TD Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UTAH 74–73 · win probability UTAH 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DAY has more of the edges
DAY 3, UTAH 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DAY 16.9%, UTAH 16.7%. Forced: DAY 21.0%, UTAH 13.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: DAY 46.1, UTAH 31.7. Allowed: DAY 35.5, UTAH 29.9
Shooting
Effective FG%: DAY 51.6 and allows 51.0; UTAH 52.0 and allows 53.9
Three-pointers
DAY hits 33.9% and allows 35.4%; UTAH hits 35.3% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 41.4% and 37.5% of their shots
Even
DAY offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 109th of 366 against a defense 68th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
DAY has played the 90th-hardest schedule, UTAH the 53rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DAY 26.9%, UTAH 29.3%. Defensive: DAY 71.2%, UTAH 68.4%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DAY 31%, UTAH 14%. Transfers in: DAY 4, UTAH 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
UTAH offense vs DAY defense
Offense 79th of 366 against a defense 57th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: DAY plays 68.3 a game (213th fastest), UTAH 68.3 (211th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UTAH -0.8 | — |
| Total | — | 146.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | DAY 72.7 · UTAH 73.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UTAH -0.4 | — |
| 1H total | 68.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | DAY 34 · UTAH 34.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 2-8 20% | |
| 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Dayton
37 games played
Straight up
25-12
68% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-24
35% overs · avg −2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-48 | -25.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 77-71 | -25.5 | L −19.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 62-74 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-82 | -21.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 74-55 | -29.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 84-79 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 79-83 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 88-71 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 84-61 | -30.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 97-69 | -6.5 | W +21.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 61-64 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 63-56 | -16.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 70-68 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 71-65 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 78-51 | -16.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 64-67 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 74-81 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 76-81 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 71-102 | +9.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 73-99 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 70-59 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 82-67 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-66 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 77-62 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 68-66 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 65-60 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 62-68 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 68-63 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 62-70 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 80-66 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 21 | @ | W 80-61 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 25 | vs | L 55-61 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CAN
W 88-48
+14.5
8
vs
UMBC
W 77-71
−19.5
11
@
CIN
L 62-74
−6.5
15
vs
BCU
W 91-82
−12.5
19
@
MARQ
W 77-71
+12.5
22
vs
NCCU
W 74-55
−10.5
27
vs
GTWN
W 84-79
+3.5
28
vs
BYU
L 79-83
+5.5
2
vs
ETSU
W 88-71
+5.5
6
vs
UVA
L 73-86
−7.5
13
vs
UNF
W 84-61
−7.5
16
vs
FSU
W 97-69
+21.5
20
vs
LIB
L 61-64
−12.5
31
vs
FOR
W 63-56
−9.5
3
@
LUC
W 70-68
−5.5
6
vs
GW
W 79-72
+4.5
13
@
DUQ
W 71-65
+3.5
16
vs
LUC
