Dean E. Smith Center · at North Carolina
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNC 83–75 · win probability UNC 78%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNC has more of the edges
BTLR 1, UNC 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: BTLR 50.9 and allows 51.9; UNC 54.3 and allows 48.4
UNC offense vs BTLR defense
Offense 40th of 366 against a defense 107th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: BTLR plays 71.1 a game (69th fastest), UNC 69.0 (180th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
UNC at home. This season: UNC 0-0 at home, BTLR 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: BTLR 42.1, UNC 37.1. Allowed: BTLR 24.9, UNC 23.8
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BTLR 15.9%, UNC 13.9%. Forced: BTLR 15.1%, UNC 13.6%
Context
Schedule so far
BTLR has played the 56th-hardest schedule, UNC the 61st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Three-pointers
BTLR hits 32.7% and allows 33.3%; UNC hits 34.2% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 35.0% and 42.2% of their shots
Even
BTLR offense vs UNC defense
Offense 56th of 366 against a defense 52nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BTLR 22%, UNC 20%. Transfers in: BTLR 5, UNC 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BTLR 34.5%, UNC 31.2%. Defensive: BTLR 70.0%, UNC 72.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNC -8.7 | — |
| Total | — | 157.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | BTLR 74.6 · UNC 83.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNC -5.1 | — |
| 1H total | 73.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | BTLR 34.3 · UNC 39.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Butler
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 88-58 | -22.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 112-80 | -20.5 | W +11.5 | 192.5 | U 192 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 98-66 | -26.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 85-87 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 79-72 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 80-73 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 94-69 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 84-68 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 113-110 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | O 223 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 60-79 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 61-58 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 101-52 | -32.5 | W +16.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 85-89 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-85 | -2.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 70-84 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 75-89 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 77-66 | +6.5 | W +17.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 87-80 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 87-76 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 70-92 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 64-77 | -5.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 87-97 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 168.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 55-70 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 70-80 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 56-63 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 93-89 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 80-75 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 73-82 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 59-76 | -2.5 | L −19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 81-71 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 81-91 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
USI
W 88-58
+7.5
8
vs
IUIN
W 112-80
+11.5
11
vs
CHST
W 98-66
+5.5
15
@
SMU
L 85-87
+5.5
21
vs
SC
W 79-72
+3.5
23
vs
UVA
W 80-73
+13.5
28
vs
WRST
W 94-69
+10.5
2
vs
EMU
W 84-68
−1.5
6
vs
BOIS
L 68-77
−11.5
13
vs
PROV
W 113-110
−0.5
16
@
CONN
L 60-79
−3.5
20
vs
NU
W 61-58
−0.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 101-52
+16.5
30
@
CREI
L 85-89
+1.5
3
vs
VILL
L 67-85
−20.5
6
vs
SJU
