Koessler Athletic Center · at Canisius · Conference game
Closing line
QUIN -7.5✓ CAN covered by 3.5
Closing total138.5Under by 8.5
| This season | CAN | |
|---|---|---|
| 17-12 | Record | 9-20 |
| 12-17 | ATS | 14-15 |
| 11-18 | O/U | 9-20 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: QUIN 74–65 CAN · ✓ QUIN (78%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUIN | 29 | 38 | 67 |
| CAN | 30 | 33 | 63 |
1st half: QUIN 29, CAN 30 (CAN by 1). The model had QUIN by 5.4 and a total of 65.2 (actual 59).
Team stats
| QUIN | CAN | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-59 36% | Field goals | 23-60 38% |
| 5-20 25% | 3-pointers | 6-26 23% |
| 20-30 67% | Free throws | 11-16 69% |
| 45 14 off | Rebounds | 38 8 off |
| 7 | Assists | 12 |
| 3 | Steals | 4 |
| 3 | Blocks | 3 |
| 7 | Turnovers | 7 |
| 16 | Fouls | 18 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 4 | Fast-break points | 10 |
Players
| QUIN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asim Jones G | 38 | 27 | 1 | 2 | 10-22 | 4-9 |
| Keith McKnight F | 35 | 22 | 9 | 1 | 9-16 | 1-3 |
| Jaden Zimmerman G | 33 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0-8 | 0-3 |
| Spence Wewe F | 26 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Grant Randall F | 21 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nate Guerengomba G | 23 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Sam Nosakhare C | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Samson Reilly G | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Tai Turnage G | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Braylan Ritvo F | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Christopher Skenderi, Jayden Reid, Akintola Akinniyi, Amarri Monroe, Ronell Giles Jr.
| CAN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kahlil Singleton G | 38 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 5-14 | 2-9 |
| Javantae Edwards G | 23 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-4 |
| Myles Wilmoth F | 22 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-4 |
| Max Jusianiec G | 14 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-3 |
| King Ijeoma F | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Mike Evbagharu G | 38 | 10 | 14 | 5 | 5-8 | 0-0 |
| Bryan Ndjonga F | 36 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 6-13 | 0-2 |
| Evan van der Plas F | 12 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Brendan Oliver F | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Andreo Ash, Chris Kumu, Zach Christian, Trevor Augustine, Nicco DiGiulio, Anthony Benard, Marcus Niblack
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenQUIN -6.5
1 → QUIN
CloseQUIN -7.5
1 pt toward QUIN
Total
Open135.5
▲ 3
Close138.5
Up 3 since the open
Moneyline
QUIN -375 · CAN +295
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened QUIN -6.5 · closed QUIN -7.5 · moved 1 toward QUINmodel QUIN -9
model QUIN -9
Opened 135.5 · closed 138.5 · moved 3 upmodel 139
model 139
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | QUIN -7.5 | QUIN -8.9 | QUIN +1.4 | L CAN covered |
| Total | 138.5 | 139.2 | Over 0.7 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | QUIN 74 · CAN 65.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | QUIN -5.4 | CAN -1.0 |
| 1H total | 65.2 | 59 |
| 1H projected score | QUIN 35.3 · CAN 29.9 | QUIN 29 · CAN 30 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
QUIN 5–4 CANQUIN leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · QUIN has won the last 4 meetings · QUIN 3-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2025-26 | CAN 60 @ QUIN 75 | QUIN -15.5 | CAN W |
| Feb 6, 2024-25 | CAN 71 @ QUIN 89 | QUIN -16.5 | QUIN W |
| Mar 13, 2023-24 | CAN 52 vs QUIN 76 | QUIN -6.5 | QUIN W |
| Feb 4, 2023-24 | CAN 63 @ QUIN 88 | QUIN -7.5 | QUIN W |
| Dec 1, 2023-24 | QUIN 73 @ CAN 93 | CAN -3.5 | CAN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Quinnipiac
29 games played
Straight up
17-12
59% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-18
38% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 74-108 | +26.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 71-49 | -9.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 60-97 | +6.5 | L −30.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 70-64 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 83-75 | +12.5 | W +20.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 91-102 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 76-62 | -15.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 5 | @ | W 89-68 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 72-58 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 75-71 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 85-75 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 66-74 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 64-58 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 79-80 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 80-69 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 70-60 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 70-74 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 71-83 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 98-92 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 77-62 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 64-71 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 91-98 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 72-65 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 75-60 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 56-55 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 137.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 74-62 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 49-56 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 79-85 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 76-78 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SJU
