Paul Porter Arena · at Gardner-Webb
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GWEB 77–72 · win probability GWEB 66%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NCCU has more of the edges
NCCU 3, GWEB 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
NCCU has played the 310th-hardest schedule, GWEB the 154th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NCCU 18.2%, GWEB 19.8%. Forced: NCCU 19.8%, GWEB 15.3%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NCCU plays 66.9 a game (282nd fastest), GWEB 70.8 (84th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: NCCU 39.3, GWEB 30.3. Allowed: NCCU 36.9, GWEB 35.3
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NCCU 30.0%, GWEB 23.2%. Defensive: NCCU 60.6%, GWEB 63.4%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NCCU 4%, GWEB 35%. Transfers in: NCCU 4, GWEB 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
GWEB at home. This season: GWEB 0-0 at home, NCCU 0-0 away
Even
GWEB offense vs NCCU defense
Offense 318th of 366 against a defense 352nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
NCCU hits 32.6% and allows 36.4%; GWEB hits 31.0% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 33.9% and 39.8% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NCCU 47.5 and allows 54.5; GWEB 47.8 and allows 57.0
Even
NCCU offense vs GWEB defense
Offense 345th of 366 against a defense 357th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GWEB -4.7 | — |
| Total | — | 148.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | NCCU 71.8 · GWEB 76.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GWEB -2.7 | — |
| 1H total | 69.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | NCCU 33.3 · GWEB 36 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 1-9 10% | 9-1 90% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
NCCU 3–3 GWEBSeries tied · 6 games since 2021-22 · NCCU 4-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | NCCU 78 @ GWEB 77 | GWEB -6.5 | NCCU W |
| Nov 8, 2024-25 | GWEB 88 @ NCCU 82 | NCCU -1.5 | GWEB W |
| Dec 17, 2022-23 | NCCU 70 @ GWEB 72 | GWEB -5.5 | NCCU W |
| Nov 26, 2022-23 | GWEB 53 @ NCCU 58 | NCCU +0.5 | NCCU W |
| Dec 15, 2021-22 | GWEB 71 @ NCCU 72 | NCCU +8 | NCCU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
NC Central
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
15-13
54% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 66-114 | +31.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 62-81 | +34.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 54-76 | +10.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 53-97 | +34.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 55-74 | +29.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 67-82 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 62-67 | +14.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 54-69 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 67-103 | +42.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 72-74 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 67-90 | +23.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 69-67 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 88-77 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 89-78 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 69-83 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 65-63 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-75 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 72-63 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 56-58 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 80-76 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 72-85 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 67-100 | +12.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 74-60 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 77-73 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 64-80 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 83-76 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 131.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 59-53 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 131.5 | U 112 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 63-70 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
