Pete Mathews Coliseum · at Jax State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | JXST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects JXST 72–67 · win probability JXST 67%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 139.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: JXST has more of the edges
LT 1, JXST 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
LT hits 28.6% and allows 33.9%; JXST hits 35.7% and allows 33.3%. Threes are 33.4% and 38.1% of their shots
LT offense vs JXST defense
Offense 302nd of 366 against a defense 172nd, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: LT 33.1, JXST 43.1. Allowed: LT 36.3, JXST 38.7
JXST offense vs LT defense
Offense 245th of 366 against a defense 184th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
JXST at home. This season: JXST 0-0 at home, LT 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: LT 47.4 and allows 48.7; JXST 49.7 and allows 49.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LT 11%, JXST 0%. Transfers in: LT 0, JXST 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: LT plays 65.5 a game (332nd fastest), JXST 66.3 (302nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LT 18.2%, JXST 17.0%. Forced: LT 17.9%, JXST 16.2%
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LT 36.4%, JXST 29.8%. Defensive: LT 68.4%, JXST 72.0%
Context
Schedule so far
LT has played the 197th-hardest schedule, JXST the 196th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | JXST -5.0 | — |
| Total | — | 139.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | LT 67.2 · JXST 72.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | JXST -2.9 | — |
| 1H total | 65.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | LT 31.2 · JXST 34.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
LT 3–3 JXSTSeries tied · 6 games since 2021-22 · LT 3-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2025-26 | JXST 71 @ LT 77 | LT -2.5 | LT W |
| Jan 17, 2025-26 | LT 60 @ JXST 64 | JXST -4.5 | LT W |
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | JXST 70 @ LT 68 | LT -3.5 | JXST W |
| Jan 16, 2024-25 | LT 61 @ JXST 63 | JXST +2.5 | JXST W |
| Feb 15, 2023-24 | JXST 58 @ LT 63 | LT -10.5 | JXST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Louisiana Tech
31 games played
Straight up
17-14
55% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 50-77 | +9.5 | L −17.5 | 136.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 68-51 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 51-60 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-73 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 83-58 | -16.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-77 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 65-44 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 126.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-61 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 75-63 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 51-88 | +6.5 | L −30.5 | 134.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 61-66 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 56-72 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-68 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 123.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 59-58 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 60-64 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 82-76 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 69-59 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 130.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-83 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 63-72 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 87-78 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 79-78 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 64-77 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 77-71 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 55-58 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 72-70 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 76-84 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 76-71 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 81-38 | -2.5 | W +40.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-69 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 69-66 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 60-71 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
NEV
L 50-77
−17.5
15
vs
JKST
W 68-51
+8.5
19
@
INST
L 51-60
−5.5
26
vs
INST
W 75-73
−0.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 83-58
+8.5
3
@
GASO
L 69-77
−6.5
13
vs
UL
W 65-44
+11.5
17
@
TULN
L 53-61
−3.5
29
vs
UTEP
W 75-63
+9.5
2
@
MTSU
L 51-88
−30.5
4
@
WKU
L 61-66
+4.5
8
vs
LIB
L 56-72
−11.5
10
vs
DEL
W 70-68
−4.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 59-58
+4.5
17
@
JXST
L 60-64
+0.5
23
vs
KENN
W 82-76
+7.5
28
@
UTEP
W 69-59
+12.5
31
@
SHSU
L 67-83
−8.5
4
vs
NMSU
L 63-72
−10.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+12.5
12
@
MOST
W 79-78
+4.5
14
@
FIU
L 64-77
−9.5
18
vs
JXST
W 77-71
+3.5
21
@
KENN
L 55-58
+2.5
26
vs
MOST
W 72-70
−0.5
28
vs
FIU
L 76-84
−10.5
5
@
LIB
W 76-71
+13.5
7
@
DEL
W 81-38
+40.5
12
vs
MTSU
W 80-69
+12.5
13
vs
MOST
W 69-66
+4.5
14
vs
KENN
L 60-71
−9.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
NEV
L 50-77
−9.5
15
vs
JKST
W 68-51
−27.5
19
@
INST
L 51-60
−36.5
26
vs
INST
W 75-73
+6.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 83-58
+3.5
3
@
GASO
L 69-77
+0.5
13
vs
UL
W 65-44
−17.5
17
@
TULN
L 53-61
−26.5
29
vs
UTEP
W 75-63
+7.5
2
@
MTSU
L 51-88
+4.5
4
@
WKU
L 61-66
−18.5
8
vs
LIB
L 56-72
−7.5
10
vs
DEL
W 70-68
+14.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 59-58
−14.5
17
@
JXST
L 60-64
−3.5
23
vs
KENN
W 82-76
+13.5
28
@
UTEP
W 69-59
−2.5
31
@
SHSU
L 67-83
+8.5
4
vs
NMSU
L 63-72
−0.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+21.5
12
@
MOST
W 79-78
+20.5
14
@
FIU
L 64-77
−5.5
18
vs
JXST
W 77-71
+15.5
21
@
KENN
L 55-58
−34.5
26
vs
MOST
W 72-70
+3.5
28
vs
FIU
L 76-84
+14.5
5
@
LIB
W 76-71
+10.5
7
@
DEL
W 81-38
−13.5
12
vs
MTSU
W 80-69
+14.5
13
vs
MOST
W 69-66
+0.5
14
vs
KENN
L 60-71
−11.5
over 16under 15avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Jax State
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg +0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-12
59% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14 | vs | W 74-67 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 65-71 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 43-56 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 99 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-73 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 134.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 73-77 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 59-62 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 81-75 | +9.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 78-67 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 67-64 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 126.5 | O 131 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 69-78 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 71-64 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-88 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 62-77 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 64-60 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 75-58 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 78-74 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-74 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 71-66 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-58 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 64-69 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 70-79 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 71-77 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 78-82 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 80-70 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 78-81 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 75-77 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 63-68 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
14
vs
CCU
W 74-67
−0.5
19
vs
USA
L 65-71
−8.5
24
@
ARST
L 63-74
−6.5
26
vs
NDSU
L 43-56
−9.5
1
vs
UNA
L 66-73
−13.5
13
@
GAST
L 73-77
−7.5
17
vs
EKU
L 59-62
−5.5
20
@
ETSU
W 81-75
+15.5
29
vs
WKU
W 78-67
+13.5
2
@
DEL
W 67-64
−1.5
4
@
LIB
L 69-78
+0.5
7
vs
FIU
W 71-64
+5.5
10
@
KENN
L 82-88
−0.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 62-77
−16.5
17
vs
LT
W 64-60
−0.5
23
vs
MTSU
W 75-58
+18.5
28
@
FIU
W 78-74
+7.5
31
@
MOST
L 67-74
−2.5
5
@
WKU
W 71-66
+9.5
7
vs
KENN
W 77-58
+20.5
11
vs
UTEP
L 64-69
−11.5
14
vs
NMSU
L 70-79
−10.5
18
@
LT
L 71-77
−3.5
21
@
SHSU
L 78-82
+2.5
26
vs
DEL
W 80-70
+2.5
28
vs
LIB
L 78-81
+0.5
5
@
NMSU
L 75-77
+4.5
7
@
UTEP
W 64-61
+1.5
10
vs
NMSU
L 63-68
−3.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
14
vs
CCU
W 74-67
+1.5
19
vs
USA
L 65-71
+0.5
24
@
ARST
L 63-74
−18.5
26
vs
NDSU
L 43-56
−43.5
1
vs
UNA
L 66-73
+4.5
13
@
GAST
L 73-77
+10.5
17
vs
EKU
L 59-62
−21.5
20
@
ETSU
W 81-75
+21.5
29
vs
WKU
W 78-67
+2.5
2
@
DEL
W 67-64
+4.5
4
@
LIB
L 69-78
+12.5
7
vs
FIU
W 71-64
−15.5
10
@
KENN
L 82-88
+20.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 62-77
−11.5
17
vs
LT
W 64-60
−3.5
23
vs
MTSU
W 75-58
−0.5
28
@
FIU
W 78-74
+3.5
31
@
MOST
L 67-74
+5.5
5
@
WKU
W 71-66
−3.5
7
vs
KENN
W 77-58
−14.5
11
vs
UTEP
L 64-69
−1.5
14
vs
NMSU
L 70-79
+9.5
18
@
LT
L 71-77
+15.5
21
@
SHSU
L 78-82
+12.5
26
vs
DEL
W 80-70
+16.5
28
vs
LIB
L 78-81
+19.5
5
@
NMSU
L 75-77
+6.5
7
@
UTEP
W 64-61
−14.5
10
vs
NMSU
L 63-68
−10.5
over 17under 12avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Louisiana Tech 0, Jax State 0, even 5
Louisiana TechBetterJax State
G J. Fenner5.3 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
=Even
G J. Stiemke TR9.7 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 28
G D. Bates NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Lockett TR9.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 49
G K. Tilley NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F N. Cunningham TR5.1 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 38
F E. Blackmon NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F M. Hill TR2.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 7
F L. Rowe NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F B. Walker TR4.7 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
Louisiana TechBetterJax State
LT offense302nd of 366 · -9.4
→JXSTBig
JXST defense172nd of 366 · -3.9
LT defense184th of 366 · -4.3
←LTSmall
JXST offense245th of 366 · -7.4
Backcourt-1.6 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt-0.9 · 3 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench+0.3 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestLT betterJXST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Fenner22 minD. BatesNewK. TilleyNewJ. TylerNewJ. SandersonNewA. BoydNew
Forwards
E. BlackmonNewL. RoweNewB. WengerNewI. EmelifeNewI. FrancisNew
Guards
J. Stiemke28 min · TRC. Lockett25 min · TRL. Horner9 min · TRG. GondrezickNewJ. VickNewN. HernandezNew
Forwards
N. Cunningham13 min · TRM. Hill10 min · TRB. Walker9 min · TRE. Croley5 min · TRK. Polk1 min · TRA. CurryNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.8 #318 | Points per game | 69.9 #287 |
| 1.03 #284 | Points per possession | 1.05 #241 |
| 65.5 #332 | Pace (possessions) | 66.3 #302 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.4 #329 | Effective FG% | 49.7 #253 |
| 28.6 #359 | 3-point % | 35.7 #76 |
| 33.4 #310 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.1 #209 |
| 33.1 #234 | Free throw rate | 43.1 #21 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #283 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #204 |
| 36.4 #21 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.8 #208 |
| 11.9 #297 | Assists per game | 11.6 #310 |
| Defense | ||
| 67.8 #30 | Points allowed | 70.6 #66 |
| 1.04 #75 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #120 |
| 48.7 #51 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.6 #85 |
| 33.9 #178 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.3 #141 |
| 17.9 #102 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #208 |
| 68.4 #232 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.0 #67 |
| 6.8 #144 | Steals per game | 5.8 #252 |
| 4.6 #31 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #233 |
Louisiana Tech
17-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-10 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kennesaw St60–71
- Wvs Missouri St69–66
- Wvs MTSU80–69
- W@ Delaware81–38
- W@ Liberty76–71
A week or more of rest.
Jax State
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs New Mexico St63–68
- W@ UTEP64–61
- L@ New Mexico St75–77
- Lvs Liberty78–81
- Wvs Delaware80–70
A week or more of rest.