Great Southern Bank Arena · at Missouri St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MOST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TLSA 79–71 · win probability TLSA 76%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TLSA has more of the edges
TLSA 6, MOST 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
TLSA hits 38.5% and allows 32.4%; MOST hits 33.0% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 46.7% and 41.3% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: TLSA 55.4 and allows 49.5; MOST 51.1 and allows 52.0
MOST offense vs TLSA defense
Offense 275th of 366 against a defense 133rd, on the model’s ratings
TLSA offense vs MOST defense
Offense 99th of 366 against a defense 219th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TLSA 32.8%, MOST 32.0%. Defensive: TLSA 71.0%, MOST 68.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: TLSA 41.4, MOST 43.8. Allowed: TLSA 32.0, MOST 40.2
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: TLSA plays 70.1 a game (115th fastest), MOST 67.4 (261st). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
TLSA has played the 111th-hardest schedule, MOST the 180th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
MOST at home. This season: MOST 0-0 at home, TLSA 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TLSA 15.6%, MOST 16.7%. Forced: TLSA 15.4%, MOST 16.9%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TLSA 18%, MOST 25%. Transfers in: TLSA 7, MOST 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TLSA -8.1 | — |
| Total | — | 150.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | TLSA 79.2 · MOST 71 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TLSA -5.0 | — |
| 1H total | 70.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | TLSA 37.6 · MOST 32.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TLSA 2–1 MOSTTLSA leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · TLSA 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | MOST 74 @ TLSA 98 | TLSA -7.5 | TLSA W |
| Nov 16, 2024-25 | TLSA 106 @ MOST 111 | MOST +3.5 | MOST W |
| Dec 16, 2023-24 | MOST 72 @ TLSA 73 | TLSA +0.5 | TLSA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Tulsa
36 games played
Straight up
28-8
78% wins
Against the spread
19-17
53% covers · avg +4.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
24-12
67% overs · avg +4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 82-65 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 88-87 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 83-84 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 84-75 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-51 | -5.5 | W +24.5 | 149.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 63-60 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 98-74 | -7.5 | W +16.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 117-84 | -25.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 201 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 83-70 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 19 | @ | W 82-81 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 90-85 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 97-48 | -12.5 | W +36.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 67-72 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 78-93 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-74 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 99-77 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 83-66 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 87-81 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 82-66 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 93-83 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 74-80 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 170.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 63-68 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 77-81 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 79-74 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 100-74 | -21.5 | W +4.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 90-56 | -5.5 | W +28.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 93-66 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 156.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-76 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 90-84 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 68-81 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 89-84 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 77-66 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 24 | vs | W 83-79 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 74-69 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Apr 5 | vs | L 86-92 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
