Tennessee Volunteers at Purdue Boilermakers: Model Line and Edge

Fri, Dec 11, 8:00 PM ETMackey Arena · at Purdue

LineNo line yet

Total—

Season records: Tennessee and Purdue
TENN	This season	PUR
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects TENN 78–72 · win probability TENN 69%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Line

—

no line yet

Total

—

model 150.4

Model edge

—

No market line yet

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: PUR has more of the edges

TENN 0, PUR 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

PURSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: TENN 17.4%, PUR 13.7%. Forced: TENN 16.1%, PUR 15.3%

PURSmall

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: TENN 13%, PUR 43%. Transfers in: TENN 9, PUR 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Context

Tempo

About 67 possessions: TENN plays 68.1 a game (226th fastest), PUR 65.4 (333rd). Faster games mean more points

PURSmall

Home court

PUR at home. This season: PUR 0-0 at home, TENN 0-0 away

Even

PUR offense vs TENN defense

Offense 38th of 366 against a defense 9th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Shooting

Effective FG%: TENN 51.4 and allows 47.8; PUR 57.6 and allows 52.4

Even

Three-pointers

TENN hits 33.4% and allows 30.5%; PUR hits 38.3% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 32.1% and 40.2% of their shots

Even

TENN offense vs PUR defense

Offense 9th of 366 against a defense 18th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Free throws

Free throw rate: TENN 37.4, PUR 28.6. Allowed: TENN 36.3, PUR 25.5

Even

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: TENN 44.7%, PUR 36.4%. Defensive: TENN 72.2%, PUR 72.9%

Context

Schedule so far

TENN has played the 7th-hardest schedule, PUR the 6th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	—	TENN -5.6	—
Total	—	150.4	—
Projected score	—	TENN 78 · PUR 72.4

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	TENN -3.5	—
1H total	70.3	—
1H projected score	TENN 36.9 · PUR 33.4	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
TENN LWWWL	17-20	46%	4-6	—
PUR WWWLL	17-22	44%	5-12	—

Venue/role: TENN away; PUR home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
TENN UUOUO	18-19	49%	25-12
PUR OOOOU	20-19	51%	30-9

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
TENN	5-5 50%	5-5 50%	3-7 30%
PUR	8-2 80%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Tennessee

No more games listed yet.

Purdue

No more games listed yet.

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

TENN 0–2 PURPUR leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · PUR has won the last 2 meetings · TENN 0-2 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Mar 31, 2023-24	TENN 66 vs PUR 72	PUR -3.5	PUR W
Nov 21, 2023-24	TENN 67 vs PUR 71	PUR -3.5	PUR W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Tennessee

37 games played

Straight up

25-12

68% wins

Against the spread

17-20

46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line

Over / Under

18-19

49% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total

Straight up

25-1268%

W W W W W W W L L L W W W L W L W L W W W W L W W W W L L W L W L W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-2046%

