Siegel Center · at VCU
Line
VCU -19.5moved 1 toward LR
Total154.5up 1 from 153.5
| This season | VCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VCU 85–64 · win probability VCU 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
VCU -19.5
moved 1 toward LR
Total
154.5
model 148.4 · Under by 6
Model edge
VCU by 1
model vs market
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VCU has more of the edges
LR 0, VCU 9 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
LR has played the 347th-hardest schedule, VCU the 88th. A record against a soft schedule means less
LR offense vs VCU defense
Offense 238th of 366 against a defense 50th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: LR 49.4 and allows 51.8; VCU 53.6 and allows 49.0
Free throws
Free throw rate: LR 27.7, VCU 42.0. Allowed: LR 33.1, VCU 32.8
VCU offense vs LR defense
Offense 65th of 366 against a defense 208th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LR 31.5%, VCU 31.6%. Defensive: LR 63.4%, VCU 70.0%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LR 12%, VCU 65%. Transfers in: LR 8, VCU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LR 18.4%, VCU 15.1%. Forced: LR 18.6%, VCU 17.0%
Three-pointers
LR hits 35.3% and allows 34.4%; VCU hits 36.3% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 31.0% and 43.8% of their shots
Home court
VCU at home. This season: VCU 0-0 at home, LR 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: LR plays 67.6 a game (248th fastest), VCU 69.5 (147th). Faster games mean more points
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home favorites of 15 to 19.5 | 993 | 94% | 48% | 52% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 632 | 93% | 49% | 53% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog | 4513 | 74% | 51% | 50% |
| Games with a total of 150 to 154.5 | 2755 | 75% | 51% | 50% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenVCU -20.5
1 → LR
NowVCU -19.5
1 pt toward LR
Total
Open153.5
▲ 1
Now154.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
LR +1350 · VCU -3850
Line movement
Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened VCU -20.5 · now VCU -19 · moved 1.5 toward LRmodel VCU -20.5
model VCU -20.5
Opened 153.5 · unchangedmodel 148.5
model 148.5
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Over 154.5TotalUnder 154.5
Bets
Money
Bets
Money
Books
8 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | VCU | Over | Under | LR | VCU | |
| BetMGMMGM | -19.5-115 | +19.5-105 | 153.5-115 | 153.5-105 | +1250 | -3000 |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | -19-105 | +19-115 | 153.5-115 | 153.5-105 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | -20.5-113 | +20.5-113 | 153.5-112 | 153.5-114 | — | — |
| BetUSBetUS | -19-105 | +19-115 | 153.5-115 | 153.5-105 | — | — |
| BovadaBovada | -18.5-105 | +18.5-115 | 154-105 | 154-115 | +1300 | -6000 |
| DraftKingsDK | -18.5-105 | +18.5-115 | 154.5-105 | 154.5-115 | +1400 | -3200 |
| FanDuelFD | -19.5-115 | +19.5-105 | 153.5-118 | 153.5-104 | +1600 | -4500 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | -19-101 | +19-111 | 153.5-113 | 153.5-103 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | VCU -19.5 | VCU -20.7 | VCU +1.2 |
| Total | 154.5 | 148.4 | Under 6.1 |
| Projected score | — | LR 63.9 · VCU 84.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VCU -12.2 | — |
| 1H total | 69.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | LR 28.6 · VCU 40.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Little Rock
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ | L 72-92 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 49-89 | +21.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 68-62 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 68-89 | +13.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 56-65 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 65-74 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 47-85 | +3.5 | L −34.5 | 138.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-90 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 58-90 | +27.5 | L −4.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 64-78 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 77-62 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 77-58 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 79-84 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 73-70 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 82-74 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-79 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 65-70 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 77-87 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 52-55 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 74-79 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 61-71 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 77-58 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 72-78 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 67-65 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-70 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-70 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@
