Jersey Mike’s Arena · at Rutgers · Conference game
Closing line
WASH -4.5✓ WASH covered by 2.5
Closing total139.5Over by 11.5
| This season | RUTG | |
|---|---|---|
| 13-14 | Record | 11-16 |
| 16-11 | ATS | 13-14 |
| 9-18 | O/U | 16-11 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: WASH 77–71 RUTG · ✓ WASH (71%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WASH | 36 | 43 | 79 |
| RUTG | 29 | 43 | 72 |
1st half: WASH 36, RUTG 29 (WASH by 7). The model had WASH by 3.8 and a total of 69.0 (actual 65).
Team stats
| WASH | RUTG | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-56 50% | Field goals | 23-58 40% |
| 7-19 37% | 3-pointers | 3-14 21% |
| 16-21 76% | Free throws | 23-32 72% |
| 34 7 off | Rebounds | 29 8 off |
| 15 | Assists | 10 |
| 4 | Steals | 6 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 7 |
| 24 | Fouls | 17 |
| 40 | Points in paint | 24 |
| 18 | Fast-break points | 19 |
Players
| WASH | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wesley Yates III G | 37 | 19 | 3 | 6 | 7-13 | 3-7 |
| Hannes Steinbach F | 37 | 24 | 16 | 1 | 9-13 | 0-2 |
| Zoom Diallo G | 36 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 4-14 | 0-2 |
| Quimari Peterson G | 31 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| Lathan Sommerville C | 25 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Courtland Muldrew G | 19 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-1 |
| Bryson Tucker F | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Nikola Dzepina F | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Jacob Ognacevic F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Jasir Rencher, Mady Traore, Desmond Claude, Christian Nitu, JJ Mandaquit, Franck Kepnang, BJ Roy
| RUTG | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tariq Francis G | 33 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 5-16 | 0-3 |
| Harun Zrno G | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
| Dylan Grant F | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Kaden Powers G | 13 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| Emmanuel Ogbole C | 10 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jamichael Davis G | 29 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-3 |
| Darren Buchanan Jr. G | 28 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 5-8 | 1-2 |
| Lino Mark G | 27 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-1 |
| Bryce Ruglass Dortch F | 23 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Chris Nwuli F | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Denis Badalau F | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Max Fradkin, Gevonte Ware, Dorian Jones, Baye Fall
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenWASH -4.5
no move
CloseWASH -4.5
No change since the open
Total
Open143.5
▼ 4
Close139.5
Down 4 since the open
Moneyline
WASH -198 · RUTG +164
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened WASH -4.5 · unchangedmodel WASH -6.5
model WASH -6.5
Opened 143.5 · closed 139.5 · moved 4 downmodel 147.5
model 147.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | WASH -4.5 | WASH -6.3 | WASH +1.8 | W WASH covered |
| Total | 139.5 | 147.5 | Over 8.0 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | WASH 76.9 · RUTG 70.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WASH -3.8 | WASH -7.0 |
| 1H total | 69.0 | 65 |
| 1H projected score | WASH 36.4 · RUTG 32.6 | WASH 36 · RUTG 29 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 2-8 20% | |
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WASH 0–1 RUTGRUTG leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · WASH 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2024-25 | RUTG 89 @ WASH 85 | WASH -2.5 | RUTG W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Washington
27 games played
Straight up
13-14
48% wins
Against the spread
16-11
59% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-18
33% overs · avg −3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-50 | -34.5 | W +9.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 84-70 | -27.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 69-78 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 81-69 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 99-93 | -23.5 | L −17.5 | 157.5 | O 192 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 83-66 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-81 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 80-82 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 84-76 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 105-69 | -25.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 66-70 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 86-56 | -18.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 74-65 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 80-90 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 73-81 | +16.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 81-74 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 72-82 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-80 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 66-76 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 72-57 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 66-75 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 76-62 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 74-84 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-77 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 60-63 | -12.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 69-57 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 60-64 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UAPB
