Army Black Knights at Duke Blue Devils: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 6:30 PM ETCameron Indoor Stadium · at Duke

#288ARMYArmy

#3DUKEDuke AP #2

LineDUKE -42.5no move

Total152.5up 2 from 150.5

Season records: Army and Duke
ARMY	This season	DUKE
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects DUKE 96–53 · win probability DUKE 100%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

DUKE -42.5

no move since the open

Total

152.5

model 148.8 · Under by 3.5

Model edge

DUKE by 1.5

model vs market

Public on the spread

77% ARMY

63% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: DUKE has more of the edges

ARMY 0, DUKE 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

DUKEBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: ARMY 49.3 and allows 55.1; DUKE 56.6 and allows 46.2

DUKEBig

DUKE offense vs ARMY defense

Offense 11th of 366 against a defense 304th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

ARMY has played the 302nd-hardest schedule, DUKE the 23rd. A record against a soft schedule means less

DUKEBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: ARMY 26.8, DUKE 38.2. Allowed: ARMY 39.6, DUKE 22.8

DUKEBig

ARMY offense vs DUKE defense

Offense 271st of 366 against a defense 3rd, on the model’s ratings

DUKEBig

Three-pointers

ARMY hits 32.0% and allows 35.5%; DUKE hits 34.7% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 53.3% and 43.5% of their shots

DUKEBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: ARMY 29.6%, DUKE 38.4%. Defensive: ARMY 72.3%, DUKE 74.8%

DUKESmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: ARMY 17.2%, DUKE 16.0%. Forced: ARMY 15.4%, DUKE 17.2%

DUKESmall

Home court

DUKE at home. This season: DUKE 0-0 at home, ARMY 0-0 away

Context

Tempo

About 68 possessions: ARMY plays 68.6 a game (200th fastest), DUKE 66.8 (285th). Faster games mean more points

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: ARMY 65%, DUKE 47%. Transfers in: ARMY 0, DUKE 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenDUKE -42.5

no move

NowDUKE -42.5

No change since the open

Total

Open150.5

▲ 2

Now152.5

Up 2 since the open

Moneyline

ARMY +5650 · DUKE -55000

Line movement

Median of 7 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened DUKE -42.5 · now DUKE -43.5 · moved 1 toward DUKEmodel DUKE -44

model DUKE -44

Nov 1line modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

ARMY +42.5Spread

DUKE -42.5

Bets

77%23%

Money

63%37%

Money is 14 pts ahead of bets on DUKE -42.5

Over 152.5TotalUnder 152.5

Bets

67%33%

Money

76%24%

ARMYWinner

DUKE

Bets

93%

Money

9%91%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

7 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	ARMY	DUKE	Over	Under	ARMY	DUKE
BetMGMMGM	-43.5-110	+43.5-110	152.5-110	152.5-110	+3300	-10000
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-43.5-110	+43.5-110	153-110	153-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-42.5-108	+42.5-115	151.5-113	151.5-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-43.5-110	+43.5-110	153-110	153-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-43.5-110	+43.5-110	152.5-112	152.5-108	—	—
FanDuelFD	-42.5-104	+42.5-118	151.5-115	151.5-105	+8000	-100000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-43.5-106	+43.5-106	153-108	153-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 2:00 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	DUKE -42.5	DUKE -43.9	DUKE +1.4
Total	152.5	148.8	Under 3.7
Projected score	—	ARMY 52.5 · DUKE 96.4

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	DUKE -26.0	—
1H total	69.6	—
1H projected score	ARMY 21.8 · DUKE 47.8	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
ARMY WLLLL	12-18	40%	8-7	12-14
DUKE LLWLL	21-17	55%	8-7	20-17

Venue/role: ARMY away, as underdog; DUKE home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
ARMY OOOOU	17-13	57%	9-21
DUKE OUUOO	14-24	37%	35-3

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
ARMY	2-8 20%	1-9 10%	5-5 50%
DUKE	9-1 90%	4-6 40%	5-5 50%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Army

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 10	@ NHVN	No recent meeting
Nov 14	vs STMN	L76–83WO
Nov 17	vs MRST	L65–76WO

Duke

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	vs CCU	No recent meeting
Nov 10	vs MSU	W66–60WU
Nov 13	vs SIUE	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

