Freedom Hall (TN) · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
WIN -7.5✓ PRES covered by 5.5
Closing total145.5Under by 1.5
| This season | WIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 12-17 | Record | 19-10 |
| 16-13 | ATS | 12-17 |
| 16-13 | O/U | 14-15 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: PRES 72–78 WIN · ✓ WIN (71%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRES | 25 | 46 | 71 |
| WIN | 32 | 41 | 73 |
1st half: PRES 25, WIN 32 (WIN by 7). The model had WIN by 3.5 and a total of 70.1 (actual 57).
Team stats
| PRES | WIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-55 47% | Field goals | 23-51 45% |
| 7-20 35% | 3-pointers | 5-18 28% |
| 12-18 67% | Free throws | 22-31 71% |
| 31 9 off | Rebounds | 34 9 off |
| 13 | Assists | 12 |
| 7 | Steals | 10 |
| 5 | Blocks | 4 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 23 | Fouls | 18 |
| 36 | Points in paint | 34 |
| 2 | Fast-break points | 9 |
Players
| PRES | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triston Wilson G | 38 | 26 | 5 | 5 | 8-16 | 3-7 |
| Josh Pickett G | 36 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 4-11 | 4-10 |
| Jaylen Peterson F | 34 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| Jonah Pierce F | 34 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-0 |
| Carl Parrish G | 34 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Iverson King G | 10 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Chidi Chiakwelu F | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Khalon Hudson G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| JD Bowden G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Amare Anderson, Luke Allison, Augustine Ayelyine, Erik Taylor
| WIN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kody Clouet G | 36 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-5 |
| Daylen Berry G | 33 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-5 |
| Kareem Rozier G | 27 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-4 |
| Isaiah Wilson G | 26 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 5-7 | 1-1 |
| Ed Nnamoko F | 21 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Seifeldin Hendawy G | 16 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Josh Meo G | 14 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-3 |
| Logan Duncomb C | 11 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Tommy Kamarad F | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Tai Hamilton F | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Kaleb Evans, Pharrell Boyogueno, Braylhan Thomas, Henry Harrison, Cam Christy
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketWIN -7.5
ModelWIN -6.2
Model edgePRES +1.3
W PRES covered
Total
Market145.5
Model150.0
Model edgeOver 4.5
L Under
Projected score
PRES 71.9 · WIN 78.1
PRES 71 · WIN 73
Win probability
WIN 71%
1st half
Spread
WIN -3.5
WIN -7.0
Total
70.1
57 points
Projected score
PRES 33.3 · WIN 36.8
PRES 25 · WIN 32
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenWIN -6.5
1 → WIN
CloseWIN -7.5
1 pt toward WIN
Total
Open146.5
▼ 1
Close145.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
PRES +260 · WIN -325
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened WIN -6.5 · closed WIN -7.5 · moved 1 toward WINmodel WIN -6
model WIN -6
Opened 146.5 · closed 145.5 · moved 1 downmodel 150
model 150
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
PRES 1–9 WINWIN leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · WIN has won the last 4 meetings · PRES 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025-26 | PRES 70 @ WIN 74 | WIN -7.5 | PRES W |
| Jan 24, 2025-26 | WIN 82 @ PRES 72 | PRES +5.5 | WIN W |
| Feb 19, 2024-25 | WIN 81 @ PRES 77 | PRES +3.5 | WIN W |
| Jan 29, 2024-25 | PRES 67 @ WIN 76 | WIN -7.5 | WIN W |
| Feb 21, 2023-24 | PRES 78 @ WIN 55 | WIN -9.5 | PRES W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Presbyterian
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 55-76 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 68-64 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 63-61 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 61-81 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 62-64 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-67 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 124.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 46-86 | +25.5 | L −14.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 69-41 | -8.5 | W +19.5 | 133.5 | U 110 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 56-63 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-72 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-74 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 81-87 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 61-80 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 70-77 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 71-70 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 92-55 | -8.5 | W +28.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 87-83 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 72-82 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 81-84 | +14.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-93 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 68-62 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 67-84 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 58-57 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 72-65 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 73-79 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-74 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 91-85 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−17.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
+10.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
+5.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
−3.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
+4.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
+0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
−14.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
+19.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−2.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+0.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−16.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
−8.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+7.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−12.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
