Watsco Center · at Miami
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIA 94–59 · win probability MIA 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MIA has more of the edges
MAN 0, MIA 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MIA offense vs MAN defense
Offense 30th of 366 against a defense 346th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MAN 28.6%, MIA 37.2%. Defensive: MAN 63.0%, MIA 74.1%
MAN offense vs MIA defense
Offense 301st of 366 against a defense 26th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MAN has played the 336th-hardest schedule, MIA the 75th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: MAN 47.9 and allows 53.9; MIA 55.3 and allows 51.8
Three-pointers
MAN hits 32.0% and allows 36.6%; MIA hits 34.9% and allows 35.8%. Threes are 37.1% and 31.9% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MAN 10%, MIA 52%. Transfers in: MAN 5, MIA 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
MIA at home. This season: MIA 0-0 at home, MAN 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MAN 15.6%, MIA 16.1%. Forced: MAN 16.6%, MIA 18.3%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MAN 34.0, MIA 37.1. Allowed: MAN 25.7, MIA 29.5
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: MAN plays 69.0 a game (182nd fastest), MIA 69.2 (170th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MIA -34.7 | — |
| Total | — | 152.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | MAN 58.8 · MIA 93.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MIA -20.5 | — |
| 1H total | 71.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | MAN 25.3 · MIA 45.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Manhattan
31 games played
Straight up
11-20
35% wins
Against the spread
11-20
35% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-18
42% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ | L 83-114 | +28.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 79-75 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 56-86 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 80-73 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 68-109 | +23.5 | L −17.5 | 162.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 101-103 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 204 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 78-81 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 70-66 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-80 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 53-82 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-75 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 87-81 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 74-71 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 80-79 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-73 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 64-70 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 79-70 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 62-98 | +6.5 | L −29.5 | 158.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 59-74 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 92-98 | +13.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 57-66 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 95-90 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 65-72 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 75-80 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 80-68 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 161.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 76-69 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 69-65 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 70-84 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 65-75 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 65-69 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 60-71 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@
USC
L 83-114
−2.5
12
vs
UTU
W 79-75
+6.5
14
@
HAW
L 56-86
−14.5
15
vs
MVSU
W 80-73
−13.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-109
−17.5
26
vs
WAG
L 101-103
−4.5
29
@
ARMY
L 78-81
−4.5
5
vs
FAIR
W 70-66
+5.5
7
@
MRST
L 68-80
−4.5
13
@
FOR
L 53-82
−20.5
18
vs
FUR
L 68-75
+3.5
21
vs
PRES
W 87-81
+8.5
29
@
RID
W 74-71
+0.5
2
vs
QUIN
W 80-79
+8.5
4
@
MRMK
L 66-73
−0.5
9
vs
CAN
L 64-70
−13.5
11
vs
NIA
W 79-70