NCSU
L 66-114
−16.5
7
@
UVA
L 62-81
+15.5
9
@
APP
L 54-76
−11.5
14
@
UNC
L 53-97
−9.5
22
@
DAY
L 55-74
+10.5
25
@
UPST
L 67-82
−7.5
3
@
JMU
L 62-67
+9.5
6
vs
NCAT
L 54-69
−12.5
9
@
UK
L 67-103
+6.5
20
vs
LONG
L 72-74
+1.5
29
@
PSU
L 67-90
+0.5
3
vs
NORF
W 69-67
+3.5
10
@
COPP
W 88-77
+4.5
12
@
MORG
W 89-78
+7.5
17
vs
HOW
L 69-83
−11.5
2
vs
UMES
W 65-63
−0.5
7
@
NORF
L 68-75
−2.5
9
vs
DSU
W 72-63
+1.5
14
vs
COPP
L 56-58
−12.5
16
vs
MORG
W 80-76
−1.5
18
@
SCST
L 72-85
−15.5
21
@
HOW
L 67-100
−20.5
28
@
DSU
W 74-60
+11.5
2
@
UMES
W 77-73
+6.5
5
vs
SCST
L 64-80
−23.5
12
vs
UMES
W 83-76
+8.5
13
vs
DSU
W 59-53
+2.5
14
vs
HOW
L 63-70
+4.5
covered 15didn’t cover 13avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
NCSU
L 66-114
+34.5
7
@
UVA
L 62-81
−8.5
9
@
APP
L 54-76
−6.5
14
@
UNC
L 53-97
−9.5
22
@
DAY
L 55-74
−17.5
25
@
UPST
L 67-82
+0.5
3
@
JMU
L 62-67
−14.5
6
vs
NCAT
L 54-69
−19.5
9
@
UK
L 67-103
+21.5
20
vs
LONG
L 72-74
−0.5
29
@
PSU
L 67-90
+6.5
3
vs
NORF
W 69-67
−5.5
10
@
COPP
W 88-77
+21.5
12
@
MORG
W 89-78
+25.5
17
vs
HOW
L 69-83
+10.5
2
vs
UMES
W 65-63
−6.5
7
@
NORF
L 68-75
−5.5
9
vs
DSU
W 72-63
+0.5
14
vs
COPP
L 56-58
−29.5
16
vs
MORG
W 80-76
+9.5
18
@
SCST
L 72-85
+20.5
21
@
HOW
L 67-100
+23.5
28
@
DSU
W 74-60
−1.5
2
@
UMES
W 77-73
+16.5
5
vs
SCST
L 64-80
+3.5
12
vs
UMES
W 83-76
+27.5
13
vs
DSU
W 59-53
−19.5
14
vs
HOW
L 63-70
−9.5
over 14under 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Gardner-Webb
30 games played
Straight up
2-28
7% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 60-87 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 59-97 | +29.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 84-95 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 62-93 | +21.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 67-102 | +19.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 51-84 | +10.5 | L −22.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-76 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 62-88 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 74-107 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 84-88 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 57-83 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 52-94 | +42.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 79-89 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-88 | +23.5 | W +12.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 49-104 | +26.5 | L −28.5 | 162.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 80-89 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 55-92 | +8.5 | L −28.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 56-91 | +16.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 67-65 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 50-69 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-86 | +12.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 62-68 | +17.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 85-103 | +20.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 87-112 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 66-75 | +16.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 70-82 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-77 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-71 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 65-64 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 59-81 | +27.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MINN
L 60-87
+1.5
7
@
CLEM
L 59-97
−8.5
15
@
ELON
L 84-95
+2.5
18
@
DEP
L 62-93
−9.5
22
@
RICH
L 67-102
−15.5
26
vs
NAVY
L 51-84
−22.5
28
vs
SELA
L 68-76
−1.5
29
@
UNCW
L 62-88
−7.5
3
@
QUC
L 74-107
−18.5
6
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+6.5
15
vs
WOF
L 57-83
−15.5
21
@
TENN
L 52-94
+0.5
31
vs
CHSO
L 79-89
+2.5
3
@
WIN
L 77-88
+12.5
7
@
HPU
L 49-104
−28.5
14
vs
RAD
L 80-89
+4.5
17
vs
PRES
L 55-92
−28.5
21
@
LONG
L 56-91
−18.5
23
vs
UPST
W 67-65
+11.5
29
@
UNCA
L 50-69
−1.5
4
vs
LONG
L 66-86
−7.5
7
@
PRES
L 62-68
+11.5
12
vs
WIN
L 85-103
+2.5
14
vs
HPU
L 87-112
+0.5
17
@
CHSO
L 66-75
+7.5
19
@
RAD
L 70-82
+6.5
26
vs
UNCA
L 71-77
+6.5
28
@
UPST
L 61-71
+1.5
4
vs
UPST
W 65-64
+11.5
6
vs
HPU
L 59-81
