Paul Porter Arena · at Gardner-Webb
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects QUC 85–75 · win probability QUC 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 160.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: QUC has more of the edges
QUC 5, GWEB 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
QUC offense vs GWEB defense
Offense 102nd of 366 against a defense 357th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: QUC 56.4 and allows 54.6; GWEB 47.8 and allows 57.0
Turnovers
Turnover rate: QUC 14.8%, GWEB 19.8%. Forced: QUC 15.1%, GWEB 15.3%
Three-pointers
QUC hits 35.7% and allows 36.5%; GWEB hits 31.0% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 46.5% and 39.8% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: QUC 30.2%, GWEB 23.2%. Defensive: QUC 66.4%, GWEB 63.4%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: QUC 0%, GWEB 35%. Transfers in: QUC 0, GWEB 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
GWEB at home. This season: GWEB 0-0 at home, QUC 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
QUC has played the 194th-hardest schedule, GWEB the 154th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: QUC 35.4, GWEB 30.3. Allowed: QUC 38.1, GWEB 35.3
Even
GWEB offense vs QUC defense
Offense 318th of 366 against a defense 331st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: QUC plays 71.2 a game (65th fastest), GWEB 70.8 (84th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | QUC -10.3 | — |
| Total | — | 160.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | QUC 85.1 · GWEB 74.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | QUC -6.2 | — |
| 1H total | 74.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | QUC 40.5 · GWEB 34.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 8-2 80% | |
| 1-9 10% | 9-1 90% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
QUC 3–0 GWEBQUC leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · QUC has won the last 3 meetings · QUC 3-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | GWEB 74 @ QUC 107 | QUC -14.5 | QUC W |
| Dec 14, 2024-25 | QUC 85 @ GWEB 83 | GWEB -6.5 | QUC W |
| Nov 29, 2023-24 | GWEB 80 @ QUC 83 | QUC +3 | QUC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Queens University Royals
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-12
65% overs · avg +6.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 74-81 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 163.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 74-94 | +17.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 81-87 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 81-64 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 165.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 101-94 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 79-90 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 69-94 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 107-74 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 102-78 | -18.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 73-111 | +18.5 | L −19.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 80-108 | +23.5 | L −4.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 65-106 | +25.5 | L −15.5 | 171.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 91-89 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 98-76 | -7.5 | W +14.5 | 169.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 77-51 | -4.5 | W +21.5 | 154.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 89-82 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 85-74 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 87-81 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 87-62 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 66-74 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 90-100 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 75-78 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 93-84 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 91-72 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 178.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 87-95 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 87-81 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 85-78 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-84 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 96-79 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-84 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 71-63 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 90-83 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 98-93 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 191 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 71-104 | +25.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WIN
L 74-81
−3.5
8
@
VILL
L 74-94
−2.5
11
@
DUQ
L 81-87
+6.5
15
vs
SHU
W 81-64
+11.5
20
vs
UNCG
W 101-94
−0.5
23
@
FUR
L 79-90
−2.5
28
@
UVA
L 69-94
+0.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 107-74
+18.5
12
vs
SCST
W 102-78
+5.5
14
@
WAKE
L 73-111
−19.5
16
@
ARK
L 80-108
−4.5
29
@
AUB
L 65-106
−15.5
1
vs
EKU
W 91-89
−2.5
3
vs
BELL
W 98-76
+14.5
8
@
JAX
W 77-51
+21.5
10
@
UNF
W 89-82
−4.5
15
@
FGCU
W 85-74
+12.5
17
@
STET
W 87-81
−4.5
21
vs
UNA
W 87-62
+12.5
24
@
WGA
L 66-74
−15.5
28
vs
CARK
L 90-100
−15.5
31
@
BELL
L 75-78
−8.5
5
vs
JAX
W 93-84
+0.5
7
vs
UNF
W 91-72
+3.5
11
vs
APSU
L 87-95
−10.5
14
vs
LIP
W 87-81
+2.5
18
@
UNA
W 85-78
−1.5
21
vs
WGA
W 91-84
−4.5
25
@
EKU
W 96-79
+14.5
28
@
CARK
L 79-84
−2.5
6
vs
WGA
W 71-63
−0.5
7
vs
APSU
W 90-83
+9.5
8
vs
CARK
W 98-93
+6.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-104
−7.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WIN
L 74-81
−8.5
8
@
VILL
L 74-94
+17.5
11
@
DUQ
L 81-87
+5.5
15
vs
SHU
W 81-64
−20.5
20
vs
UNCG
W 101-94
+44.5
23
@
FUR
L 79-90
+15.5
28
@
UVA
L 69-94
