Winthrop Coliseum · at Winthrop · Conference game
Closing line
WIN -9.5✓ RAD covered by 8.5
Closing total165.5Under by 14.5
| This season | WIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 8-9 | Record | 10-8 |
| 6-11 | ATS | 9-9 |
| 11-6 | O/U | 8-10 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: RAD 77–87 WIN · ✓ WIN (80%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAD | 33 | 42 | 75 |
| WIN | 32 | 44 | 76 |
1st half: RAD 33, WIN 32 (RAD by 1). The model had WIN by 5.6 and a total of 76.8 (actual 65).
Team stats
| RAD | WIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 24-45 53% | Field goals | 26-55 47% |
| 9-22 41% | 3-pointers | 12-26 46% |
| 18-24 75% | Free throws | 12-19 63% |
| 31 6 off | Rebounds | 28 8 off |
| 9 | Assists | 16 |
| 6 | Steals | 7 |
| 4 | Blocks | 1 |
| 19 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 19 | Fouls | 20 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 28 |
| 5 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| RAD | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Del Jones G | 34 | 25 | 8 | 2 | 9-16 | 1-3 |
| Jaylon Johnson G | 29 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 2-7 |
| Lukas Walls G | 29 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-4 |
| Tyson Brown F | 29 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Dennis Parker Jr. G | 28 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Brennan Rigsby Jr. G | 17 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Frederik Erichsen F | 14 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-1 |
| Mari Jordan G | 11 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Louie Jordan F | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
Did not play: Bradley Land, Zion Walker, Gabriel Ferreira, Warren Keel Jr., Diogo Alves
| WIN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kody Clouet G | 37 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 7-14 | 4-8 |
| Kareem Rozier G | 34 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 7-8 | 6-7 |
| Logan Duncomb C | 31 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-0 |
| Isaiah Wilson G | 27 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Tommy Kamarad F | 18 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Josh Meo G | 20 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-4 |
| Pharrell Boyogueno G | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| Seifeldin Hendawy G | 12 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Ed Nnamoko F | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Henry Harrison, Tai Hamilton, Daylen Berry, Braylhan Thomas, Cam Christy, Kaleb Evans
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketWIN -9.5
ModelWIN -9.6
Model edgeWIN +0.1
L RAD covered
Total
Market165.5
Model164.1
Model edgeUnder 1.4
W Under
Projected score
RAD 77.2 · WIN 86.9
RAD 75 · WIN 76
Win probability
WIN 80%
1st half
Spread
WIN -5.6
RAD -1.0
Total
76.8
65 points
Projected score
RAD 35.6 · WIN 41.2
RAD 33 · WIN 32
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenWIN -10.5
1 → RAD
CloseWIN -9.5
1 pt toward RAD
Total
Open164.5
▲ 1
Close165.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
RAD +390 · WIN -520
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened WIN -10.5 · closed WIN -9.5 · moved 1 toward RADmodel WIN -9.5 matches the line
model WIN -9.5 = line ✓
Opened 164.5 · closed 165.5 · moved 1 upmodel 164
model 164
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
RAD 4–4 WINSeries tied · 8 games since 2021-22 · RAD 4-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2024-25 | RAD 74 @ WIN 78 | WIN -3.5 | WIN W |
| Jan 4, 2024-25 | WIN 67 @ RAD 87 | RAD +1.5 | RAD W |
| Feb 15, 2023-24 | WIN 85 @ RAD 69 | RAD -1.5 | WIN W |
| Jan 13, 2023-24 | RAD 88 @ WIN 92 | WIN -4.5 | RAD W |
| Mar 3, 2022-23 | WIN 69 vs RAD 78 | RAD -2.5 | RAD W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Radford
17 games played
Straight up
8-9
47% wins
Against the spread
6-11
35% covers · avg −4.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-6
65% overs · avg +3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-75 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 74-89 | +20.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 59-92 | -6.5 | L −39.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 82-87 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 58-87 | +10.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 73-81 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 72-89 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 75-82 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 89-56 | -13.5 | W +19.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 107-77 | -20.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 83-96 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 170.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 97-90 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 76-69 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 80-61 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-91 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 89-80 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 85-83 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WIU