L 70-84
−9.5
14
@
XAV
L 75-89
−15.5
17
@
HALL
W 77-66
+17.5
20
vs
DEP
W 87-80
−0.5
23
vs
MARQ
W 87-76
+5.5
28
@
SJU
L 70-92
−9.5
31
vs
GTWN
L 64-77
−18.5
4
@
PROV
L 87-97
−7.5
7
@
MARQ
L 55-70
−11.5
11
vs
CONN
L 70-80
+1.5
15
vs
HALL
L 56-63
−1.5
18
@
GTWN
W 93-89
+10.5
21
vs
XAV
W 80-75
+0.5
25
@
VILL
L 73-82
+1.5
4
vs
CREI
L 59-76
−19.5
7
@
DEP
W 81-71
+14.5
11
vs
PROV
L 81-91
−8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
USI
W 88-58
−10.5
8
vs
IUIN
W 112-80
−0.5
11
vs
CHST
W 98-66
+5.5
15
@
SMU
L 85-87
+8.5
21
vs
SC
W 79-72
+0.5
23
vs
UVA
W 80-73
−2.5
28
vs
WRST
W 94-69
+12.5
2
vs
EMU
W 84-68
−1.5
6
vs
BOIS
L 68-77
−3.5
13
vs
PROV
W 113-110
+58.5
16
@
CONN
L 60-79
−5.5
20
vs
NU
W 61-58
−35.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 101-52
+3.5
30
@
CREI
L 85-89
+17.5
3
vs
VILL
L 67-85
+2.5
6
vs
SJU
L 70-84
−8.5
14
@
XAV
L 75-89
+2.5
17
@
HALL
W 77-66
−1.5
20
vs
DEP
W 87-80
+19.5
23
vs
MARQ
W 87-76
+1.5
28
@
SJU
L 70-92
+3.5
31
vs
GTWN
L 64-77
−8.5
4
@
PROV
L 87-97
+15.5
7
@
MARQ
L 55-70
−30.5
11
vs
CONN
L 70-80
+6.5
15
vs
HALL
L 56-63
−19.5
18
@
GTWN
W 93-89
+34.5
21
vs
XAV
W 80-75
−4.5
25
@
VILL
L 73-82
+7.5
4
vs
CREI
L 59-76
−20.5
7
@
DEP
W 81-71
+9.5
11
vs
PROV
L 81-91
+9.5
over 18under 14avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
North Carolina
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-54 | -31.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-74 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 89-74 | -20.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 97-53 | -34.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 73-61 | -26.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 85-70 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 58-74 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 67-64 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 163.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 81-61 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-62 | -29.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 77-58 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 71-70 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 99-51 | -25.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 79-66 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-97 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 87-84 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 90-95 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 78-84 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 91-69 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-80 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 91-75 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 87-77 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-68 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 66-75 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-65 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 58-82 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 77-64 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 77-74 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-82 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 67-63 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 61-76 | +18.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 79-80 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 78-82 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CARK
W 94-54
+8.5
7
vs
KU
W 87-74
+10.5
11
vs
RAD
W 89-74
−5.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 97-53
+9.5
18
vs
NAVY
W 73-61
−14.5
25
vs
SBU
W 85-70
+4.5
27
vs
MSU
L 58-74
−14.5
2
@
UK
W 67-64
+10.5
7
vs
GTWN
W 81-61
+9.5
13
vs
UPST
W 80-62
−11.5
16
vs
ETSU
W 77-58
+1.5
20
vs
OSU
W 71-70
−1.5
22
vs
ECU
W 99-51
+22.5
30
vs
FSU
W 79-66
+0.5
3
@
SMU
L 83-97
−12.5
10
vs
WAKE
W 87-84
−7.5
14
@
STAN
L 90-95
−9.5
17
@
CAL
L 78-84
−13.5
21
vs
ND
W 91-69
+8.5
24
@
UVA
W 85-80
+11.5
31
@
GT
W 91-75
+6.5
2
vs
SYR
W 87-77
−1.5
7
vs
DUKE
W 71-68
+9.5
10
@
MIA
L 66-75
−7.5
14
vs
PITT
W 79-65
+2.5
17
@
NCSU
L 58-82
−15.5
21
@
SYR
W 77-64
+15.5
23
vs
LOU
W 77-74
+6.5
28
vs
VT
W 89-82
−0.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 67-63
+1.5
7
@
DUKE
L 61-76
+3.5
12
vs
CLEM
L 79-80
+1.5
19
vs
VCU
L 78-82
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CARK