W 94-50
+9.5
6
vs
DEN
W 84-70
−13.5
9
@
BAY
L 69-78
−2.5
14
@
WSU
W 81-69
+3.5
18
vs
SOU
W 99-93
−17.5
27
vs
NEV
W 83-66
+13.5
28
vs
COLO
L 68-81
−15.5
3
vs
UCLA
L 80-82
+0.5
6
@
USC
W 84-76
+12.5
13
vs
SUU
W 105-69
+10.5
19
@
SEA
L 66-70
−11.5
22
vs
USD
W 86-56
+11.5
29
vs
UTAH
W 74-65
−3.5
4
@
IU
L 80-90
−0.5
7
@
PUR
L 73-81
+8.5
11
vs
OSU
W 81-74
+5.5
14
vs
MICH
L 72-82
+2.5
17
vs
MSU
L 63-80
−13.5
21
@
NEB
L 66-76
+0.5
25
vs
ORE
W 72-57
+7.5
29
@
ILL
L 66-75
+3.5
31
@
NU
W 76-62
+15.5
4
vs
IOWA
L 74-84
−7.5
7
@
UCLA
L 73-77
+0.5
11
vs
PSU
L 60-63
−15.5
14
vs
MINN
W 69-57
+5.5
21
@
MD
L 60-64
−8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 11avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UAPB
W 94-50
−16.5
6
vs
DEN
W 84-70
+0.5
9
@
BAY
L 69-78
−9.5
14
@
WSU
W 81-69
−8.5
18
vs
SOU
W 99-93
+34.5
27
vs
NEV
W 83-66
+3.5
28
vs
COLO
L 68-81
−2.5
3
vs
UCLA
L 80-82
+20.5
6
@
USC
W 84-76
+5.5
13
vs
SUU
W 105-69
+20.5
19
@
SEA
L 66-70
−15.5
22
vs
USD
W 86-56
−17.5
29
vs
UTAH
W 74-65
−18.5
4
@
IU
L 80-90
+17.5
7
@
PUR
L 73-81
−0.5
11
vs
OSU
W 81-74
−0.5
14
vs
MICH
L 72-82
−11.5
17
vs
MSU
L 63-80
−2.5
21
@
NEB
L 66-76
−10.5
25
vs
ORE
W 72-57
−14.5
29
@
ILL
L 66-75
−12.5
31
@
NU
W 76-62
−8.5
4
vs
IOWA
L 74-84
+16.5
7
@
UCLA
L 73-77
+5.5
11
vs
PSU
L 60-63
−30.5
14
vs
MINN
W 69-57
−12.5
21
@
MD
L 60-64
−19.5
over 9under 18avg −3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Rutgers
27 games played
Straight up
11-16
41% wins
Against the spread
13-14
48% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-11
59% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 81-53 | -18.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 72-60 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 84-72 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-71 | -16.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 54-67 | -15.5 | L −28.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 60-85 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 63-68 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 80-65 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 65-81 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 60-101 | +25.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 59-81 | +13.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 70-69 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 65-50 | -20.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 73-80 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 88-85 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 55-81 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 77-75 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 87-96 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 62-68 | +17.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 59-82 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 79-88 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 75-78 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 66-98 | +13.5 | L −18.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 68-80 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 68-57 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 85-72 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 61-80 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
RID
W 81-53
+9.5
10
vs
ME
W 72-60
−6.5
14
vs
LEH
W 84-72
−6.5
18
vs
AMER
W 80-71
−7.5
21
vs
CCSU
L 54-67
−28.5
24
vs
TENN
L 60-85
−10.5
25
vs
ND
L 63-68
+1.5
27
vs
UNLV
W 80-65
+19.5
2
vs
PUR
L 65-81
−2.5
6
@
MICH
L 60-101
−15.5
13
@
HALL
L 59-81
−8.5
20
vs
PENN
W 70-69
−10.5
29
vs
DSU
W 65-50
−5.5
2
vs
OSU
L 73-80
+2.5
5
vs
ORE
W 88-85
+7.5
8
@
ILL
L 55-81
−3.5
11
vs
NU
W 77-75
+6.5
17
@
WIS
L 87-96
+6.5
20
@
IOWA
L 62-68
+11.5
23
vs
IU
L 59-82
−15.5
27
vs
MSU
L 79-88
+5.5
31
@
USC
L 75-78
+8.5
3
@
UCLA
L 66-98
−18.5
7
vs
NEB
L 68-80
+0.5
15
vs
MD
W 68-57
+8.5
18
@
PSU
W 85-72
+17.5
21
@
MINN
L 61-80
−10.5
covered 13didn’t cover 14avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
RID
W 81-53
−5.5
10
vs
ME
W 72-60
+1.5
14
vs
LEH
W 84-72
+19.5
18
vs
AMER
W 80-71
+7.5
21
vs
CCSU
L 54-67
−16.5
24
vs
TENN
L 60-85
+3.5
25
vs
ND
L 63-68
−9.5
27
vs
UNLV
W 80-65
−8.5
2
vs
PUR
L 65-81
−0.5
6
@
MICH
L 60-101
+7.5
13
@
HALL
L 59-81
+3.5
20
vs
PENN
W 70-69
−11.5
29
vs
DSU
W 65-50
−20.5
2
vs
OSU
L 73-80
+1.5
5
vs
ORE
W 88-85
+33.5
8
@
ILL
L 55-81
−13.5
11
vs
NU
W 77-75
+7.5
17
@
WIS
L 87-96
+33.5
20
@
IOWA
L 62-68
−10.5
23
vs
IU
L 59-82
−6.5
27
vs
MSU
L 79-88
+28.5
31
@
USC
L 75-78
+6.5
3
@
UCLA
L 66-98
+21.5
7
vs
NEB
L 68-80
+2.5
15
vs
MD
W 68-57
−19.5
18
@
PSU
W 85-72
+8.5
21
@
MINN
L 61-80
+4.5
over 16under 11avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Washington
13-14 overall · 5-11 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Maryland60–64
- Wvs Minnesota69–57
- Lvs Penn State60–63
- L@ UCLA73–77
- Lvs Iowa74–84
3 days since their last game.
Rutgers
11-16 overall · 4-12 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Minnesota61–80
- W@ Penn State85–72
- Wvs Maryland68–57
- Lvs Nebraska68–80
- L@ UCLA66–98
3 days since their last game.