W 80-75
−11.5
11
@
UNC
L 74-89
+5.5
15
vs
WRST
L 59-92
−39.5
16
vs
CLE
L 82-87
−13.5
18
@
SC
L 58-87
−18.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 73-81
−3.5
24
@
SMU
L 72-89
+6.5
3
vs
USM
L 75-82
−10.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 89-56
+19.5
14
vs
COPP
W 107-77
+9.5
18
@
W&M
L 83-96
−4.5
21
vs
VMI
W 97-90
−4.5
31
@
UPST
W 76-69
+8.5
7
vs
PRES
W 80-61
+12.5
10
vs
UNCA
L 72-91
−23.5
14
@
GWEB
W 89-80
−4.5
17
vs
LONG
W 85-83
−2.5
covered 6didn’t cover 11avg −4.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WIU
W 80-75
+3.5
11
@
UNC
L 74-89
+0.5
15
vs
WRST
L 59-92
−5.5
16
vs
CLE
L 82-87
+6.5
18
@
SC
L 58-87
−8.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 73-81
+2.5
24
@
SMU
L 72-89
−4.5
3
vs
USM
L 75-82
+4.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 89-56
−9.5
14
vs
COPP
W 107-77
+29.5
18
@
W&M
L 83-96
+8.5
21
vs
VMI
W 97-90
+28.5
31
@
UPST
W 76-69
−13.5
7
vs
PRES
W 80-61
−6.5
10
vs
UNCA
L 72-91
+11.5
14
@
GWEB
W 89-80
+3.5
17
vs
LONG
W 85-83
+10.5
over 11under 6avg +3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Winthrop
18 games played
Straight up
10-8
56% wins
Against the spread
9-9
50% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-10
44% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 81-74 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 90-96 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 66-72 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 105-69 | -2.5 | W +33.5 | 162.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 83-84 | +23.5 | W +22.5 | 168.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 80-62 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 73-80 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 101-79 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 94-92 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 84-88 | -16.5 | L −20.5 | 153.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 88-90 | -12.5 | L −14.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 57-87 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 70-82 | -7.5 | L −19.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-77 | -23.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 166.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 71-50 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 92-75 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 162.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 69-67 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
QUC
W 81-74
+3.5
7
@
GMU
L 90-96
+3.5
11
@
CCU
L 66-72
−8.5
15
vs
MER
W 105-69
+33.5
18
@
ARK
L 83-84
+22.5
23
@
JKST
W 80-62
+7.5
25
@
NEB
L 73-80
+7.5
29
vs
SCST
W 101-79
+1.5
2
@
LIU
W 94-92
−3.5
6
vs
CCU
L 84-88
−20.5
18
@
UND
L 88-90
−14.5
28
@
TTU
L 57-87
−12.5
31
@
LONG
L 70-82
−19.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 88-77
−12.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 81-77
−4.5
10
@
UPST
W 71-50
+15.5
14
vs
HPU
W 92-75
+19.5
17
@
UNCA
W 69-67
−3.5
covered 9didn’t cover 9avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
QUC
W 81-74
−8.5
7
@
GMU
L 90-96
+39.5
11
@
CCU
L 66-72
−27.5
15
vs
MER
W 105-69
+11.5
18
@
ARK
L 83-84
−1.5
23
@
JKST
W 80-62
−21.5
25
@
NEB
L 73-80
−13.5
29
vs
SCST
W 101-79
+22.5
2
@
LIU
W 94-92
+32.5
6
vs
CCU
L 84-88
+18.5
18
@
UND
L 88-90
+20.5
28
@
TTU
L 57-87
−19.5
31
@
LONG
L 70-82
−9.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 88-77
+0.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 81-77
−8.5
10
@
UPST
W 71-50
−36.5
14
vs
HPU
W 92-75
+4.5
17
@
UNCA
W 69-67
−16.5
over 8under 10avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Radford
8-9 overall · 4-1 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Longwood85–83
- W@ Gardner-Webb89–80
- Lvs UNC Asheville72–91
- Wvs Presbyterian80–61
- W@ SC Upstate76–69
4 days since their last game.
Winthrop
10-8 overall · 5-1 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ UNC Asheville69–67
- Wvs High Point92–75
- W@ SC Upstate71–50
- Wvs Charleston So81–77
- Wvs Gardner-Webb88–77
4 days since their last game.