Dean E. Smith Center · at North Carolina
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNC 84–69 · win probability UNC 90%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNC has more of the edges
WYO 1, UNC 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: WYO 35.5, UNC 37.1. Allowed: WYO 47.9, UNC 23.8
Shooting
Effective FG%: WYO 51.8 and allows 52.0; UNC 54.3 and allows 48.4
UNC offense vs WYO defense
Offense 40th of 366 against a defense 130th, on the model’s ratings
WYO offense vs UNC defense
Offense 124th of 366 against a defense 52nd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UNC at home. This season: UNC 0-0 at home, WYO 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WYO 45%, UNC 20%. Transfers in: WYO 4, UNC 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
WYO has played the 105th-hardest schedule, UNC the 61st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WYO 34.0%, UNC 31.2%. Defensive: WYO 72.0%, UNC 72.2%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: WYO plays 67.6 a game (252nd fastest), UNC 69.0 (180th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
WYO hits 33.0% and allows 32.8%; UNC hits 34.2% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 43.0% and 42.2% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WYO 16.3%, UNC 13.9%. Forced: WYO 16.8%, UNC 13.6%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNC -14.6 | — |
| Total | — | 152.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | WYO 68.9 · UNC 83.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNC -8.6 | — |
| 1H total | 71.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | WYO 31.3 · UNC 39.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wyoming
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 92-82 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 79-65 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-56 | -11.5 | W +25.5 | 160.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 70-78 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 75-67 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 101-59 | -9.5 | W +32.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 72-76 | +19.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-80 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 106-79 | -14.5 | W +12.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 15 | vs | W 87-72 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 70-82 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 68-56 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 58-78 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 98-66 | -4.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 83-92 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 57-74 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 60-63 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 65-81 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 66-62 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 62-94 | +13.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 68-57 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 63-72 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 83-85 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 68-79 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 92-82 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-65 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 62-72 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 66-62 | -20.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 83-73 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 88-78 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 70-73 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 70-74 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
CSUF
W 92-82
−5.5
11
vs
APSU
W 79-65
+8.5
15
vs
PORT
W 93-56
+25.5
19
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−6.5
23
vs
NORF
W 75-67
−7.5
26
vs
DEN
W 101-59
+32.5
30
@
TTU
L 72-76
+15.5
6
vs
DART
W 93-80
−1.5
9
vs
SDAK
W 106-79
+12.5
15
vs
SDST
W 87-72
+11.5
20
vs
GCU
L 70-82
−14.5
30
@
AF
W 68-56
−2.5
3
@
UNM
L 58-78
−12.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 98-66
+27.5
10
@
NEV
L 83-92
−5.5
14
vs
SDSU
L 57-74
−15.5
17
@
FRES
L 60-63
−6.5
20
vs
BOIS
L 65-81
−14.5
24
