Hope Coliseum · at West Virginia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WVU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WVU 83–55 · win probability WVU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 138.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WVU has more of the edges
MERC 1, WVU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MERC offense vs WVU defense
Offense 346th of 366 against a defense 19th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MERC has played the 356th-hardest schedule, WVU the 62nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: MERC 25.6, WVU 35.1. Allowed: MERC 42.6, WVU 29.3
WVU offense vs MERC defense
Offense 77th of 366 against a defense 272nd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MERC 26.4%, WVU 30.5%. Defensive: MERC 70.1%, WVU 71.4%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MERC 14.3%, WVU 16.8%. Forced: MERC 18.6%, WVU 17.8%
Shooting
Effective FG%: MERC 49.5 and allows 50.1; WVU 51.6 and allows 48.5
Home court
WVU at home. This season: WVU 0-0 at home, MERC 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
MERC hits 32.1% and allows 32.3%; WVU hits 33.0% and allows 34.3%. Threes are 31.1% and 43.0% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MERC 26%, WVU 23%. Transfers in: MERC 3, WVU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: MERC plays 65.6 a game (327th fastest), WVU 65.3 (336th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WVU -27.8 | — |
| Total | — | 138.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | MERC 55.2 · WVU 83 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WVU -16.4 | — |
| 1H total | 64.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | MERC 24.1 · WVU 40.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MERC 0–2 WVUWVU leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · WVU has won the last 2 meetings · MERC 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2025-26 | MERC 38 @ WVU 70 | WVU -21.5 | WVU W |
| Dec 22, 2024-25 | MERC 46 @ WVU 67 | WVU -31.5 | MERC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Mercyhurst
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
21-10
68% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 47-70 | +26.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 6 | @ | W 73-65 | +21.5 | W +29.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 55-58 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 71-76 | +15.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 60-69 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 38-70 | +21.5 | L −10.5 | 127.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 71-79 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 47-80 | +11.5 | L −21.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 62-76 | +24.5 | W +10.5 | 131.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 82-61 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 67-74 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-60 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 58-60 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 132.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 57-62 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 128.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 79-61 | -1.5 | W +16.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 61-57 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 122.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 61-59 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 70-51 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 122.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 74-78 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 98-89 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 52-55 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 131.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 57-58 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 94-79 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 80-83 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-83 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 78-80 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 75-72 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 70-61 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 56-51 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 107 |
| Mar 10 | @ | L 70-79 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
NU
L 47-70
+3.5
6
@
LUC
W 73-65
+29.5
12
@
CAN
L 55-58
−4.5
15
vs
MORG
W 86-72
+7.5
20
@
M-OH
L 71-76
+10.5
23
@
MRSH
L 60-69
+2.5
30
@
WVU
L 38-70
−10.5
13
@
DAV
L 47-80
−21.5
17
@
SYR
L 62-76
+10.5
20
vs
BING
W 82-61
+13.5
2
vs
FDU
L 67-74
−12.5
4
vs
LEM
W 74-60
+11.5
8
@
LIU
L 58-60
+6.5
10
@
WAG
W 70-69
+2.5
17
vs
STO
L 57-62
−9.5
19
vs
CCSU
W 79-61
+16.5
23
@
NHVN
W 61-57
+2.5
25
vs
CHST
W 61-59
−7.5
29
vs
NHVN
W 70-51
+13.5
31
@
CHST
L 74-78
−6.5
5
vs
SFPA
W 98-89
+2.5
7
@
FDU
L 52-55
−0.5
12
@
LEM
L 57-58
+1.5
14
@
SFPA
W 94-79
+12.5
19
vs
WAG
L 80-83
−6.5
21
vs
LIU
W 91-83
+11.5
26
@
CCSU
L 78-80
+1.5
28
@
STO
W 75-72
+1.5
4
vs
FDU
W 70-61
+5.5
7
vs
STO
W 56-51
+0.5
10
@
LIU
L 70-79
−4.5
covered 21didn’t cover 10avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
NU
L 47-70
−23.5
6
@
LUC
W 73-65
−6.5
12
@
CAN
L 55-58
−22.5
15
vs
MORG
W 86-72
+11.5
20
@
M-OH
L 71-76
+7.5
23
@
MRSH
L 60-69
−18.5
30
@
WVU
L 38-70
−19.5
13
@
DAV
L 47-80
−5.5
17
@
SYR
L 62-76
+6.5
20
vs
BING
W 82-61
+10.5
2
vs
FDU
L 67-74
+7.5
4
vs
LEM
W 74-60
−7.5
8
@
LIU
L 58-60
−21.5
10
@
WAG
W 70-69
+6.5
17
vs
STO
L 57-62
−9.5
19
vs
CCSU
W 79-61
+7.5
23
@
NHVN
W 61-57
−4.5
25
vs
CHST
W 61-59
−11.5
29
vs
NHVN
W 70-51
−1.5
31
@
CHST
L 74-78
+22.5
5
vs
SFPA
W 98-89
+49.5
7
@
FDU
L 52-55
−24.5
12
@
LEM
L 57-58
−23.5
14
@
SFPA
W 94-79
+34.5
19
vs
WAG
L 80-83
+29.5
21
vs
LIU
W 91-83
+33.5
26
@
CCSU
L 78-80
+16.5
28
@
STO
W 75-72
+9.5
4
vs
FDU
W 70-61
−0.5
7
vs
STO
W 56-51
−27.5
10
@
LIU
L 70-79
+14.5
over 15under 16avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
West Virginia
35 games played
Straight up
21-14
60% wins
Against the spread
18-17
51% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-22
37% overs · avg −1.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 70-54 | -19.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 73-65 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 69-47 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 71-49 | -5.5 | W +16.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 81-59 | -24.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-70 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 68-78 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 70-38 | -21.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 91-49 | -31.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 66-75 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 90-58 | -27.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 88-89 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 86-51 | -42.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 59-80 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 62-60 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-75 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 48-77 | +13.5 | L −15.5 | 127.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 72-61 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 75-63 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-88 | +17.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 59-54 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 53-63 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 59-54 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 74-67 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 56-61 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-60 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 84-91 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 79-71 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 63-65 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 77-62 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 48-68 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 159 |