ARMY 0–3 DUKEDUKE leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · DUKE has won the last 3 meetings · ARMY 0-2-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Nov 11, 2025-26	DUKE 114 @ ARMY 59	ARMY +33.5	DUKE W
Nov 8, 2024-25	ARMY 58 @ DUKE 100	DUKE -33.5	DUKE W
Nov 12, 2021-22	ARMY 56 @ DUKE 82	DUKE -26	P

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Army

30 games played

Straight up

9-21

30% wins

Against the spread

12-18

40% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line

Over / Under

17-13

57% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total

Straight up

9-2130%

L L L L L L W W L W W W L L L L L W L W W L L L L W L L L L

4 straight losses0 of last 4 won

Against the spread

12-1840%

W L L W W L W W W W L W W L L L L W L W L L L L L W L L L L

4 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

17-1357%

O O U U O O O O U U O O U O O O U O U U U U U O U O O O O U

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 8	@STMN	L 76-83	+18.5	W +11.5	151.5	O 159
Nov 11	vsDUKE	L 59-114	+33.5	L −21.5	152.5	O 173
Nov 15	vsHARV	L 52-75	+6.5	L −16.5	146.5	U 127
Nov 18	@COR	L 73-86	+17.5	W +4.5	164.5	U 159
Nov 21	@MRST	L 65-76	+12.5	W +1.5	132.5	O 141
Nov 25	vsETAM	L 67-84	+2.5	L −14.5	143.5	O 151
Nov 26	@FDU	W 81-73	+4.5	W +12.5	152.5	O 154
Nov 29	vsMAN	W 81-78	+1.5	W +4.5	152.5	O 159
Dec 2	vsGW	L 70-84	+19.5	W +5.5	156.5	U 154
Dec 12	@UMBC	W 63-60	+7.5	W +10.5	146.5	U 123
Dec 23	vsBING	W 95-85	-12.5	L −2.5	140.5	O 180
Dec 31	@LEH	W 85-78	+5.5	W +12.5	146.5	O 163
Jan 3	vsCOLG	L 69-76	+7.5	W +0.5	147.5	U 145
Jan 7	vsL-MD	L 76-84	-4.5	L −12.5	146.5	O 160
Jan 10	@BU	L 91-100	+7.5	L −1.5	140.5	O 191
Jan 14	@HC	L 75-82	+4.5	L −2.5	142.5	O 157
Jan 18	vsAMER	L 67-78	+4.5	L −6.5	147.5	U 145
Jan 21	@BUCK	W 87-84	+4.5	W +7.5	144.5	O 171
Jan 24	@NAVY	L 56-84	+10.5	L −17.5	143.5	U 140
Jan 28	vsLEH	W 67-64	+1.5	W +4.5	147.5	U 131
Jan 31	vsHC	W 69-68	-2.5	L −1.5	144.5	U 137
Feb 4	@COLG	L 55-69	+10.5	L −3.5	150.5	U 124
Feb 7	vsLAF	L 60-63	+1.5	L −1.5	142.5	U 123
Feb 11	vsBU	L 68-85	+2.5	L −14.5	140.5	O 153
Feb 14	@AMER	L 63-75	+9.5	L −2.5	144.5	U 138
Feb 18	@L-MD	W 87-77	+4.5	W +14.5	149.5	O 164
Feb 21	vsNAVY	L 63-81	+8.5	L −9.5	139.5	O 144
Feb 25	vsBUCK	L 73-75	-2.5	L −4.5	142.5	O 148
Feb 28	@LAF	L 77-83	+3.5	L −2.5	144.5	O 160
Mar 3	@BUCK	L 55-65	+1.5	L −8.5	144.5	U 120

