UD Arena · at Dayton
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DAY | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DAY 79–62 · win probability DAY 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DAY has more of the edges
SIE 1, DAY 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SIE offense vs DAY defense
Offense 309th of 366 against a defense 57th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SIE has played the 320th-hardest schedule, DAY the 90th. A record against a soft schedule means less
DAY offense vs SIE defense
Offense 109th of 366 against a defense 194th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: SIE plays 64.4 a game (354th fastest), DAY 68.3 (213th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SIE 31.8%, DAY 26.9%. Defensive: SIE 70.5%, DAY 71.2%
Home court
DAY at home. This season: DAY 0-0 at home, SIE 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SIE 15.8%, DAY 16.9%. Forced: SIE 17.0%, DAY 21.0%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SIE 50.4 and allows 48.5; DAY 51.6 and allows 51.0
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SIE 33.4, DAY 46.1. Allowed: SIE 27.5, DAY 35.5
Even
Three-pointers
SIE hits 30.6% and allows 32.4%; DAY hits 33.9% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 32.2% and 41.4% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SIE 28%, DAY 31%. Transfers in: SIE 1, DAY 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DAY -17.2 | — |
| Total | — | 141.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | SIE 61.9 · DAY 79.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DAY -10.1 | — |
| 1H total | 66.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | SIE 27.9 · DAY 38.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 1-9 10% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 2-8 20% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Siena
35 games played
Straight up
23-12
66% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-66 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 62-46 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 66-75 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 17 | vs | L 69-72 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-63 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 73-69 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 70-63 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 59-55 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 64-60 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 83-54 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 129.5 | O 137 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-52 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 69-83 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 60-81 | +21.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 72-75 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 74-65 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 59-63 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 67-50 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 80-86 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-59 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 85-77 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 69-50 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 133.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 82-79 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 128.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 78-63 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 79-72 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 62-74 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 67-63 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 72-79 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 72-63 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 58-72 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 76-61 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 63-58 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-61 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 64-54 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 128.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 65-71 | +28.5 | W +22.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BRY
W 82-66
+2.5
7
@
BRWN
W 62-46
+12.5
12
@
SBU
L 66-75
+0.5
17
vs
COLG