L W L L L W W L L L W L W L W L L L W L W W L W L W W L L W L W L W W W L

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

18-1949%

U O O O U O O O U U U U O O O O O O U O U O U U U O U U U U O U U U O U O

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsMER	W 76-61	-28.5	L −13.5	143.5	U 137
Nov 8	vsNKU	W 95-56	-27.5	W +11.5	137.5	O 151
Nov 12	vsUNF	W 99-66	-41.5	L −8.5	155.5	O 165
Nov 17	vsRICE	W 91-66	-26.5	L −1.5	143.5	O 157
Nov 20	vsTNST	W 89-60	-31.5	L −2.5	157.5	U 149
Nov 24	vsRUTG	W 85-60	-14.5	W +10.5	141.5	O 145
Nov 25	vsHOU	W 76-73	+2.5	W +5.5	136.5	O 149
Nov 26	vsKU	L 76-81	-7.5	L −12.5	140.5	O 157
Dec 2	@SYR	L 60-62	-7.5	L −9.5	147.5	U 122
Dec 6	vsILL	L 62-75	-1.5	L −14.5	149.5	U 137
Dec 16	vsLOU	W 83-62	-4.5	W +16.5	156.5	U 145
Dec 21	vsGWEB	W 94-52	-42.5	L −0.5	152.5	U 146
Dec 30	vsSCST	W 105-54	-44.5	W +6.5	147.5	O 159
Jan 3	@ARK	L 75-86	-1.5	L −12.5	158.5	O 161
Jan 6	vsTEX	W 85-71	-12.5	W +1.5	153.5	O 156
Jan 10	@FLA	L 67-91	+4.5	L −19.5	151.5	O 158
Jan 13	vsTA&M	W 87-82	-11.5	L −6.5	159.5	O 169
Jan 17	vsUK	L 78-80	-6.5	L −8.5	145.5	O 158
Jan 24	@ALA	W 79-73	+4.5	W +10.5	167.5	U 152
Jan 28	@UGA	W 86-85	-1.5	L −0.5	157.5	O 171
Jan 31	vsAUB	W 77-69	-5.5	W +2.5	147.5	U 146
Feb 3	vsMISS	W 84-66	-12.5	W +5.5	139.5	O 150
Feb 7	@UK	L 71-74	+1.5	L −1.5	147.5	U 145
Feb 11	@MSST	W 73-64	-8.5	W +0.5	147.5	U 137
Feb 14	vsLSU	W 73-63	-14.5	L −4.5	143.5	U 136
Feb 18	vsOU	W 89-66	-11.5	W +11.5	149.5	O 155
Feb 21	@VAN	W 69-65	+2.5	W +6.5	150.5	U 134
Feb 24	@MIZ	L 69-73	-3.5	L −7.5	143.5	U 142
Feb 28	vsALA	L 69-71	-5.5	L −7.5	162.5	U 140
Mar 3	@SC	W 78-59	-10.5	W +8.5	141.5	U 137
Mar 7	vsVAN	L 82-86	-2.5	L −6.5	146.5	O 168
Mar 12	vsAUB	W 72-62	-5.5	W +4.5	144.5	U 134
Mar 13	vsVAN	L 68-75	-1.5	L −8.5	147.5	U 143
Mar 20	vsM-OH	W 78-56	-12.5	W +9.5	148.5	U 134
Mar 22	vsUVA	W 79-72	-1.5	W +5.5	137.5	O 151
Mar 27	vsISU	W 76-62	+2.5	W +16.5	139.5	U 138
Mar 29	vsMICH	L 62-95	+8.5	L −24.5	146.5	O 157

