Addition Financial Arena · at UCF
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UCF 91–67 · win probability UCF 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UCF has more of the edges
JAX 0, UCF 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
JAX has played the 247th-hardest schedule, UCF the 41st. A record against a soft schedule means less
UCF offense vs JAX defense
Offense 18th of 366 against a defense 210th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
JAX hits 31.8% and allows 36.3%; UCF hits 36.2% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 37.4% and 34.8% of their shots
JAX offense vs UCF defense
Offense 232nd of 366 against a defense 93rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: JAX plays 65.7 a game (322nd fastest), UCF 71.2 (63rd). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: JAX 50.0 and allows 54.8; UCF 52.6 and allows 52.1
Turnovers
Turnover rate: JAX 17.2%, UCF 16.0%. Forced: JAX 15.0%, UCF 15.7%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: JAX 31.7%, UCF 35.0%. Defensive: JAX 70.9%, UCF 71.2%
Free throws
Free throw rate: JAX 32.8, UCF 30.5. Allowed: JAX 42.7, UCF 34.9
Home court
UCF at home. This season: UCF 0-0 at home, JAX 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: JAX 27%, UCF 20%. Transfers in: JAX 6, UCF 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UCF -23.8 | — |
| Total | — | 157.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | JAX 66.7 · UCF 90.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UCF -14.0 | — |
| 1H total | 73.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | JAX 29.7 · UCF 43.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
JAX 0–3 UCFUCF leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · UCF has won the last 3 meetings · JAX 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2024-25 | JAX 66 @ UCF 86 | UCF -13.5 | UCF W |
| Dec 6, 2023-24 | JAX 52 @ UCF 94 | UCF -14.5 | UCF W |
| Nov 16, 2021-22 | JAX 54 @ UCF 63 | UCF -18 | JAX W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jacksonville
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-18
40% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 69-86 | +18.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-85 | +17.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 69-67 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-79 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 69-64 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 53-68 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 85-82 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 65-88 | +5.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 75-112 | +26.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 65-72 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 63-87 | +23.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 57-76 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 68-71 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 51-77 | +4.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-43 | -1.5 | W +30.5 | 141.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 60-62 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 90-68 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 133.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 70-77 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-76 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 70-65 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 49-68 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 84-93 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-87 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 62-67 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 63-56 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 84-86 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 61-65 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 89-85 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 85-61 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 79-82 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MIA
L 69-86
+1.5
11
@
HPU
L 64-85
−3.5
15
@
VMI
W 69-67
+0.5
18
@
GMU
L 57-79
−5.5
24
vs
BCU
W 69-64
+8.5
25
vs
PAC
L 53-68
−12.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 85-82
−7.5
6
@
FIU
L 65-88
−17.5
14
@
TA&M
L 75-112
−10.5
17
@
FAMU
L 65-72