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MINN
L 60-87
−1.5
7
@
CLEM
L 59-97
+10.5
15
@
ELON
L 84-95
+24.5
18
@
DEP
L 62-93
−0.5
22
@
RICH
L 67-102
+14.5
26
vs
NAVY
L 51-84
−18.5
28
vs
SELA
L 68-76
+2.5
29
@
UNCW
L 62-88
+2.5
3
@
QUC
L 74-107
+19.5
6
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+9.5
15
vs
WOF
L 57-83
−15.5
21
@
TENN
L 52-94
−6.5
31
vs
CHSO
L 79-89
+4.5
3
@
WIN
L 77-88
+0.5
7
@
HPU
L 49-104
−9.5
14
vs
RAD
L 80-89
+3.5
17
vs
PRES
L 55-92
+1.5
21
@
LONG
L 56-91
−8.5
23
vs
UPST
W 67-65
−21.5
29
@
UNCA
L 50-69
−30.5
4
vs
LONG
L 66-86
+4.5
7
@
PRES
L 62-68
−15.5
12
vs
WIN
L 85-103
+31.5
14
vs
HPU
L 87-112
+37.5
17
@
CHSO
L 66-75
−20.5
19
@
RAD
L 70-82
−10.5
26
vs
UNCA
L 71-77
+2.5
28
@
UPST
L 61-71
−14.5
4
vs
UPST
W 65-64
−14.5
6
vs
HPU
L 59-81
−15.5
over 15under 15avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Gardner-Webb has the better starters
Position by position: NC Central 1, Gardner-Webb 2, even 2
NC CentralBetterGardner-Webb
G T. Brown TR3.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 11
→GWEBBig
G J. Hudson10.6 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 62
G R. Archey3.1 pts · 1 reb · 0.7 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G A. Talbert6.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 10
F C. Meeks TR5.7 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 6
→GWEBSmall
G J. Ferere6.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 32
F T. Mason TR5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 32
←NCCUSmall
F M. Pocknett TR3.7 pts · 4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 14
F M. Vassel TR1.7 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C S. Nosakhare TR0.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
NC CentralBetterGardner-Webb
NCCU offense345th of 366 · -11.9
=Even
GWEB defense357th of 366 · -10.2
NCCU defense352nd of 366 · -9.9
=Even
GWEB offense318th of 366 · -10.4
Backcourt-2.4 · 2 players
←NCCUSmall
Backcourt-4.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-5.2 · 3 players
→GWEBBig
Frontcourt-2.0 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.9 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestNCCU betterGWEB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Brown14 min · TRR. Archey8 minD. KaneNewC. SanonNewI. BuckleyNewA. BowserNew
Forwards
C. Meeks29 min · TRT. Mason12 min · TRM. Vassel8 min · TRJ. PriceNewD. DuorNew
Centers
D. MbaetekaNew
Guards
J. Hudson27 minA. Talbert25 minJ. Ferere18 minS. BrownNewD. DanielNewB. LutherNew
Forwards
M. Pocknett14 min · TRJ. Skipper8 min · TRC. OkparaNew
Centers
S. Nosakhare9 min · TRG. TropnasNewB. RutsinduraNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.6 #322 | Points per game | 66.2 #343 |
| 1.02 #308 | Points per possession | 0.94 #360 |
| 66.9 #282 | Pace (possessions) | 70.8 #84 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.5 #328 | Effective FG% | 47.8 #317 |
| 32.6 #247 | 3-point % | 31.0 #320 |
| 33.9 #299 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.8 #174 |
| 39.3 #72 | Free throw rate | 30.3 #302 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #285 | Turnover rate | 19.8 #347 |
| 30.0 #201 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.2 #350 |
| 12.1 #279 | Assists per game | 9.7 #362 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.3 #246 | Points allowed | 86.7 #362 |
| 1.15 #322 | Points allowed per possession | 1.22 #361 |
| 54.5 #317 | Opponent effective FG% | 57.0 #356 |
| 36.4 #321 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #300 |
| 19.8 #27 | Turnovers forced | 15.3 #265 |
| 60.6 #364 | Defensive rebound rate | 63.4 #355 |
| 7.7 #60 | Steals per game | 6.1 #224 |
| 3.4 #165 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #309 |
NC Central
10-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-7 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Howard63–70
- Wvs Delaware St59–53
- Wvs MD Eastern83–76
- Lvs SC State64–80
- W@ MD Eastern77–73
A week or more of rest.
Gardner-Webb
2-28 in 2025-26 overall · 2-16 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point59–81
- Wvs SC Upstate65–64
- L@ SC Upstate61–71
- Lvs UNC Asheville71–77
- L@ Radford70–82
A week or more of rest.