MVP Arena · at Siena
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SIE | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BRWN 70–69 · win probability BRWN 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 138.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SIE has more of the edges
BRWN 2, SIE 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SIE offense vs BRWN defense
Offense 309th of 366 against a defense 124th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: BRWN 28.1, SIE 33.4. Allowed: BRWN 37.6, SIE 27.5
Context
Schedule so far
BRWN has played the 176th-hardest schedule, SIE the 320th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BRWN 100%, SIE 28%. Transfers in: BRWN 0, SIE 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: BRWN 48.6 and allows 51.3; SIE 50.4 and allows 48.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BRWN 29.0%, SIE 31.8%. Defensive: BRWN 70.0%, SIE 70.5%
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: BRWN plays 68.0 a game (229th fastest), SIE 64.4 (354th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BRWN 19.4%, SIE 15.8%. Forced: BRWN 18.8%, SIE 17.0%
Home court
SIE at home. This season: SIE 0-0 at home, BRWN 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
BRWN hits 30.3% and allows 33.5%; SIE hits 30.6% and allows 32.4%. Threes are 36.3% and 32.2% of their shots
Even
BRWN offense vs SIE defense
Offense 220th of 366 against a defense 194th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BRWN -0.5 | — |
| Total | — | 138.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | BRWN 69.6 · SIE 69.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BRWN -0.5 | — |
| 1H total | 64.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | BRWN 32.7 · SIE 32.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 1-9 10% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BRWN 1–2 SIESIE leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · SIE has won the last 2 meetings · BRWN 0-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2025-26 | SIE 62 @ BRWN 46 | BRWN +3.5 | SIE W |
| Nov 4, 2024-25 | BRWN 71 @ SIE 72 | SIE +2.5 | SIE W |
| Dec 22, 2023-24 | SIE 67 @ BRWN 71 | BRWN -9.5 | SIE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Brown
25 games played
Straight up
7-18
28% wins
Against the spread
13-12
52% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-12
52% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | L 46-62 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 84-89 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 77-90 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 129.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 63-72 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 68-49 | -2.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 58-53 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 127.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 59-47 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 56-66 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 75-56 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 130.5 | O 131 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 79-86 | +19.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 53-70 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-81 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-80 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 67-89 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-63 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 59-69 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 70-77 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 69-81 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 53-56 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-76 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 80-71 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 62-80 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 80-86 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 61-82 | -1.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
SIE
L 46-62
−12.5
9
vs
UVM
L 84-89
+0.5
12
@
BU
L 77-90
−9.5
14
vs
HAMP
L 63-72
−10.5
18
vs
HC
W 68-49
+16.5
20
@
STBK
L 70-80
−6.5
23
@
ME
W 58-53
+3.5