vs
SJSU
W 66-62
−9.5
28
@
USU
L 62-94
−18.5
31
vs
CSU
W 68-57
+9.5
3
@
SDSU
L 63-72
+3.5
7
vs
USU
L 83-85
+7.5
14
@
CSU
L 68-79
−7.5
17
vs
FRES
W 92-82
+0.5
21
@
GCU
W 70-65
+12.5
24
@
BOIS
L 62-72
−1.5
28
vs
AF
W 66-62
−16.5
3
vs
NEV
W 83-73
+11.5
7
@
SJSU
W 88-78
+3.5
11
vs
UNLV
L 70-73
−0.5
17
@
WICH
L 70-74
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
CSUF
W 92-82
+19.5
11
vs
APSU
W 79-65
−9.5
15
vs
PORT
W 93-56
−11.5
19
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−8.5
23
vs
NORF
W 75-67
+0.5
26
vs
DEN
W 101-59
+6.5
30
@
TTU
L 72-76
−4.5
6
vs
DART
W 93-80
+16.5
9
vs
SDAK
W 106-79
+23.5
15
vs
SDST
W 87-72
+9.5
20
vs
GCU
L 70-82
+4.5
30
@
AF
W 68-56
−22.5
3
@
UNM
L 58-78
−15.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 98-66
+9.5
10
@
NEV
L 83-92
+31.5
14
vs
SDSU
L 57-74
−17.5
17
@
FRES
L 60-63
−22.5
20
vs
BOIS
L 65-81
+0.5
24
vs
SJSU
W 66-62
−13.5
28
@
USU
L 62-94
+7.5
31
vs
CSU
W 68-57
−17.5
3
@
SDSU
L 63-72
−6.5
7
vs
USU
L 83-85
+18.5
14
@
CSU
L 68-79
+6.5
17
vs
FRES
W 92-82
+25.5
21
@
GCU
W 70-65
−9.5
24
@
BOIS
L 62-72
−12.5
28
vs
AF
W 66-62
−17.5
3
vs
NEV
W 83-73
+12.5
7
@
SJSU
W 88-78
+17.5
11
vs
UNLV
L 70-73
−10.5
17
@
WICH
L 70-74
−4.5
over 16under 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
North Carolina
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-54 | -31.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-74 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 89-74 | -20.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 97-53 | -34.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 73-61 | -26.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 85-70 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 58-74 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 67-64 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 163.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 81-61 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-62 | -29.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 77-58 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 71-70 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 99-51 | -25.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 79-66 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-97 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 87-84 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 90-95 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 78-84 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 91-69 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-80 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 91-75 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 87-77 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-68 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 66-75 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-65 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 58-82 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 77-64 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 77-74 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-82 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 67-63 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 61-76 | +18.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 79-80 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 78-82 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CARK
W 94-54
+8.5
7
vs
KU
W 87-74
+10.5
11
vs
RAD
W 89-74
−5.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 97-53
+9.5
18
vs
NAVY
W 73-61
−14.5
25
vs
SBU
W 85-70
+4.5
27
vs
MSU
L 58-74
−14.5
2
@
UK
W 67-64
+10.5
7
vs
GTWN
W 81-61
+9.5
13
vs
UPST
W 80-62
−11.5
16
vs
ETSU
W 77-58
+1.5
20
vs
OSU
W 71-70
−1.5
22
vs
ECU
W 99-51
+22.5
30
vs
FSU
W 79-66
+0.5
3
@
SMU
L 83-97
−12.5
10
vs
WAKE
W 87-84
−7.5
14
@
STAN
L 90-95
−9.5
17
@
CAL
L 78-84
−13.5
21
vs
ND
W 91-69
+8.5
24
@
UVA
W 85-80
+11.5
31
@
GT
W 91-75
+6.5
2
vs
SYR
W 87-77
−1.5
7
vs
DUKE
W 71-68
+9.5
10
@
MIA
L 66-75
−7.5
14
vs
PITT
W 79-65
+2.5
17
@
NCSU
L 58-82
−15.5
21
@
SYR
W 77-64
+15.5
23
vs
LOU
W 77-74
+6.5
28
vs
VT
W 89-82
−0.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 67-63
+1.5
7
@
DUKE
L 61-76
+3.5
12
vs
CLEM
L 79-80
+1.5
19
vs
VCU
L 78-82
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CARK
W 94-54
−9.5
7
vs