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

MER

W 76-61

−13.5

NKU

W 95-56

+11.5

UNF

W 99-66

−8.5

RICE

W 91-66

−1.5

TNST

W 89-60

−2.5

RUTG

W 85-60

+10.5

HOU

W 76-73

+5.5

L 76-81

−12.5

SYR

L 60-62

−9.5

ILL

L 62-75

−14.5

LOU

W 83-62

+16.5

GWEB

W 94-52

−0.5

SCST

W 105-54

+6.5

ARK

L 75-86

−12.5

TEX

W 85-71

+1.5

FLA

L 67-91

−19.5

TA&M

W 87-82

−6.5

L 78-80

−8.5

ALA

W 79-73

+10.5

UGA

W 86-85

−0.5

AUB

W 77-69

+2.5

MISS

W 84-66

+5.5

L 71-74

−1.5

MSST

W 73-64

+0.5

LSU

W 73-63

−4.5

W 89-66

+11.5

VAN

W 69-65

+6.5

MIZ

L 69-73

−7.5

ALA

L 69-71

−7.5

W 78-59

+8.5

VAN

L 82-86

−6.5

AUB

W 72-62

+4.5

VAN

L 68-75

−8.5

M-OH

W 78-56

+9.5

UVA

W 79-72

+5.5

ISU

W 76-62

+16.5

MICH

L 62-95

−24.5

covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

MER

W 76-61

−6.5

NKU

W 95-56

+13.5

UNF

W 99-66

+9.5

RICE

W 91-66

+13.5

TNST

W 89-60

−8.5

RUTG

W 85-60

+3.5

HOU

W 76-73

+12.5

L 76-81

+16.5

SYR

L 60-62

−25.5

ILL

L 62-75

−12.5

LOU

W 83-62

−11.5

GWEB

W 94-52

−6.5

SCST

W 105-54

+11.5

ARK

L 75-86

+2.5

TEX

W 85-71

+2.5

FLA

L 67-91

+6.5

TA&M

W 87-82

+9.5

L 78-80

+12.5

ALA

W 79-73

−15.5

UGA

W 86-85

+13.5

AUB

W 77-69

−1.5

MISS

W 84-66

+10.5

L 71-74

−2.5

MSST

W 73-64

−10.5

LSU

W 73-63

−7.5

W 89-66

+5.5

VAN

W 69-65

−16.5

MIZ

L 69-73

−1.5

ALA

L 69-71

−22.5

W 78-59

−4.5

VAN

L 82-86

+21.5

AUB

W 72-62

−10.5

VAN

L 68-75

−4.5

M-OH

W 78-56

−14.5

UVA

W 79-72

+13.5

ISU

W 76-62

−1.5

MICH

L 62-95

+10.5

over 18under 19avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Purdue

39 games played

Straight up

30-9

77% wins

Against the spread

17-22

44% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-19

51% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total

Straight up

30-977%

W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W L L L W W W W L W L L W L W W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-2244%

L L W L L W W W L W W W W W L L L L L L L W L W W L W L L L L L W L W W W L L

2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

20-1951%

U O U O U U O U U U U U O O U O O U U O U O U O U O O O O U O O U U O O O O U

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsEVAN	W 82-51	-33.5	L −2.5	150.5	U 133
Nov 7	vsOAK	W 87-77	-31.5	L −21.5	158.5	O 164
Nov 13	@ALA	W 87-80	+3.5	W +10.5	172.5	U 167
Nov 16	vsAKR	W 97-79	-18.5	L −0.5	163.5	O 176
Nov 20	vsMEM	W 80-71	-14.5	L −5.5	156.5	U 151
Nov 21	vsTTU	W 86-56	-3.5	W +26.5	153.5	U 142
Nov 28	vsEIU	W 109-62	-40.5	W +6.5	141.5	O 171
Dec 2	@RUTG	W 81-65	-13.5	W +2.5	146.5	U 146
Dec 6	vsISU	L 58-81	-4.5	L −27.5	154.5	U 139
Dec 10	vsMINN	W 85-57	-19.5	W +8.5	143.5	U 142
Dec 13	vsMARQ	W 79-59	-16.5	W +3.5	154.5	U 138
Dec 20	vsAUB	W 88-60	-7.5	W +20.5	152.5	U 148
Dec 29	vsKENT	W 101-60	-24.5	W +16.5	155.5	O 161
Jan 3	@WIS	W 89-73	-5.5	W +10.5	153.5	O 162
Jan 7	vsWASH	W 81-73	-16.5	L −8.5	154.5	U 154
Jan 10	vsPSU	W 93-85	-22.5	L −14.5	152.5	O 178
Jan 14	vsIOWA	W 79-72	-10.5	L −3.5	145.5	O 151
Jan 17	@USC	W 69-64	-9.5	L −4.5	155.5	U 133
Jan 20	@UCLA	L 67-69	-5.5	L −7.5	147.5	U 136
Jan 24	vsILL	L 82-88	-5.5	L −11.5	152.5	O 170
Jan 27	@IU	L 67-72	-4.5	L −9.5	150.5	U 139
Feb 1	@MD	W 93-63	-15.5	W +14.5	148.5	O 156
Feb 7	vsORE	W 68-64	-19.5	L −15.5	144.5	U 132
Feb 10	@NEB	W 80-77	+2.5	W +5.5	146.5	O 157
Feb 14	@IOWA	W 78-57	-2.5	W +18.5	142.5	U 135
Feb 17	vsMICH	L 80-91	+2.5	L −8.5	156.5	O 171
Feb 20	vsIU	W 93-64	-11.5	W +17.5	150.5	O 157
Feb 26	vsMSU	L 74-76	-5.5	L −7.5	143.5	O 150
Mar 1	@OSU	L 74-82	-6.5	L −14.5	149.5	O 156
Mar 4	@NU	W 70-66	-12.5	L −8.5	145.5	U 136
Mar 7	vsWIS	L 93-97	-9.5	L −13.5	154.5	O 190
Mar 12	vsNU	W 81-68	-13.5	L −0.5	139.5	O 149
Mar 13	vsNEB	W 74-58	-4.5	W +11.5	145.5	U 132
Mar 14	vsUCLA	W 73-66	-7.5	L −0.5	143.5	U 139
Mar 15	vsMICH	W 80-72	+4.5	W +12.5	149.5	O 152
Mar 20	vsQUC	W 104-71	-25.5	W +7.5	159.5	O 175
Mar 22	vsMIA	W 79-69	-8.5	W +1.5	146.5	O 148
Mar 26	vsTEX	W 79-77	-8.5	L −6.5	146.5	O 156
Mar 28	vsARIZ	L 64-79	+5.5	L −9.5	152.5	U 143