+3.5
14
@
FAIR
L 62-98
−29.5
17
vs
SIE
L 59-74
−8.5
19
@
QUIN
L 92-98
+7.5
24
@
IONA
L 57-66
−1.5
30
vs
RID
W 95-90
−0.5
1
@
MSM
L 65-72
−0.5
5
vs
SPU
L 75-80
−0.5
7
vs
SHU
W 80-68
+13.5
13
@
NIA
W 76-69
+4.5
15
@
CAN
W 69-65
+2.5
20
vs
MRST
L 70-84
−8.5
27
@
SPU
L 65-75
−2.5
1
vs
IONA
L 65-69
−1.5
5
vs
FAIR
L 60-71
−7.5
covered 11didn’t cover 20avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@
USC
L 83-114
+41.5
12
vs
UTU
W 79-75
−4.5
14
@
HAW
L 56-86
−14.5
15
vs
MVSU
W 80-73
−1.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-109
+14.5
26
vs
WAG
L 101-103
+59.5
29
@
ARMY
L 78-81
+6.5
5
vs
FAIR
W 70-66
−19.5
7
@
MRST
L 68-80
+7.5
13
@
FOR
L 53-82
−12.5
18
vs
FUR
L 68-75
−11.5
21
vs
PRES
W 87-81
+29.5
29
@
RID
W 74-71
−2.5
2
vs
QUIN
W 80-79
−0.5
4
@
MRMK
L 66-73
−9.5
9
vs
CAN
L 64-70
−11.5
11
vs
NIA
W 79-70
+8.5
14
@
FAIR
L 62-98
+1.5
17
vs
SIE
L 59-74
−11.5
19
@
QUIN
L 92-98
+36.5
24
@
IONA
L 57-66
−30.5
30
vs
RID
W 95-90
+39.5
1
@
MSM
L 65-72
−10.5
5
vs
SPU
L 75-80
+10.5
7
vs
SHU
W 80-68
−13.5
13
@
NIA
W 76-69
+8.5
15
@
CAN
W 69-65
−8.5
20
vs
MRST
L 70-84
+11.5
27
@
SPU
L 65-75
−5.5
1
vs
IONA
L 65-69
−17.5
5
vs
FAIR
L 60-71
−17.5
over 13under 18avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Miami
35 games played
Straight up
26-9
74% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-14
60% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 86-69 | -18.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 101-61 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 102-61 | -34.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 68-82 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 171.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 99-72 | -19.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-41 | -34.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 62-72 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 78-65 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 75-66 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-64 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 104-79 | -35.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 98-81 | -22.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 105-67 | -37.5 | W +0.5 | 171.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 76-69 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 81-77 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 91-81 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 81-69 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 59-69 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 63-65 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-76 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 79-70 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 85-86 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 74-68 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 75-66 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 77-76 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 67-66 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 83-86 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 83-73 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 76-54 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 77-69 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 89-92 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 62-84 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 80-66 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 69-79 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
JAX
W 86-69
−1.5
6
vs
BCU
W 101-61
+23.5
10
vs
STET
W 102-61
+6.5
16
vs
FLA
L 68-82
−3.5
20
vs
ELON
W 99-72
+7.5
23
vs
DSU
W 97-41
+21.5
27
vs
BYU
L 62-72
−2.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 78-65
+7.5
2
@
MISS
W 75-66
+10.5
6
vs
USM
W 88-64
+4.5
13
vs
ULM
W 104-79
−10.5
16
vs
FIU
W 98-81
−5.5
21
vs
UNF
W 105-67
+0.5
30
vs
PITT
W 76-69
−2.5
7
@
WAKE
W 81-77
+5.5
10
vs
GT
W 91-81
−5.5
13
@
ND
W 81-69
+6.5
17
@
CLEM
L 59-69
−5.5
20
vs
FSU
L 63-65
−12.5
24
@
SYR
W 85-76
+7.5
28
vs
STAN
W 79-70
−0.5
31
vs
CAL
L 85-86
−12.5
7
@
BC
W 74-68
−2.5
10
vs
UNC
W 75-66
+7.5
14
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+6.5
17
vs
VT
W 67-66
−7.5
21
@
UVA
L 83-86
+4.5
24
@
FSU
W 83-73
+7.5
28
vs
BC
W 76-54
+6.5
4
@
SMU
W 77-69
+9.5
7
vs
LOU
L 89-92
−4.5
12
vs
LOU
W 78-73
+6.5
13
vs
UVA