MILW
L 72-92
−16.5
12
@
MARQ
L 49-89
−18.5
15
@
BALL
W 68-62
+8.5
18
@
MUR
L 68-89
−7.5
21
@
TXST
L 56-65
−3.5
29
@
SIU
L 65-74
+4.5
3
@
CARK
L 47-85
−34.5
6
vs
ARST
L 78-90
−2.5
9
@
WVU
L 58-90
−4.5
16
@
MORE
L 64-78
−11.5
18
@
USI
W 77-62
+12.5
1
vs
TNTC
W 77-58
+17.5
3
vs
TNST
L 79-84
−3.5
8
@
SIUE
W 73-70
+6.5
10
@
LIN
W 82-74
+14.5
15
vs
EIU
W 74-63
+4.5
17
vs
WIU
W 86-79
−3.5
22
@
SEMO
L 65-70
+0.5
29
@
TNST
L 63-70
−2.5
31
@
TNTC
L 77-87
−11.5
3
@
UTM
L 52-55
+3.5
5
vs
LIN
L 74-79
−3.5
7
vs
SIUE
L 61-71
−11.5
12
@
WIU
W 77-58
+11.5
14
@
EIU
L 72-78
−8.5
19
vs
UTM
W 67-65
+4.5
21
vs
SEMO
L 65-70
−3.5
26
vs
MORE
L 70-76
−8.5
28
vs
USI
W 89-70
+13.5
4
vs
LIN
L 62-72
−4.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@
MILW
L 72-92
+7.5
12
@
MARQ
L 49-89
−17.5
15
@
BALL
W 68-62
−16.5
18
@
MUR
L 68-89
+3.5
21
@
TXST
L 56-65
−10.5
29
@
SIU
L 65-74
−2.5
3
@
CARK
L 47-85
−6.5
6
vs
ARST
L 78-90
+20.5
9
@
WVU
L 58-90
+15.5
16
@
MORE
L 64-78
+5.5
18
@
USI
W 77-62
−1.5
1
vs
TNTC
W 77-58
−9.5
3
vs
TNST
L 79-84
+18.5
8
@
SIUE
W 73-70
+11.5
10
@
LIN
W 82-74
+6.5
15
vs
EIU
W 74-63
+3.5
17
vs
WIU
W 86-79
+29.5
22
@
SEMO
L 65-70
−10.5
29
@
TNST
L 63-70
−17.5
31
@
TNTC
L 77-87
+22.5
3
@
UTM
L 52-55
−32.5
5
vs
LIN
L 74-79
+3.5
7
vs
SIUE
L 61-71
−0.5
12
@
WIU
W 77-58
−6.5
14
@
EIU
L 72-78
+15.5
19
vs
UTM
W 67-65
−4.5
21
vs
SEMO
L 65-70
−8.5
26
vs
MORE
L 70-76
+7.5
28
vs
USI
W 89-70
+19.5
4
vs
LIN
L 62-72
−14.5
over 15under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
VCU
36 games played
Straight up
28-8
78% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-20
44% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 103-74 | -25.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 77-80 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 78-61 | -20.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 79-85 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 101-58 | -32.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 78-66 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 74-89 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 86-68 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 83-57 | -19.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 78-81 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 15 | vs | W 84-58 | -30.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 105-83 | -19.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 100-79 | -30.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 89-82 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 93-80 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 62-71 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 80-86 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 84-75 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 79-72 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-69 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 77-69 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 89-75 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 63-59 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 99-73 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 77-68 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-67 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 89-75 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 75-88 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-63 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 70-65 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 68-62 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 77-64 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 70-62 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 82-78 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 55-76 | +12.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WAG
W 103-74
+3.5
7
vs
USU
L 77-80
−0.5
12
vs
SPU
W 78-61
−3.5
17
@
NCSU
L 79-85
+5.5
22
vs
COPP
W 101-58
+10.5
26
vs
USF
W 78-66
+10.5
27
vs
VAN
L 74-89
−8.5
28
vs
VT
W 86-68
+15.5
5
vs
SAM
W 83-57
+6.5
10
vs
UNM
L 78-81
−11.5
15
vs
NIA
W 84-58
−4.5
18
vs
AMER
W 105-83
+2.5
22
vs
RID
W 100-79
−9.5
31
vs
SBU
W 89-82
−2.5
3
@
DUQ
W 93-80
+7.5
7
vs
SLU
L 62-71
−10.5
10
@
GMU
L 80-86
−7.5
14
@
URI
W 84-75
+5.5
19
vs
JOES
W 79-72
−7.5
24
@
DAV
W 75-69
+0.5
27
vs
RICH
W 77-69
−4.5
30
vs
LUC
W 89-75
−4.5
3
@
FOR
W 63-59
−3.5
6
