Lenovo Center · at NC State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NCSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NCSU 81–71 · win probability NCSU 79%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NCSU has more of the edges
SC 1, NCSU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SC 14.4%, NCSU 13.1%. Forced: SC 14.6%, NCSU 18.2%
Shooting
Effective FG%: SC 50.3 and allows 51.6; NCSU 55.0 and allows 52.7
Free throws
Free throw rate: SC 36.7, NCSU 35.1. Allowed: SC 34.0, NCSU 36.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SC 27.2%, NCSU 28.2%. Defensive: SC 67.9%, NCSU 69.5%
Home court
NCSU at home. This season: NCSU 0-0 at home, SC 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: SC plays 68.8 a game (195th fastest), NCSU 70.2 (103rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
SC hits 31.1% and allows 31.8%; NCSU hits 38.8% and allows 35.5%. Threes are 44.4% and 43.4% of their shots
Even
SC offense vs NCSU defense
Offense 98th of 366 against a defense 58th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SC 13%, NCSU 28%. Transfers in: SC 6, NCSU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
NCSU offense vs SC defense
Offense 42nd of 366 against a defense 53rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SC has played the 54th-hardest schedule, NCSU the 51st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NCSU -9.2 | — |
| Total | — | 152.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | SC 71.4 · NCSU 80.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NCSU -5.3 | — |
| 1H total | 71.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | SC 32.9 · NCSU 38.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
South Carolina
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 91-72 | -22.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 83-79 | -17.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 81-61 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 87-58 | -10.5 | W +18.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 72-79 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 77-79 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 74-62 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 83-86 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-51 | -22.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 71-55 | -22.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 61-68 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 95-70 | -31.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 96-67 | -19.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-83 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 78-68 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 70-75 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 74-108 | +12.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-71 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 85-76 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-92 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 48-95 | +13.5 | L −33.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 87-92 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 75-84 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 59-78 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-89 | +17.5 | W +3.5 | 170.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 62-76 | +23.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 97-89 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 186 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 68-87 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 59-78 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 64-61 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 74-86 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
NCAT
W 91-72
−3.5
9
vs
USM
W 83-79
−13.5
12
vs
PRES
W 81-61
+3.5
18
vs
RAD
W 87-58
+18.5
21
vs
BTLR
L 72-79
−3.5
23
vs
NU
L 77-79
+2.5
28
vs
CHSO
W 74-62
−5.5
2
vs
VT
L 83-86
−5.5
6
vs
STET
W 82-51
+8.5
13
vs
CIT
W 71-55
−6.5
16
@
CLEM
L 61-68
+5.5
22
vs
SCST
W 95-70
−6.5
30
vs
UALB
W 96-67
+9.5
3
vs
VAN
L 71-83
−2.5
6
@
LSU
W 78-68
+17.5
10
vs
UGA
L 70-75
−0.5
14
@
ARK
L 74-108
−21.5
17
@
AUB
L 67-71
+9.5
20
vs
OU
W 85-76
+11.5
24
@
TA&M
L 69-92
−12.5
28
vs
FLA
L 48-95
−33.5
31
vs
LSU
L 87-92
−2.5
3
@
TEX
L 75-84
+4.5
7
vs
MIZ
L 59-78
−15.5
14
@
ALA
L 75-89
+3.5
17
@
FLA
L 62-76
+9.5
21
vs
MSST
W 97-89
+9.5
24
vs
UK
L 63-72
−1.5
28
@
UGA
L 68-87
−6.5
3
vs
TENN
L 59-78
−8.5
7
@
MISS
W 64-61
+10.5
11
vs
OU
L 74-86
−4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
NCAT
W 91-72
+19.5
9
vs
USM
W 83-79
+14.5
12
vs
PRES
W 81-61
+4.5
18
vs
RAD
W 87-58
−8.5
21
vs
BTLR
L 72-79
+0.5
23
vs
NU
L 77-79
+9.5
28
vs
CHSO
W 74-62
−14.5
2
vs
VT
L 83-86
+19.5
6
vs
STET
W 82-51
−9.5
13
vs
CIT
W 71-55
−15.5
16
@
CLEM
L 61-68
−13.5
22
vs
SCST
W 95-70
+15.5
30
vs
UALB
W 96-67
+14.5
3
vs
VAN
L 71-83
−1.5
6
@
LSU
W 78-68
+0.5
10
vs
UGA
L 70-75
−18.5
14
@
ARK
L 74-108
+26.5
17
@
AUB
L 67-71
−14.5
20
vs
OU
W 85-76
+10.5
24
@
TA&M
L 69-92
+5.5
28
vs
FLA
L 48-95
−8.5
31
vs
LSU
L 87-92
+31.5
3
@
TEX
L 75-84
+9.5
7
vs
MIZ
L 59-78
−10.5
14
@
ALA
L 75-89
−6.5
17
@
FLA
L 62-76
−18.5
21
vs
MSST
W 97-89
+34.5
24
vs
UK
L 63-72
−16.5
28
@
UGA
L 68-87
−3.5
3
vs
TENN
L 59-78
−4.5
7
@
MISS
W 64-61
−22.5
11
vs
OU
L 74-86
+10.5
over 16under 16avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
NC State
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-13
62% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Against the spread
15-1944%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 114-66 | -31.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-70 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 110-64 | -30.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-85 | -7.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-70 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 97-102 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-83 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-63 | -28.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-45 | -12.5 | W +27.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-77 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 108-72 | -34.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 70-57 | -10.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-76 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 79-71 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 113-69 | -4.5 | W +39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 74-78 | -17.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 80-76 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-72 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 96-78 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 84-83 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 77-118 | +6.5 | L −34.5 | 161.5 | O 195 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-77 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-58 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 61-90 | +6.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 90-96 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 64-93 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 84-85 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 98-88 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-81 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 66-68 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+16.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+4.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+15.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−5.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
