Jeffery P. Hazell Athletics Center · at New Haven
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NHVN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ARMY 71–70 · win probability ARMY 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
ARMY 3, NHVN 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: ARMY 26.8, NHVN 31.7. Allowed: ARMY 39.6, NHVN 27.7
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: ARMY plays 68.6 a game (200th fastest), NHVN 63.5 (363rd). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ARMY 65%, NHVN 27%. Transfers in: ARMY 0, NHVN 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ARMY 29.6%, NHVN 21.5%. Defensive: ARMY 72.3%, NHVN 73.2%
NHVN offense vs ARMY defense
Offense 362nd of 366 against a defense 304th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: ARMY 49.3 and allows 55.1; NHVN 48.7 and allows 51.8
Home court
NHVN at home. This season: NHVN 0-0 at home, ARMY 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ARMY 17.2%, NHVN 17.8%. Forced: ARMY 15.4%, NHVN 17.1%
Even
ARMY offense vs NHVN defense
Offense 271st of 366 against a defense 285th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
ARMY hits 32.0% and allows 35.5%; NHVN hits 30.2% and allows 34.3%. Threes are 53.3% and 39.9% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
ARMY has played the 302nd-hardest schedule, NHVN the 307th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ARMY -0.8 | — |
| Total | — | 141.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | ARMY 70.9 · NHVN 70.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ARMY -0.6 | — |
| 1H total | 66.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | ARMY 33.3 · NHVN 32.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Army
30 games played
Straight up
9-21
30% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 76-83 | +18.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 59-114 | +33.5 | L −21.5 | 152.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 52-75 | +6.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 73-86 | +17.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 65-76 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 67-84 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 81-73 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 81-78 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 70-84 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 12 | @ | W 63-60 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 95-85 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 85-78 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 69-76 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 76-84 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 91-100 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 75-82 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 67-78 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 87-84 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 56-84 | +10.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 67-64 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 69-68 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 55-69 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 60-63 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 68-85 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-75 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 87-77 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-81 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 73-75 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 77-83 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 55-65 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
STMN
L 76-83
+11.5
11
vs
DUKE
L 59-114
−21.5
15
vs
HARV
L 52-75
−16.5
18
@
COR
L 73-86
+4.5
21
@
MRST
L 65-76
+1.5
25
vs
ETAM
L 67-84
−14.5
26
@
FDU
W 81-73
+12.5
29
vs
MAN
W 81-78
+4.5
2
vs
GW
L 70-84
+5.5
12
@
UMBC
W 63-60
+10.5
23
vs
BING
W 95-85
−2.5
31
@
LEH
W 85-78
+12.5
3
vs
COLG
L 69-76
+0.5
7
vs
L-MD
L 76-84
−12.5
10
@
BU
L 91-100
−1.5
14
@
HC
L 75-82
−2.5
18
vs
AMER
L 67-78
−6.5
21
@
BUCK
W 87-84
+7.5
24
@
NAVY
L 56-84
−17.5
28
vs
LEH
W 67-64
+4.5
31
vs
HC
W 69-68
−1.5
4
@
COLG
L 55-69
−3.5
7
vs
LAF
L 60-63
−1.5
11
vs
BU
L 68-85
−14.5
14
@
AMER
L 63-75
−2.5
18
@
L-MD
W 87-77
+14.5
21
vs
NAVY
L 63-81
−9.5
25
vs
BUCK
L 73-75
−4.5
28
@
LAF
L 77-83
−2.5
3
@
BUCK
L 55-65
−8.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
STMN
L 76-83
+7.5
11
vs
DUKE
L 59-114
+20.5
15
vs
HARV
L 52-75
−19.5
18
@
COR
L 73-86
−5.5
21
@
MRST
L 65-76
+8.5
25
vs
ETAM
L 67-84
+7.5
26
@
FDU
W 81-73
+1.5
29
vs
MAN
W 81-78
+6.5
2
vs
GW
L 70-84
−2.5
12
@
UMBC
W 63-60
−23.5
23
vs
BING
W 95-85
+39.5
31
@
LEH
W 85-78
+16.5
3
vs
COLG
L 69-76
−2.5
7
vs
L-MD
L 76-84
+13.5
10
@
BU
L 91-100
+50.5
14
@
HC
L 75-82
+14.5
18
vs
AMER
L 67-78
−2.5
21
@
BUCK
W 87-84
+26.5
24
@
NAVY
L 56-84
−3.5
28
vs
LEH
W 67-64
−16.5
31
vs
HC
W 69-68
−7.5
4
@
COLG
L 55-69
−26.5
7
vs
LAF
L 60-63
−19.5
11
vs
BU
L 68-85
+12.5
14
@
AMER
L 63-75
−6.5
18
@
L-MD
W 87-77
+14.5
21
vs
NAVY
L 63-81
+4.5
25
vs
BUCK
L 73-75
+5.5
28
@
LAF
L 77-83
+15.5
3
@
BUCK
L 55-65
−24.5
over 17under 13avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
New Haven
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
15-13
54% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-20
29% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 55-79 | +42.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 53-71 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 43-87 | +18.5 | L −25.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 73-67 | +10.5 | W +16.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 65-52 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 130.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 45-68 | +25.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-67 | +17.5 | W +13.5 | 126.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 64-70 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 47-65 | +13.5 | L −4.5 | 127.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 53-96 | +39.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 70-55 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 61-72 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 47-73 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 65-55 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 80-74 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 129.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 62-56 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 129.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 57-61 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 122.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 51-70 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 122.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 81-69 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 55-60 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 57-63 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 127.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 76-81 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 128.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 55-52 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 129.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 64-51 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 121.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 84-77 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 123.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 67-73 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 62-65 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 66-59 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CONN
L 55-79
+18.5
7
vs
COLU
L 53-71
−10.5
8
vs
PSU
L 43-87
−25.5
10
@
UML
W 73-67
+16.5
15
vs
DSU
W 65-52
+11.5
18
@
HALL
L 45-68
+2.5
6
@
BC
L 63-67
+13.5
10
@
NJIT
L 64-70
−8.5
22
@
FOR
L 47-65
−4.5
29
@
VAN
L 53-96
−3.5
2
@
STO
W 70-55
+16.5
4
@
CCSU
L 61-72
−3.5
8
@
LEM
L 47-73
−20.5
10
vs
FDU
W 65-55
+8.5
17
vs
WAG
W 80-74
+4.5
19
@
CHST
W 62-56
+7.5
23
vs
MERC
L 57-61
−2.5
29
@
MERC
L 51-70
−13.5
31
@
SFPA
W 81-69
+13.5
5
@
LIU
L 55-60
+4.5
7
vs
CHST
L 57-63
−11.5
12
vs
CCSU
L 76-81
−1.5
14
vs
LIU
W 55-52
+9.5
19
vs
STO
W 64-51
+10.5
21
@
FDU
W 84-77
+9.5
24
vs
SFPA
L 67-73
−12.5
26
@
WAG
L 62-65
−0.5
28
vs
LEM
W 66-59
+8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 13avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CONN
L 55-79
−11.5
7
vs
COLU
L 53-71
−24.5
8
vs
PSU
L 43-87
−13.5
10
@
UML
W 73-67
−2.5
15
vs
DSU
W 65-52
−13.5
18
@
HALL
L 45-68
−16.5
6
@
BC
L 63-67
+3.5
10
@
NJIT
L 64-70
+3.5
22
@
FOR
L 47-65
−15.5
29
@
VAN
L 53-96
+3.5
2
@
STO
W 70-55
−3.5
4
@
CCSU
L 61-72
+2.5
8
@
LEM
L 47-73
−17.5
10
vs
FDU
W 65-55
−10.5
17
vs
WAG
W 80-74
+24.5
19
@
CHST
W 62-56
−11.5
23
vs
MERC
L 57-61
−4.5
29
@
MERC
L 51-70
−1.5
31
@
SFPA
W 81-69
+18.5
5
@
LIU
L 55-60
−20.5
7
vs
CHST
L 57-63
−7.5
12
vs
CCSU
L 76-81
+28.5
14
vs
LIU
W 55-52
−22.5
19
vs
STO
W 64-51
−6.5
21
@
FDU
W 84-77
+37.5
24
vs
SFPA
L 67-73
−1.5
26
@
WAG
L 62-65
−4.5
28
vs
LEM
W 66-59
−12.5
over 8under 20avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Army has the better starters
Position by position: Army 1, New Haven 0, even 4
ArmyBetterNew Haven
G R. Curry13.4 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 57
←ARMYSmall
G K. Briggs6.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 38
G K. McCarthy7.2 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 13
=No call
G A. Losiewicz2.6 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
F J. Holloway10.7 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 37
=Even
F T. Steele3.2 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 27
F T. Laczkowski5.3 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 38
=No call
F Z. Traore1.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
F D. Benner1.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C T. Burth0.9 pts · 1 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
ArmyBetterNew Haven
ARMY offense271st of 366 · -8.2
=Even
NHVN defense285th of 366 · -7.1
ARMY defense304th of 366 · -7.8
←ARMYSmall
NHVN offense362nd of 366 · -14.4
Backcourt-3.1 · 2 players
→NHVNSmall
Backcourt-1.3 · 2 players
Frontcourt-2.6 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-2.5 · 3 players
Bench-1.0 · 5 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestARMY betterNHVN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Curry34 minK. McCarthy24 minD. Watt5 minJ. Green3 minB. O'Keefe2 minJ. EllisNew
Forwards
J. Holloway29 minT. Laczkowski22 minD. Benner6 minN. Ikechi3 minD. Murans3 minH. RasmussenNew
Centers
P. HendersonNew
Guards
K. Briggs19 minA. Losiewicz7 minD. YoungNewF. MosleyNewD. LaDucaNewJ. HannaNew
Forwards
T. Steele15 minZ. Traore7 minN. NarcisseNewA. RamirezNewJ. BascombeNewM. OgleNew
Centers
T. Burth6 minT. ColemanNewM. CamaraNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.8 #268 | Points per game | 61.5 #363 |
| 1.03 #281 | Points per possession | 0.97 #345 |
| 68.6 #200 | Pace (possessions) | 63.5 #363 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.3 #279 | Effective FG% | 48.7 #296 |
| 32.0 #278 | 3-point % | 30.2 #340 |
| 53.3 #3 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.9 #172 |
| 26.8 #352 | Free throw rate | 31.7 #261 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.2 #221 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #259 |
| 29.6 #219 | Offensive rebound rate | 21.5 #359 |
| 14.5 #118 | Assists per game | 10.9 #339 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.0 #298 | Points allowed | 67.4 #24 |
| 1.15 #321 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #107 |
| 55.1 #334 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #203 |
| 35.5 #285 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.3 #199 |
| 15.4 #257 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #146 |
| 72.3 #54 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.2 #30 |
| 5.4 #307 | Steals per game | 6.0 #232 |
| 1.6 #359 | Blocks per game | 2.0 #342 |
Army
9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Bucknell55–65
- L@ Lafayette77–83
- Lvs Bucknell73–75
- Lvs Navy63–81
- W@ Loyola MD87–77
A week or more of rest.
New Haven
11-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Le Moyne66–59
- L@ Wagner62–65
- Lvs Saint Francis Red Wolves67–73
- W@ FDU84–77
- Wvs Stonehill64–51
A week or more of rest.