L 69-72
−9.5
21
vs
UALB
W 73-63
−0.5
24
@
HC
W 73-69
−5.5
28
vs
LONG
W 70-63
+1.5
29
@
AMER
W 59-55
+1.5
30
vs
ME
W 64-60
−5.5
5
vs
NIA
W 83-54
+16.5
7
vs
CAN
W 74-52
+4.5
17
@
UVM
L 69-83
−11.5
22
@
IU
L 60-81
+0.5
2
@
IONA
L 72-75
−4.5
4
@
RID
W 74-65
+0.5
9
vs
MRMK
L 59-63
−9.5
11
@
MSM
W 67-50
+14.5
14
vs
SHU
L 80-86
−14.5
17
@
MAN
W 74-59
+8.5
19
vs
FAIR
W 85-77
+1.5
22
vs
MRST
W 69-50
+17.5
30
@
NIA
W 82-79
−6.5
1
@
CAN
W 78-63
+6.5
5
vs
IONA
W 79-72
−1.5
7
@
SPU
L 65-70
−6.5
13
vs
QUIN
L 62-74
−15.5
15
@
MRST
W 67-63
+6.5
20
@
MRMK
L 72-79
−4.5
22
vs
SPU
W 72-63
+3.5
27
@
FAIR
L 58-72
−15.5
1
vs
RID
W 76-61
+0.5
7
vs
MSM
W 63-58
+2.5
8
vs
FAIR
W 76-61
+13.5
10
vs
MRMK
W 64-54
+12.5
19
vs
DUKE
L 65-71
+22.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BRY
W 82-66
−0.5
7
@
BRWN
W 62-46
−34.5
12
@
SBU
L 66-75
+0.5
17
vs
COLG
L 69-72
−5.5
21
vs
UALB
W 73-63
−4.5
24
@
HC
W 73-69
+4.5
28
vs
LONG
W 70-63
−12.5
29
@
AMER
W 59-55
−23.5
30
vs
ME
W 64-60
−3.5
5
vs
NIA
W 83-54
+7.5
7
vs
CAN
W 74-52
−5.5
17
@
UVM
L 69-83
+17.5
22
@
IU
L 60-81
−4.5
2
@
IONA
L 72-75
−2.5
4
@
RID
W 74-65
+3.5
9
vs
MRMK
L 59-63
−10.5
11
@
MSM
W 67-50
−22.5
14
vs
SHU
L 80-86
+26.5
17
@
MAN
W 74-59
−11.5
19
vs
FAIR
W 85-77
+19.5
22
vs
MRST
W 69-50
−14.5
30
@
NIA
W 82-79
+32.5
1
@
CAN
W 78-63
+5.5
5
vs
IONA
W 79-72
+10.5
7
@
SPU
L 65-70
−0.5
13
vs
QUIN
L 62-74
−8.5
15
@
MRST
W 67-63
−3.5
20
@
MRMK
L 72-79
+17.5
22
vs
SPU
W 72-63
−0.5
27
@
FAIR
L 58-72
−12.5
1
vs
RID
W 76-61
−0.5
7
vs
MSM
W 63-58
−14.5
8
vs
FAIR
W 76-61
−1.5
10
vs
MRMK
W 64-54
−10.5
19
vs
DUKE
L 65-71
−1.5
over 11under 24avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Dayton
37 games played
Straight up
25-12
68% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-24
35% overs · avg −2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-48 | -25.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 77-71 | -25.5 | L −19.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 62-74 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-82 | -21.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 74-55 | -29.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 84-79 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 79-83 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 88-71 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 84-61 | -30.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 97-69 | -6.5 | W +21.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 61-64 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 63-56 | -16.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 70-68 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 71-65 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 78-51 | -16.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 64-67 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 74-81 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 76-81 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 71-102 | +9.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 73-99 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 70-59 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 82-67 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-66 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 77-62 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 68-66 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 65-60 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 62-68 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 68-63 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 62-70 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 80-66 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 21 | @ | W 80-61 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 25 | vs | L 55-61 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CAN
W 88-48
+14.5
8
vs
UMBC
W 77-71
−19.5
11
@
CIN
L 62-74
−6.5
15
vs
BCU
W 91-82
−12.5
19
@
MARQ
W 77-71
+12.5
22
vs
NCCU
W 74-55
−10.5
27
vs
GTWN
W 84-79
+3.5
28
vs
BYU
L 79-83
+5.5
2
vs
ETSU
W 88-71
+5.5
6
vs
UVA
L 73-86
−7.5
13
vs
UNF
W 84-61
−7.5
16
vs
FSU
W 97-69
+21.5
20
vs
LIB
L 61-64
−12.5
31
vs
FOR
W 63-56
−9.5
3
@
LUC
W 70-68
−5.5
6
vs
GW
W 79-72
+4.5
13
@
DUQ
W 71-65
+3.5
16
vs
LUC
W 78-51
+10.5
21
@
LAS
L 64-67
−12.5
24
@
JOES
L 74-81
−13.5
27
vs
URI
L 76-81
−14.5
30
@
SLU
L 71-102
−21.5
3
vs
SBU
W 72-70
−5.5
6
@
VCU
L 73-99
−17.5
15
vs
DAV