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−2.5

OAK

W 87-77

−21.5

ALA

W 87-80

+10.5

AKR

W 97-79

−0.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

+26.5

EIU

W 109-62

+6.5

RUTG

W 81-65

+2.5

ISU

L 58-81

−27.5

MINN

W 85-57

+8.5

MARQ

W 79-59

+3.5

AUB

W 88-60

+20.5

KENT

W 101-60

+16.5

WIS

W 89-73

+10.5

WASH

W 81-73

−8.5

PSU

W 93-85

−14.5

IOWA

W 79-72

−3.5

USC

W 69-64

−4.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−7.5

ILL

L 82-88

−11.5

L 67-72

−9.5

W 93-63

+14.5

ORE

W 68-64

−15.5

NEB

W 80-77

+5.5

IOWA

W 78-57

+18.5

MICH

L 80-91

−8.5

W 93-64

+17.5

MSU

L 74-76

−7.5

OSU

L 74-82

−14.5

W 70-66

−8.5

WIS

L 93-97

−13.5

W 81-68

−0.5

NEB

W 74-58

+11.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−0.5

MICH

W 80-72

+12.5

QUC

W 104-71

+7.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

−6.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

covered 17didn’t cover 22avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−17.5

OAK

W 87-77

+5.5

ALA

W 87-80

−5.5

AKR

W 97-79

+12.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

−11.5

EIU

W 109-62

+29.5

RUTG

W 81-65

−0.5

ISU

L 58-81

−15.5

MINN

W 85-57

−1.5

MARQ

W 79-59

−16.5

AUB

W 88-60

−4.5

KENT

W 101-60

+5.5

WIS

W 89-73

+8.5

WASH

W 81-73

−0.5

PSU

W 93-85

+25.5

IOWA

W 79-72

+5.5

USC

W 69-64

−22.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−11.5

ILL

L 82-88

+17.5

L 67-72

−11.5

W 93-63

+7.5

ORE

W 68-64

−12.5

NEB

W 80-77

+10.5

IOWA

W 78-57

−7.5

MICH

L 80-91

+14.5

W 93-64

+6.5

MSU

L 74-76

+6.5

OSU

L 74-82

+6.5

W 70-66

−9.5

WIS

L 93-97

+35.5

W 81-68

+9.5

NEB

W 74-58

−13.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−4.5

MICH

W 80-72

+2.5

QUC

W 104-71

+15.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

+9.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

over 20under 19avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Tennessee has the better starters

Position by position: Tennessee 1, Purdue 0, even 4

TennesseeBetterPurdue

G J. Harris TR21.4 pts · 6.5 reb · 1.9 ast Score 99

TENNSmall

G C. Cox8.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.3 ast Score 82

G T. Lundblade TR15.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.8 ast Score 63

Even

G G. Harris4.6 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

G D. Dai Ames TR17 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast Score 83

Even

G J. Benter4.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

F B. Lue TR10.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.3 ast Score 53

Even

G O. Mayer5.5 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.2 ast Score 64

C M. Rubin TR11.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.3 ast Score 83