KU
W 87-74
+1.5
11
vs
RAD
W 89-74
+0.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 97-53
−9.5
18
vs
NAVY
W 73-61
−26.5
25
vs
SBU
W 85-70
+2.5
27
vs
MSU
L 58-74
−20.5
2
@
UK
W 67-64
−32.5
7
vs
GTWN
W 81-61
−7.5
13
vs
UPST
W 80-62
−9.5
16
vs
ETSU
W 77-58
−15.5
20
vs
OSU
W 71-70
−16.5
22
vs
ECU
W 99-51
+5.5
30
vs
FSU
W 79-66
−21.5
3
@
SMU
L 83-97
+24.5
10
vs
WAKE
W 87-84
+16.5
14
@
STAN
L 90-95
+37.5
17
@
CAL
L 78-84
+10.5
21
vs
ND
W 91-69
+10.5
24
@
UVA
W 85-80
+12.5
31
@
GT
W 91-75
+5.5
2
vs
SYR
W 87-77
+5.5
7
vs
DUKE
W 71-68
−13.5
10
@
MIA
L 66-75
−15.5
14
vs
PITT
W 79-65
+1.5
17
@
NCSU
L 58-82
−16.5
21
@
SYR
W 77-64
−13.5
23
vs
LOU
W 77-74
−11.5
28
vs
VT
W 89-82
+21.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 67-63
−11.5
7
@
DUKE
L 61-76
−10.5
12
vs
CLEM
L 79-80
+18.5
19
vs
VCU
L 78-82
+9.5
over 16under 17avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
North Carolina has the better starters
Position by position: Wyoming 1, North Carolina 4, even 0
WyomingBetterNorth Carolina
G C. Jefferson TR12.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 48
→UNCSmall
G N. Avdalas TR12.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 67
G K. Bennett10.1 pts · 4.8 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 76
→UNCSmall
G T. Brown TR19.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 98
G N. Meyer12.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 83
←WYOSmall
G A. Brizzi TR14.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
F R. Sondors TR10.4 pts · 4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
→UNCBig
F J. Stevenson8.1 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 65
F G. Gores7.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 65
→UNCSmall
C C. Fens TR14.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 85
WyomingBetterNorth Carolina
WYO offense124th of 366 · -3.3
→UNCSmall
UNC defense52nd of 366 · +1.9
WYO defense130th of 366 · -2.4
→UNCSmall
UNC offense40th of 366 · +5.0
Backcourt+1.8 · 3 players
→UNCBig
Backcourt+6.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.2 · 2 players
→UNCBig
Frontcourt+3.9 · 2 players
Bench-1.4 · 3 players
→UNCSmall
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWYO betterUNC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Jefferson31 min · TRK. Bennett28 minN. Meyer28 minU. Rojas17 minP. Gerrits10 min · TRM. De MartinNew
Forwards
R. Sondors29 min · TRG. Gores18 minM. Curtis9 min · TRM. MoraNewN. SummersNewC. PohlNew
Centers
L. RufNew
Guards
N. Avdalas32 min · TRT. Brown32 min · TRA. Brizzi30 min · TRM. Able22 min · TRJ. Young7 minI. Denis3 min
Forwards
J. Stevenson26 minJ. Holbrook2 minA. SamodurovNewM. AdamsNew
Centers
C. Fens26 min · TRC. BennermanNewS. KeitaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.2 #137 | Points per game | 79.7 #73 |
| 1.13 #92 | Points per possession | 1.16 #50 |
| 67.6 #252 | Pace (possessions) | 69.0 #180 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.8 #154 | Effective FG% | 54.3 #57 |
| 33.0 #234 | 3-point % | 34.2 #159 |
| 43.0 #116 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.2 #132 |
| 35.5 #166 | Free throw rate | 37.1 #127 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.3 #155 | Turnover rate | 13.9 #20 |
| 34.0 #66 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.2 #159 |
| 14.1 #141 | Assists per game | 16.0 #47 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.9 #131 | Points allowed | 71.6 #97 |
| 1.08 #169 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #65 |
| 52.0 #211 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.4 #44 |
| 32.8 #108 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #234 |
| 16.8 #164 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #344 |
| 72.0 #66 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.2 #59 |
| 6.6 #169 | Steals per game | 5.4 #308 |
| 2.4 #318 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #167 |
Wyoming
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Wichita St70–74
- Lvs UNLV70–73
- W@ San José St88–78
- Wvs Nevada83–73
- Wvs Air Force66–62
A week or more of rest.
North Carolina
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs VCU78–82
- Lvs Clemson79–80
- L@ Duke61–76
- Wvs Clemson67–63
- Wvs Virginia Tech89–82
A week or more of rest.