−10.5
22
@
FSU
L 63-87
−0.5
1
@
LIP
L 57-76
−6.5
3
@
APSU
L 68-71
+7.5
8
vs
QUC
L 51-77
−21.5
10
vs
WGA
W 75-43
+30.5
15
@
CARK
L 60-62
+5.5
17
@
UNA
W 90-68
+23.5
22
vs
BELL
L 70-77
−11.5
24
vs
EKU
W 81-76
+3.5
29
vs
LIP
W 70-65
+8.5
31
vs
FGCU
L 49-68
−20.5
5
@
QUC
L 84-93
−0.5
7
@
WGA
L 73-87
−15.5
11
@
STET
L 62-67
−7.5
14
vs
UNF
W 63-56
−0.5
18
@
FGCU
L 84-86
+4.5
21
vs
APSU
L 61-65
+2.5
26
vs
STET
W 89-85
−3.5
28
@
UNF
W 85-61
+22.5
4
vs
BELL
L 79-82
−1.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MIA
L 69-86
+12.5
11
@
HPU
L 64-85
−7.5
15
@
VMI
W 69-67
−15.5
18
@
GMU
L 57-79
−0.5
24
vs
BCU
W 69-64
−10.5
25
vs
PAC
L 53-68
−14.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 85-82
+28.5
6
@
FIU
L 65-88
+7.5
14
@
TA&M
L 75-112
+39.5
17
@
FAMU
L 65-72
−2.5
22
@
FSU
L 63-87
−9.5
1
@
LIP
L 57-76
−14.5
3
@
APSU
L 68-71
−1.5
8
vs
QUC
L 51-77
−26.5
10
vs
WGA
W 75-43
−23.5
15
@
CARK
L 60-62
−14.5
17
@
UNA
W 90-68
+24.5
22
vs
BELL
L 70-77
+8.5
24
vs
EKU
W 81-76
+14.5
29
vs
LIP
W 70-65
−7.5
31
vs
FGCU
L 49-68
−19.5
5
@
QUC
L 84-93
+30.5
7
@
WGA
L 73-87
+21.5
11
@
STET
L 62-67
−9.5
14
vs
UNF
W 63-56
−34.5
18
@
FGCU
L 84-86
+33.5
21
vs
APSU
L 61-65
−16.5
26
vs
STET
W 89-85
+35.5
28
@
UNF
W 85-61
−5.5
4
vs
BELL
L 79-82
+16.5
over 12under 18avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
UCF
33 games played
Straight up
21-12
64% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-78 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 93-105 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 97-60 | -23.5 | W +13.5 | 169.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 86-74 | +10.5 | W +22.5 | 172.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 87-83 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 77-67 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 102-91 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 82-57 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 86-61 | -9.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 81-63 | -16.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 102-80 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 85-80 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 81-75 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 76-87 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 175.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 73-72 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 82-73 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 170.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 77-84 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 57-87 | +14.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 95-86 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 79-76 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-80 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 55-79 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 72-92 | +4.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-74 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-71 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 97-84 | +14.5 | W +27.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 86-87 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 104-111 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | O 215 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 62-77 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 66-65 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 59-81 | +15.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 71-75 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HOF
W 82-78
−4.5
8
vs
VAN
L 93-105
−1.5
11
vs
FAMU
W 97-60
+13.5
14
@
TA&M
W 86-74
+22.5
17
vs
OAK
W 87-83
−9.5
20
vs
PITT
W 77-67
+11.5
25
vs
QUIN
W 102-91
−2.5
29
vs
VMI
W 82-57
−0.5
7
vs
TOW
W 86-61
+15.5
17
vs
MER
W 81-63
+1.5
20
vs
FGCU
W 102-80
+4.5
23
vs
FAU
W 85-80
−3.5
3
vs
KU
W 81-75
+10.5
6
@
OKST
L 76-87
−9.5
11
vs
CIN
W 73-72
−1.5
14
@
KSU
W 82-73
+11.5
17
vs
ARIZ
L 77-84
+2.5
20
@
ISU
L 57-87
−15.5
24
@
COLO
W 95-86
+12.5
27
vs
ASU
W 79-76
−3.5
31
vs
TTU
W 88-80
+13.5
4
@
HOU
L 55-79
−8.5
8
@
CIN
L 72-92
−15.5
14
vs
WVU
L 67-74
−10.5
17
vs
TCU
W 82-71
+12.5
21
@
UTAH
W 73-71
+0.5
24
@
BYU
W 97-84
+27.5
28
vs
BAY
L 86-87
−2.5
3
vs
OKST
L 104-111
−15.5
6
@
WVU
L 62-77
−10.5
11
vs
CIN
W 66-65
+4.5
12
vs
ARIZ
L 59-81
−6.5
20
vs
UCLA
L 71-75