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

STMN

L 76-83

+11.5

DUKE

L 59-114

−21.5

HARV

L 52-75

−16.5

COR

L 73-86

+4.5

MRST

L 65-76

+1.5

ETAM

L 67-84

−14.5

FDU

W 81-73

+12.5

MAN

W 81-78

+4.5

L 70-84

+5.5

UMBC

W 63-60

+10.5

BING

W 95-85

−2.5

LEH

W 85-78

+12.5

COLG

L 69-76

+0.5

L-MD

L 76-84

−12.5

L 91-100

−1.5

L 75-82

−2.5

AMER

L 67-78

−6.5

BUCK

W 87-84

+7.5

NAVY

L 56-84

−17.5

LEH

W 67-64

+4.5

W 69-68

−1.5

COLG

L 55-69

−3.5

LAF

L 60-63

−1.5

L 68-85

−14.5

AMER

L 63-75

−2.5

L-MD

W 87-77

+14.5

NAVY

L 63-81

−9.5

BUCK

L 73-75

−4.5

LAF

L 77-83

−2.5

BUCK

L 55-65

−8.5

covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

STMN

L 76-83

+7.5

DUKE

L 59-114

+20.5

HARV

L 52-75

−19.5

COR

L 73-86

−5.5

MRST

L 65-76

+8.5

ETAM

L 67-84

+7.5

FDU

W 81-73

+1.5

MAN

W 81-78

+6.5

L 70-84

−2.5

UMBC

W 63-60

−23.5

BING

W 95-85

+39.5

LEH

W 85-78

+16.5

COLG

L 69-76

−2.5

L-MD

L 76-84

+13.5

L 91-100

+50.5

L 75-82

+14.5

AMER

L 67-78

−2.5

BUCK

W 87-84

+26.5

NAVY

L 56-84

−3.5

LEH

W 67-64

−16.5

W 69-68

−7.5

COLG

L 55-69

−26.5

LAF

L 60-63

−19.5

L 68-85

+12.5

AMER

L 63-75

−6.5

L-MD

W 87-77

+14.5

NAVY

L 63-81

+4.5

BUCK

L 73-75

+5.5

LAF

L 77-83

+15.5

BUCK

L 55-65

−24.5

over 17under 13avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Duke

38 games played

Straight up

35-3

92% wins

Against the spread

21-17

55% covers · avg +1.6 pts vs the line

Over / Under

14-24

37% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total

Straight up

35-392%

W W W W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

21-1755%

W W W W W W L L L W L L L L W L W W W W W L L L W W W W W W L L W L L W L L

2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

14-2437%

U U O U U U U U U U O O O O U O U U O U U U U U U O U O U O U O U O U U O O

2 straight overs2 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsTEX	W 75-60	-10.5	W +4.5	153.5	U 135
Nov 8	vsWCU	W 95-54	-36.5	W +4.5	152.5	U 149
Nov 11	@ARMY	W 114-59	-33.5	W +21.5	152.5	O 173
Nov 14	vsINST	W 100-62	-37.5	W +0.5	163.5	U 162
Nov 18	vsKU	W 78-66	-10.5	W +1.5	149.5	U 144
Nov 21	vsNIA	W 100-42	-39.5	W +18.5	146.5	U 142
Nov 23	vsHOW	W 93-56	-43.5	L −6.5	154.5	U 149
Nov 27	vsARK	W 80-71	-12.5	L −3.5	159.5	U 151
Dec 2	vsFLA	W 67-66	-9.5	L −8.5	157.5	U 133
Dec 6	@MSU	W 66-60	-1.5	W +4.5	141.5	U 126
Dec 16	vsLIP	W 97-73	-32.5	L −8.5	151.5	O 170
Dec 20	vsTTU	L 81-82	-9.5	L −10.5	152.5	O 163
Dec 31	vsGT	W 85-79	-27.5	L −21.5	153.5	O 164
Jan 3	@FSU	W 91-87	-16.5	L −12.5	163.5	O 178
Jan 6	@LOU	W 84-73	-1.5	W +9.5	161.5	U 157
Jan 10	vsSMU	W 82-75	-15.5	L −8.5	155.5	O 157
Jan 14	@CAL	W 71-56	-14.5	W +0.5	149.5	U 127
Jan 17	@STAN	W 80-50	-11.5	W +18.5	148.5	U 130
Jan 24	vsWAKE	W 90-69	-19.5	W +1.5	153.5	O 159
Jan 26	vsLOU	W 83-52	-8.5	W +22.5	157.5	U 135
Jan 31	@VT	W 72-58	-13.5	W +0.5	148.5	U 130
Feb 3	vsBC	W 67-49	-26.5	L −8.5	141.5	U 116
Feb 7	@UNC	L 68-71	-6.5	L −9.5	152.5	U 139
Feb 10	@PITT	W 70-54	-17.5	L −1.5	136.5	U 124
Feb 14	vsCLEM	W 67-54	-12.5	W +0.5	134.5	U 121
Feb 16	vsSYR	W 101-64	-20.5	W +16.5	144.5	O 165
Feb 21	vsMICH	W 68-63	+3.5	W +8.5	151.5	U 131
Feb 24	@ND	W 100-56	-16.5	W +27.5	141.5	O 156
Feb 28	vsUVA	W 77-51	-9.5	W +16.5	143.5	U 128
Mar 2	@NCSU	W 93-64	-8.5	W +20.5	150.5	O 157
Mar 7	vsUNC	W 76-61	-18.5	L −3.5	147.5	U 137
Mar 12	vsFSU	W 80-79	-16.5	L −15.5	150.5	O 159
Mar 13	vsCLEM	W 73-61	-10.5	W +1.5	134.5	U 134
Mar 14	vsUVA	W 74-70	-6.5	L −2.5	140.5	O 144
Mar 19	vsSIE	W 71-65	-28.5	L −22.5	137.5	U 136
Mar 21	vsTCU	W 81-58	-12.5	W +10.5	140.5	U 139
Mar 27	vsSJU	W 80-75	-6.5	L −1.5	140.5	O 155
Mar 29	vsCONN	L 72-73	-4.5	L −5.5	135.5	O 145

