Paul Porter Arena · at Gardner-Webb
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Queens University Royals and Gardner-Webb
QUCThis seasonGWEB
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects QUC 85–75 · win probability QUC 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 160.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: QUC has more of the edges

QUC 5, GWEB 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
QUCBig
QUC offense vs GWEB defense
Offense 102nd of 366 against a defense 357th, on the model’s ratings
QUCBig
Shooting
Effective FG%: QUC 56.4 and allows 54.6; GWEB 47.8 and allows 57.0
QUCBig
Turnovers
Turnover rate: QUC 14.8%, GWEB 19.8%. Forced: QUC 15.1%, GWEB 15.3%
QUCBig
Three-pointers
QUC hits 35.7% and allows 36.5%; GWEB hits 31.0% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 46.5% and 39.8% of their shots
QUCSmall
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: QUC 30.2%, GWEB 23.2%. Defensive: QUC 66.4%, GWEB 63.4%
GWEBSmall
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: QUC 0%, GWEB 35%. Transfers in: QUC 0, GWEB 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
GWEBSmall
Home court
GWEB at home. This season: GWEB 0-0 at home, QUC 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
QUC has played the 194th-hardest schedule, GWEB the 154th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: QUC 35.4, GWEB 30.3. Allowed: QUC 38.1, GWEB 35.3
Even
GWEB offense vs QUC defense
Offense 318th of 366 against a defense 331st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: QUC plays 71.2 a game (65th fastest), GWEB 70.8 (84th). Faster games mean more points

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—QUC -10.3—
Total—160.0—
Projected score—QUC 85.1 · GWEB 74.8

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadQUC -6.2—
1H total74.7—
1H projected scoreQUC 40.5 · GWEB 34.2—
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
QUCGWEB
Scoring
84.4 #16Points per game66.2 #343
1.19 #25Points per possession0.94 #360
71.2 #65Pace (possessions)70.8 #84
Shooting
56.4 #15Effective FG%47.8 #317
35.7 #743-point %31.0 #320
46.5 #383-point attempt rate39.8 #174
35.4 #167Free throw rate30.3 #302
Possessions
14.8 #54Turnover rate19.8 #347
30.2 #190Offensive rebound rate23.2 #350
16.0 #49Assists per game9.7 #362
Defense
83.8 #355Points allowed86.7 #362
1.17 #346Points allowed per possession1.22 #361
54.6 #319Opponent effective FG%57.0 #356
36.5 #325Opponent 3-point %36.0 #300
15.1 #276Turnovers forced15.3 #265
66.4 #308Defensive rebound rate63.4 #355
6.0 #238Steals per game6.1 #224
2.9 #236Blocks per game2.4 #309

Queens University Royals

20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Purdue71–104
  • Wvs C Arkansas98–93
  • Wvs Austin Peay90–83
  • Wvs West Georgia71–63
  • L@ C Arkansas79–84

A week or more of rest.

Gardner-Webb

2-28 in 2025-26 overall · 2-16 in conference · Big South Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs High Point59–81
  • Wvs SC Upstate65–64
  • L@ SC Upstate61–71
  • Lvs UNC Asheville71–77
  • L@ Radford70–82

A week or more of rest.