Lenovo Center · at NC State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NCSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NCSU 85–64 · win probability NCSU 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NCSU has more of the edges
PRES 3, NCSU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PRES 19.4%, NCSU 13.1%. Forced: PRES 15.7%, NCSU 18.2%
Context
Schedule so far
PRES has played the 272nd-hardest schedule, NCSU the 51st. A record against a soft schedule means less
PRES offense vs NCSU defense
Offense 222nd of 366 against a defense 58th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
PRES hits 31.6% and allows 34.7%; NCSU hits 38.8% and allows 35.5%. Threes are 28.0% and 43.4% of their shots
NCSU offense vs PRES defense
Offense 42nd of 366 against a defense 160th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PRES 86%, NCSU 28%. Transfers in: PRES 0, NCSU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: PRES plays 66.9 a game (283rd fastest), NCSU 70.2 (103rd). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PRES 33.1%, NCSU 28.2%. Defensive: PRES 69.3%, NCSU 69.5%
Home court
NCSU at home. This season: NCSU 0-0 at home, PRES 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: PRES 39.4, NCSU 35.1. Allowed: PRES 37.1, NCSU 36.9
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: PRES 51.0 and allows 51.2; NCSU 55.0 and allows 52.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NCSU -20.6 | — |
| Total | — | 149.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | PRES 64.4 · NCSU 85 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NCSU -12.1 | — |
| 1H total | 69.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | PRES 28.9 · NCSU 41 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
PRES 0–1 NCSUNCSU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · PRES 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024-25 | PRES 72 @ NCSU 81 | NCSU -21.5 | PRES W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Presbyterian
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 55-76 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 68-64 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 63-61 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 61-81 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 62-64 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-67 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 124.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 46-86 | +25.5 | L −14.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 69-41 | -8.5 | W +19.5 | 133.5 | U 110 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 56-63 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-72 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-74 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 81-87 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 61-80 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 70-77 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 71-70 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 92-55 | -8.5 | W +28.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 87-83 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 72-82 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 81-84 | +14.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-93 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 68-62 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 67-84 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 58-57 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 72-65 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 73-79 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-74 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 91-85 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-73 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−17.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
+10.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
+5.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
−3.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
+4.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
+0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
−14.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
+19.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−2.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+0.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−16.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
−8.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+7.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−12.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
−3.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+3.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+28.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+5.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
−4.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+11.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
−10.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−11.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
−15.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
+6.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
+4.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
−3.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+6.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
+3.5
6
vs
RAD
W 91-85
+8.5
7
vs
WIN
L 71-73
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−10.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
−9.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
−17.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
+4.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
−24.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
−0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
+0.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
−23.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−19.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+17.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−4.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
+29.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+25.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−6.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
+7.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+2.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+1.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+22.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
+7.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+15.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
+25.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−15.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
+4.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
−22.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
−2.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
+8.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+0.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
−6.5
6
vs
RAD
W 91-85
+29.5
7
vs
WIN
L 71-73
−1.5
over 16under 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
NC State
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-13
62% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Against the spread
15-1944%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 114-66 | -31.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-70 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 110-64 | -30.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-85 | -7.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-70 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 97-102 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-83 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-63 | -28.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-45 | -12.5 | W +27.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-77 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 108-72 | -34.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 70-57 | -10.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-76 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 79-71 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 113-69 | -4.5 | W +39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 74-78 | -17.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 80-76 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-72 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 96-78 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 84-83 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 77-118 | +6.5 | L −34.5 | 161.5 | O 195 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-77 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-58 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 61-90 | +6.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 90-96 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 64-93 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 84-85 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 98-88 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-81 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 66-68 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+16.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+4.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+15.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−5.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
−18.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
+4.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
−6.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−4.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−16.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
+27.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+1.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
+6.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
+2.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−19.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
−3.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+39.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−21.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+6.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+2.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+9.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+12.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
−0.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
−1.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
−34.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−6.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
+15.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−22.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
−12.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
−20.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
−10.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+1.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−3.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+34.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+1.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+20.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−0.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
+15.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
−1.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
+37.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−6.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−17.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
−19.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
+4.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+27.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
−10.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
−32.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−14.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
+8.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+21.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−2.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+13.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+8.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+4.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+17.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
+7.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
+0.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
+33.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−4.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
−16.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−0.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
+32.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
+6.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
+16.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+41.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
+1.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−23.5
over 21under 13avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
NC State has the better starters
Position by position: Presbyterian 0, NC State 3, even 2
PresbyterianBetterNC State
G C. Parrish14.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 56
→NCSUSmall
G P. Edmead TR16.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 83
G T. Wilson11.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 52
→NCSUBig
G C. Hammond TR15.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 87
G E. Taylor5.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 3.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G P. McNeil13.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 90
G I. King3.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 2
→NCSUBig
F K. Evans TR11.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 95
F J. Peterson11 pts · 7.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 71
=Even
F E. Yalaho TR10.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 58
PresbyterianBetterNC State
PRES offense222nd of 366 · -6.8
→NCSUBig
NCSU defense58th of 366 · +1.3
PRES defense160th of 366 · -3.5
→NCSUSmall
NCSU offense42nd of 366 · +4.6
Backcourt-4.4 · 4 players
→NCSUBig
Backcourt+6.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
→NCSUBig
Frontcourt+4.6 · 2 players
Bench-1.6 · 5 players
→NCSUBig
Bench+2.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestPRES betterNCSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Parrish35 minT. Wilson32 minE. Taylor21 minI. King19 minK. Hudson11 minJ. Bowden8 min
Forwards
J. Peterson30 minC. Chiakwelu11 minA. AyelyineNewL. HackworthNew
Guards
P. Edmead35 min · TRC. Hammond30 min · TRP. McNeil29 minD. Adams26 min · TRR. Keene23 min · TRJ. Brim5 min · TR
Forwards
K. Evans30 min · TRE. Yalaho29 min · TRV. Lubin28 minC. Emuobor19 min · TRR. JurkovicNewS. HallNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.0 #286 | Points per game | 83.2 #25 |
| 1.05 #249 | Points per possession | 1.18 #30 |
| 66.9 #283 | Pace (possessions) | 70.2 #103 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #196 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #35 |
| 31.6 #302 | 3-point % | 38.8 #6 |
| 28.0 #360 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.4 #104 |
| 39.4 #71 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #175 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.4 #335 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #7 |
| 33.1 #86 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.2 #258 |
| 12.4 #260 | Assists per game | 15.4 #70 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.1 #133 | Points allowed | 76.3 #224 |
| 1.09 #192 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #186 |
| 51.2 #170 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #256 |
| 34.7 #235 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.5 #281 |
| 15.7 #237 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #90 |
| 69.3 #188 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.5 #181 |
| 5.5 #303 | Steals per game | 8.1 #37 |
| 4.5 #35 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #159 |
Presbyterian
12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-10 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Winthrop71–73
- Wvs Radford91–85
- L@ Winthrop70–74
- Lvs High Point73–79
- L@ SC Upstate74–76
A week or more of rest.
NC State
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas66–68
- Lvs Virginia74–81
- Wvs Pitt98–88
- Lvs Stanford84–85
- Lvs Duke64–93
A week or more of rest.