Jack Stephens Center · at Little Rock
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LR 74–67 · win probability LR 74%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LR has more of the edges
NWST 1, LR 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NWST offense vs LR defense
Offense 340th of 366 against a defense 208th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: NWST 40.1, LR 27.7. Allowed: NWST 36.3, LR 33.1
Three-pointers
NWST hits 33.2% and allows 35.5%; LR hits 35.3% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 33.9% and 31.0% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
NWST has played the 292nd-hardest schedule, LR the 347th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NWST 26.1%, LR 31.5%. Defensive: NWST 67.4%, LR 63.4%
Home court
LR at home. This season: LR 0-0 at home, NWST 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: NWST 48.6 and allows 53.0; LR 49.4 and allows 51.8
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: NWST plays 65.4 a game (334th fastest), LR 67.6 (248th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NWST 18.3%, LR 18.4%. Forced: NWST 16.9%, LR 18.6%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NWST 28%, LR 12%. Transfers in: NWST 2, LR 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
LR offense vs NWST defense
Offense 238th of 366 against a defense 236th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | LR -7.3 | — |
| Total | — | 140.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | NWST 66.8 · LR 74.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LR -4.2 | — |
| 1H total | 66.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | NWST 30.9 · LR 35.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
N'Western St
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 68-98 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 53-80 | +11.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 83-87 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 64-84 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-85 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 73-75 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 54-92 | +19.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 76-68 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 70-79 | +19.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 61-76 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 64-74 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-68 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 72-74 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-78 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 64-63 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-76 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 80-82 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 67-69 | +14.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-75 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 58-61 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 68-74 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 48-52 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | U 100 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 70-68 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 135.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 69-66 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 64-75 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 71-53 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 54-49 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 103 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 59-71 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 62-74 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 47-61 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TA&M
L 68-98
−8.5
6
@
UNT
L 53-80
−15.5
11
@
UNA
L 83-87
+2.5
18
@
SF
L 64-84
−3.5
21
@
GCU
L 72-85
+5.5
29
vs
SOU
L 73-75
+1.5
5
@
MCN
L 54-92
−18.5
7
@
SELA
W 76-68
+15.5
13
@
CAL
L 70-79
+10.5
29
vs
LAM
L 61-76
−11.5
31
vs
SFA
L 64-74
−1.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 74-68
+7.5
5
@
NICH
L 72-74
+6.5
10
vs
AMCC
W 79-78
+6.5
12
vs
RGV
W 64-63
+3.5
17
@
UIW
L 74-76
+6.5
19
@
HCU
L 80-82
+0.5
27
@
SFA
L 67-69
+12.5
31
@
NOLA
L 64-75
−6.5
2
vs
NICH
L 58-61
−1.5
4
vs
ETAM
L 68-74
−9.5
7
@
ETAM
L 48-52
−2.5
9
@
LAM
W 70-68
+8.5
14
vs
SELA
W 69-66
+1.5
16
vs
MCN
L 64-75
+3.5
21
vs
HCU
W 71-53
+15.5
23
vs
UIW
W 54-49
+3.5
28
@
AMCC
L 59-71
−6.5
2
@
RGV
L 62-74
−2.5
8
vs
NICH
L 47-61
−12.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TA&M
L 68-98
+12.5
6
@
UNT
L 53-80
−4.5
11
@
UNA
L 83-87
+27.5
18
@
SF
L 64-84
+4.5
21
@
GCU
L 72-85
+9.5
29
vs
SOU
L 73-75
+3.5
5
@
MCN
L 54-92
+6.5
7
@
SELA
W 76-68
+10.5
13
@
CAL
L 70-79
+3.5
29
vs
LAM
L 61-76
−1.5
31
vs
SFA
L 64-74
−0.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 74-68
−7.5
5
@
NICH
L 72-74
+1.5
10
vs
AMCC
W 79-78
+18.5
12
vs
RGV
W 64-63
−16.5
17
@
UIW
L 74-76
+8.5
19
@
HCU
L 80-82
+22.5
27
@
SFA
L 67-69
−5.5
31
@
NOLA
L 64-75
−14.5
2
vs
NICH
L 58-61
−28.5
4
vs
ETAM
L 68-74
−1.5
7
@
ETAM
L 48-52
−40.5
9
@
LAM
W 70-68
+2.5
14
vs
SELA
W 69-66
+3.5
16
vs
MCN
L 64-75
+0.5
21
vs
HCU
W 71-53
−10.5
23
vs
UIW
W 54-49
−35.5
28
@
AMCC
L 59-71
−4.5
2
@
RGV
L 62-74
−3.5
8
vs
NICH
L 47-61
−30.5
over 15under 15avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Little Rock