URI
W 82-65
+20.5
12
@
ORU
W 88-87
−4.5
17
@
KSU
L 83-84
+11.5
21
vs
APSU
W 84-75
+0.5
25
vs
SJSU
W 81-51
+24.5
26
vs
UNI
W 63-60
+5.5
6
vs
MOST
W 98-74
+16.5
10
vs
UAPB
W 117-84
+7.5
13
vs
NMSU
W 83-70
+8.5
19
@
WKU
W 82-81
−1.5
22
vs
DEN
W 90-85
−11.5
31
vs
RICE
W 97-48
+36.5
4
@
UNT
L 67-72
−7.5
10
vs
USF
L 78-93
−16.5
14
@
CLT
W 86-74
+8.5
18
@
UAB
W 99-77
+23.5
21
vs
MEM
W 83-66
+10.5
24
@
RICE
W 87-81
−2.5
28
vs
UNT
W 82-66
+7.5
1
vs
WICH
W 93-83
+4.5
4
@
FAU
W 78-76
−1.5
8
@
USF
L 74-80
−1.5
11
vs
UAB
L 63-68
−15.5
14
@
WICH
L 77-81
−2.5
18
vs
CLT
W 79-74
−7.5
22
vs
UTSA
W 100-74
+4.5
25
@
TULN
W 90-56
+28.5
5
@
ECU
W 93-66
+18.5
8
vs
TEM
W 78-76
−9.5
13
vs
UNT
W 90-84
−1.5
14
vs
WICH
L 68-81
−14.5
17
vs
SFA
W 89-84
−0.5
22
vs
UNLV
W 77-66
+6.5
24
vs
WICH
W 83-79
−0.5
2
vs
UNM
W 74-69
+7.5
5
vs
AUB
L 86-92
−0.5
covered 19didn’t cover 17avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
URI
W 82-65
−6.5
12
@
ORU
W 88-87
+14.5
17
@
KSU
L 83-84
+6.5
21
vs
APSU
W 84-75
+10.5
25
vs
SJSU
W 81-51
−17.5
26
vs
UNI
W 63-60
−14.5
6
vs
MOST
W 98-74
+29.5
10
vs
UAPB
W 117-84
+45.5
13
vs
NMSU
W 83-70
+6.5
19
@
WKU
W 82-81
+4.5
22
vs
DEN
W 90-85
+14.5
31
vs
RICE
W 97-48
−7.5
4
@
UNT
L 67-72
+0.5
10
vs
USF
L 78-93
+7.5
14
@
CLT
W 86-74
+13.5
18
@
UAB
W 99-77
+16.5
21
vs
MEM
W 83-66
−4.5
24
@
RICE
W 87-81
+15.5
28
vs
UNT
W 82-66
+6.5
1
vs
WICH
W 93-83
+21.5
4
@
FAU
W 78-76
−8.5
8
@
USF
L 74-80
−16.5
11
vs
UAB
L 63-68
−30.5
14
@
WICH
L 77-81
+5.5
18
vs
CLT
W 79-74
+1.5
22
vs
UTSA
W 100-74
+14.5
25
@
TULN
W 90-56
−10.5
5
@
ECU
W 93-66
+2.5
8
vs
TEM
W 78-76
+4.5
13
vs
UNT
W 90-84
+32.5
14
vs
WICH
L 68-81
−3.5
17
vs
SFA
W 89-84
+23.5
22
vs
UNLV
W 77-66
−18.5
24
vs
WICH
W 83-79
+7.5
2
vs
UNM
W 74-69
−18.5
5
vs
AUB
L 86-92
+19.5
over 24under 12avg +4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Missouri St
31 games played
Straight up
13-18
42% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-12
61% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11 | vs | L 85-86 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 49-67 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 74-67 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 61-75 | -4.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 74-98 | +7.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 57-75 | +18.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 63-62 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 61-43 | -1.5 | W +16.5 | 131.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 79-55 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 131.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 89-82 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 80-90 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-71 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 72-87 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 87-90 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 84-75 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 62-57 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 71-80 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 74-67 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 76-79 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 78-79 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-76 | -9.5 | L −18.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 87-91 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 67-70 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-72 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 81-86 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 87-74 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-75 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 75-72 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 77-69 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 66-69 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
11
vs
ARST
L 85-86
−2.5
15
@
UTA
L 49-67
−14.5
22
vs
RGV
W 74-67
+3.5
24
vs
LIU
L 61-75
−18.5
6
@
TLSA
L 74-98
−16.5
12
@
XAV
L 57-75
+0.5
16
vs
ORU
W 63-62
−3.5
23
vs
LIN
W 70-65
+1.5
29
@
DEL
W 61-43
+16.5
2
vs
UTEP
W 79-55
+20.5
4
vs
NMSU
W 89-82
+5.5
7
@
KENN
L 80-90
−3.5
10
vs
FIU
W 79-71
+5.5
14
@
WKU
L 72-87
−8.5
17
@
MTSU
L 87-90
+2.5
22
@
NMSU
W 84-75
+15.5
24
@