−3.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+3.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+28.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+5.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
−4.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+11.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
−10.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−11.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
−15.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
+6.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
+4.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
−3.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+6.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
+3.5
6
vs
RAD
W 91-85
+8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−10.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
−9.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
−17.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
+4.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
−24.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
−0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
+0.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
−23.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−19.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+17.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−4.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
+29.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+25.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−6.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
+7.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+2.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+1.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+22.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
+7.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+15.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
+25.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−15.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
+4.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
−22.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
−2.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
+8.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+0.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
−6.5
6
vs
RAD
W 91-85
+29.5
over 16under 13avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Winthrop
29 games played
Straight up
19-10
66% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 81-74 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 90-96 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 66-72 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 105-69 | -2.5 | W +33.5 | 162.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 83-84 | +23.5 | W +22.5 | 168.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 80-62 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 73-80 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 101-79 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 94-92 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 84-88 | -16.5 | L −20.5 | 153.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 88-90 | -12.5 | L −14.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 57-87 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 70-82 | -7.5 | L −19.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-77 | -23.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 166.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 71-50 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 92-75 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 162.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 69-67 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 76-75 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 82-72 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 84-71 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 80-78 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-74 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 103-85 | -20.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 68-64 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 87-89 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 166.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 84-86 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-70 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 86-81 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
QUC
W 81-74
+3.5
7
@
GMU
L 90-96
+3.5
11
@
CCU
L 66-72
−8.5
15
vs
MER
W 105-69
+33.5
18
@
ARK
L 83-84
+22.5
23
@
JKST
W 80-62
+7.5
25
@
NEB
L 73-80
+7.5
29
vs
SCST
W 101-79
+1.5
2
@
LIU
W 94-92
−3.5
6
vs
CCU
L 84-88
−20.5
18
@
UND
L 88-90
−14.5
28
@
TTU
L 57-87
−12.5
31
@
LONG
L 70-82
−19.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 88-77
−12.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 81-77
−4.5
10
@
UPST
W 71-50
+15.5
14
vs
HPU
W 92-75
+19.5
17
@
UNCA
W 69-67
−3.5
21
vs
RAD
W 76-75
−8.5
24
@
PRES
W 82-72
+4.5
31
vs
UNCA
W 84-71
+3.5
4
@
RAD
W 80-78
−2.5
7
vs
LONG
W 79-74
−5.5
12
@
GWEB
W 103-85
−2.5
19
vs
UPST
W 68-64
−9.5
21
@
HPU
L 87-89
+7.5
26
@
CHSO
L 84-86
−10.5
28
vs
PRES
W 74-70
−3.5
6
vs
CHSO
W 86-81
−1.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
QUC
W 81-74
−8.5
7
@
GMU
L 90-96
+39.5
11
@
CCU
L 66-72
−27.5
15
vs
MER
W 105-69
+11.5
18
@
ARK
L 83-84
−1.5
23
@
JKST
W 80-62
−21.5
25
@
NEB
L 73-80
−13.5
29
vs
SCST
W 101-79
+22.5
2
@
LIU
W 94-92
+32.5
6
vs
CCU
L 84-88
+18.5
18
@
UND
L 88-90
+20.5
28
@
TTU
L 57-87
−19.5
31
@
LONG
L 70-82
−9.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 88-77
+0.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 81-77
−8.5
10
@
UPST
W 71-50
−36.5
14
vs
HPU
W 92-75
+4.5
17
@
UNCA
W 69-67
−16.5
21
vs
RAD
W 76-75
−14.5
24
@
PRES
W 82-72
+7.5
31
vs
UNCA
W 84-71
+7.5
4
@
RAD
W 80-78
−3.5
7
vs
LONG
W 79-74
−0.5
12
@
GWEB
W 103-85
+31.5
19
vs
UPST
W 68-64
−26.5
21
@
HPU
L 87-89
+9.5
26
@
CHSO
L 84-86
+5.5
28
vs
PRES
W 74-70
−6.5
6
vs
CHSO
W 86-81
+2.5
over 14under 15avg −0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Presbyterian
12-17 overall · 8-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Radford91–85
- L@ Winthrop70–74
- Lvs High Point73–79
- L@ SC Upstate74–76
- Wvs Longwood72–65
1 day since their last game.
Winthrop
19-10 overall · 14-3 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Charleston So86–81
- Wvs Presbyterian74–70
- L@ Charleston So84–86
- L@ High Point87–89
- Wvs SC Upstate68–64
1 day since their last game.