Pete Mathews Coliseum · at Jax State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | JXST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects JXST 74–70 · win probability JXST 64%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: JXST has more of the edges
LR 0, JXST 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
LR has played the 347th-hardest schedule, JXST the 196th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LR 31.5%, JXST 29.8%. Defensive: LR 63.4%, JXST 72.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: LR 27.7, JXST 43.1. Allowed: LR 33.1, JXST 38.7
Shooting
Effective FG%: LR 49.4 and allows 51.8; JXST 49.7 and allows 49.6
LR offense vs JXST defense
Offense 238th of 366 against a defense 172nd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
JXST at home. This season: JXST 0-0 at home, LR 0-0 away
Three-pointers
LR hits 35.3% and allows 34.4%; JXST hits 35.7% and allows 33.3%. Threes are 31.0% and 38.1% of their shots
Even
JXST offense vs LR defense
Offense 245th of 366 against a defense 208th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: LR plays 67.6 a game (248th fastest), JXST 66.3 (302nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LR 18.4%, JXST 17.0%. Forced: LR 18.6%, JXST 16.2%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LR 12%, JXST 0%. Transfers in: LR 8, JXST 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | JXST -4.0 | — |
| Total | — | 143.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | LR 69.5 · JXST 73.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | JXST -2.3 | — |
| 1H total | 67.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | LR 32.3 · JXST 34.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
LR 0–3 JXSTJXST leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · JXST has won the last 3 meetings · LR 0-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2023-24 | JXST 90 @ LR 60 | LR -2.5 | JXST W |
| Dec 17, 2022-23 | LR 62 @ JXST 72 | JXST -7.5 | JXST W |
| Dec 21, 2021-22 | JXST 87 @ LR 67 | LR +8.5 | JXST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Little Rock
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ | L 72-92 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 49-89 | +21.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 68-62 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 68-89 | +13.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 56-65 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 65-74 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 47-85 | +3.5 | L −34.5 | 138.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-90 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 58-90 | +27.5 | L −4.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 64-78 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 77-62 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 77-58 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 79-84 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 73-70 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 82-74 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-79 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 65-70 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 77-87 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 52-55 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 74-79 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 61-71 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 77-58 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 72-78 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 67-65 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-70 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-70 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@
MILW
L 72-92
−16.5
12
@
MARQ
L 49-89
−18.5
15
@
BALL
W 68-62
+8.5
18
@
MUR
L 68-89
−7.5
21
@
TXST
L 56-65
−3.5
29
@
SIU
L 65-74
+4.5
3
@
CARK
L 47-85
−34.5
6
vs
ARST
L 78-90
−2.5
9
@
WVU
L 58-90
−4.5
16
@
MORE
L 64-78
−11.5
18
@
USI
W 77-62
+12.5
1
vs
TNTC
W 77-58
+17.5
3
vs
TNST
L 79-84
−3.5
8
@
SIUE
W 73-70