26
@
UNH
W 59-47
+6.5
2
@
URI
L 56-66
+3.5
5
vs
BRY
W 75-56
+12.5
9
@
PROV
L 79-86
+12.5
5
vs
YALE
L 53-70
−8.5
10
@
PENN
L 73-81
−2.5
17
vs
COLU
W 86-80
+8.5
19
vs
COR
L 67-89
−19.5
24
@
PRIN
L 53-63
−5.5
30
vs
HARV
L 59-69
−8.5
31
vs
DART
L 70-77
−8.5
6
@
YALE
L 69-81
+3.5
13
@
HARV
L 53-56
+4.5
14
@
DART
W 79-76
+5.5
20
vs
PRIN
W 80-71
+6.5
27
@
COLU
L 62-80
−12.5
28
@
COR
L 80-86
+3.5
6
vs
PENN
L 61-82
−22.5
covered 13didn’t cover 12avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
SIE
L 46-62
−34.5
9
vs
UVM
L 84-89
+41.5
12
@
BU
L 77-90
+37.5
14
vs
HAMP
L 63-72
−4.5
18
vs
HC
W 68-49
−24.5
20
@
STBK
L 70-80
+13.5
23
@
ME
W 58-53
−16.5
26
@
UNH
W 59-47
−30.5
2
@
URI
L 56-66
−16.5
5
vs
BRY
W 75-56
+0.5
9
@
PROV
L 79-86
+19.5
5
vs
YALE
L 53-70
−19.5
10
@
PENN
L 73-81
+8.5
17
vs
COLU
W 86-80
+22.5
19
vs
COR
L 67-89
−7.5
24
@
PRIN
L 53-63
−18.5
30
vs
HARV
L 59-69
−4.5
31
vs
DART
L 70-77
+4.5
6
@
YALE
L 69-81
+9.5
13
@
HARV
L 53-56
−22.5
14
@
DART
W 79-76
+15.5
20
vs
PRIN
W 80-71
+21.5
27
@
COLU
L 62-80
+1.5
28
@
COR
L 80-86
+9.5
6
vs
PENN
L 61-82
−3.5
over 13under 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Siena
35 games played
Straight up
23-12
66% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-66 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 62-46 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 66-75 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 17 | vs | L 69-72 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-63 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 73-69 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 70-63 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 59-55 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 64-60 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 83-54 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 129.5 | O 137 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-52 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 69-83 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 60-81 | +21.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 72-75 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 74-65 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 59-63 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 67-50 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 80-86 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-59 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 85-77 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 69-50 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 133.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 82-79 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 128.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 78-63 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 79-72 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 62-74 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 67-63 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 72-79 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 72-63 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 58-72 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 76-61 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 63-58 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-61 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 64-54 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 128.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 65-71 | +28.5 | W +22.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BRY
W 82-66
+2.5
7
@
BRWN
W 62-46
+12.5
12
@
SBU
L 66-75
+0.5
17
vs
COLG
L 69-72
−9.5
21
vs
UALB
W 73-63
−0.5
24
@
HC
W 73-69
−5.5
28
vs
LONG
W 70-63
+1.5
29
@
AMER
W 59-55
+1.5
30
vs
ME
W 64-60
−5.5
5
vs
NIA
W 83-54
+16.5
7
vs
CAN
W 74-52
+4.5
17
@
UVM
L 69-83
−11.5
22
@
IU
L 60-81
+0.5
2
@
IONA
L 72-75
−4.5
4
@
RID
W 74-65
+0.5
9
vs
MRMK
L 59-63
−9.5
11
@
MSM
W 67-50
+14.5
14
vs
SHU
L 80-86
−14.5
17
@
MAN
W 74-59
+8.5
19
vs
FAIR
W 85-77
+1.5
22
vs
MRST
W 69-50
+17.5
30
@
NIA
W 82-79
−6.5
1
@
CAN
W 78-63
+6.5
5
vs
IONA
W 79-72
−1.5
7
@
SPU
L 65-70
−6.5
13
vs
QUIN
L 62-74
−15.5
15
@
MRST
W 67-63
+6.5
20
@
MRMK
L 72-79
−4.5
22
vs
SPU
W 72-63
+3.5
27
@
FAIR
L 58-72
−15.5
1
vs
RID
W 76-61
+0.5
7
vs