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ | L 72-92 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 49-89 | +21.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 68-62 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 68-89 | +13.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 56-65 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 65-74 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 47-85 | +3.5 | L −34.5 | 138.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-90 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 58-90 | +27.5 | L −4.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 64-78 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 77-62 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 77-58 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 79-84 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 73-70 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 82-74 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-79 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 65-70 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 77-87 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 52-55 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 74-79 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 61-71 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 77-58 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 72-78 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 67-65 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-70 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-70 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@
MILW
L 72-92
−16.5
12
@
MARQ
L 49-89
−18.5
15
@
BALL
W 68-62
+8.5
18
@
MUR
L 68-89
−7.5
21
@
TXST
L 56-65
−3.5
29
@
SIU
L 65-74
+4.5
3
@
CARK
L 47-85
−34.5
6
vs
ARST
L 78-90
−2.5
9
@
WVU
L 58-90
−4.5
16
@
MORE
L 64-78
−11.5
18
@
USI
W 77-62
+12.5
1
vs
TNTC
W 77-58
+17.5
3
vs
TNST
L 79-84
−3.5
8
@
SIUE
W 73-70
+6.5
10
@
LIN
W 82-74
+14.5
15
vs
EIU
W 74-63
+4.5
17
vs
WIU
W 86-79
−3.5
22
@
SEMO
L 65-70
+0.5
29
@
TNST
L 63-70
−2.5
31
@
TNTC
L 77-87
−11.5
3
@
UTM
L 52-55
+3.5
5
vs
LIN
L 74-79
−3.5
7
vs
SIUE
L 61-71
−11.5
12
@
WIU
W 77-58
+11.5
14
@
EIU
L 72-78
−8.5
19
vs
UTM
W 67-65
+4.5
21
vs
SEMO
L 65-70
−3.5
26
vs
MORE
L 70-76
−8.5
28
vs
USI
W 89-70
+13.5
4
vs
LIN
L 62-72
−4.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@
MILW
L 72-92
+7.5
12
@
MARQ
L 49-89
−17.5
15
@
BALL
W 68-62
−16.5
18
@
MUR
L 68-89
+3.5
21
@
TXST
L 56-65
−10.5
29
@
SIU
L 65-74
−2.5
3
@
CARK
L 47-85
−6.5
6
vs
ARST
L 78-90
+20.5
9
@
WVU
L 58-90
+15.5
16
@
MORE
L 64-78
+5.5
18
@
USI
W 77-62
−1.5
1
vs
TNTC
W 77-58
−9.5
3
vs
TNST
L 79-84
+18.5
8
@
SIUE
W 73-70
+11.5
10
@
LIN
W 82-74
+6.5
15
vs
EIU
W 74-63
+3.5
17
vs
WIU
W 86-79
+29.5
22
@
SEMO
L 65-70
−10.5
29
@
TNST
L 63-70
−17.5
31
@
TNTC
L 77-87
+22.5
3
@
UTM
L 52-55
−32.5
5
vs
LIN
L 74-79
+3.5
7
vs
SIUE
L 61-71
−0.5
12
@
WIU
W 77-58
−6.5
14
@
EIU
L 72-78
+15.5
19
vs
UTM
W 67-65
−4.5
21
vs
SEMO
L 65-70
−8.5
26
vs
MORE
L 70-76
+7.5
28
vs
USI
W 89-70
+19.5
4
vs
LIN
L 62-72
−14.5
over 15under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Little Rock has the better starters
Position by position: N'Western St 0, Little Rock 3, even 2
N'Western StBetterLittle Rock
G I. Miles10.7 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 57
=Even
G A. Clark TR15.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 62
G C. Larry2.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 1
→LRBig
G J. King TR14 pts · 3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 46
F D. Thomas TR5.1 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
→LRSmall
G T. Walters TR8.3 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 37
F A. Osojnik TR5.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 22
→LRBig
F B. Hubbard TR16.1 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 80
F K. Turner3.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 34
=No call
F T. Burgess7.4 pts · 3 reb · 1.2 ast
Not ranked
N'Western StBetterLittle Rock
NWST offense340th of 366 · -11.5
→LRBig
LR defense208th of 366 · -5.2
NWST defense236th of 366 · -6.2
=Even
LR offense238th of 366 · -7.3
Backcourt-3.7 · 2 players
→LRSmall
Backcourt-2.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.2 · 3 players
→LRBig
Frontcourt+0.9 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-2.3 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestNWST betterLR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
I. Miles25 minC. Larry18 minK. SimpsonNewD. BrownNewA. AlmuttarNewB. RemoNew
Forwards
D. Thomas18 min · TRA. Osojnik16 min · TRK. Turner13 minN. OjukwuNewC. KellyNewJ. NesbittNew
Guards
A. Clark33 min · TRJ. King32 min · TRT. Walters28 min · TRA. Economou6 min · TRT. LaceyNewJ. LynNew
Forwards
B. Hubbard29 min · TRT. Burgess24 minP. Amadou Kante14 min · TRA. Bamisile14 min · TRJ. Felt13 min · TRR. OselkaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.1 #346 | Points per game | 68.9 #300 |
| 1.01 #315 | Points per possession | 1.02 #306 |
| 65.4 #334 | Pace (possessions) | 67.6 #248 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.6 #301 | Effective FG% | 49.4 #273 |
| 33.2 #218 | 3-point % | 35.3 #96 |
| 33.9 #298 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.0 #339 |
| 40.1 #58 | Free throw rate | 27.7 #345 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.3 #286 | Turnover rate | 18.4 #292 |
| 26.1 #321 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.5 #143 |
| 11.3 #322 | Assists per game | 13.4 #183 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.9 #129 | Points allowed | 74.2 #160 |
| 1.12 #262 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #217 |
| 53.0 #270 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #199 |
| 35.5 #278 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #211 |
| 16.9 #160 | Turnovers forced | 18.6 #71 |
| 67.4 #286 | Defensive rebound rate | 63.4 #357 |
| 6.2 #215 | Steals per game | 7.5 #77 |
| 2.3 #321 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #45 |
N'Western St
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nicholls47–61
- L@ UT Rio Grande62–74
- L@ Texas A&M-CC59–71
- Wvs Incarnate Word54–49
- Wvs Hou Christian71–53
A week or more of rest.
Little Rock
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Lindenwood Lions62–72
- Wvs Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles89–70
- Lvs Morehead St70–76
- Lvs SE Missouri65–70
- Wvs UT Martin67–65
A week or more of rest.