+6.5
10
@
LIN
W 82-74
+14.5
15
vs
EIU
W 74-63
+4.5
17
vs
WIU
W 86-79
−3.5
22
@
SEMO
L 65-70
+0.5
29
@
TNST
L 63-70
−2.5
31
@
TNTC
L 77-87
−11.5
3
@
UTM
L 52-55
+3.5
5
vs
LIN
L 74-79
−3.5
7
vs
SIUE
L 61-71
−11.5
12
@
WIU
W 77-58
+11.5
14
@
EIU
L 72-78
−8.5
19
vs
UTM
W 67-65
+4.5
21
vs
SEMO
L 65-70
−3.5
26
vs
MORE
L 70-76
−8.5
28
vs
USI
W 89-70
+13.5
4
vs
LIN
L 62-72
−4.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@
MILW
L 72-92
+7.5
12
@
MARQ
L 49-89
−17.5
15
@
BALL
W 68-62
−16.5
18
@
MUR
L 68-89
+3.5
21
@
TXST
L 56-65
−10.5
29
@
SIU
L 65-74
−2.5
3
@
CARK
L 47-85
−6.5
6
vs
ARST
L 78-90
+20.5
9
@
WVU
L 58-90
+15.5
16
@
MORE
L 64-78
+5.5
18
@
USI
W 77-62
−1.5
1
vs
TNTC
W 77-58
−9.5
3
vs
TNST
L 79-84
+18.5
8
@
SIUE
W 73-70
+11.5
10
@
LIN
W 82-74
+6.5
15
vs
EIU
W 74-63
+3.5
17
vs
WIU
W 86-79
+29.5
22
@
SEMO
L 65-70
−10.5
29
@
TNST
L 63-70
−17.5
31
@
TNTC
L 77-87
+22.5
3
@
UTM
L 52-55
−32.5
5
vs
LIN
L 74-79
+3.5
7
vs
SIUE
L 61-71
−0.5
12
@
WIU
W 77-58
−6.5
14
@
EIU
L 72-78
+15.5
19
vs
UTM
W 67-65
−4.5
21
vs
SEMO
L 65-70
−8.5
26
vs
MORE
L 70-76
+7.5
28
vs
USI
W 89-70
+19.5
4
vs
LIN
L 62-72
−14.5
over 15under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Jax State
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg +0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-12
59% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14 | vs | W 74-67 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 65-71 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 43-56 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 99 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-73 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 134.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 73-77 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 59-62 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 81-75 | +9.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 78-67 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 67-64 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 126.5 | O 131 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 69-78 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 71-64 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-88 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 62-77 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 64-60 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 75-58 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 78-74 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-74 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 71-66 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-58 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 64-69 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 70-79 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 71-77 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 78-82 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 80-70 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 78-81 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 75-77 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 63-68 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
14
vs
CCU
W 74-67
−0.5
19
vs
USA
L 65-71
−8.5
24
@
ARST
L 63-74
−6.5
26
vs
NDSU
L 43-56
−9.5
1
vs
UNA
L 66-73
−13.5
13
@
GAST
L 73-77
−7.5
17
vs
EKU
L 59-62
−5.5
20
@
ETSU
W 81-75
+15.5
29
vs
WKU
W 78-67
+13.5
2
@
DEL
W 67-64
−1.5
4
@
LIB
L 69-78
+0.5
7
vs
FIU
W 71-64
+5.5
10
@
KENN
L 82-88
−0.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 62-77
−16.5
17
vs
LT
W 64-60
−0.5
23
vs
MTSU
W 75-58
+18.5
28
@
FIU
W 78-74
+7.5
31
@
MOST
L 67-74
−2.5
5
@
WKU
W 71-66
+9.5
7
vs
KENN
W 77-58
+20.5
11
vs
UTEP
L 64-69
−11.5
14
vs
NMSU
L 70-79
−10.5
18
@
LT
L 71-77
−3.5
21
@
SHSU
L 78-82
+2.5
26
vs
DEL
W 80-70
+2.5
28
vs
LIB
L 78-81
+0.5
5
@
NMSU
L 75-77
+4.5
7
@
UTEP
W 64-61
+1.5
10
vs
NMSU
L 63-68
−3.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
14
vs
CCU
W 74-67
+1.5
19
vs
USA
L 65-71
+0.5
24
@
ARST
L 63-74
−18.5
26
vs
NDSU
L 43-56
−43.5
1
vs
UNA
L 66-73
+4.5
13
@
GAST
L 73-77
+10.5
17
vs
EKU
L 59-62
−21.5