vs
DAY
W 99-73
+17.5
11
@
LAS
W 77-68
−3.5
14
@
RICH
W 78-67
+3.5
17
vs
GW
W 89-75
+7.5
20
@
SLU
L 75-88
−5.5
28
vs
FOR
W 82-63
+6.5
3
vs
GMU
W 70-65
−4.5
6
@
DAY
W 68-62
+7.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 71-66
−1.5
14
vs
JOES
W 77-64
+6.5
15
vs
DAY
W 70-62
+4.5
19
vs
UNC
W 82-78
+6.5
21
vs
ILL
L 55-76
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WAG
W 103-74
+43.5
7
vs
USU
L 77-80
−6.5
12
vs
SPU
W 78-61
−8.5
17
@
NCSU
L 79-85
−0.5
22
vs
COPP
W 101-58
+7.5
26
vs
USF
W 78-66
−28.5
27
vs
VAN
L 74-89
+1.5
28
vs
VT
W 86-68
+0.5
5
vs
SAM
W 83-57
−14.5
10
vs
UNM
L 78-81
+1.5
15
vs
NIA
W 84-58
−1.5
18
vs
AMER
W 105-83
+33.5
22
vs
RID
W 100-79
+33.5
31
vs
SBU
W 89-82
+13.5
3
@
DUQ
W 93-80
+7.5
7
vs
SLU
L 62-71
−38.5
10
@
GMU
L 80-86
+21.5
14
@
URI
W 84-75
+11.5
19
vs
JOES
W 79-72
−0.5
24
@
DAV
W 75-69
−4.5
27
vs
RICH
W 77-69
−9.5
30
vs
LUC
W 89-75
+13.5
3
@
FOR
W 63-59
−24.5
6
vs
DAY
W 99-73
+24.5
11
@
LAS
W 77-68
−2.5
14
@
RICH
W 78-67
−9.5
17
vs
GW
W 89-75
+2.5
20
@
SLU
L 75-88
−1.5
28
vs
FOR
W 82-63
+0.5
3
vs
GMU
W 70-65
−12.5
6
@
DAY
W 68-62
−16.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 71-66
−16.5
14
vs
JOES
W 77-64
−4.5
15
vs
DAY
W 70-62
−7.5
19
vs
UNC
W 82-78
+9.5
21
vs
ILL
L 55-76
−20.5
over 16under 20avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
VCU has the better starters
Position by position: Little Rock 0, VCU 2, even 3
Little RockBetterVCU
G A. Clark TR15.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 62
=Even
G N. Ralph-Beyer TR14.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 61
G J. King TR14 pts · 3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 46
→VCUSmall
G B. Jennings8.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 79
G T. Walters TR8.3 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 37
→VCUBig
G N. Lewis8.7 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 79
F B. Hubbard TR16.1 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 80
=Even
F T. Alston TR13.3 pts · 8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 85
F T. Burgess7.4 pts · 3 reb · 1.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F L. Djokovic13.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
Little RockBetterVCU
LR offense238th of 366 · -7.3
→VCUBig
VCU defense50th of 366 · +2.0
LR defense208th of 366 · -5.2
→VCUBig
VCU offense65th of 366 · +2.0
Backcourt-2.3 · 3 players
→VCUBig
Backcourt+2.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt+0.9 · 2 players
→VCUBig
Frontcourt+5.5 · 2 players
Bench-2.3 · 4 players
→VCUBig
Bench+3.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLR betterVCU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Clark33 min · TRJ. King32 min · TRT. Walters28 min · TRA. Economou6 min · TRT. LaceyNewJ. LynNew
Forwards
B. Hubbard29 min · TRT. Burgess24 minP. Amadou Kante14 min · TRA. Bamisile14 min · TRJ. Felt13 min · TRR. OselkaNew
Guards
N. Ralph-Beyer31 min · TRB. Jennings25 minN. Lewis24 minB. Harper18 min · TRT. Ward14 minA. Nowell11 min
Forwards
T. Alston30 min · TRL. Djokovic28 minM. Belle22 minJ. Wyche7 min · TRC. RossNewS. PlisnicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.9 #300 | Points per game | 80.8 #50 |
| 1.02 #306 | Points per possession | 1.16 #47 |
| 67.6 #248 | Pace (possessions) | 69.5 #147 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.4 #273 | Effective FG% | 53.6 #78 |
| 35.3 #96 | 3-point % | 36.3 #46 |
| 31.0 #339 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.8 #91 |
| 27.7 #345 | Free throw rate | 42.0 #30 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.4 #292 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #70 |
| 31.5 #143 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.6 #139 |
| 13.4 #183 | Assists per game | 13.9 #158 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.2 #160 | Points allowed | 71.8 #100 |
| 1.10 #217 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #66 |
| 51.8 #199 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.0 #69 |
| 34.4 #211 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #125 |
| 18.6 #71 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #151 |
| 63.4 #357 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #162 |
| 7.5 #77 | Steals per game | 7.3 #99 |
| 4.4 #45 | Blocks per game | 4.3 #50 |
Little Rock
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Lindenwood Lions62–72
- Wvs Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles89–70
- Lvs Morehead St70–76
- Lvs SE Missouri65–70
- Wvs UT Martin67–65
A week or more of rest.
VCU
28-8 in 2025-26 overall · 18-3 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois55–76
- Wvs North Carolina82–78
- Wvs Dayton70–62
- Wvs Saint Joseph's77–64
- Wvs Duquesne71–66
A week or more of rest.