright G | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Demarris Winters G | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| Dane Christensen F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Marshal Destremau F | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Mustafo Vanjov, Kye Dickson, Luis Ramirez
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenRGV -5.5
no move
CloseRGV -5.5
No change since the open
Total
Open135.5
no move
Close135.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
SELA +195 · RGV -238
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened RGV -5.5 · unchangedmodel RGV -3
model RGV -3
Opened 135.5 · unchangedmodel 138
model 138
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | RGV -5.5 | RGV -3.2 | SELA +2.3 | W SELA covered |
| Total | 135.5 | 138.2 | Over 2.7 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | SELA 67.5 · RGV 70.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | RGV -1.8 | RGV -2.0 |
| 1H total | 64.8 | 60 |
| 1H projected score | SELA 31.5 · RGV 33.3 | SELA 29 · RGV 31 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SELA 1–1 RGVSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · SELA 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2024-25 | SELA 76 @ RGV 77 | RGV -0.5 | RGV W |
| Jan 6, 2024-25 | RGV 75 @ SELA 79 | SELA +3.5 | SELA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SE Louisiana
17 games played
Straight up
4-13
24% wins
Against the spread
8-9
47% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-10
41% overs · avg −1.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 58-88 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 52-58 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 60-70 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 68-75 | +27.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 57-70 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 76-68 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 69-65 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 68-76 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 74-71 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 132.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 69-70 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 65-78 | +24.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 70-79 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 63-73 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 60-52 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 61-73 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 76-79 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 56-68 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 130.5 | U 124 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MISS
L 58-88
−8.5
7
@
UL
L 52-58
−2.5
10
@
GT
L 60-70
+4.5
15
@
MSST
L 68-75
+20.5
26
@
UNCW
L 57-70
−1.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 76-68
+1.5
29
vs
NAVY
W 69-65
+7.5
7
vs
NWST
L 68-76
−15.5
13
@
HCU
W 74-71
+5.5
15
vs
ETAM
L 69-70
−5.5
19
@
LSU
L 65-78
+11.5
30
@
UIW
L 70-79
−2.5
3
vs
SFA
L 63-73
−6.5
5
vs
LAM
W 60-52
+9.5
10
@
MCN
L 61-73
+4.5
12
vs
NOLA
L 76-79
−5.5
17
@
AMCC
L 56-68
−6.5
covered 8didn’t cover 9avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MISS
L 58-88
+2.5
7
@
UL
L 52-58
−25.5
10
@
GT
L 60-70
−3.5
15
@
MSST
L 68-75
−7.5
26
@
UNCW
L 57-70
−10.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 76-68
+2.5
29
vs
NAVY
W 69-65
−2.5
7
vs
NWST
L 68-76
+10.5
13
@
HCU
W 74-71
+12.5
15
vs
ETAM
L 69-70
+1.5
19
@
LSU
L 65-78
−1.5
30
@
UIW
L 70-79
+13.5
3
vs
SFA
L 63-73
−1.5
5
vs
LAM
W 60-52
−23.5
10
@
MCN
L 61-73
−4.5
12
vs
NOLA
L 76-79
+12.5
17
@
AMCC
L 56-68
−6.5
over 7under 10avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
UT Rio Grande
16 games played
Straight up
5-11
31% wins
Against the spread
7-9
44% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-9
44% overs · avg −5.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 81-96 | +24.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 95-72 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 65-85 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 67-74 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 73-87 | +33.5 | W +19.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 60-73 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 63-50 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 11 | vs | L 50-58 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 83-72 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 69-85 | -6.5 | L −22.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-71 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 59-63 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 80-67 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-77 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 63-64 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 79-76 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BAY
L 81-96
+9.5
8
@
SUU
W 95-72
+21.5
11
@
BOIS
L 65-85
−3.5
22
@
MOST
L 67-74
−3.5
24
@
ILL
L 73-87
+19.5
3
@
SFA
L 60-73
−6.5
7
vs
APSU
W 63-50
+10.5
11
vs
UTA
L 50-58
−12.5
16
@
LAM
W 83-72
+14.5
29
vs
NOLA
L 69-85
−22.5
31
vs
NICH
L 69-71
−5.5
3
vs
AMCC
L 59-63
−6.5
5
vs
UIW
W 80-67
+11.5
10
@
ETAM
L 69-77
−11.5
12
@
NWST
L 63-64
−3.5
17
vs
MCN
W 79-76
+12.5
covered 7didn’t cover 9avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BAY
L 81-96
+22.5
8
@
SUU
W 95-72
+6.5
11
@
BOIS
L 65-85
−11.5
22
@
MOST
L 67-74
−8.5
24
@
ILL
L 73-87
−4.5
3
@
SFA
L 60-73
−10.5
7
vs
APSU
W 63-50
−38.5
11
vs
UTA
L 50-58
−37.5
16
@
LAM
W 83-72
+15.5
29
vs
NOLA
L 69-85
+1.5
31
vs
NICH
L 69-71
−5.5
3
vs
AMCC
L 59-63
−15.5
5
vs
UIW
W 80-67
+0.5
10
@
ETAM
L 69-77
+0.5
12
@
NWST
L 63-64
−16.5
17
vs
MCN
W 79-76
+8.5
over 7under 9avg −5.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SE Louisiana
4-13 overall · 2-7 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Texas A&M-CC56–68
- Lvs LSU N Orleans76–79
- L@ McNeese61–73
- Wvs Lamar60–52
- Lvs SF Austin63–73
2 days since their last game.
UT Rio Grande
5-11 overall · 3-6 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs McNeese79–76
- L@ N'Western St63–64
- L@ East Texas A&M69–77
- Wvs Incarnate Word80–67
- Lvs Texas A&M-CC59–63
2 days since their last game.