| Apr 4 | vs | W 87-70 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
| Apr 5 | vs | W 89-82 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−3.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−7.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
+4.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
+16.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
−2.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+1.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
−15.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
+10.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+10.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−11.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+4.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+2.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−7.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−4.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
+3.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+13.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−15.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
+4.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
+13.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−17.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−2.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−12.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
+10.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−2.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+10.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−15.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−1.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
−5.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+10.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−5.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
+10.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−16.5
2
vs
STAN
W 82-77
+2.5
4
vs
CREI
W 87-70
+15.5
5
vs
OU
W 89-82
+10.5
covered 18didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−12.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−0.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
−23.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
−14.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
+4.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+4.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
+5.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
−19.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+5.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−2.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+15.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+31.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−0.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−3.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
−10.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+21.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−2.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
−8.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
−7.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−2.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−33.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−23.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
−14.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−6.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+0.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−16.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−19.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
+30.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+8.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−15.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
−3.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−25.5
2
vs
STAN
W 82-77
+23.5
4
vs
CREI
W 87-70
+19.5
5
vs
OU
W 89-82
+29.5
over 13under 22avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
West Virginia has the better starters
Position by position: Mercyhurst 0, West Virginia 4, even 1
MercyhurstBetterWest Virginia
G J. Lemelman14.4 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 61
→WVUSmall
G F. Bizjack TR17.1 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 88
G D. Kelly TR5 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 6
→WVUBig
G S. Traore TR9 pts · 3.4 reb · 2 ast
Score 46
G M. Jackson TR0.5 pts · 2 reb · 0.7 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Somerville TR8 pts · 3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 54
F T. Rainwater TR9.7 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 48
→WVUBig
F B. Lorient11.9 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 91
F C. Johnson2.8 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 2
→WVUBig
F J. Buchanan TR12.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
MercyhurstBetterWest Virginia
MERC offense346th of 366 · -11.9
→WVUBig
WVU defense19th of 366 · +5.5
MERC defense272nd of 366 · -6.9
→WVUBig
WVU offense77th of 366 · +0.9
Backcourt-3.4 · 3 players
→WVUBig
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
→WVUBig
Frontcourt+6.2 · 2 players
Bench-0.9 · 3 players
→WVUSmall
Bench+1.6 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestMERC betterWVU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Lemelman31 minD. Kelly21 min · TRM. Jackson7 min · TRO. Faran4 minB. Conner3 minM. Maxwell-GrimesNew
Forwards
T. Rainwater25 min · TRC. Johnson12 minC. Leman2 minD. AgbaosiNewS. KirkerNew
Guards
F. Bizjack34 min · TRS. Traore29 min · TRM. Somerville26 min · TRJ. Sanon21 min · TRA. Jenkins16 minM. FeenaneNew
Forwards
B. Lorient29 minJ. Buchanan28 min · TRM. OlejaszNew
Centers
M. Sylla21 min · TRA. DioumNewA. SeiniNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.3 #310 | Points per game | 70.6 #271 |
| 1.04 #260 | Points per possession | 1.08 #183 |
| 65.6 #327 | Pace (possessions) | 65.3 #336 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.5 #269 | Effective FG% | 51.6 #166 |
| 32.1 #276 | 3-point % | 33.0 #227 |
| 31.1 #338 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.0 #118 |
| 25.6 #361 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #173 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.3 #35 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #188 |
| 26.4 #312 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.5 #178 |
| 14.0 #148 | Assists per game | 12.8 #228 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.7 #43 | Points allowed | 65.7 #11 |
| 1.04 #76 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #34 |
| 50.1 #107 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.5 #50 |
| 32.3 #80 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.3 #201 |
| 18.6 #68 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #108 |
| 70.1 #153 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.4 #86 |
| 7.0 #130 | Steals per game | 6.3 #195 |
| 3.8 #94 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #204 |
Mercyhurst
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Long Island70–79
- Wvs Stonehill56–51
- Wvs FDU70–61
- W@ Stonehill75–72
- L@ C Connecticut78–80
A week or more of rest.
West Virginia
21-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Oklahoma89–82
- Wvs Creighton87–70
- Wvs Stanford82–77
- Lvs BYU48–68
- Wvs UCF77–62
A week or more of rest.