Even

C D. Jacobsen5.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast Score 88

TennesseeBetterPurdue

TENN offense9th of 366 · +10.4

Even

PUR defense18th of 366 · +6.0

TENN defense9th of 366 · +8.2

Even

PUR offense38th of 366 · +5.0

Backcourt+8.4 · 3 players

TENNBig

Backcourt+2.4 · 4 players

Frontcourt+3.1 · 2 players

TENNSmall

Frontcourt+1.8 · 1 player

Bench+11.2 · 5 players

TENNBig

Bench-0.0 · 2 players

Score, worst to bestTENN betterPUR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Tennessee

Guards

J. Harris35 min · TRT. Lundblade35 min · TRD. Dai Ames32 min · TRJ. Haralson27 min · TRT. Hill25 min · TRT. Henderson7 min

Forwards

B. Lue27 min · TRJ. Washington21 min · TRD. Brown15 minC. Fermin13 min · TRC. WashingtonNewR. ScottNew

Centers

M. Rubin30 min · TR

Purdue

Guards

C. Cox24 minG. Harris16 minJ. Benter15 minO. Mayer14 minJ. Rayl2 minJ. Lusk2 min

Forwards

S. KingNewC. PierceNewE. ShahrvinNewR. BurgessNewR. KnightNew

Centers

D. Jacobsen13 minS. HuanNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

TENN78.8 #81

PUR81.6 #35

Points per possession

TENN1.16 #49

PUR1.25 #2

Pace (possessions)

TENN68.1 #226

PUR65.4 #333

Shooting

Effective FG%

TENN51.4 #174

PUR57.6 #10

3-point %

TENN33.4 #201

PUR38.3 #11

3-point attempt rate

TENN32.1 #328

PUR40.2 #164

Free throw rate

TENN37.4 #115

PUR28.6 #336

Possessions

Turnover rate

TENN17.4 #227

PUR13.7 #16

Offensive rebound rate

TENN44.7 #1

PUR36.4 #19

Assists per game

TENN17.1 #24

PUR19.6 #2

Defense

Points allowed

TENN69.6 #58

PUR70.5 #65

Points allowed per possession

TENN1.02 #43

PUR1.08 #162

Opponent effective FG%

TENN47.8 #37

PUR52.4 #232

Opponent 3-point %

TENN30.5 #21

PUR34.1 #192

Turnovers forced

TENN16.1 #215

PUR15.3 #263

Defensive rebound rate

TENN72.2 #61

PUR72.9 #39

Steals per game

TENN7.3 #101

PUR5.5 #297

Blocks per game

TENN3.7 #114

PUR2.8 #257

TENN		PUR
Scoring
78.8 #81	Points per game	81.6 #35
1.16 #49	Points per possession	1.25 #2
68.1 #226	Pace (possessions)	65.4 #333
Shooting
51.4 #174	Effective FG%	57.6 #10
33.4 #201	3-point %	38.3 #11
32.1 #328	3-point attempt rate	40.2 #164
37.4 #115	Free throw rate	28.6 #336
Possessions
17.4 #227	Turnover rate	13.7 #16
44.7 #1	Offensive rebound rate	36.4 #19
17.1 #24	Assists per game	19.6 #2
Defense
69.6 #58	Points allowed	70.5 #65
1.02 #43	Points allowed per possession	1.08 #162
47.8 #37	Opponent effective FG%	52.4 #232
30.5 #21	Opponent 3-point %	34.1 #192
16.1 #215	Turnovers forced	15.3 #263
72.2 #61	Defensive rebound rate	72.9 #39
7.3 #101	Steals per game	5.5 #297
3.7 #114	Blocks per game	2.8 #257

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Tennessee

25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Michigan62–95
Wvs Iowa State76–62
Wvs Virginia79–72
Wvs Miami OH78–56
Lvs Vanderbilt68–75

A week or more of rest.

Purdue

30-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Arizona64–79
Wvs Texas79–77
Wvs Miami79–69
Wvs Queens University Royals104–71
Wvs Michigan80–72

A week or more of rest.

Tennessee Volunteers at Purdue Boilermakers

What could decide it: PUR has more of the edges

Market

Model vs market

1st-half model

ATS

Totals

Last 10 games

Next 3 games

Recent meetings

ATS History · 2025-26

Tennessee

Purdue

Tennessee has the better starters

Depth chart

Matchup stats

Tennessee

Purdue