+2.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 107-74
+19.5
12
vs
SCST
W 102-78
+22.5
14
@
WAKE
L 73-111
+18.5
16
@
ARK
L 80-108
+18.5
29
@
AUB
L 65-106
−0.5
1
vs
EKU
W 91-89
+15.5
3
vs
BELL
W 98-76
+4.5
8
@
JAX
W 77-51
−26.5
10
@
UNF
W 89-82
−2.5
15
@
FGCU
W 85-74
−7.5
17
@
STET
W 87-81
+5.5
21
vs
UNA
W 87-62
−13.5
24
@
WGA
L 66-74
−22.5
28
vs
CARK
L 90-100
+31.5
31
@
BELL
L 75-78
−10.5
5
vs
JAX
W 93-84
+30.5
7
vs
UNF
W 91-72
−15.5
11
vs
APSU
L 87-95
+20.5
14
vs
LIP
W 87-81
+2.5
18
@
UNA
W 85-78
+6.5
21
vs
WGA
W 91-84
+13.5
25
@
EKU
W 96-79
+9.5
28
@
CARK
L 79-84
−0.5
6
vs
WGA
W 71-63
−30.5
7
vs
APSU
W 90-83
+11.5
8
vs
CARK
W 98-93
+33.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-104
+15.5
over 22under 12avg +6.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Gardner-Webb
30 games played
Straight up
2-28
7% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 60-87 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 59-97 | +29.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 84-95 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 62-93 | +21.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 67-102 | +19.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 51-84 | +10.5 | L −22.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-76 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 62-88 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 74-107 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 84-88 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 57-83 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 52-94 | +42.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 79-89 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-88 | +23.5 | W +12.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 49-104 | +26.5 | L −28.5 | 162.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 80-89 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 55-92 | +8.5 | L −28.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 56-91 | +16.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 67-65 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 50-69 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-86 | +12.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 62-68 | +17.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 85-103 | +20.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 87-112 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 66-75 | +16.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 70-82 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-77 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-71 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 65-64 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 59-81 | +27.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MINN
L 60-87
+1.5
7
@
CLEM
L 59-97
−8.5
15
@
ELON
L 84-95
+2.5
18
@
DEP
L 62-93
−9.5
22
@
RICH
L 67-102
−15.5
26
vs
NAVY
L 51-84
−22.5
28
vs
SELA
L 68-76
−1.5
29
@
UNCW
L 62-88
−7.5
3
@
QUC
L 74-107
−18.5
6
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+6.5
15
vs
WOF
L 57-83
−15.5
21
@
TENN
L 52-94
+0.5
31
vs
CHSO
L 79-89
+2.5
3
@
WIN
L 77-88
+12.5
7
@
HPU
L 49-104
−28.5
14
vs
RAD
L 80-89
+4.5
17
vs
PRES
L 55-92
−28.5
21
@
LONG
L 56-91
−18.5
23
vs
UPST
W 67-65
+11.5
29
@
UNCA
L 50-69
−1.5
4
vs
LONG
L 66-86
−7.5
7
@
PRES
L 62-68
+11.5
12
vs
WIN
L 85-103
+2.5
14
vs
HPU
L 87-112
+0.5
17
@
CHSO
L 66-75
+7.5
19
@
RAD
L 70-82
+6.5
26
vs
UNCA
L 71-77
+6.5
28
@
UPST
L 61-71
+1.5
4
vs
UPST
W 65-64
+11.5
6
vs
HPU
L 59-81
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MINN
L 60-87
−1.5
7
@
CLEM
L 59-97
+10.5
15
@
ELON
L 84-95
+24.5
18
@
DEP
L 62-93
−0.5
22
@
RICH
L 67-102
+14.5
26
vs
NAVY
L 51-84
−18.5
28
vs
SELA
L 68-76
+2.5
29
@
UNCW
L 62-88
+2.5
3
@
QUC
L 74-107
+19.5
6
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+9.5
15
vs
WOF
L 57-83
−15.5
21
@
TENN
L 52-94
−6.5
31
vs
CHSO
L 79-89
+4.5
3
@
WIN
L 77-88
+0.5
7
@
HPU
L 49-104
−9.5
14
vs
RAD
L 80-89
+3.5
17
vs
PRES
L 55-92
+1.5
21
@
LONG
L 56-91
−8.5
23
vs
UPST
W 67-65
−21.5
29
@
UNCA
L 50-69
−30.5
4
vs
LONG
L 66-86
+4.5
7
@
PRES
L 62-68
−15.5
12
vs
WIN
L 85-103
+31.5
14
vs
HPU
L 87-112
+37.5
17
@
CHSO
L 66-75
−20.5
19
@
RAD
L 70-82
−10.5
26
vs
UNCA
L 71-77
+2.5
28
@
UPST
L 61-71
−14.5
4
vs
UPST
W 65-64
−14.5
6
vs
HPU
L 59-81
−15.5
over 15under 15avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 84.4 #16 | Points per game | 66.2 #343 |
| 1.19 #25 | Points per possession | 0.94 #360 |
| 71.2 #65 | Pace (possessions) | 70.8 #84 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.4 #15 | Effective FG% | 47.8 #317 |
| 35.7 #74 | 3-point % | 31.0 #320 |
| 46.5 #38 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.8 #174 |
| 35.4 #167 | Free throw rate | 30.3 #302 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.8 #54 | Turnover rate | 19.8 #347 |
| 30.2 #190 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.2 #350 |
| 16.0 #49 | Assists per game | 9.7 #362 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.8 #355 | Points allowed | 86.7 #362 |
| 1.17 #346 | Points allowed per possession | 1.22 #361 |
| 54.6 #319 | Opponent effective FG% | 57.0 #356 |
| 36.5 #325 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #300 |
| 15.1 #276 | Turnovers forced | 15.3 #265 |
| 66.4 #308 | Defensive rebound rate | 63.4 #355 |
| 6.0 #238 | Steals per game | 6.1 #224 |
| 2.9 #236 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #309 |
Queens University Royals
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue71–104
- Wvs C Arkansas98–93
- Wvs Austin Peay90–83
- Wvs West Georgia71–63
- L@ C Arkansas79–84
A week or more of rest.
Gardner-Webb
2-28 in 2025-26 overall · 2-16 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point59–81
- Wvs SC Upstate65–64
- L@ SC Upstate61–71
- Lvs UNC Asheville71–77
- L@ Radford70–82
A week or more of rest.