Lenovo Center · at NC State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NCSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NCSU 91–61 · win probability NCSU 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NCSU has more of the edges
NORF 0, NCSU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
NORF has played the 343rd-hardest schedule, NCSU the 51st. A record against a soft schedule means less
NCSU offense vs NORF defense
Offense 42nd of 366 against a defense 301st, on the model’s ratings
NORF offense vs NCSU defense
Offense 314th of 366 against a defense 58th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NORF 18.7%, NCSU 13.1%. Forced: NORF 18.8%, NCSU 18.2%
Shooting
Effective FG%: NORF 49.3 and allows 51.7; NCSU 55.0 and allows 52.7
Home court
NCSU at home. This season: NCSU 0-0 at home, NORF 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NORF 8%, NCSU 28%. Transfers in: NORF 4, NCSU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
NORF hits 34.2% and allows 32.0%; NCSU hits 38.8% and allows 35.5%. Threes are 30.6% and 43.4% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: NORF plays 69.1 a game (172nd fastest), NCSU 70.2 (103rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NORF 32.5%, NCSU 28.2%. Defensive: NORF 67.7%, NCSU 69.5%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: NORF 43.5, NCSU 35.1. Allowed: NORF 45.3, NCSU 36.9
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NCSU -30.1 | — |
| Total | — | 152.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | NORF 61.1 · NCSU 91.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NCSU -17.8 | — |
| 1H total | 71.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | NORF 26.7 · NCSU 44.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Norfolk St
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-10
64% overs · avg +4.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | L 78-81 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 57-60 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 41-51 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 62-60 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 67-75 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 61-98 | +35.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-68 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 67-97 | +26.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-80 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 135.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 82-72 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 72-71 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 70-89 | +11.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 54-63 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 126.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 67-69 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 70-74 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-82 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 103-76 | -13.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 78-79 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-88 | +7.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 75-68 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 75-58 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 70-66 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 90-71 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 75-69 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 84-90 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 76-84 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 82-88 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
−0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
+5.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
+3.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−0.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+7.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
−1.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
+9.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
−3.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
−13.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+4.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+11.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
−7.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−5.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−3.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
−9.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+1.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+13.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
−8.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
−20.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
+2.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
+7.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
+2.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+8.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+0.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
−9.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
−1.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
−13.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
+0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
−32.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
−46.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−11.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+0.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
+12.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
−3.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
+15.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
+12.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+13.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+6.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
+22.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−9.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−5.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
+11.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+31.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+35.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
+4.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
+1.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
−5.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
−1.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
−0.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+20.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+3.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
+17.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
+10.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
+25.5
over 18under 10avg +4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
NC State
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-13
62% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Against the spread
15-1944%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 114-66 | -31.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-70 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 110-64 | -30.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-85 | -7.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-70 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 97-102 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-83 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-63 | -28.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-45 | -12.5 | W +27.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-77 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 108-72 | -34.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 70-57 | -10.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-76 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 79-71 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 113-69 | -4.5 | W +39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 74-78 | -17.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 80-76 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-72 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 96-78 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 84-83 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 77-118 | +6.5 | L −34.5 | 161.5 | O 195 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-77 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-58 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 61-90 | +6.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 90-96 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 64-93 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 84-85 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 98-88 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-81 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 66-68 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+16.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+4.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+15.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−5.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
−18.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
+4.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
−6.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−4.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−16.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
+27.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+1.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
+6.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
+2.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−19.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
−3.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+39.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−21.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+6.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+2.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+9.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+12.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
−0.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
−1.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
−34.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−6.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
+15.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−22.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
−12.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
−20.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
−10.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+1.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−3.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+34.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+1.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+20.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−0.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
+15.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
−1.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
+37.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−6.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−17.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
−19.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
+4.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+27.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
−10.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
−32.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−14.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
+8.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+21.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−2.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+13.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+8.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+4.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+17.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
+7.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
+0.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
+33.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−4.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
−16.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−0.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
+32.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
+6.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
+16.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+41.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
+1.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−23.5
over 21under 13avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
NC State has the better starters
Position by position: Norfolk St 0, NC State 4, even 1
Norfolk StBetterNC State
G B. Laster TR6.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 51
→NCSUSmall
G P. Edmead TR16.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 83
G A. Newton3.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
→NCSUBig
G C. Hammond TR15.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 87
F J. Gupton TR7.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 22
→NCSUBig
G P. McNeil13.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 90
F B. Gardner TR3.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 3
→NCSUBig
F K. Evans TR11.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 95
F J. Riley TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 56
=Even
F E. Yalaho TR10.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 58
Norfolk StBetterNC State
NORF offense314th of 366 · -10.1
→NCSUBig
NCSU defense58th of 366 · +1.3
NORF defense301st of 366 · -7.7
→NCSUBig
NCSU offense42nd of 366 · +4.6
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
→NCSUBig
Backcourt+6.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt-4.2 · 3 players
→NCSUBig
Frontcourt+4.6 · 2 players
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
→NCSUSmall
Bench+2.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNORF betterNCSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Laster19 min · TRA. Newton16 minA. Torrence1 minC. WalkerNewD. CamaraNewJ. SkyersNew
Forwards
J. Gupton25 min · TRB. Gardner16 min · TRJ. Riley11 min · TRM. MitchellNew
Centers
J. JordanNew
Guards
P. Edmead35 min · TRC. Hammond30 min · TRP. McNeil29 minD. Adams26 min · TRR. Keene23 min · TRJ. Brim5 min · TR
Forwards
K. Evans30 min · TRE. Yalaho29 min · TRV. Lubin28 minC. Emuobor19 min · TRR. JurkovicNewS. HallNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.6 #257 | Points per game | 83.2 #25 |
| 1.04 #274 | Points per possession | 1.18 #30 |
| 69.1 #172 | Pace (possessions) | 70.2 #103 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.3 #277 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #35 |
| 34.2 #157 | 3-point % | 38.8 #6 |
| 30.6 #347 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.4 #104 |
| 43.5 #13 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #175 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.7 #311 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #7 |
| 32.5 #108 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.2 #258 |
| 11.3 #326 | Assists per game | 15.4 #70 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.7 #181 | Points allowed | 76.3 #224 |
| 1.08 #160 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #186 |
| 51.7 #196 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #256 |
| 32.0 #61 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.5 #281 |
| 18.8 #58 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #90 |
| 67.7 #270 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.5 #181 |
| 6.5 #180 | Steals per game | 8.1 #37 |
| 2.8 #264 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #159 |
Norfolk St
11-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SC State82–88
- Lvs Howard76–84
- L@ Morgan St84–90
- W@ Coppin St75–69
- Wvs SC State90–71
A week or more of rest.
NC State
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas66–68
- Lvs Virginia74–81
- Wvs Pitt98–88
- Lvs Stanford84–85
- Lvs Duke64–93
A week or more of rest.