L 62-84
−18.5
20
vs
MIZ
W 80-66
+12.5
22
vs
PUR
L 69-79
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
JAX
W 86-69
+12.5
6
vs
BCU
W 101-61
+7.5
10
vs
STET
W 102-61
+1.5
16
vs
FLA
L 68-82
−21.5
20
vs
ELON
W 99-72
+6.5
23
vs
DSU
W 97-41
−13.5
27
vs
BYU
L 62-72
−31.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 78-65
−8.5
2
@
MISS
W 75-66
−4.5
6
vs
USM
W 88-64
+6.5
13
vs
ULM
W 104-79
+29.5
16
vs
FIU
W 98-81
+17.5
21
vs
UNF
W 105-67
+0.5
30
vs
PITT
W 76-69
+0.5
7
@
WAKE
W 81-77
+0.5
10
vs
GT
W 91-81
+15.5
13
@
ND
W 81-69
+6.5
17
@
CLEM
L 59-69
−15.5
20
vs
FSU
L 63-65
−35.5
24
@
SYR
W 85-76
+11.5
28
vs
STAN
W 79-70
+1.5
31
vs
CAL
L 85-86
+22.5
7
@
BC
W 74-68
+0.5
10
vs
UNC
W 75-66
−15.5
14
@
NCSU
W 77-76
−4.5
17
vs
VT
W 67-66
−15.5
21
@
UVA
L 83-86
+23.5
24
@
FSU
W 83-73
+3.5
28
vs
BC
W 76-54
−13.5
4
@
SMU
W 77-69
−10.5
7
vs
LOU
L 89-92
+25.5
12
vs
LOU
W 78-73
−2.5
13
vs
UVA
L 62-84
−0.5
20
vs
MIZ
W 80-66
+1.5
22
vs
PUR
L 69-79
+1.5
over 21under 14avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Miami has the better starters
Position by position: Manhattan 0, Miami 3, even 2
ManhattanBetterMiami
G B. Tweedy TR9 pts · 3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 29
→MIABig
G B. Bland TR13.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 74
G J. Sabino TR7.1 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 53
→MIABig
G A. Lewis TR12.2 pts · 3 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 92
G Q. Elliott3.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 17
→MIABig
F D. Goode TR15.7 pts · 8.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 94
G J. Delaney0.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F S. Henderson13.8 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 81
F O. Stankovic TR1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F M. Reneau18.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 98
ManhattanBetterMiami
MAN offense301st of 366 · -9.4
→MIABig
MIA defense26th of 366 · +4.3
MAN defense346th of 366 · -9.3
→MIABig
MIA offense30th of 366 · +6.0
Backcourt-4.3 · 4 players
→MIABig
Backcourt+4.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
→MIABig
Frontcourt+12.3 · 3 players
Bench-0.5 · 3 players
→MIABig
Bench+3.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMAN betterMIA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Tweedy30 min · TRJ. Sabino21 min · TRQ. Elliott12 minJ. Delaney5 minA. Miguel4 minB. PearceNew
Forwards
O. Stankovic6 min · TRK. Kearney4 min · TRL. McChesney3 min · TRI. JohnsonNewD. EricNewN. ManojlovicNew
Guards
B. Bland34 min · TRA. Lewis31 min · TRD. Allen24 minN. Dorn23 min · TRL. Cason19 min · TRQ. Berger17 min · TR
Forwards
D. Goode31 min · TRS. Henderson31 minM. Reneau29 minR. Miller19 min · TRM. Allen19 minC. GaskinsNew
Centers
S. Cyril21 min · TRE. RyzhovNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.4 #232 | Points per game | 81.5 #39 |
| 1.05 #247 | Points per possession | 1.18 #38 |
| 69.0 #182 | Pace (possessions) | 69.2 #170 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.9 #315 | Effective FG% | 55.3 #32 |
| 32.0 #280 | 3-point % | 34.9 #127 |
| 37.1 #228 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.9 #331 |
| 34.0 #208 | Free throw rate | 37.1 #125 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #112 | Turnover rate | 16.1 #147 |
| 28.6 #247 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.2 #14 |
| 12.3 #268 | Assists per game | 16.2 #42 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.6 #309 | Points allowed | 71.2 #79 |
| 1.15 #330 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #60 |
| 53.9 #297 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #198 |
| 36.6 #332 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.8 #296 |
| 16.6 #175 | Turnovers forced | 18.3 #87 |
| 63.0 #358 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.1 #19 |
| 7.8 #54 | Steals per game | 7.9 #48 |
| 2.3 #325 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #174 |
Manhattan
11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Fairfield60–71
- Lvs Iona65–69
- L@ Saint Peter's65–75
- Lvs Marist70–84
- W@ Canisius69–65
A week or more of rest.
Miami
26-9 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue69–79
- Wvs Missouri80–66
- Lvs Virginia62–84
- Wvs Louisville78–73
- Lvs Louisville89–92
A week or more of rest.