Hill Field House · at Morgan St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MORG | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MORG 77–77 · win probability MORG 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MORG has more of the edges
MAN 3, MORG 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
MAN hits 32.0% and allows 36.6%; MORG hits 31.7% and allows 31.5%. Threes are 37.1% and 35.2% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: MAN 34.0, MORG 42.7. Allowed: MAN 25.7, MORG 50.9
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MAN 15.6%, MORG 17.8%. Forced: MAN 16.6%, MORG 16.5%
MAN offense vs MORG defense
Offense 301st of 366 against a defense 360th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: MAN plays 69.0 a game (182nd fastest), MORG 71.1 (73rd). Faster games mean more points
MORG offense vs MAN defense
Offense 293rd of 366 against a defense 346th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MORG at home. This season: MORG 0-0 at home, MAN 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MAN 10%, MORG 36%. Transfers in: MAN 5, MORG 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MAN 28.6%, MORG 30.7%. Defensive: MAN 63.0%, MORG 64.8%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MAN 47.9 and allows 53.9; MORG 45.8 and allows 51.7
Context
Schedule so far
MAN has played the 336th-hardest schedule, MORG the 360th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MORG -0.5 | — |
| Total | — | 153.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | MAN 76.7 · MORG 77.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MORG -0.1 | — |
| 1H total | 72.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | MAN 35.9 · MORG 36 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Manhattan
31 games played
Straight up
11-20
35% wins
Against the spread
11-20
35% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-18
42% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ | L 83-114 | +28.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 79-75 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 56-86 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 80-73 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 68-109 | +23.5 | L −17.5 | 162.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 101-103 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 204 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 78-81 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 70-66 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-80 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 53-82 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-75 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 87-81 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 74-71 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 80-79 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-73 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 64-70 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 79-70 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 62-98 | +6.5 | L −29.5 | 158.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 59-74 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 92-98 | +13.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 57-66 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 95-90 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 65-72 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 75-80 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 80-68 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 161.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 76-69 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 69-65 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 70-84 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 65-75 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 65-69 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 60-71 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@
USC
L 83-114
−2.5
12
vs
UTU
W 79-75
+6.5
14
@
HAW
L 56-86
−14.5
15
vs
MVSU
W 80-73
−13.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-109
−17.5
26
vs
WAG
L 101-103
−4.5
29
@
ARMY
L 78-81
−4.5
5
vs
FAIR
W 70-66
+5.5
7
@
MRST
L 68-80
−4.5
13
@
FOR
L 53-82
−20.5
18
vs
FUR
L 68-75
+3.5
21
vs
PRES
W 87-81
+8.5
29
@
RID
W 74-71
+0.5
2
vs
QUIN
W 80-79
+8.5
4
@
MRMK
L 66-73
−0.5
9
vs
CAN
L 64-70
−13.5
11
vs
NIA
W 79-70
+3.5
14
@
FAIR
L 62-98
−29.5
17
vs
SIE
L 59-74
−8.5
19
@
QUIN
L 92-98
+7.5
24
@
IONA
L 57-66
−1.5
30
vs
RID
W 95-90
−0.5
1
@
MSM
L 65-72
−0.5
5
vs
SPU
L 75-80
−0.5
7
vs
SHU
W 80-68
+13.5
13
@
NIA
W 76-69
+4.5
15
@
CAN
W 69-65
+2.5
20
vs
MRST
L 70-84
−8.5
27
@
SPU
L 65-75
−2.5
1
vs
IONA
L 65-69
−1.5
5
vs
FAIR
L 60-71
−7.5
covered 11didn’t cover 20avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@
USC
L 83-114
+41.5
12
vs
UTU
W 79-75
−4.5
14
@
HAW
L 56-86
−14.5
15
vs
MVSU
W 80-73
−1.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-109
+14.5
26
vs
WAG
L 101-103
+59.5
29
@
ARMY
L 78-81
+6.5
5
vs
FAIR
W 70-66
−19.5
7
@
MRST
L 68-80
+7.5
13
@
FOR
L 53-82
−12.5
18
vs
FUR
L 68-75
−11.5
21
vs
PRES
W 87-81
+29.5
29
@
RID
W 74-71
−2.5
2
vs
QUIN
W 80-79
−0.5
4
@
MRMK
L 66-73
−9.5
9
vs
CAN
L 64-70
−11.5
11
vs
NIA
W 79-70
+8.5
14
@
FAIR
L 62-98
+1.5
17
vs
SIE
L 59-74
−11.5
19
@
QUIN
L 92-98
+36.5
24
@
IONA
L 57-66
−30.5
30
vs
RID
W 95-90
+39.5
1
@
MSM
L 65-72
−10.5
5
vs
SPU
L 75-80
+10.5
7
vs
SHU
W 80-68
−13.5
13
@
NIA
W 76-69
+8.5
15
@
CAN
W 69-65
−8.5
20
vs
MRST
L 70-84
+11.5
27
@
SPU
L 65-75
−5.5
1
vs
IONA
L 65-69
−17.5
5
vs
FAIR
L 60-71
−17.5
over 13under 18avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Morgan St
27 games played
Straight up
11-16
41% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-11
59% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-87 | +27.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 79-81 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 73-79 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 56-88 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 66-71 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 80-84 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 49-92 | +21.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 81-73 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 50-97 | +26.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 64-94 | +25.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 56-83 | +23.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 49-66 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 78-89 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-79 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 78-77 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 26 | @ | W 79-78 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-80 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-71 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 76-80 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-68 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 90-83 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 59-84 | +8.5 | L −16.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 90-84 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 70-66 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GTWN
L 70-87
+10.5
11
vs
UMBC
L 79-81
+2.5
15
@
MERC
L 72-86
−7.5
18
vs
NCAT
L 73-79
−3.5
21
@
ODU
L 56-88
−20.5
25
vs
DREX
L 66-71
+0.5
6
vs
LONG
L 80-84
+1.5
9
@
DEP
L 49-92
−21.5
13
vs
NIA
W 81-73
+6.5
19
@
CAL
L 50-97
−20.5
21
@
SF
L 64-94
−4.5
23
@
LMU
L 56-83
−3.5
3
@
UMES
L 49-66
−10.5
10
vs
SCST
W 72-67
+0.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 78-89
−7.5
17
@
DSU
W 80-79
+4.5
24
@
HOW
W 78-77
+15.5
26
@
NORF
W 79-78
+8.5
31
@
COPP
W 89-80
+5.5
7
vs
UMES
W 79-71
+9.5
16
@
NCCU
L 76-80
+1.5
21
vs
DSU
W 82-68
+8.5
25
@
SCST
W 90-83
+5.5
28
vs
HOW
L 59-84
−16.5
2
vs
NORF
W 90-84
+9.5
5
vs
COPP
W 70-66
−1.5
11
vs
DSU
L 70-75
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GTWN
L 70-87
+2.5
11
vs
UMBC
L 79-81
−2.5
15
@
MERC
L 72-86
+11.5
18
vs
NCAT
L 73-79
−9.5
21
@
ODU
L 56-88
−12.5
25
vs
DREX
L 66-71
−6.5
6
vs
LONG
L 80-84
+9.5
9
@
DEP
L 49-92
−9.5
13
vs
NIA
W 81-73
+13.5
19
@
CAL
L 50-97
−4.5
21
@
SF
L 64-94
+12.5
23
@
LMU
L 56-83
−5.5
3
@
UMES
L 49-66
−23.5
10
vs
SCST
W 72-67
−8.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 78-89
+25.5
17
@
DSU
W 80-79
+22.5
24
@
HOW
W 78-77
+6.5
26
@
NORF
W 79-78
+4.5
31
@
COPP
W 89-80
+13.5
7
vs
UMES
W 79-71
+9.5
16
@
NCCU
L 76-80
+9.5
21
vs
DSU
W 82-68
+6.5
25
@
SCST
W 90-83
+19.5
28
vs
HOW
L 59-84
−15.5
2
vs
NORF
W 90-84
+17.5
5
vs
COPP
W 70-66
−13.5
11
vs
DSU
L 70-75
+2.5
over 16under 11avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Manhattan 1, Morgan St 1, even 3
ManhattanBetterMorgan St
G B. Tweedy TR9 pts · 3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 29
→MORGBig
G A. Worrell16.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 70
G J. Sabino TR7.1 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 53
←MANBig
G J. Awoke TR6.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 12
G Q. Elliott3.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 17
=No call
G D. Bumpass2.7 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
G J. Delaney0.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F K. Horton TR7.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
F O. Stankovic TR1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F T. Edwards3.5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
ManhattanBetterMorgan St
MAN offense301st of 366 · -9.4
←MANSmall
MORG defense360th of 366 · -11.0
MAN defense346th of 366 · -9.3
=Even
MORG offense293rd of 366 · -9.1
Backcourt-4.3 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt-3.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
←MANSmall
Frontcourt-2.7 · 2 players
Bench-0.5 · 3 players
←MANSmall
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestMAN betterMORG betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Tweedy30 min · TRJ. Sabino21 min · TRQ. Elliott12 minJ. Delaney5 minA. Miguel4 minB. PearceNew
Forwards
O. Stankovic6 min · TRK. Kearney4 min · TRL. McChesney3 min · TRI. JohnsonNewD. EricNewN. ManojlovicNew
Guards
A. Worrell30 minJ. Awoke25 min · TRD. Bumpass9 minB. Barnett2 minJ. KwartengNewK. RichardNew
Forwards
K. Horton20 min · TRT. Edwards17 minM. Wade8 minM. Lual7 minI. Traore6 min · TRT. PettigrewNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.4 #232 | Points per game | 71.7 #252 |
| 1.05 #247 | Points per possession | 1.01 #316 |
| 69.0 #182 | Pace (possessions) | 71.1 #73 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.9 #315 | Effective FG% | 45.8 #351 |
| 32.0 #280 | 3-point % | 31.7 #295 |
| 37.1 #228 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #274 |
| 34.0 #208 | Free throw rate | 42.7 #22 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #112 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #262 |
| 28.6 #247 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.7 #172 |
| 12.3 #268 | Assists per game | 12.2 #269 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.6 #309 | Points allowed | 80.1 #321 |
| 1.15 #330 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #288 |
| 53.9 #297 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.7 #194 |
| 36.6 #332 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.5 #43 |
| 16.6 #175 | Turnovers forced | 16.5 #186 |
| 63.0 #358 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.8 #341 |
| 7.8 #54 | Steals per game | 4.3 #359 |
| 2.3 #325 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #172 |
Manhattan
11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Fairfield60–71
- Lvs Iona65–69
- L@ Saint Peter's65–75
- Lvs Marist70–84
- W@ Canisius69–65
A week or more of rest.
Morgan St
11-16 in 2025-26 overall · 10-5 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Delaware St70–75
- Wvs Coppin St70–66
- Wvs Norfolk St90–84
- Lvs Howard59–84
- W@ SC State90–83
A week or more of rest.