20
@
ETSU
W 81-75
+21.5
29
vs
WKU
W 78-67
+2.5
2
@
DEL
W 67-64
+4.5
4
@
LIB
L 69-78
+12.5
7
vs
FIU
W 71-64
−15.5
10
@
KENN
L 82-88
+20.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 62-77
−11.5
17
vs
LT
W 64-60
−3.5
23
vs
MTSU
W 75-58
−0.5
28
@
FIU
W 78-74
+3.5
31
@
MOST
L 67-74
+5.5
5
@
WKU
W 71-66
−3.5
7
vs
KENN
W 77-58
−14.5
11
vs
UTEP
L 64-69
−1.5
14
vs
NMSU
L 70-79
+9.5
18
@
LT
L 71-77
+15.5
21
@
SHSU
L 78-82
+12.5
26
vs
DEL
W 80-70
+16.5
28
vs
LIB
L 78-81
+19.5
5
@
NMSU
L 75-77
+6.5
7
@
UTEP
W 64-61
−14.5
10
vs
NMSU
L 63-68
−10.5
over 17under 12avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Little Rock has the better starters
Position by position: Little Rock 2, Jax State 0, even 3
Little RockBetterJax State
G A. Clark TR15.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 62
←LRSmall
G J. Stiemke TR9.7 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 28
G J. King TR14 pts · 3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 46
=Even
G C. Lockett TR9.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 49
G T. Walters TR8.3 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 37
=Even
F N. Cunningham TR5.1 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 38
F B. Hubbard TR16.1 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 80
←LRBig
F M. Hill TR2.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 7
F T. Burgess7.4 pts · 3 reb · 1.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F B. Walker TR4.7 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
Little RockBetterJax State
LR offense238th of 366 · -7.3
→JXSTSmall
JXST defense172nd of 366 · -3.9
LR defense208th of 366 · -5.2
=Even
JXST offense245th of 366 · -7.4
Backcourt-2.3 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.9 · 2 players
←LRSmall
Frontcourt-0.9 · 3 players
Bench-2.3 · 4 players
→JXSTSmall
Bench+0.3 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestLR betterJXST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Clark33 min · TRJ. King32 min · TRT. Walters28 min · TRA. Economou6 min · TRT. LaceyNewJ. LynNew
Forwards
B. Hubbard29 min · TRT. Burgess24 minP. Amadou Kante14 min · TRA. Bamisile14 min · TRJ. Felt13 min · TRR. OselkaNew
Guards
J. Stiemke28 min · TRC. Lockett25 min · TRL. Horner9 min · TRG. GondrezickNewJ. VickNewN. HernandezNew
Forwards
N. Cunningham13 min · TRM. Hill10 min · TRB. Walker9 min · TRE. Croley5 min · TRK. Polk1 min · TRA. CurryNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.9 #300 | Points per game | 69.9 #287 |
| 1.02 #306 | Points per possession | 1.05 #241 |
| 67.6 #248 | Pace (possessions) | 66.3 #302 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.4 #273 | Effective FG% | 49.7 #253 |
| 35.3 #96 | 3-point % | 35.7 #76 |
| 31.0 #339 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.1 #209 |
| 27.7 #345 | Free throw rate | 43.1 #21 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.4 #292 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #204 |
| 31.5 #143 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.8 #208 |
| 13.4 #183 | Assists per game | 11.6 #310 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.2 #160 | Points allowed | 70.6 #66 |
| 1.10 #217 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #120 |
| 51.8 #199 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.6 #85 |
| 34.4 #211 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.3 #141 |
| 18.6 #71 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #208 |
| 63.4 #357 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.0 #67 |
| 7.5 #77 | Steals per game | 5.8 #252 |
| 4.4 #45 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #233 |
Little Rock
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Lindenwood Lions62–72
- Wvs Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles89–70
- Lvs Morehead St70–76
- Lvs SE Missouri65–70
- Wvs UT Martin67–65
A week or more of rest.
Jax State
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs New Mexico St63–68
- W@ UTEP64–61
- L@ New Mexico St75–77
- Lvs Liberty78–81
- Wvs Delaware80–70
A week or more of rest.