UTEP
W 62-57
+3.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 71-80
−10.5
31
vs
JXST
W 74-67
+2.5
7
@
LIB
L 76-79
+6.5
12
vs
LT
L 78-79
−4.5
14
vs
DEL
L 67-76
−18.5
18
vs
KENN
L 87-91
−5.5
21
@
FIU
L 67-70
+0.5
26
@
LT
L 70-72
+0.5
28
@
SHSU
L 81-86
+1.5
5
vs
WKU
W 87-74
+14.5
7
vs
MTSU
L 63-75
−14.5
10
vs
FIU
W 75-72
+1.5
11
vs
LIB
W 77-69
+12.5
13
vs
LT
L 66-69
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
11
vs
ARST
L 85-86
+18.5
15
@
UTA
L 49-67
−27.5
22
vs
RGV
W 74-67
−8.5
24
vs
LIU
L 61-75
−9.5
6
@
TLSA
L 74-98
+29.5
12
@
XAV
L 57-75
−19.5
16
vs
ORU
W 63-62
−21.5
23
vs
LIN
W 70-65
−10.5
29
@
DEL
W 61-43
−27.5
2
vs
UTEP
W 79-55
+2.5
4
vs
NMSU
W 89-82
+36.5
7
@
KENN
L 80-90
+17.5
10
vs
FIU
W 79-71
−3.5
14
@
WKU
L 72-87
+10.5
17
@
MTSU
L 87-90
+39.5
22
@
NMSU
W 84-75
+14.5
24
@
UTEP
W 62-57
−20.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 71-80
+2.5
31
vs
JXST
W 74-67
+5.5
7
@
LIB
L 76-79
+14.5
12
vs
LT
L 78-79
+20.5
14
vs
DEL
L 67-76
+7.5
18
vs
KENN
L 87-91
+25.5
21
@
FIU
L 67-70
−17.5
26
@
LT
L 70-72
+3.5
28
@
SHSU
L 81-86
+14.5
5
vs
WKU
W 87-74
+8.5
7
vs
MTSU
L 63-75
−7.5
10
vs
FIU
W 75-72
−5.5
11
vs
LIB
W 77-69
+3.5
13
vs
LT
L 66-69
+0.5
over 19under 12avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Tulsa has the better starters
Position by position: Tulsa 2, Missouri St 0, even 3
TulsaBetterMissouri St
G K. Williams TR14.2 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 46
=Even
G T. Williams9.2 pts · 1.9 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 34
G J. Johnson TR15 pts · 3.5 reb · 2 ast
Score 69
←TLSASmall
G M. Cunningham3.1 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 43
G B. Moss TR9.6 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 54
←TLSABig
F C. Boone1.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 19
F M. Emory TR11.3 pts · 6.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 27
=No call
F M. Gray NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F C. Loofe TR7.1 pts · 6.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 26
=No call
F C. Thompson NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
TulsaBetterMissouri St
TLSA offense99th of 366 · -0.8
←TLSASmall
MOST defense219th of 366 · -5.7
TLSA defense133rd of 366 · -2.5
←TLSABig
MOST offense275th of 366 · -8.4
Backcourt-0.9 · 3 players
←TLSASmall
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt-3.8 · 2 players
→MOSTBig
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
Bench+1.3 · 5 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestTLSA betterMOST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Williams36 min · TRJ. Johnson33 min · TRB. Moss27 min · TRM. Williams21 min · TRM. Rigsby19 minJ. Lawal13 min
Forwards
M. Emory37 min · TRC. Loofe26 min · TRK. Banks16 min · TRD. DesireNewA. DimitrijevicNew
Guards
T. Williams31 minM. Cunningham12 minK. StubblefieldNewJ. BlairNewD. RoweNew
Forwards
C. Boone8 minM. GrayNewC. ThompsonNewN. RueyNewL. RolleNewI. MedinaNew
Centers
A. AcimovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.9 #20 | Points per game | 73.1 #223 |
| 1.20 #16 | Points per possession | 1.09 #169 |
| 70.1 #115 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #261 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.4 #29 | Effective FG% | 51.1 #191 |
| 38.5 #10 | 3-point % | 33.0 #236 |
| 46.7 #37 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.3 #144 |
| 41.4 #39 | Free throw rate | 43.8 #12 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #109 | Turnover rate | 16.7 #180 |
| 32.8 #95 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.0 #124 |
| 15.1 #79 | Assists per game | 13.9 #155 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.4 #172 | Points allowed | 74.3 #166 |
| 1.06 #111 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #222 |
| 49.5 #82 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #217 |
| 32.4 #85 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #209 |
| 15.4 #260 | Turnovers forced | 16.9 #158 |
| 71.0 #108 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.0 #261 |
| 6.6 #170 | Steals per game | 6.7 #152 |
| 2.5 #306 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #215 |
Tulsa
28-8 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Auburn86–92
- Wvs New Mexico74–69
- Wvs Wichita St83–79
- Wvs UNLV77–66
- Wvs SF Austin89–84
A week or more of rest.
Missouri St
13-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech66–69
- Wvs Liberty77–69
- Wvs FIU75–72
- Lvs MTSU63–75
- Wvs Western KY87–74
A week or more of rest.