W 70-59
+5.5
18
@
GMU
W 82-67
+17.5
21
vs
DUQ
W 78-66
+5.5
24
vs
SLU
W 77-62
+18.5
27
@
GW
W 68-66
+4.5
3
@
RICH
W 65-60
−0.5
6
vs
VCU
L 62-68
−7.5
13
vs
SBU
W 68-63
−0.5
14
vs
SLU
W 70-69
+5.5
15
vs
VCU
L 62-70
−4.5
18
@
BRAD
W 80-66
+11.5
21
@
UNCW
W 80-61
+15.5
25
vs
ILST
L 55-61
−13.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CAN
W 88-48
−6.5
8
vs
UMBC
W 77-71
−6.5
11
@
CIN
L 62-74
−11.5
15
vs
BCU
W 91-82
+24.5
19
@
MARQ
W 77-71
−3.5
22
vs
NCCU
W 74-55
−17.5
27
vs
GTWN
W 84-79
+17.5
28
vs
BYU
L 79-83
+11.5
2
vs
ETSU
W 88-71
+18.5
6
vs
UVA
L 73-86
+11.5
13
vs
UNF
W 84-61
−14.5
16
vs
FSU
W 97-69
+3.5
20
vs
LIB
L 61-64
−17.5
31
vs
FOR
W 63-56
−20.5
3
@
LUC
W 70-68
−2.5
6
vs
GW
W 79-72
−3.5
13
@
DUQ
W 71-65
−16.5
16
vs
LUC
W 78-51
−12.5
21
@
LAS
L 64-67
−6.5
24
@
JOES
L 74-81
+15.5
27
vs
URI
L 76-81
+18.5
30
@
SLU
L 71-102
+21.5
3
vs
SBU
W 72-70
−2.5
6
@
VCU
L 73-99
+24.5
15
vs
DAV
W 70-59
−11.5
18
@
GMU
W 82-67
+11.5
21
vs
DUQ
W 78-66
−4.5
24
vs
SLU
W 77-62
−18.5
27
@
GW
W 68-66
−18.5
3
@
RICH
W 65-60
−19.5
6
vs
VCU
L 62-68
−16.5
13
vs
SBU
W 68-63
−10.5
14
vs
SLU
W 70-69
−6.5
15
vs
VCU
L 62-70
−7.5
18
@
BRAD
W 80-66
+4.5
21
@
UNCW
W 80-61
+2.5
25
vs
ILST
L 55-61
−24.5
over 13under 24avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Dayton has the better starters
Position by position: Siena 0, Dayton 3, even 2
SienaBetterDayton
G T. Yildizoglu TR10.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 30
→DAYSmall
G Z. Lowery TR8.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 63
G B. Coyle8.7 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 17
→DAYBig
G L. Joseph TR7.9 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 78
G I. Henderson3.8 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 12
→DAYBig
F G. Randall TR11.5 pts · 6.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 65
G O. Schlager2.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F A. L'Etang11.9 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
G C. Torres0.5 pts · 0 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Simon5.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 63
SienaBetterDayton
SIE offense309th of 366 · -9.6
→DAYBig
DAY defense57th of 366 · +1.4
SIE defense194th of 366 · -4.7
→DAYSmall
DAY offense109th of 366 · -1.7
Backcourt-7.7 · 5 players
→DAYBig
Backcourt+0.8 · 2 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+3.5 · 3 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSIE betterDAY betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Yildizoglu32 min · TRB. Coyle31 minI. Henderson14 minO. Schlager10 minC. Torres3 minR. DucharmeNew
Guards
Z. Lowery23 min · TRL. Joseph18 min · TRT. Perry17 min · TRE. Dickey2 minM. Grant1 minW. Maxwell1 min
Forwards
G. Randall32 min · TRA. L'Etang26 minJ. Simon18 minM. Thomas9 minD. Friery6 minJ. HaynesNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.4 #276 | Points per game | 74.1 #193 |
| 1.09 #154 | Points per possession | 1.09 #167 |
| 64.4 #354 | Pace (possessions) | 68.3 #213 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #222 | Effective FG% | 51.6 #168 |
| 30.6 #330 | 3-point % | 33.9 #182 |
| 32.2 #327 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.4 #142 |
| 33.4 #226 | Free throw rate | 46.1 #2 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #126 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #198 |
| 31.8 #133 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.9 #298 |
| 13.5 #182 | Assists per game | 14.2 #134 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.8 #12 | Points allowed | 69.3 #50 |
| 1.02 #44 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #37 |
| 48.5 #48 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #164 |
| 32.4 #82 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #270 |
| 17.0 #154 | Turnovers forced | 21.0 #11 |
| 70.5 #133 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.2 #94 |
| 5.8 #262 | Steals per game | 8.2 #31 |
| 3.1 #205 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #90 |
Siena
23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke65–71
- Wvs Merrimack64–54
- Wvs Fairfield76–61
- Wvs Mount St Marys63–58
- Wvs Rider76–61
A week or more of rest.
Dayton
25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois St55–61
- W@ UNC Wilmington80–61
- W@ Bradley80–66
- Lvs VCU62–70
- Wvs Saint Louis70–69
A week or more of rest.