W 78-51
+10.5
21
@
LAS
L 64-67
−12.5
24
@
JOES
L 74-81
−13.5
27
vs
URI
L 76-81
−14.5
30
@
SLU
L 71-102
−21.5
3
vs
SBU
W 72-70
−5.5
6
@
VCU
L 73-99
−17.5
15
vs
DAV
W 70-59
+5.5
18
@
GMU
W 82-67
+17.5
21
vs
DUQ
W 78-66
+5.5
24
vs
SLU
W 77-62
+18.5
27
@
GW
W 68-66
+4.5
3
@
RICH
W 65-60
−0.5
6
vs
VCU
L 62-68
−7.5
13
vs
SBU
W 68-63
−0.5
14
vs
SLU
W 70-69
+5.5
15
vs
VCU
L 62-70
−4.5
18
@
BRAD
W 80-66
+11.5
21
@
UNCW
W 80-61
+15.5
25
vs
ILST
L 55-61
−13.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CAN
W 88-48
−6.5
8
vs
UMBC
W 77-71
−6.5
11
@
CIN
L 62-74
−11.5
15
vs
BCU
W 91-82
+24.5
19
@
MARQ
W 77-71
−3.5
22
vs
NCCU
W 74-55
−17.5
27
vs
GTWN
W 84-79
+17.5
28
vs
BYU
L 79-83
+11.5
2
vs
ETSU
W 88-71
+18.5
6
vs
UVA
L 73-86
+11.5
13
vs
UNF
W 84-61
−14.5
16
vs
FSU
W 97-69
+3.5
20
vs
LIB
L 61-64
−17.5
31
vs
FOR
W 63-56
−20.5
3
@
LUC
W 70-68
−2.5
6
vs
GW
W 79-72
−3.5
13
@
DUQ
W 71-65
−16.5
16
vs
LUC
W 78-51
−12.5
21
@
LAS
L 64-67
−6.5
24
@
JOES
L 74-81
+15.5
27
vs
URI
L 76-81
+18.5
30
@
SLU
L 71-102
+21.5
3
vs
SBU
W 72-70
−2.5
6
@
VCU
L 73-99
+24.5
15
vs
DAV
W 70-59
−11.5
18
@
GMU
W 82-67
+11.5
21
vs
DUQ
W 78-66
−4.5
24
vs
SLU
W 77-62
−18.5
27
@
GW
W 68-66
−18.5
3
@
RICH
W 65-60
−19.5
6
vs
VCU
L 62-68
−16.5
13
vs
SBU
W 68-63
−10.5
14
vs
SLU
W 70-69
−6.5
15
vs
VCU
L 62-70
−7.5
18
@
BRAD
W 80-66
+4.5
21
@
UNCW
W 80-61
+2.5
25
vs
ILST
L 55-61
−24.5
over 13under 24avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Utah
32 games played
Straight up
10-22
31% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-75 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 92-89 | -15.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 87-69 | -21.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 85-79 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 85-77 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 85-92 | -14.5 | L −21.5 | 167.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 58-68 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-74 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 72-79 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 91-85 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 74-82 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 101-77 | -10.5 | W +13.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 65-74 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 78-97 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 73-85 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 84-89 | +14.5 | W +9.5 | 168.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 74-88 | +17.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-79 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 78-81 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 168.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 78-91 | +19.5 | W +6.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 69-81 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 63-71 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-71 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 52-66 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 65-69 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 61-56 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 71-73 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 59-75 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 60-73 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 78-92 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 75-101 | +13.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 66-73 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SJSU
W 84-75
−2.5
8
vs
WEB
W 92-89
−12.5
10
vs
HC
W 87-69
−3.5
15
vs
SHSU
W 85-79
−6.5
18
vs
PFW
W 85-77
−5.5
20
vs
CP
L 85-92
−21.5
25
vs
GCU
L 58-68
−4.5
26
vs
MISS
W 75-74
+11.5
2
@
CAL
L 72-79
+0.5
6
vs
CBU
W 91-85
+0.5
13
vs
MSST
L 74-82
−6.5
20
vs
EWU
W 101-77
+13.5
29
@
WASH
L 65-74
+3.5
3
vs
ARIZ
L 78-97
−1.5
7
@
COLO
L 73-85
−2.5
10
vs
BYU
L 84-89
+9.5
14
@
TTU
L 74-88
+3.5
17
vs
TCU
W 82-79
+7.5
20
@
KSU
L 78-81
+7.5
24
@
BYU
L 78-91
+6.5
31
vs
OKST
L 69-81
−10.5
4
vs
ASU
L 63-71
−9.5
7
@
KU
L 59-71
+6.5
10
vs
HOU
L 52-66
+2.5
15
@
CIN
L 65-69
+8.5
18
@
WVU
W 61-56
+15.5
21
vs
UCF
L 71-73
−0.5
24
vs
ISU
L 59-75
−1.5
28
@
ASU
L 60-73
−6.5
3
vs
COLO
L 78-92
−12.5
7
@
BAY