MSM
W 63-58
+2.5
8
vs
FAIR
W 76-61
+13.5
10
vs
MRMK
W 64-54
+12.5
19
vs
DUKE
L 65-71
+22.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BRY
W 82-66
−0.5
7
@
BRWN
W 62-46
−34.5
12
@
SBU
L 66-75
+0.5
17
vs
COLG
L 69-72
−5.5
21
vs
UALB
W 73-63
−4.5
24
@
HC
W 73-69
+4.5
28
vs
LONG
W 70-63
−12.5
29
@
AMER
W 59-55
−23.5
30
vs
ME
W 64-60
−3.5
5
vs
NIA
W 83-54
+7.5
7
vs
CAN
W 74-52
−5.5
17
@
UVM
L 69-83
+17.5
22
@
IU
L 60-81
−4.5
2
@
IONA
L 72-75
−2.5
4
@
RID
W 74-65
+3.5
9
vs
MRMK
L 59-63
−10.5
11
@
MSM
W 67-50
−22.5
14
vs
SHU
L 80-86
+26.5
17
@
MAN
W 74-59
−11.5
19
vs
FAIR
W 85-77
+19.5
22
vs
MRST
W 69-50
−14.5
30
@
NIA
W 82-79
+32.5
1
@
CAN
W 78-63
+5.5
5
vs
IONA
W 79-72
+10.5
7
@
SPU
L 65-70
−0.5
13
vs
QUIN
L 62-74
−8.5
15
@
MRST
W 67-63
−3.5
20
@
MRMK
L 72-79
+17.5
22
vs
SPU
W 72-63
−0.5
27
@
FAIR
L 58-72
−12.5
1
vs
RID
W 76-61
−0.5
7
vs
MSM
W 63-58
−14.5
8
vs
FAIR
W 76-61
−1.5
10
vs
MRMK
W 64-54
−10.5
19
vs
DUKE
L 65-71
−1.5
over 11under 24avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Brown has the better starters
Position by position: Brown 1, Siena 0, even 4
BrownBetterSiena
G J. Jenkins8.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 47
←BRWNSmall
G T. Yildizoglu TR10.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 30
G A. Uchidiuno9.1 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 20
=Even
G B. Coyle8.7 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 17
G M. Wrisby-Jefferson4.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 25
=Even
G I. Henderson3.8 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 12
G D. Rochester5.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 27
=No call
G O. Schlager2.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
F N. Dabo7.1 pts · 5.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 72
=No call
G C. Torres0.5 pts · 0 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
BrownBetterSiena
BRWN offense220th of 366 · -6.7
=Even
SIE defense194th of 366 · -4.7
BRWN defense124th of 366 · -2.2
←BRWNBig
SIE offense309th of 366 · -9.6
Backcourt-6.6 · 4 players
←BRWNSmall
Backcourt-7.7 · 5 players
Frontcourt+1.0 · 1 player
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-2.4 · 5 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestBRWN betterSIE betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Jenkins31 minA. Uchidiuno26 minM. Wrisby-Jefferson23 minD. Rochester22 minI. Langham21 minB. Loughlin18 min
Forwards
N. Dabo24 minC. O'Sullivan11 minW. DeGraaf8 minE. JamgbadiNewL. JonesNew
Guards
T. Yildizoglu32 min · TRB. Coyle31 minI. Henderson14 minO. Schlager10 minC. Torres3 minR. DucharmeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.2 #330 | Points per game | 70.4 #276 |
| 0.98 #338 | Points per possession | 1.09 #154 |
| 68.0 #229 | Pace (possessions) | 64.4 #354 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.6 #299 | Effective FG% | 50.4 #222 |
| 30.3 #338 | 3-point % | 30.6 #330 |
| 36.3 #244 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.2 #327 |
| 28.1 #342 | Free throw rate | 33.4 #226 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.4 #334 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #126 |
| 29.0 #236 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.8 #133 |
| 14.8 #99 | Assists per game | 13.5 #182 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.4 #115 | Points allowed | 65.8 #12 |
| 1.07 #134 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #44 |
| 51.3 #176 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.5 #48 |
| 33.5 #157 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.4 #82 |
| 18.8 #57 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #154 |
| 70.0 #164 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #133 |
| 7.5 #82 | Steals per game | 5.8 #262 |
| 3.8 #104 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #205 |
Brown
7-18 in 2025-26 overall · 3-11 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Penn61–82
- L@ Cornell80–86
- L@ Columbia62–80
- Wvs Princeton80–71
- W@ Dartmouth79–76
A week or more of rest.
Siena
23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke65–71
- Wvs Merrimack64–54
- Wvs Fairfield76–61
- Wvs Mount St Marys63–58
- Wvs Rider76–61
A week or more of rest.