Bridgestone Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TENN 84–72 · win probability TENN 85%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TENN has more of the edges
NCSU 1, TENN 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NCSU 28.2%, TENN 44.7%. Defensive: NCSU 69.5%, TENN 72.2%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NCSU 13.1%, TENN 17.4%. Forced: NCSU 18.2%, TENN 16.1%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NCSU plays 70.2 a game (103rd fastest), TENN 68.1 (226th). Faster games mean more points
TENN offense vs NCSU defense
Offense 9th of 366 against a defense 58th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
NCSU has played the 51st-hardest schedule, TENN the 7th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NCSU 55.0 and allows 52.7; TENN 51.4 and allows 47.8
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: NCSU 35.1, TENN 37.4. Allowed: NCSU 36.9, TENN 36.3
Even
NCSU offense vs TENN defense
Offense 42nd of 366 against a defense 9th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
NCSU hits 38.8% and allows 35.5%; TENN hits 33.4% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 43.4% and 32.1% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NCSU 28%, TENN 13%. Transfers in: NCSU 8, TENN 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TENN -11.7 | — |
| Total | — | 156.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | NCSU 72.3 · TENN 84 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TENN -6.8 | — |
| 1H total | 73.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | NCSU 33.1 · TENN 39.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NCSU 0–1 TENNTENN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · NCSU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2023-24 | NCSU 70 vs TENN 79 | TENN -9.5 | NCSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
NC State
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-13
62% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Against the spread
15-1944%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 114-66 | -31.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-70 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 110-64 | -30.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-85 | -7.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-70 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 97-102 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-83 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-63 | -28.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-45 | -12.5 | W +27.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-77 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 108-72 | -34.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 70-57 | -10.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-76 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 79-71 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 113-69 | -4.5 | W +39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 74-78 | -17.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 80-76 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-72 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 96-78 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 84-83 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 77-118 | +6.5 | L −34.5 | 161.5 | O 195 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-77 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-58 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 61-90 | +6.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 90-96 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 64-93 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 84-85 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 98-88 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-81 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 66-68 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+16.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+4.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+15.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−5.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
−18.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
+4.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
−6.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−4.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−16.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
+27.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+1.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
+6.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
+2.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−19.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
−3.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+39.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−21.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+6.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+2.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+9.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+12.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
−0.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
−1.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
−34.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−6.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
+15.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−22.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
−12.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
−20.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
−10.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+1.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−3.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+34.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+1.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+20.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−0.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
+15.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
−1.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
+37.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−6.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−17.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
−19.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
+4.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+27.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
−10.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
−32.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−14.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
+8.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+21.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−2.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+13.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+8.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+4.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+17.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
+7.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
+0.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
+33.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−4.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
−16.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−0.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
+32.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
+6.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
+16.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+41.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
+1.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−23.5
over 21under 13avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Tennessee
37 games played
Straight up
25-12
68% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-19
49% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 76-61 | -28.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 95-56 | -27.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 99-66 | -41.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 91-66 | -26.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 89-60 | -31.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 85-60 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 76-73 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 76-81 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 60-62 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 62-75 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 83-62 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-52 | -42.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 105-54 | -44.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 75-86 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 85-71 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 67-91 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-82 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 78-80 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-73 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 167.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 86-85 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 84-66 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-74 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 73-64 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 73-63 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 89-66 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 69-65 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 69-73 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-71 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 78-59 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 82-86 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 68-75 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 78-56 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 79-72 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 27 | vs | W 76-62 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 29 | vs | L 62-95 | +8.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−13.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+11.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
−8.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
−1.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−2.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+10.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+5.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
−12.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−9.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−14.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
+16.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−0.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+6.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
−12.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+1.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
−19.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
−6.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
−8.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
+10.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
−0.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
+2.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+5.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−1.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
+0.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−4.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+11.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
+6.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−7.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−7.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
+8.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
−6.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
+4.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−8.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
+9.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+5.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
+16.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
−24.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−6.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+13.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
+9.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
+13.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−8.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+3.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+12.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
+16.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−25.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−12.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
−11.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−6.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+11.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
+2.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+2.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
+6.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
+9.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
+12.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
−15.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
+13.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
−1.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+10.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−2.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
−10.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−7.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+5.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
−16.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−1.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−22.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
−4.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
+21.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
−10.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−4.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
−14.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+13.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
−1.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
+10.5
over 18under 19avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: NC State 2, Tennessee 2, even 1
NC StateBetterTennessee
G P. Edmead TR16.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 83
→TENNSmall
G J. Harris TR21.4 pts · 6.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 99
G C. Hammond TR15.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 87
←NCSUSmall
G T. Lundblade TR15.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 63
G P. McNeil13.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 90
=Even
G D. Dai Ames TR17 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 83
F K. Evans TR11.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 95
←NCSUBig
F B. Lue TR10.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 53
F E. Yalaho TR10.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 58
→TENNSmall
C M. Rubin TR11.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 83
NC StateBetterTennessee
NCSU offense42nd of 366 · +4.6
=Even
TENN defense9th of 366 · +8.2
NCSU defense58th of 366 · +1.3
=Even
TENN offense9th of 366 · +10.4
Backcourt+6.7 · 3 players
→TENNSmall
Backcourt+8.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt+4.6 · 2 players
←NCSUSmall
Frontcourt+3.1 · 2 players
Bench+2.9 · 5 players
→TENNBig
Bench+11.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNCSU betterTENN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
P. Edmead35 min · TRC. Hammond30 min · TRP. McNeil29 minD. Adams26 min · TRR. Keene23 min · TRJ. Brim5 min · TR
Forwards
K. Evans30 min · TRE. Yalaho29 min · TRV. Lubin28 minC. Emuobor19 min · TRR. JurkovicNewS. HallNew
Guards
J. Harris35 min · TRT. Lundblade35 min · TRD. Dai Ames32 min · TRJ. Haralson27 min · TRT. Hill25 min · TRT. Henderson7 min
Forwards
B. Lue27 min · TRJ. Washington21 min · TRD. Brown15 minC. Fermin13 min · TRC. WashingtonNewR. ScottNew
Centers
M. Rubin30 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.2 #25 | Points per game | 78.8 #81 |
| 1.18 #30 | Points per possession | 1.16 #49 |
| 70.2 #103 | Pace (possessions) | 68.1 #226 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.0 #35 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #174 |
| 38.8 #6 | 3-point % | 33.4 #201 |
| 43.4 #104 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.1 #328 |
| 35.1 #175 | Free throw rate | 37.4 #115 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.1 #7 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #227 |
| 28.2 #258 | Offensive rebound rate | 44.7 #1 |
| 15.4 #70 | Assists per game | 17.1 #24 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.3 #224 | Points allowed | 69.6 #58 |
| 1.09 #186 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #43 |
| 52.7 #256 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.8 #37 |
| 35.5 #281 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.5 #21 |
| 18.2 #90 | Turnovers forced | 16.1 #215 |
| 69.5 #181 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.2 #61 |
| 8.1 #37 | Steals per game | 7.3 #101 |
| 3.4 #159 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #114 |
NC State
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas66–68
- Lvs Virginia74–81
- Wvs Pitt98–88
- Lvs Stanford84–85
- Lvs Duke64–93
A week or more of rest.
Tennessee
25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan62–95
- Wvs Iowa State76–62
- Wvs Virginia79–72
- Wvs Miami OH78–56
- Lvs Vanderbilt68–75
A week or more of rest.