L 75-101
−12.5
10
vs
CIN
L 66-73
+5.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SJSU
W 84-75
+12.5
8
vs
WEB
W 92-89
+32.5
10
vs
HC
W 87-69
+0.5
15
vs
SHSU
W 85-79
+4.5
18
vs
PFW
W 85-77
+0.5
20
vs
CP
L 85-92
+9.5
25
vs
GCU
L 58-68
−27.5
26
vs
MISS
W 75-74
+4.5
2
@
CAL
L 72-79
−1.5
6
vs
CBU
W 91-85
+30.5
13
vs
MSST
L 74-82
+2.5
20
vs
EWU
W 101-77
+17.5
29
@
WASH
L 65-74
−18.5
3
vs
ARIZ
L 78-97
+12.5
7
@
COLO
L 73-85
−4.5
10
vs
BYU
L 84-89
+4.5
14
@
TTU
L 74-88
+2.5
17
vs
TCU
W 82-79
+6.5
20
@
KSU
L 78-81
−9.5
24
@
BYU
L 78-91
+0.5
31
vs
OKST
L 69-81
−16.5
4
vs
ASU
L 63-71
−27.5
7
@
KU
L 59-71
−20.5
10
vs
HOU
L 52-66
−24.5
15
@
CIN
L 65-69
−5.5
18
@
WVU
W 61-56
−16.5
21
vs
UCF
L 71-73
−10.5
24
vs
ISU
L 59-75
−10.5
28
@
ASU
L 60-73
−17.5
3
vs
COLO
L 78-92
+21.5
7
@
BAY
L 75-101
+27.5
10
vs
CIN
L 66-73
+0.5
over 18under 14avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Utah has the better starters
Position by position: Dayton 2, Utah 3, even 0
DaytonBetterUtah
G Z. Lowery TR8.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 63
→UTAHSmall
G T. Campbell TR13.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 85
G L. Joseph TR7.9 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 78
→UTAHSmall
G J. Holcombe TR15.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 97
F G. Randall TR11.5 pts · 6.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 65
→UTAHSmall
G T. Burch TR12.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 88
F A. L'Etang11.9 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
←DAYBig
G O. Abbey2.5 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 12
F J. Simon5.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 63
←DAYBig
C M. Gomma TR8 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 28
DaytonBetterUtah
DAY offense109th of 366 · -1.7
=Even
UTAH defense68th of 366 · +0.9
DAY defense57th of 366 · +1.4
=Even
UTAH offense79th of 366 · +0.7
Backcourt+0.8 · 2 players
→UTAHBig
Backcourt+6.8 · 4 players
Frontcourt+3.5 · 3 players
←DAYBig
Frontcourt-1.4 · 1 player
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
←DAYSmall
Bench-0.7 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestDAY betterUTAH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Z. Lowery23 min · TRL. Joseph18 min · TRT. Perry17 min · TRE. Dickey2 minM. Grant1 minW. Maxwell1 min
Forwards
G. Randall32 min · TRA. L'Etang26 minJ. Simon18 minM. Thomas9 minD. Friery6 minJ. HaynesNew
Guards
T. Campbell34 min · TRJ. Holcombe31 min · TRT. Burch25 min · TRO. Abbey15 minT. Chatman13 min · TRL. Langarita12 min
Forwards
G. Gaddis1 min · TRB. FayeNewZ. LoubakiNewJ. JohnsonNewA. AnigbataNew
Centers
M. Gomma26 min · TRF. SchottNewL. McCannaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.1 #193 | Points per game | 74.3 #185 |
| 1.09 #167 | Points per possession | 1.08 #173 |
| 68.3 #213 | Pace (possessions) | 68.3 #211 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.6 #168 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #142 |
| 33.9 #182 | 3-point % | 35.3 #98 |
| 41.4 #142 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.5 #222 |
| 46.1 #2 | Free throw rate | 31.7 #262 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.9 #198 | Turnover rate | 16.7 #175 |
| 26.9 #298 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.3 #224 |
| 14.2 #134 | Assists per game | 13.7 #169 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.3 #50 | Points allowed | 79.1 #302 |
| 1.01 #37 | Points allowed per possession | 1.16 #337 |
| 51.0 #164 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #298 |
| 35.4 #270 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #254 |
| 21.0 #11 | Turnovers forced | 13.3 #348 |
| 71.2 #94 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #233 |
| 8.2 #31 | Steals per game | 5.3 #315 |
| 3.9 #90 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #160 |
Dayton
25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois St55–61
- W@ UNC Wilmington80–61
- W@ Bradley80–66
- Lvs VCU62–70
- Wvs Saint Louis70–69
A week or more of rest.
Utah
10-22 in 2025-26 overall · 2-17 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Cincinnati66–73
- L@ Baylor75–101
- Lvs Colorado78–92
- L@ Arizona St60–73
- Lvs Iowa State59–75
A week or more of rest.