W 94-54
−9.5
7
vs
KU
W 87-74
+1.5
11
vs
RAD
W 89-74
+0.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 97-53
−9.5
18
vs
NAVY
W 73-61
−26.5
25
vs
SBU
W 85-70
+2.5
27
vs
MSU
L 58-74
−20.5
2
@
UK
W 67-64
−32.5
7
vs
GTWN
W 81-61
−7.5
13
vs
UPST
W 80-62
−9.5
16
vs
ETSU
W 77-58
−15.5
20
vs
OSU
W 71-70
−16.5
22
vs
ECU
W 99-51
+5.5
30
vs
FSU
W 79-66
−21.5
3
@
SMU
L 83-97
+24.5
10
vs
WAKE
W 87-84
+16.5
14
@
STAN
L 90-95
+37.5
17
@
CAL
L 78-84
+10.5
21
vs
ND
W 91-69
+10.5
24
@
UVA
W 85-80
+12.5
31
@
GT
W 91-75
+5.5
2
vs
SYR
W 87-77
+5.5
7
vs
DUKE
W 71-68
−13.5
10
@
MIA
L 66-75
−15.5
14
vs
PITT
W 79-65
+1.5
17
@
NCSU
L 58-82
−16.5
21
@
SYR
W 77-64
−13.5
23
vs
LOU
W 77-74
−11.5
28
vs
VT
W 89-82
+21.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 67-63
−11.5
7
@
DUKE
L 61-76
−10.5
12
vs
CLEM
L 79-80
+18.5
19
vs
VCU
L 78-82
+9.5
over 16under 17avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Butler 1, North Carolina 1, even 3
ButlerBetterNorth Carolina
G J. Ellerbee TR13.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 66
=Even
G N. Avdalas TR12.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 67
G J. Jackson9.5 pts · 3.5 reb · 3.8 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Brown TR19.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 98
F C. Moore TR11.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 1 ast
Score 46
→UNCSmall
G A. Brizzi TR14.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
F T. Anderson TR10.8 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 92
←BTLRSmall
F J. Stevenson8.1 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 65
C D. Jones6.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 76
=Even
C C. Fens TR14.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 85
ButlerBetterNorth Carolina
BTLR offense56th of 366 · +3.1
=Even
UNC defense52nd of 366 · +1.9
BTLR defense107th of 366 · -1.1
→UNCSmall
UNC offense40th of 366 · +5.0
Backcourt+1.3 · 2 players
→UNCBig
Backcourt+6.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.5 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt+3.9 · 2 players
Bench+0.9 · 3 players
=Even
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBTLR betterUNC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Ellerbee28 min · TRJ. Jackson23 minE. Klafke15 min · TRE. McComb1 minB. WalkerNewS. AdlerNew
Forwards
C. Moore26 min · TRT. Anderson19 min · TRS. Calderon4 min · TRH. BrutusNewB. CardinalNewM. MaricNew
Centers
D. Jones20 minK. NdzieNew
Guards
N. Avdalas32 min · TRT. Brown32 min · TRA. Brizzi30 min · TRM. Able22 min · TRJ. Young7 minI. Denis3 min
Forwards
J. Stevenson26 minJ. Holbrook2 minA. SamodurovNewM. AdamsNew
Centers
C. Fens26 min · TRC. BennermanNewS. KeitaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.4 #75 | Points per game | 79.7 #73 |
| 1.12 #106 | Points per possession | 1.16 #50 |
| 71.1 #69 | Pace (possessions) | 69.0 #180 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.9 #199 | Effective FG% | 54.3 #57 |
| 32.7 #242 | 3-point % | 34.2 #159 |
| 35.0 #276 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.2 #132 |
| 42.1 #29 | Free throw rate | 37.1 #127 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #131 | Turnover rate | 13.9 #20 |
| 34.5 #58 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.2 #159 |
| 15.5 #64 | Assists per game | 16.0 #47 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.5 #252 | Points allowed | 71.6 #97 |
| 1.09 #195 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #65 |
| 51.9 #208 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.4 #44 |
| 33.3 #142 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #234 |
| 15.1 #272 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #344 |
| 70.0 #163 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.2 #59 |
| 6.5 #178 | Steals per game | 5.4 #308 |
| 3.2 #191 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #167 |
Butler
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Providence81–91
- W@ DePaul81–71
- Lvs Creighton59–76
- L@ Villanova73–82
- Wvs Xavier80–75
A week or more of rest.
North Carolina
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs VCU78–82
- Lvs Clemson79–80
- L@ Duke61–76
- Wvs Clemson67–63
- Wvs Virginia Tech89–82
A week or more of rest.