−18.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
+4.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
−6.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−4.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−16.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
+27.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+1.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
+6.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
+2.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−19.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
−3.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+39.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−21.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+6.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+2.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+9.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+12.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
−0.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
−1.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
−34.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−6.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
+15.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−22.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
−12.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
−20.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
−10.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+1.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−3.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+34.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+1.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+20.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−0.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
+15.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
−1.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
+37.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−6.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−17.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
−19.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
+4.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+27.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
−10.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
−32.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−14.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
+8.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+21.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−2.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+13.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+8.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+4.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+17.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
+7.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
+0.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
+33.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−4.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
−16.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−0.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
+32.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
+6.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
+16.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+41.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
+1.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−23.5
over 21under 13avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
NC State has the better starters
Position by position: South Carolina 0, NC State 3, even 2
South CarolinaBetterNC State
G S. Blakeney TR14.3 pts · 5 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 71
=Even
G P. Edmead TR16.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 83
G K. Mincy TR14.2 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 81
=Even
G C. Hammond TR15.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 87
F J. Necas TR6.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 46
→NCSUBig
G P. McNeil13.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 90
F C. Heide TR5.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 40
→NCSUBig
F K. Evans TR11.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 95
F A. Bieliauskas TR4.9 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 36
→NCSUSmall
F E. Yalaho TR10.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 58
South CarolinaBetterNC State
SC offense98th of 366 · -0.8
=Even
NCSU defense58th of 366 · +1.3
SC defense53rd of 366 · +1.6
=Even
NCSU offense42nd of 366 · +4.6
Backcourt+2.5 · 2 players
→NCSUBig
Backcourt+6.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 3 players
→NCSUBig
Frontcourt+4.6 · 2 players
Bench-0.7 · 4 players
→NCSUBig
Bench+2.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSC betterNCSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
S. Blakeney34 min · TRK. Mincy34 min · TRG. Polk13 minD. Hannah13 min · TRE. Sparkman4 minM. JohnsonNew
Forwards
J. Necas25 min · TRC. Heide23 min · TRA. Bieliauskas20 min · TRH. Assemian10 minH. LopezNewJ. FernandezNew
Guards
P. Edmead35 min · TRC. Hammond30 min · TRP. McNeil29 minD. Adams26 min · TRR. Keene23 min · TRJ. Brim5 min · TR
Forwards
K. Evans30 min · TRE. Yalaho29 min · TRV. Lubin28 minC. Emuobor19 min · TRR. JurkovicNewS. HallNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.9 #165 | Points per game | 83.2 #25 |
| 1.09 #161 | Points per possession | 1.18 #30 |
| 68.8 #195 | Pace (possessions) | 70.2 #103 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.3 #226 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #35 |
| 31.1 #317 | 3-point % | 38.8 #6 |
| 44.4 #80 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.4 #104 |
| 36.7 #137 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #175 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.4 #39 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #7 |
| 27.2 #289 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.2 #258 |
| 13.3 #190 | Assists per game | 15.4 #70 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.5 #228 | Points allowed | 76.3 #224 |
| 1.11 #252 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #186 |
| 51.6 #188 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #256 |
| 31.8 #56 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.5 #281 |
| 14.6 #314 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #90 |
| 67.9 #263 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.5 #181 |
| 5.5 #295 | Steals per game | 8.1 #37 |
| 2.4 #317 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #159 |
South Carolina
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 4-15 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oklahoma74–86
- W@ Ole Miss64–61
- Lvs Tennessee59–78
- L@ Georgia68–87
- Lvs Kentucky63–72
A week or more of rest.
NC State
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas66–68
- Lvs Virginia74–81
- Wvs Pitt98–88
- Lvs Stanford84–85
- Lvs Duke64–93
A week or more of rest.