Mon, Nov 2, 2026, 8:15 PM ESTWeek 8 · at Seattle Seahawks
Kickoff forecast50°F4 mphDryWeather watch ›
5-2 · Power #4
22
projected
@
3-3 · Power #1
24
projected
CHI 40%
60% SEA
Spread
SEA -3
 
Total
46.5
model 46
Spread edge
CHI by 3
lean · context
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
DraftKings via ESPNupdated 7:35 PM ET
SourceDraftKings via ESPN odds feed
Opennot available
CurrentSEA -3
Total46.5
Last update7:35 PM ET
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Line context
Home favorites of 2–4 since 2023: won 64%, covered 53% (204 games)ⓘ
DraftKings via ESPNupdated 7:35 PM ET
SourceDraftKings via ESPN odds feed
Opennot available
CurrentSEA -3
Total46.5
Last update7:35 PM ET
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Books

6 sportsbooks · current prices
BookSpreadTotalMoneyline
CHISEAOverUnderCHISEA
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag+3-120-3+10046.5-11046.5-110——
BetRiversBetRivers+3-118-3-10446.5-11246.5-109+133-162
BetUSBetUS+3-120-3+10046.5-11046.5-110——
DraftKingsDK+3-110-3-11046.5-11546.5-105+136-162
FanDuelFD+3-114-3-10646.5-11446.5-106+134-158
LowVig.agLowVig.ag+3-116-3+10546.5-10746.5-107——

Public betting

Share of bets and of money
Winner
CHISEA
Bets16% 84%
Money29% 71%
Money is 13 pts ahead of bets on CHI

Similar games

The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out

In the 10 games most like SEA as a 3-point home favorite against CHI, the favorite won 2, covered 2, and 7 went over the total.

Compare by
Customize filters
Only include
Show up to
games
Favorite won
2 of 1020%
Below normal · usually 62%
Favorite covered
2 of 1020%
Normal range · usually 51%
Went over
7 of 1070%
Normal range · usually 48%

Wins below normal. Splits like this often fade, so treat it as context, not a pick. Average result: underdog by 5.6 against an average line of 3.2; 51 points a game (usually 44.8). Of the 7 overs, 3 had cashed by the end of Q3. When games like this go over ›

All 10 games
MatchGameLineFinalCoveredO/U
Very close
2024 · Week 15 · very close · similar spread & total
-317–40 L O45.5
Very close
2025 · Week 5 · very close · similar situation & season form
-3.510–27 L U48.5
Very close
2025 · Week 6 · very close · similar total & situation
-3.530–19 W O46.5
Very close
2025 · Week 16 · very close · similar total & spread
-3.520–34 L O46.5
Very close
2024 · Week 8 · very close · similar situation & spread
-2.517–37 L O47.5
Very close
2026 · Week 3 · very close · similar spread & total
-335–6 W U46.5
Very close
2024 · Week 7 · very close · similar situation & season form
-2.518–28 L U47.5
Very close
2025 · Week 16 · very close · similar spread & total
-3.524–28 L O47.5
Very close
2025 · Week 4 · very close · similar total & season form
-3.521–26 L O46.5
Very close
2025 · Week 5 · very close · similar spread & total
-3.535–38 L O45.5
History, not a prediction. Every NFL game from 2023 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found

Model view

Power-rating model, before kickoff
Model Favorite
Seattle Seahawks 60%
Projected CHI 22 – SEA 24 · Model Favorite won 66.2% in backtest
Model line
Pick’em
Market SEA -3
Against the spread
Lean CHI +3
2.9-pt edge · No edge, context only · 458-426 (51.8%)
Total
No lean
Model 46 · Below the 5-point lean threshold.
How the model gets there (points from SEA’s side; the model line rounds to the half point)
SpreadSEA rating edge+1.0+Home field+1.8+QB EPA gap−1.7+Travel−1.0=Model marginSEA by 0.1
TotalScoring ratings46.0=Model total46.0

Signals

The data signal, and 3 trends and market moves behind it
Moderate Chicago Bears ATS trend
Moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 117-99 (54%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
No clear signal on the total

None of these signals has beaten the market in our backtest, so this describes why the matchup is interesting — it isn’t a pick.

Chicago Bears ATS trend (5-2)
Chicago Bears have covered 71% of their games with a line this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 83-84 (50%)
Seattle Seahawks ATS struggles (1-3-2)
Seattle Seahawks have covered only 25% of their games with a line this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 62-65 (49%)
Seattle Seahawks 1-3-2 ATS as a favorite
Struggling to cover in the role they have in this game. · Backtest 2023–26: 69-56 (55%)

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 32 teams
Power rating this season
pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot
CHI+0.4 →+3.2▲ 2.8#4
SEA+3.2 →+4.3▲ 1.1#1
Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW7

CHI
Longer bar = better
SEA
#11
Offense
◀ CHI better
#19
#17
Defense
SEA better ▶
#3
−0.1 #18
Turnovers
Even
−0.2 #19
72 plays #1
Pace
◀ CHI faster
63 plays #12
Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense
When CHI has the ball
Advantage: SEA defense
CHI offSEA defEdge
Points / game 25.7 #8 20.3 #6 Even
Yards / play 5.42 #15 3.96 #1 SEA
EPA / play +0.05 #11 −0.13 #2 SEA
Success rate 47% #10 37% #2 SEA
When SEA has the ball
Even matchup
SEA offCHI defEdge
Points / game 24.7 #13 20.4 #8 CHI
Yards / play 5.26 #17 6.25 #32 SEA
EPA / play −0.08 #24 0.00 #19 CHI
Success rate 41% #22 42% #8 CHI

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 32 teams
CHI scoring against the SEA defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
CHI scored
7.9
#3
7.1
#15
15.0
#3
6.4
#10
4.3
#28
10.7
#22
SEA allowed
2.8
#7
9.2
#28
12.0
#20
2.8
#3
5.0
#6
7.8
#3
SEA scoring against the CHI defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
SEA scored
4.0
#18
4.8
#25
8.8
#24
7.2
#6
8.7
#7
15.8
#4
CHI allowed
2.4
#5
8.3
#23
10.7
#15
3.7
#8
6.0
#9
9.7
#6

Game conditions

Before kickoff
Home field
SEA +1.8
home-field points in the model
Weather
50° · 4 mph
gusts 4 mph · kickoff forecast
Rest
CHI11d
SEA8d
CHI +3 days
Tempo
Fast 135 plays
slowavg 125fast
Travel
CHI 1,734 mi
Model moves the line 1.0 pts

News & sentiment

ESPN and Google News headlines
Recent ESPN and Google News headlines for both teams, injury and suspension mentions, and a keyword-based read on the tone of coverage.