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

TEX

W 75-60

+4.5

WCU

W 95-54

+4.5

ARMY

W 114-59

+21.5

INST

W 100-62

+0.5

W 78-66

+1.5

NIA

W 100-42

+18.5

HOW

W 93-56

−6.5

ARK

W 80-71

−3.5

FLA

W 67-66

−8.5

MSU

W 66-60

+4.5

LIP

W 97-73

−8.5

TTU

L 81-82

−10.5

W 85-79

−21.5

FSU

W 91-87

−12.5

LOU

W 84-73

+9.5

SMU

W 82-75

−8.5

CAL

W 71-56

+0.5

STAN

W 80-50

+18.5

WAKE

W 90-69

+1.5

LOU

W 83-52

+22.5

W 72-58

+0.5

W 67-49

−8.5

UNC

L 68-71

−9.5

PITT

W 70-54

−1.5

CLEM

W 67-54

+0.5

SYR

W 101-64

+16.5

MICH

W 68-63

+8.5

W 100-56

+27.5

UVA

W 77-51

+16.5

NCSU

W 93-64

+20.5

UNC

W 76-61

−3.5

FSU

W 80-79

−15.5

CLEM

W 73-61

+1.5

UVA

W 74-70

−2.5

SIE

W 71-65

−22.5

TCU

W 81-58

+10.5

SJU

W 80-75

−1.5

CONN

L 72-73

−5.5

covered 21didn’t cover 17avg +1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

TEX

W 75-60

−18.5

WCU

W 95-54

−3.5

ARMY

W 114-59

+20.5

INST

W 100-62

−1.5

W 78-66

−5.5

NIA

W 100-42

−4.5

HOW

W 93-56

−5.5

ARK

W 80-71

−8.5

FLA

W 67-66

−24.5

MSU

W 66-60

−15.5

LIP

W 97-73

+18.5

TTU

L 81-82

+10.5

W 85-79

+10.5

FSU

W 91-87

+14.5

LOU

W 84-73

−4.5

SMU

W 82-75

+1.5

CAL

W 71-56

−22.5

STAN

W 80-50

−18.5

WAKE

W 90-69

+5.5

LOU

W 83-52

−22.5

W 72-58

−18.5

W 67-49

−25.5

UNC

L 68-71

−13.5

PITT

W 70-54

−12.5

CLEM

W 67-54

−13.5

SYR

W 101-64

+20.5

MICH

W 68-63

−20.5

W 100-56

+14.5

UVA

W 77-51

−15.5

NCSU

W 93-64

+6.5

UNC

W 76-61

−10.5

FSU

W 80-79

+8.5

CLEM

W 73-61

−0.5

UVA

W 74-70

+3.5

SIE

W 71-65

−1.5

TCU

W 81-58

−1.5

SJU

W 80-75

+14.5

CONN

L 72-73

+9.5

over 14under 24avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Duke has the better starters

Position by position: Army 0, Duke 4, even 1

ArmyBetterDuke

G R. Curry13.4 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.4 ast Score 57

DUKEBig

G J. Blackwell TR19.1 pts · 5.1 reb · 2.3 ast Score 97

G K. McCarthy7.2 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.2 ast Score 13

DUKEBig

G C. Foster8.3 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.8 ast Score 76

F J. Holloway10.7 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.1 ast Score 37

DUKEBig

G J. Theodosiou TR12.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.6 ast Score 86