+1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HOF
W 82-78
+19.5
8
vs
VAN
L 93-105
+31.5
11
vs
FAMU
W 97-60
−12.5
14
@
TA&M
W 86-74
−12.5
17
vs
OAK
W 87-83
+6.5
20
vs
PITT
W 77-67
−5.5
25
vs
QUIN
W 102-91
+30.5
29
vs
VMI
W 82-57
−20.5
7
vs
TOW
W 86-61
−1.5
17
vs
MER
W 81-63
−16.5
20
vs
FGCU
W 102-80
+20.5
23
vs
FAU
W 85-80
+2.5
3
vs
KU
W 81-75
−1.5
6
@
OKST
L 76-87
−12.5
11
vs
CIN
W 73-72
−5.5
14
@
KSU
W 82-73
−15.5
17
vs
ARIZ
L 77-84
−4.5
20
@
ISU
L 57-87
−12.5
24
@
COLO
W 95-86
+21.5
27
vs
ASU
W 79-76
−6.5
31
vs
TTU
W 88-80
+8.5
4
@
HOU
L 55-79
−12.5
8
@
CIN
L 72-92
+17.5
14
vs
WVU
L 67-74
+0.5
17
vs
TCU
W 82-71
−1.5
21
@
UTAH
W 73-71
−10.5
24
@
BYU
W 97-84
+18.5
28
vs
BAY
L 86-87
+13.5
3
vs
OKST
L 104-111
+47.5
6
@
WVU
L 62-77
−3.5
11
vs
CIN
W 66-65
−18.5
12
vs
ARIZ
L 59-81
−19.5
20
vs
UCLA
L 71-75
−5.5
over 13under 20avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UCF has the better starters
Position by position: Jacksonville 0, UCF 3, even 2
JacksonvilleBetterUCF
G C. Williams TR16.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 65
=Even
G C. Vasko TR11 pts · 4.7 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 52
G J. Phillips TR15.5 pts · 5 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 59
→UCFBig
G D. Johnson TR23.5 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 100
G H. Wood11.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 64
→UCFSmall
F L. Walker TR18.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 87
G E. Sterck6.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 23
→UCFBig
F I. Malone TR10.4 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 82
F J. Morrow TR7.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 58
=Even
F C. Abass TR8.4 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 70
JacksonvilleBetterUCF
JAX offense232nd of 366 · -7.1
→UCFBig
UCF defense93rd of 366 · -0.4
JAX defense210th of 366 · -5.4
→UCFBig
UCF offense18th of 366 · +8.0
Backcourt-1.9 · 4 players
→UCFBig
Backcourt+7.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.2 · 1 player
→UCFBig
Frontcourt+5.3 · 3 players
Bench-1.1 · 4 players
→UCFBig
Bench+2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestJAX betterUCF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Williams33 min · TRJ. Phillips31 min · TRH. Wood28 minE. Sterck25 minR. Loux1 minL. BuckinghamNew
Forwards
J. Morrow21 min · TRR. Stirling15 min · TRN. Turner6 min · TRJ. Newell2 min · TR
Centers
S. MbingazoNew
Guards
C. Vasko33 min · TRD. Johnson26 min · TRM. Dean17 min · TRC. Pacheco16 minA. DeanNewT. JonesNew
Forwards
L. Walker34 min · TRI. Malone23 min · TRC. Abass20 min · TRJ. Asemota8 min · TRL. GivanNewD. MannNew
Centers
J. Bol19 minE. Hulsewe5 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.5 #293 | Points per game | 80.7 #53 |
| 1.06 #237 | Points per possession | 1.13 #77 |
| 65.7 #322 | Pace (possessions) | 71.2 #63 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #232 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #123 |
| 31.8 #289 | 3-point % | 36.2 #49 |
| 37.4 #223 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.8 #281 |
| 32.8 #242 | Free throw rate | 30.5 #295 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.2 #222 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #137 |
| 31.7 #137 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.0 #47 |
| 11.1 #335 | Assists per game | 15.7 #56 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.2 #194 | Points allowed | 78.3 #274 |
| 1.14 #313 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #219 |
| 54.8 #325 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.1 #221 |
| 36.3 #318 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #176 |
| 15.0 #290 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #241 |
| 70.9 #115 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.2 #96 |
| 6.3 #206 | Steals per game | 5.6 #285 |
| 2.8 #261 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #225 |
Jacksonville
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Bellarmine79–82
- W@ North Florida85–61
- Wvs Stetson89–85
- Lvs Austin Peay61–65
- L@ FGCU84–86
A week or more of rest.
UCF
21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UCLA71–75
- Lvs Arizona59–81
- Wvs Cincinnati66–65
- L@ West Virginia62–77
- Lvs Oklahoma St104–111
A week or more of rest.