L 74-108
−7.5
6
vs
CCSU
W 71-49
+12.5
11
vs
YALE
L 60-97
−30.5
16
@
ME
W 70-64
+2.5
23
@
PITT
W 83-75
+20.5
25
@
UCF
L 91-102
+2.5
30
vs
STO
W 76-62
−1.5
5
@
IONA
W 89-68
+23.5
7
vs
RID
W 72-58
−0.5
13
vs
UML
W 75-71
−8.5
17
@
MONM
W 85-75
+11.5
21
@
HOF
L 66-74
−0.5
29
vs
MRST
W 64-58
+3.5
2
@
MAN
L 79-80
−8.5
4
vs
MSM
W 80-69
+3.5
11
@
SHU
W 70-60
+4.5
14
vs
SPU
L 70-74
−10.5
17
@
MRMK
L 71-83
−13.5
19
vs
MAN
W 98-92
−7.5
22
@
MSM
W 77-62
+10.5
24
@
MRST
L 64-71
−3.5
30
vs
SHU
L 91-98
−15.5
1
@
FAIR
W 72-65
+4.5
5
vs
CAN
W 75-60
−0.5
7
vs
NIA
W 56-55
−11.5
13
@
SIE
W 74-62
+15.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 49-56
−10.5
22
vs
FAIR
L 79-85
−12.5
27
@
NIA
L 76-78
−10.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SJU
L 74-108
+25.5
6
vs
CCSU
W 71-49
−30.5
11
vs
YALE
L 60-97
+0.5
16
@
ME
W 70-64
−3.5
23
@
PITT
W 83-75
+17.5
25
@
UCF
L 91-102
+30.5
30
vs
STO
W 76-62
−10.5
5
@
IONA
W 89-68
−6.5
7
vs
RID
W 72-58
−17.5
13
vs
UML
W 75-71
−7.5
17
@
MONM
W 85-75
+14.5
21
@
HOF
L 66-74
−7.5
29
vs
MRST
W 64-58
−23.5
2
@
MAN
L 79-80
−0.5
4
vs
MSM
W 80-69
−1.5
11
@
SHU
W 70-60
−22.5
14
vs
SPU
L 70-74
+3.5
17
@
MRMK
L 71-83
+12.5
19
vs
MAN
W 98-92
+36.5
22
@
MSM
W 77-62
−9.5
24
@
MRST
L 64-71
−4.5
30
vs
SHU
L 91-98
+32.5
1
@
FAIR
W 72-65
−17.5
5
vs
CAN
W 75-60
−6.5
7
vs
NIA
W 56-55
−26.5
13
@
SIE
W 74-62
−8.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 49-56
−36.5
22
vs
FAIR
L 79-85
+13.5
27
@
NIA
L 76-78
+17.5
over 11under 18avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Canisius
29 games played
Straight up
9-20
31% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-20
31% overs · avg −3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 48-88 | +25.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 70-89 | +21.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 58-55 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 50-93 | +23.5 | L −19.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 60-57 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 128.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 75-66 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 53-71 | +9.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 57-69 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 52-74 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 131.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 70-43 | +6.5 | W +33.5 | 127.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 45-62 | +21.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 107 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 59-103 | +19.5 | L −24.5 | 143.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 85-81 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 82-78 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 70-64 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 48-74 | +11.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 54-59 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 126.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-78 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 66-69 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 55-61 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 86-88 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 129.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 63-78 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 56-65 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 60-75 | +15.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 63-69 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 65-69 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 72-66 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 131.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 47-68 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 67-62 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 129.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
DAY
L 48-88
−14.5
8
@
SBU
L 70-89
+2.5
12
vs
MERC
W 58-55
+4.5
17
@
HPU
L 50-93
−19.5
21
vs
UMES
W 60-57
−0.5
23
vs
BING
W 75-66
+6.5
29
vs
BUF
L 53-71
−8.5
5
@
SPU
L 57-69
−2.5
7
@
SIE
L 52-74
−4.5
13
@
ME
W 70-43
+33.5
16
@
URI
L 45-62
+4.5
22
@
DUQ
L 59-103
−24.5
2
vs
FAIR
W 85-81
+10.5
4
vs
SHU
W 82-78
+9.5
9
@
MAN
W 70-64
+13.5
11
@
IONA
L 48-74
−14.5
14
vs
NIA
L 54-59
−7.5
17
vs
MSM
L 68-78
−6.5
22
@
SHU
L 66-69
+7.5
24
@
FAIR
L 55-61
+4.5
30
vs
MRST
L 86-88
+7.5
1
vs
SIE
L 63-78
−6.5
3
@
NIA
L 56-65
−6.5
5
@
QUIN
L 60-75
+0.5
13
vs
IONA
L 63-69
−1.5
15
vs
MAN
L 65-69
−2.5
20
@
RID
W 72-66
+7.5
22
@
MSM
L 47-68
−13.5
27
vs
MRMK
W 67-62
+13.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
DAY
L 48-88
−6.5
8
@
SBU
L 70-89
+22.5
12
vs
MERC
W 58-55
−22.5
17
@
HPU
L 50-93
−9.5
21
vs
UMES
W 60-57
−11.5
23
vs
BING
W 75-66
+11.5
29
vs
BUF
L 53-71
−15.5
5
@
SPU
L 57-69
−3.5
7
@
SIE
L 52-74
−5.5
13
@
ME
W 70-43
−14.5
16
@
URI
L 45-62
−31.5
22
@
DUQ
L 59-103
+18.5
2
vs
FAIR
W 85-81
+25.5
4
vs
SHU
W 82-78
+18.5
9
@
MAN
W 70-64
−11.5
11
@
IONA
L 48-74
−19.5
14
vs
NIA
L 54-59
−13.5
17
vs
MSM
L 68-78
+10.5
22
@
SHU
L 66-69
−10.5
24
@
FAIR
L 55-61
−25.5
30
vs
MRST
L 86-88
+44.5
1
vs
SIE
L 63-78
+5.5
3
@
NIA
L 56-65
−8.5
5
@
QUIN
L 60-75
−6.5
13
vs
IONA
L 63-69
−5.5
15
vs
MAN
L 65-69
−8.5
20
@
RID
W 72-66
+6.5
22
@
MSM
L 47-68
−22.5
27
vs
MRMK
W 67-62
−0.5
over 9under 20avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Quinnipiac
17-12 overall · 11-8 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Niagara76–78
- Lvs Fairfield79–85
- Lvs Merrimack49–56
- W@ Siena74–62
- Wvs Niagara56–55
2 days since their last game.
Canisius
9-20 overall · 5-14 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Merrimack67–62
- L@ Mount St Marys47–68
- W@ Rider72–66
- Lvs Manhattan65–69
- Lvs Iona63–69
2 days since their last game.