F T. Laczkowski5.3 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.9 ast Score 38

DUKEBig

G C. Boozer7.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 3 ast Score 85

F D. Benner1.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.4 ast Not ranked

No call

F D. Sarr6.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.1 ast Score 52

ArmyBetterDuke

ARMY offense271st of 366 · -8.2

DUKEBig

DUKE defense3rd of 366 · +11.4

ARMY defense304th of 366 · -7.8

DUKEBig

DUKE offense11th of 366 · +10.1

Backcourt-3.1 · 2 players

DUKEBig

Backcourt+9.2 · 4 players

Frontcourt-2.6 · 3 players

DUKESmall

Frontcourt-0.2 · 1 player

Bench-1.0 · 5 players

DUKEBig

Bench+7.0 · 2 players

Score, worst to bestARMY betterDUKE betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Army

Guards

R. Curry34 minK. McCarthy24 minD. Watt5 minJ. Green3 minB. O'Keefe2 minJ. EllisNew

Forwards

J. Holloway29 minT. Laczkowski22 minD. Benner6 minN. Ikechi3 minD. Murans3 minH. RasmussenNew

Centers

P. HendersonNew

Duke

Guards

J. Blackwell34 min · TRC. Foster25 minJ. Theodosiou23 min · TRC. Boozer23 minB. DavisNewD. RippeyNew

Forwards

D. Sarr24 minD. Scharnowski22 min · TRS. WilkinsNewC. WilliamsNew

Centers

P. Ngongba22 minM. MeyerNewJ. Boumtje BoumtjeNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

ARMY70.8 #268

DUKE81.6 #36

Points per possession

ARMY1.03 #281

DUKE1.23 #4

Pace (possessions)

ARMY68.6 #200

DUKE66.8 #285

Shooting

Effective FG%

ARMY49.3 #279

DUKE56.6 #13

3-point %

ARMY32.0 #278

DUKE34.7 #133

3-point attempt rate

ARMY53.3 #3

DUKE43.5 #100

Free throw rate

ARMY26.8 #352

DUKE38.2 #97

Possessions

Turnover rate

ARMY17.2 #221

DUKE16.0 #139

Offensive rebound rate

ARMY29.6 #219

DUKE38.4 #4

Assists per game

ARMY14.5 #118

DUKE16.7 #32

Defense

Points allowed

ARMY79.0 #298

DUKE63.6 #3

Points allowed per possession

ARMY1.15 #321

DUKE0.95 #2

Opponent effective FG%

ARMY55.1 #334

DUKE46.2 #13

Opponent 3-point %

ARMY35.5 #285

DUKE30.6 #27

Turnovers forced

ARMY15.4 #257

DUKE17.2 #133

Defensive rebound rate

ARMY72.3 #54

DUKE74.8 #10

Steals per game

ARMY5.4 #307

DUKE7.4 #92

Blocks per game

ARMY1.6 #359

DUKE3.4 #164

ARMY		DUKE
Scoring
70.8 #268	Points per game	81.6 #36
1.03 #281	Points per possession	1.23 #4
68.6 #200	Pace (possessions)	66.8 #285
Shooting
49.3 #279	Effective FG%	56.6 #13
32.0 #278	3-point %	34.7 #133
53.3 #3	3-point attempt rate	43.5 #100
26.8 #352	Free throw rate	38.2 #97
Possessions
17.2 #221	Turnover rate	16.0 #139
29.6 #219	Offensive rebound rate	38.4 #4
14.5 #118	Assists per game	16.7 #32
Defense
79.0 #298	Points allowed	63.6 #3
1.15 #321	Points allowed per possession	0.95 #2
55.1 #334	Opponent effective FG%	46.2 #13
35.5 #285	Opponent 3-point %	30.6 #27
15.4 #257	Turnovers forced	17.2 #133
72.3 #54	Defensive rebound rate	74.8 #10
5.4 #307	Steals per game	7.4 #92
1.6 #359	Blocks per game	3.4 #164

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Army

9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Patriot League

Last five, 2025-26

L@ Bucknell55–65
L@ Lafayette77–83
Lvs Bucknell73–75
Lvs Navy63–81
W@ Loyola MD87–77

A week or more of rest.

Duke

35-3 in 2025-26 overall · 20-1 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs UConn72–73
Wvs St John's80–75
Wvs TCU81–58
Wvs Siena71–65
Wvs Virginia74–70

A week or more of rest.